• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

First Essex

TAS

Member
Joined
16 Jul 2005
Messages
284
First Essex have announced some quite major changes, starting from 17 April. The Basildon, Chelmsford and Colchester urban networks are being redesigned and rebranded as Basildon/Chelmsford/Colchester Shuttles (red livery, route numbers prefixed B, C and S respectively), while the rest of the network becomes Essex Bus (green livery). The Tap & Cap fare model currently in operation in Chelmsford and Colchester is also being expanded to Basildon.

The general impression is that a lot of places will be served less frequently (especially outside the peaks) and many routes are being simplified. The first of these is to be expected given the impact of the pandemic, while the latter is long overdue in some areas. There are a few definite improvements and expansions to the network too (e.g. in Colchester there are new services to Monkwick and Horkesley Heath, competing with Arriva, and route 75 is extended to the General Hospital though the Tiptree to Colchester short journeys disappear). I'm pretty certain that the main reaction to the changes will be negative though, given the various cuts and the short notice at which these are being announced. The frequency cuts impact my local service, for example, and I'm certainly not best pleased!

Full details for Basildon and South Essex:
Changes to the bus network in Basildon:

The local bus routes in Basildon, connecting the town centre with Pitsea and Laindon, will be replaced by the Basildon Shuttles network to make them more reliable and easier to understand. This network will operate with self-charging hybrid vehicles to reduce emissions in the town centre.

B1: Route B1 will run between Laindon, Fenton Way and Basildon via Durham Road, Laindon Station and Great Knightleys as routes 8/8A currently do.

The first bus will leave Laindon at 0515 on Monday to Saturday (0700 on Sundays and Bank Holidays) and will then leave Laindon up to every 10 minutes in the morning peak, every 12 minutes during the day and evening peak and then every 30 minutes up to 2300 in the evening.

On Saturdays, buses will run every 20 minutes for most of the day and every 30 minutes in the evening.

From Basildon the first bus will be 0540 Monday to Saturday with the last bus leaving at 2330 Monday to Saturday (2200 on Sundays).

B2: Route B2 will again run from Laindon, Fenton Way and Basildon but will use the King Edward Drive leg of routes 8/8A to get to Laindon Station. From here, it will replace route 5 to Langdon Hills then run via Staneway to The Knares and along The Knares replacing route 5 to Basildon.

Customers in Langdon Hills will now have to wait on the other side of the road to go to Basildon. Buses will run every 30 minutes all day Monday to Saturday and hourly on Sundays.

B3: Route B3 will start at Pitsea Tesco and run via London Road to Pitsea Broadway where it will replace routes 5/5A/5B to Basildon. Buses will leave Pitsea every 12 minutes in the morning peak, every 15 minutes for the rest of the daytime on Mondays to Saturdays with buses every 30 minutes in the evenings until 2300. The last bus will leave Basildon at 2330.

B4: Route B4 will also start at Pitsea Tesco and run via London Road to Pitsea Broadway where it will replace 8 to Basildon via Wickford Avenue running every 20 minutes during the daytimes and every 30 minutes in the evening and on Sundays with the last bus leaving Basildon at 2320 (2120 Sundays).

B5: Route B5 will start from Pitsea Broadway (westbound) and run via Sandon Road and Luncies Road to Basildon as route 8A currently does. When arriving at Pitsea; B5 buses will terminate at Pitsea Broadway (eastbound).

Buses will again run every 20 minutes during the day, every 30 minutes in the evening Monday to Saturday, every 30 minutes on Sundays with the last bus from Basildon at 2340 (2140 Sundays).

Routes 22 and 28 will no longer travel via Cherrydown East to reach the Bus Station and will instead continue on Clayhill Road to reach the Bus Station.

As a result of the introduction of these services, routes 5/5A/5B and 8/8A will be withdrawn. The Basildon to Grays service currently provided by routes 5A and 5B is covered by route 200, detailed below.


Changes to the bus network in South Essex:

Route 9
(Basildon to Brentwood) is reduced in frequency to hourly with extra peak journeys to meet customer demand at the busiest times.

Route 16 (Wickford to Runwell) has new bus stops in Runwell and a minor timetable change.

Route 20 (Hullbridge – Southend) will now run every 20 minutes instead of every 15 minutes. We are changing the way in which buses work on route 20 to make them more reliable by being less impacted by delays elsewhere in south Essex.

To make journeys on route 21 (Canvey Island – Southend) more reliable, during peak times the route will not serve Morrisons (Northwick Road).

Route 21 will also now serve SEEVIC on all journeys but this means that Thundersley Village will no longer be served.

When buses reach Thames Drive they will replace route 26 along Thames Drive to serve Leigh-on-Sea Railway Station and Rectory Grove. Most journeys on route 21 will continue along Broadway and Leigh Road to London Road where they will then use Southbourne Grove (Westbourne Grove on journeys to Canvey Island) to reach Prittlewell Chase and Southend Hospital.

Some journeys will leave Rectory Grove via Station Road to serve the schools along Blenheim Chase before re-joining the main route at Prittlewell Chase. Buses will continue to terminate at Southend Travel Centre.

Route 21B is withdrawn and replaced by journeys at similar times on route 21.

Route 22 (Canvey Island to Basildon) is reduced in frequency to every 20 minutes and will be timetabled to work with route 28 between Benfleet and Basildon to provide a combined 10 minute service on this section of the route. Route 822 is withdrawn and replaced by journeys on route 21 that divert via Prittlewell Chase at school times.

Route 25 (Basildon to Southend) will now run every 20 minutes during the day on Monday to Friday instead of every 15 minutes.

Route 26 is withdrawn as it is mostly replaced by route 21. The section from Southend Travel Centre to Newington Avenue will now only be served by Stephenson’s route 24.

Route 27 (Canvey Island to Southend) is reduced to every 20 minutes but timetabled to provide a 10-minute service with route 28 between Benfleet and Southend. Route 827 is revised to stop at all stops along line of route and will run along the same roads as route 27 to Station Road in Leigh on Sea where it will operate as route 21 will do to the schools on Blenheim Drive and on to Southend.

Route 27X is withdrawn and replaced by short journeys on route 27 operating between Leigh Beck and Benfleet Station (and back in the afternoon) and additional journeys on SEEVIC college days between Leigh Beck and SEEVIC and back in the afternoon.

Route 28 (Basildon to Southend) is reduced to every 20 minutes and will have better coordination with routes 22 and 27 to provide a bus every 10 minutes between Basildon and Benfleet and Benfleet and Southend.

We are improving the evening service to improve the connectivity between Basildon, Pitsea, Benfleet, Hadleigh, Leigh-on-Sea and Southend which, with route 27, will provide a bus every 15 minutes between Southend and Benfleet.

Route 100 between Basildon and Chelmsford will be replaced by route 300 using the same route and at the same times as route 100 currently does with newer, more comfortable buses being used. Route 100 will remain between Basildon and Lakeside with double deckers being used.

Route 200 will be reintroduced to replace routes 5A and 5B between Basildon and Grays. In Corringham buses will be diverted to serve more customers by turning from Southend Road into Springhouse Road to serve Corringham Town Centre before travelling along Abbots Drive and picking up the existing line of route. All journeys will run via Orsett Hospital and the route will run once an hour with extra journeys at the busiest times.


Having successfully had significant numbers of new colleagues join us, we are able to reintroduce route X10 between Basildon and Chelmsford and on to Stansted Airport. More suitable vehicles are being refurbished to provide a more pleasant travelling environment as the route whisks you across the county. We are sorry that we had to remove this popular link, due to a lack of staff, but hope to see you onboard again as soon as possible.


There are no changes to other services in South Essex.

Full details for Chelmsford:
Changes to the bus network in Chelmsford:

Routes 40, 42, 45, 51, 54, 56, 57 (and their variants) are withdrawn and replaced by the new Chelmsford shuttles network as detailed below.

C1: Route C1 will replace route 42 and operate a similar frequency. On Sundays, route C1 will operate every 30 minutes between Galleywood and Broomfield Hospital without the existing extensions. beyond Broomfield Hospital. to Bishops Stortford and Halstead.

C2: Route C2 will replace the north-western leg of route 54 operating as a loop from Broomfield Hospital, via Melbourne to the City Centre. In the City Centre buses will serve the stops at the Railway Station and Duke Street before serving the Retail Market and Bus Station on the way back to Melbourne and Broomfield Hospital.

C3: Route C3 will replace route 56 from Melbourne (Morrisons) to the City Centre, via the current pattern of route 56. In the City Centre, buses all serve the Railway Station and Duke Street. Some buses will also serve Tindal Street and Parkway having changed to route C11.

C4: Route C4 replaces route 45 between Oxney Green and the City Centre. During peak times, buses will serve the Railway Station and then follow route C2 back to the Bus Station and head back to Oxney Green. Outside of peak times, buses will continue from the Railway Station and Duke Street to Tindal Street and Parkway, as route C5, with some buses extending beyond the City as route C5.

C5: Route C5 is the replacement for the Moulsham journeys on route 45. However, route C5 will operate via Gunson Gate, Waterson Vale and Van Diemans Road rather than Beehive Lane and Baddow Road. In the City buses will terminate at the Bus Station.

C6: Route C6 replaces off peak route 51 to BAE Systems but instead, of using Gunson Gate and Waterson Vale, buses will stay on Beehive Lane to Baddow Road then via Army & Navy roundabout and Parkway to the Retail Market stop and terminate in the Bus Station.

C7: Route C7 replaces route 57 from Galleywood to Great Baddow and then operates along Meadgate Avenue to Army and Navy and along the normal route to the City Centre.

C8: Route C8 replaces route 54 from the City through Springfield to Beaulieu Park where it terminates at the junction of Shardelow Avenue and White Hart Lane (A130). To speed up journeys to and from Chelmsford Station in the morning and evening buses will run via Victoria Road.

C9: Route C9 replaces route 57 to Beaulieu from the Bus Station (Retail Market on Saturdays and via the Bus Station) via Victoria Road, New Street, University, to Chelmer Valley Road then a one-way loop via Essex Regiment Way, Regiment Gate, Centenary Way, White Hart Lane, New Nabbotts Way, Pump Lane and Chelmer Valley Way back to University and New Street continuing to Bus Station.

Between 9am & 3pm Mondays to Fridays and shopping hours on Saturdays and Sundays, route C9 will run via Victoria Road (east bound), Springfield Road, High Bridge Street, Parkway and Retail Market. The rest of the time, it will run direct from New Street via Victoria Road to Duke Street and the Bus Station.

C10: Route C10 partly replaces route 40 and runs along Broomfield Road, across Valley Bridge then north on Chelmer Valley Road, Lawn Lane, Brackenden Drive, Pump Lane, White Hart Lane then left into Centenery Way and then right into Commonwealth Link to Channels Drive.

From here a loop takes place as buses run along Channels Drive, right into Albatross Way, Belfry Crescent, across Channels Drive, round Brassie Wood, right on to Fairway Drive and right back on to Channels Drive and Commonwealth Link to Regiment Gate, Centenary Way and White Hart Lane.

After turning right in to New Nabbots Way buses will turn left into Pump Lane, right into Brackenden Drive, right into Lawn Lane and left into Chelmer Valley Road. Buses then run back to the City Valley Bridge and Broomfield Road to the City and loop round the centre as route 70 does.

C11: Route C11 replaces route 56 from the City to Springfield as far as New Nabbots Way. Instead of carrying on into Shardelow Avenue buses will turn right on to White Hart Lane to the roundabout at Colchester Road where they will terminate at the stop in Sainsburys creating a new link for customers to access this store.

C12: Route C12 will operate from the City via Parkway and Beeleigh Link to New Dukes Way, Cuton Hall Lane and Colchester Road to Sainsburys replacing route 40 over this section.


Changes to Essex Bus services to Chelmsford:

Chelmsford – Braintree – Colchester


Buses running between Chelmsford and Colchester will become route 370.

Route 70 between Braintree and Chelmsford will continue to loop around the City as they do now providing greater access to the centre.

Route 370 will operate hourly with additional buses in the peaks and route 70 will operate every 60 minutes providing a bus every 30 minutes between Chelmsford and Braintree between the two routes.

Chelmsford – Witham – Colchester

Route 371
will take over the Chelmsford – Witham - Colchester service and will be operated with increased double deck vehicles on-route to provide more seats when they are needed.

Route 71 will operate between Chelmsford and Witham only, serving Boreham Village and will terminate at Morrisons in Witham.

Both routes 71 and 371 will operate hourly providing a bus every 30 minutes between Chelmsford and Witham with extra buses running at the busiest times.

Because of the use of more double deck buses on route 371, and the need to avoid Duke Street railway bridge when arriving in Chelmsford; buses will serve the Retail Market stops then travel back along Parkway to enter Duke Street via Rainsford Road and into the Bus Station.

Route 371, when heading to Colchester, will leave the Bus Station via Duke Street and Coval Lane to then travel along Parkway to Duke Street, Tindal Street and the current line of route to Chelmer Village.

Route X71 will replace the 71X journeys currently operated.

Chelmsford – Maldon – Burnham-on-Crouch

The combination of services between Burnham-on-Crouch and Chelmsford will be simplified to be routes 31 and 331. The journeys that divert via Steeple will be renumbered route 332.

Journeys that operate via Baddow Road in Chelmsford and Milton Road in Maldon will become route 31 (route 332 on Sundays).

Journeys via Essex Yeomanry Way will be route 331.

Buses will leave Burnham-on-Crouch once an hour, Mondays to Saturdays, with some extra peak journeys. An extra bus will start in Maldon, every hour, to provide a bus every 30 minutes between Maldon and Chelmsford.

Chelmsford – Danbury – South Woodham Ferrers

The network of services between Chelmsford and South Woodham Ferrers will be simplified to be just route 336 which will run hourly, during the day, Mondays to Saturdays (with extra journeys to Chelmsford in the morning and back to South Woodham Ferrers in the afternoon).

Routes 94C and 94D on Sundays are withdrawn and replaced by journeys on route 94.

Other Essex Bus services in Chelmsford


On route X30, we will continue to monitor how we serve Southend Airport and will be making a change, under review to the route in the Rayleigh area October 2022.

Routes 42A and 42B will operate as stand-alone services operating from Chelmsford to either Bishops Stortford or Halstead.


All other routes in the Chelmsford area are unchanged.

Full details for Colchester:
Changes to the bus network in Colchester:

Routes 61, 62, 64, 65, 66 and 67 (and their variants) are withdrawn and replaced by the new Colchester shuttles network as detailed below.

S1: Route S1 will replace route 61 on a slightly reduced frequency from Highwoods to Wivenhoe via the Town Centre.

S2: Route S2 will replace route 65 between Highwoods and Stanway again with a slightly reduced frequency.

Between routes S1 and S2 buses will run every 10 minutes between Highwoods and the town centre.

S3: Route S3 replaces route 66 between West Bergholt and the town centre.

In the town centre, some buses will change to route S9 to Rowhedge, in the High Street, and others will continue to Osborne Street to start their return journey.

Buses will now run every 30 minutes in the morning then every 60 minutes during the day before running every 30 minutes in the afternoon peak period again. On Saturdays, buses will run every 60 minutes and every 90 minutes on Sundays.

S4: Route S4 replaces the Greenstead section of routes 64 and 64A; but will now run as a clockwise loop every 12 minutes during the day Monday to Saturday and every 20 minutes on Sundays.

Buses will leave the town via Magdalen Street and Hythe Railway Station then from Avon Road will serve Hawthorn Avenue, Forest Road, Hickory Avenue, Hawthorn Avenue, Magnolia Drive and Hamlet Drive before returning to the town via Avon Way.

S6 & S7: Routes S6 and S7 replace routes 64 and 64A between the town and Shrub End with each route running every 30 minutes to provide a bus every 15 minutes along Layer Road. On Sundays each route runs every 60 minutes so there is still a bus every 30 minutes along Layer Road.

S8: New route S8 connects the Gosfield Road area of Monkwick to the town centre every 15 minutes Monday to Saturday, every 30 minutes on Sunday. Leaving the town centre via Mersea Road buses will serve Queen Elizabeth Way, Monkwick Avenue, Berechurch Hall Road to the Lethe Grove stops and Gosfield Road before returning to the town centre via Monkwick Avenue and Queen Elizabeth Way.

S9: Route S9 will replace route 66 from Rowhedge to the town centre, and will run every 60 minutes during the day Monday to Saturday with extra buses at peak times and every 90 minutes on Sundays. Some journeys will continue to Colchester Railway Station and West Bergholt as route S3

S10: Route S10 replaces route 62B as the University term only service from the town centre but via East Hill instead of Magdalen Street to the University and Wivenhoe Park bus stop.


Changes to Essex Bus services to Colchester:

New route 86 will replace route 67, from West Mersea to Colchester, running every hour with a quicker journey time (this is possible due to no longer serving the residential area of Monkwick). Off-peak, and on Saturdays, buses will extend beyond the town centre to Colchester Railway Station and Colchester General Hospital.

New route 87 will replace route 62 from Brightlingsea to Colchester Railway Centre but to provide better links across the town it will continue to Malvern Way, Horksley Heath (providing direct links from Horksley Heath direct to the University).

The evening short journeys to Wivenhoe Co-Op, that currently operate as route 62B, will now be route 87 and use East Hill to leave the town centre.

Routes 70 and 71 to Chelmsford will be replaced by routes 370 and 371 between Colchester and Chelmsford and run hourly with extra buses in the peaks.

Route 75A will be withdrawn with journeys on route 75, to Maldon, running via Church Road and Station Road (in Tiptree) on all journeys and some journeys starting there where needed. Route 75 will also extend to Colchester General Hospital via Colchester Railway Station to provide more links from the south of the town to these areas.

Routes 103 and 104 have a minor timetable change.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

buslad1988

Member
Joined
28 Dec 2018
Messages
650
Wow! These are some significant changes. So we’re finally starting to see the simplification of the Essex network that many have been asking for on here. Makes sense to separate the ‘town’ and ‘country’ routes with the different brands and liveries. The Shuttle livery appears based on that of the recently transferred Southampton Streetlites.

In Colchester they’re clearly going in for the kill with Arriva the question is will they bother (and is it worth) them retaliating? Although haven’t they only recently secured the Park & Ride contract there for another few years?
 

90sWereBetter

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2012
Messages
1,046
Location
Lost somewhere within Bank-Monument tube station,
Colchester has certainly been crying out for a revamp for many years, it seemed they were about to start when the 62 was branded up with the ex-Scotland East B9s, but that petered out immediately. Wonder if any of their double deckers will be repainted; there's images of some Geminis pressed into service recently with unpainted panels!

Fleet-wise, it sounds like Basildon's town services are to be monopolised by the Volvo hybrids which are currently on the 100.

I imagine these changes in a roundabout way will kill off the remaining Darts in Chelmsford, and possibly Hadleigh's Trident fleet.
 

TAS

Member
Joined
16 Jul 2005
Messages
284
Wow! These are some significant changes. So we’re finally starting to see the simplification of the Essex network that many have been asking for on here. Makes sense to separate the ‘town’ and ‘country’ routes with the different brands and liveries. The Shuttle livery appears based on that of the recently transferred Southampton Streetlites.

In Colchester they’re clearly going in for the kill with Arriva the question is will they bother (and is it worth) them retaliating? Although haven’t they only recently secured the Park & Ride contract there for another few years?
Yes, the simplification is very welcome. Some people will undoubtedly lose out, but you only have to compare the old and new network maps to see how much easier to understand the network will be after the changes. It's a shame that the frequency cuts are coming in at the same time and the notice period is so short, because those will probably get more attention that the improvement in the ease of use of the services.

The attack on Arriva is interesting and presumably resourced using staff and vehicles surplus after cuts elsewhere in Colchester. I struggle to see Arriva responding by covering some of First's routes in the town given that the general trend in their operations in Colchester has been towards decline, though I could be wrong. If they can't hold their own on these routes (e.g. by offers on fares etc.), then I'm not convinced what they'd be left with would be a particularly promising set of services. While both First and Arriva have both run on the town centre to Highwoods via North Station and Mile End corridor for many years, I suspect that is much busier than the two in question.

By my reckoning, only two or three major bus corridors in Colchester (i.e. excluding short stretches of road) will be served only by Arriva:
  • Town centre to Ambrose Avenue (part of service 1). The Maldon Road/Shrub End Road stretch is served by First 75 but that's reduced to hourly in these changes so isn't much of a competitor.
  • Town centre to Highwoods via Ipswich Road and St John's (part of service 2). First only serves Highwoods via North Station and Mile End so the bulk of this route is unserved.
  • Town centre to Greenstead via Harwich Road (part of service 1). I'm not sure about this one. Much of Greenstead is already covered by First and I don't know whether Harwich Road on its own would generate more passengers than could already be provided for via First 104 and Essex County Council tender 4.
Beyond this, Arriva have the Colchester Park and Ride contract which I think runs until September 2025 and service 133, which could presumably be resourced from the Stansted end by Arriva's Harlow depot. I assume they also have some school contracts, but don't actually know.

Also interesting that there's no S5 in Colchester. I wonder if this was earmarked for something originally - perhaps one or more of the Arriva routes above? EDIT: Or maybe they were originally planning on either the S1 (ex-61) or S2 (ex-65) being split in the town centre like the other former cross-town routes, and one section would have been the S5?
 
Last edited:

buslad1988

Member
Joined
28 Dec 2018
Messages
650
Yes, the simplification is very welcome. Some people will undoubtedly lose out, but you only have to compare the old and new network maps to see how much easier to understand the network will be after the changes. It's a shame that the frequency cuts are coming in at the same time and the notice period is so short, because those will probably get more attention that the improvement in the ease of use of the services.

The attack on Arriva is interesting and presumably resourced using staff and vehicles surplus after cuts elsewhere in Colchester. I struggle to see Arriva responding by covering some of First's routes in the town given that the general trend in their operations in Colchester has been towards decline, though I could be wrong. If they can't hold their own on these routes (e.g. by offers on fares etc.), then I'm not convinced what they'd be left with would be a particularly promising set of services. While both First and Arriva have both run on the town centre to Highwoods via North Station and Mile End corridor for many years, I suspect that is much busier than the two in question.

By my reckoning, only two or three major bus corridors in Colchester (i.e. excluding short stretches of road) will be served only by Arriva:
  • Town centre to Ambrose Avenue (part of service 1). The Maldon Road/Shrub End Road stretch is served by First 75 but that's reduced to hourly in these changes so isn't much of a competitor.
  • Town centre to Highwoods via Ipswich Road and St John's (part of service 2). First only serves Highwoods via North Station and Mile End so the bulk of this route is unserved.
  • Town centre to Greenstead via Harwich Road (part of service 1). I'm not sure about this one. Much of Greenstead is already covered by First and I don't know whether Harwich Road on its own would generate more passengers than could already be provided for via First 104 and Essex County Council tender 4.
Beyond this, Arriva have the Colchester Park and Ride contract which I think runs until September 2025 and service 133, which could presumably be resourced from the Stansted end by Arriva's Harlow depot. I assume they also have some school contracts, but don't actually know.

Also interesting that there's no S5 in Colchester. I wonder if this was earmarked for something originally - perhaps one or more of the Arriva routes above? EDIT: Or maybe they were originally planning on either the S1 (ex-61) or S2 (ex-65) being split in the town centre like the other former cross-town routes, and one section would have been the S5?
All the network maps are now much more clearer and easier to understand. I noticed too that a Colchester S5 is missing - maybe something they’re planning in the future?

Not convinced now is the right time to be starting potential bus wars. Arriva are very well established on the corridors they’ve targeted; unless they take this as an opportunity to refresh their own network. If they’re committed to another 3 years in the area (with Park & Ride) if Colchester is saturated could they maybe target a couple of busy corridors in Ipswich?
 

TAS

Member
Joined
16 Jul 2005
Messages
284
All the network maps are now much more clearer and easier to understand. I noticed too that a Colchester S5 is missing - maybe something they’re planning in the future?

Not convinced now is the right time to be starting potential bus wars. Arriva are very well established on the corridors they’ve targeted; unless they take this as an opportunity to refresh their own network. If they’re committed to another 3 years in the area (with Park & Ride) if Colchester is saturated could they maybe target a couple of busy corridors in Ipswich?
Yeah, the timing does seem weird. Of course, much of First's current town network was run by Arriva's ultimate predecessor CBT for decades, but Eastern National still managed to force them off it. As for resources to target other routes, I'm not sure where Arriva would get them from. First have got them by cutting routes elsewhere in Colchester (but all of Arriva's routes are at least partially in competition with First so they don't have much scope for cuts) and there's a shortage of drivers locally (look at the horrific scale of Hedingham and Chambers' cancellations each day), which is why I suspect Arriva's ability to retaliate is limited. As with many bus wars, it's entirely possible (perhaps even likely) that the whole thing will fizzle out before too long, but every so often one does strike a fatal blow and First may be judging that Arriva just won't have the space to react given all the constraints the industry is under after the pandemic.
 

nesw

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2013
Messages
279
Location
London
The changes look like the work of expensive consultants and are similar to the disastrous network revamp Yellow Buses, Bournemouth introduced around 2018. Some of the renumbering of services is logical however, most of them are of no benefit to the passenger.


It appears that most of the ‘Shuttle’ routes are inter worked, although not advertised as through services, so that’s unlikely to assist with punctuality. It’s also notable that some running time variations have be smoothed out.

The Basildon changes are very similar to the ‘Overground’ network from 2002.

Overall, it’s likely that that peak vehicle requirement will be reduced by at least ten and further changes will be made.
 

Adtrainsam

Member
Joined
31 Dec 2019
Messages
72
Location
Essex
I think the refresh is very welcome in Essex, a long overhaul of the network was much overdue. However, it remains to be seen if this will be effective or confusing. Whilst these changes have been rumoured for weeks, it’s poor of First to give such short notice to a substantial set of changes. I dread to think of the scenes in Basildon, Colchester and Chelmsford’s town/city centres and bus stations after Easter Monday. If, over the next week, marketing and awareness of the changes is actively promoted, we’ll see less of the general public being confused over which bus goes where.

One of the aims of the new ‘shuttles’ network is to create simpler town-estate routes rather than having cross city routes, reducing knock on delays from one area to another, however many of the routes will interwork, raising questions if broken cross city connections will be offset by increased reliability.

It’s a shame to see many key corridors have had their frequency cut, especially on routes where 30 minute services have been reduced to hourly. This is a shame, and like others have said, overlook the benefits of simplification. They’ve also sneakily cut some other frequencies, such as the C3/C11 (ex-56) and C7 (ex-57) down from 3 buses an hour to 2; considering these are some of the more deprived areas of Chelmsford, this is unexpected. You also have the removal of the 21 through Thundersley and past Westcliff Schools which has already attracted quite a bit of attention on social media.

This is an interesting scene to watch and will be interesting to see it develop…
 

ACBest

Member
Joined
30 Aug 2011
Messages
346
Location
Lincoln
Incredible print error on the timetable for the 71/371 from Colchester to Chelmsford, in which the Sunday timetable is non-existent, and replaced by a note which reads…

is there meant to be a Sunday tt here - as nothing was supplied and the other direction has Sundays?


One of many things which I’ve spotted, making me wonder how much proof reading was actually done before this was rushed out - seems to be all very last minute to announce such a large network change with just a few days to go.
 

Attachments

  • B5F5FC12-2879-4EFE-84CC-82E2C2AC6367.png
    B5F5FC12-2879-4EFE-84CC-82E2C2AC6367.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 122
Last edited:

RELL6L

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
1,252
Haven’t had a chance to study these in detail as I am away (non-bus) for a week. They do look like a much needed tidy but not impressed with the reduction in frequency from Braintree to Colchester or Witham to Colchester. What with these 3xx numbers- are they meant to signify anything? And that 71 Sunday missing timetable is very poor!

But above all else, these completely new networks need to be heavily publicised locally for a decent period in advance, not slipped out at one week’s notice!
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,842
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
I'm beginning to wonder if I should be sending an invoice for consultancy services to First Essex...

I'd be interested to see if they have one brand for the whole Essex business or perhaps some sub-brands; I always thought that there was room for more brands; just that the complex route network made it more difficult. Why not have a red Chelmsford City network, or a burgundy and cream version for Colchester locals, and a few targetted others with the green for the more standard routes?
In all seriousness, I've been banging on about First Essex simplifying their network for some time and simply because it is was obvious. In Chelmsford, the sheer number of service variations was baffling. What I said in December wasn't some seer of seers or from inside knowledge.... it just seemed so obvious. The removal of the Mersea service from Monkwick was one example though I didn't suspect First would go in competitively at this point in time...

The route takes you past Colchester Garrison and along the main road except it then heads via Monkwick and a bizarre double run where I never saw a soul; certainly, that's a route where a diversion could be removed but then again, I guess it's an anti Arriva spoiler.
Similarly, the other things that I said about Colchester/Maldon/Chelmsford were...
  • The new livery is an improvement but keep it for those standard services like the 70/70A or the 71 or the 88 to Halstead, or Chelmsford to Ongar. However, where there's the potential for some branding, then go for it (like the 31 corridor)
  • In Colchester, there's a decent local network and that could do with a better, stronger image - better call Stenning. As I say, a chat with Arriva about selling up might also be an idea but that will soak up management time when they have a lot to do
  • Chelmsford needs a root and branch rethink of its local network. There's too much complexity and it would really benefit from a cohesive image and simplification. I was looking at the 54 and 56 routes and struggled to pick them apart with each having more variants of concern than Covid
    • The simplification of the 42 is hopefully a foretelling of what they will do
  • Same with the 31 group of routes - I shouldn't have to contend with a 31, 31B, 31C and 31X...
  • The fleet needs updating; hopefully sending 15 year old Geminis to replace older Tridents is a stop gap measure and nothing more.
    • They need some newer fleet and perhaps something for a relaunched 62 group (Colchester to University/Wivenhoe/Brightlingsea) that is Uni-branded with more modern deckers might help even if they're only 2012 era e400s from somewhere like West of England?
    • Get some more e300s (from Glasgow?) to help clear out the phalanx of 2005 Eclipses still hanging around
    • The e200mmc that should come free from Chelmsford P&R (lost to Vectare?) can be used to reinvigorate something like the 100 through Basildon?
  • Work with Essex CC and local authorities to improve bus priority - it's desperately needed in Chelmsford but you can see the potential in places like Colchester and even Braintree; same with organisations such as the NHS or the Universities to really encourage partnership
Aside from the lack of service specific liveries and using branding on the green livery (as per the southern bit of the 100), I was pretty close. The formal splitting of the 100 is a good move and perhaps the ex P&R fleet will end up on the new 300 to Chelmsford.

The fleet is still a bone of contention though and whilst I'd expect the Darts to be cleared out and a number of other withdrawals courtesy of fleet reductions, they really do need a) some more modern fleet to clear out the crap and b) look to refurb some of the mid life fleet

Share the concerns about the rush in which this is being undertaken; I'd have suggested a three phase approach with Basildon, then Chelmsford and then Colchester. I also have to say that my serious questions about Arriva's future in Colchester have only intensified.
 

Megafuss

Member
Joined
5 May 2018
Messages
884
Location
Spalding
Whenever I've used First Essex I was always left with the feeling that there is a kernal of something there to build on, but lost in the mire of the bad half of Firstbus.

it may have taken a pandemic and change of senior commercial management to get there, i just hope this recast isn't three years too late.
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
9,086
Haven’t had a chance to study these in detail as I am away (non-bus) for a week. They do look like a much needed tidy but not impressed with the reduction in frequency from Braintree to Colchester or Witham to Colchester. What with these 3xx numbers- are they meant to signify anything? And that 71 Sunday missing timetable is very poor!

But above all else, these completely new networks need to be heavily publicised locally for a decent period in advance, not slipped out at one week’s notice!

Alot of people still use the train service between those points, as by the time you get down to the Newland Street from the top end your just as quick going to train station.


Whenever I've used First Essex I was always left with the feeling that there is a kernal of something there to build on, but lost in the mire of the bad half of Firstbus.

it may have taken a pandemic and change of senior commercial management to get there, i just hope this recast isn't three years too late.

If this recast had happen before covid, it would be a complete mess right now. This time its clean break with fresh chance to move forward.
 

Mal

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2015
Messages
289
Location
Liverpool
I have two thoughts on this.
1. Could they not have renumbered all town routes into the B, C and S series so that the whole town network was consistent? If not, Colchester will have the 1A and 2A as wel as the S1 and S2! Unless I have missed something?
2. The notice given is far too short. I hope that they have distributed info to all places (libraries, TICs, Lwixure Centres etc) and households to let them know the changes in advance.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Just had a look at the current (First) Colchester map and there is no 1A or 2A shown on it though there are still timetabies for them! Now I am confused!! Help please!
 
Last edited:

RELL6L

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
1,252
I have two thoughts on this.
1. Could they not have renumbered all town routes into the B, C and S series so that the whole town network was consistent? If not, Colchester will have the 1A and 2A as wel as the S1 and S2! Unless I have missed something?
2. The notice given is far too short. I hope that they have distributed info to all places (libraries, TICs, Lwixure Centres etc) and households to let them know the changes in advance.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Just had a look at the current (First) Colchester map and there is no 1A or 2A shown on it though there are still timetabies for them! Now I am confused!! Help please!
I presume the 1A and 2A are contracted versions of Arriva services and cannot be changed.

Agree on publicity- they should have had a month of heavy publicity!
 

Mal

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2015
Messages
289
Location
Liverpool
I presume the 1A and 2A are contracted versions of Arriva services and cannot be changed.

Agree on publicity- they should have had a month of heavy publicity!
Thanks for that. I wasn't certain but thought it might have been contracted.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,842
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
I presume the 1A and 2A are contracted versions of Arriva services and cannot be changed.

Agree on publicity- they should have had a month of heavy publicity!
I would think you're right on the town services

As for publicity, certainly a couple of weeks would've been the minimum; as I say, perhaps a phased approach might have made things more manageable in terms of getting everything achieved. Right idea, not great execution.

Some fairly brutal cuts though on those inter-urban routes. Reducing the Braintree to Chelmsford made some sense (4 bph seemed a lot) but hourly from Colchester to Maldon/Braintree and Mersea is quite the axe. Surprised they've not done more with the University in Wivenhoe either.
 

martin2345uk

Established Member
Joined
21 Sep 2011
Messages
2,391
Location
Essex
As someone who lives on one of the soon to change completely Chelmsford routes I do wonder when I’d have found out, had it not been for this forum…. I wonder if it would have been when waiting for the 40 only for a C12 to show up confusing the heck out of me!
 

THC

Member
Joined
21 Sep 2009
Messages
717
Location
Stuck on the GEML
As someone who lives on one of the soon to change completely Chelmsford routes I do wonder when I’d have found out, had it not been for this forum…. I wonder if it would have been when waiting for the 40 only for a C12 to show up confusing the heck out of me!
I'm in the same boat as you - and not only personally but professionally, where I would have expected the organisation I work for to receive formal notification of these changes - and nothing has been forthcoming. I feel a strongly-worded letter coming on...

THC
 
Joined
31 Oct 2017
Messages
78
Location
London
Does anyone know if there are going to be any fleet changes i.e. withdrawals and transfers from other First divisions as part of Essex changes this Sunday?

I would imagine that the likes of Tridents, Darts and the Euro 3 Volvos would be withdrawn from Essex at some point, though I'm not too sure if they are being withdrawn this weekend as part of the changes or if they are staying a bit longer?
 

Delenn

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
215
Have to admit this has come as a shock. Firstly, it is great that the Essex company has got some focus, and there is a lot here that is good. There is a lot that is bad though.

So, the good. Splitting the 100. Ending the farce that is the 5A and 5B.

The bad. The notice given. Next week will be chaos. Publicity has been virtually nil, and no one I know of in Essex knows this is happening.

Route maps are non-existant. Detailed timetables are non-existant. It all looks so rushed.

I'll focus on Colchester with a few random thoughts, as that is where I really know. (Apart from the 71 and 100, which I used regularly for a while).

I think they've used the change of name to try to hide the frequency cuts. Splitting the 66 is a case in point - it has always been imbalanced, so splitting allows the Bergholt side to be cut more than the Rowhedge side.

The new town network reminded me of the way CBT used to be - routes going into town then round in a loop.

This is clearly an attack on Arriva, although why they are after the Horkesley end of the 2 is hard to fathom - the other end is the busier end. It will be interesting to see if they timetable the 2 overlap bits to be a few minutes in front of the 2. Same for the 8.

The 87 number for Brightlingsea is interesting. That was the old Hedingham number, so I wonder if they got it off them.

I also wonder is the S5 is for the 1 replacement if they totally drive Arriva out.

I don't think Southend has been renumbered, as I can see a deal being done to swap routes. There was clearly discussion between First and Stephensons about the 26 replacement.

And finally, why are the 370/371 not the short turners? It makes no sense for the short turners to be the established numbers, unless First can see culling the 370 and 371 at some point.
 

Adtrainsam

Member
Joined
31 Dec 2019
Messages
72
Location
Essex
Does anyone know if there are going to be any fleet changes i.e. withdrawals and transfers from other First divisions as part of Essex changes this Sunday?

I would imagine that the likes of Tridents, Darts and the Euro 3 Volvos would be withdrawn from Essex at some point, though I'm not too sure if they are being withdrawn this weekend as part of the changes or if they are staying a bit longer?
From a Facebook Group, it was heard that 4 mid-life E200s had turned up for Chelmsford, however First rejected them and sent them back to the dealers!

With the whole thing seeming rather rushed, I think it'll take a few more weeks until we see some proper withdrawals. Some of the older vehicles may also remain whilst First send buses for repaint/refurbishment. The whole process of repainting is also slower as all of it is done externally, since First's paintshop closed before covid.
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
9,086
Does anyone know how long these changes have been on the books for? is it possible they were designed in 2020 and have been waiting in the wings ever since?
 

Man of Kent

Member
Joined
5 Jul 2018
Messages
903
Does anyone know why Southend hasn't been renumbered?
Southend is a separate authority to Essex. Assuming the Enhanced Partnerships have started, Southend may be more concerned with a single number series for all operators in its patch than Essex is in its much larger area. And Southend may have refused to support short notice alterations - the few that are on the DVSA database seem to have been done with notice periods of around 4 weeks.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,842
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
I think they've used the change of name to try to hide the frequency cuts. Splitting the 66 is a case in point - it has always been imbalanced, so splitting allows the Bergholt side to be cut more than the Rowhedge side.
I don't think that's the reason. The fact is that the whole Essex business has been crying out for some decent marketing and it's not as if they're hiding the frequency cuts on the 70, 71 or 75 as examples
This is clearly an attack on Arriva, although why they are after the Horkesley end of the 2 is hard to fathom - the other end is the busier end. It will be interesting to see if they timetable the 2 overlap bits to be a few minutes in front of the 2. Same for the 8.
I thought it was only really Monkwick that was being impacted by competition?
The 87 number for Brightlingsea is interesting. That was the old Hedingham number, so I wonder if they got it off them.
Think it was available and had some significance as a former number.
And finally, why are the 370/371 not the short turners? It makes no sense for the short turners to be the established numbers, unless First can see culling the 370 and 371 at some point.
I doubt that's the reason. Again, they are indulging in a bit of nostagia for 3** numbers of the past
With the whole thing seeming rather rushed, I think it'll take a few more weeks until we see some proper withdrawals. Some of the older vehicles may also remain whilst First send buses for repaint/refurbishment. The whole process of repainting is also slower as all of it is done externally, since First's paintshop closed before covid.
They do have a couple of e400s on loan and expect you're right that the picture will not be immediately clear as they send the newer fleet via Mardens paintshop but expect the Tridents and Darts to be gone in the near future
Does anyone know how long these changes have been on the books for? is it possible they were designed in 2020 and have been waiting in the wings ever since?
Er no. Piers Marlow came in Nov 2020 and has doubtless been looking at rationalising the network as well as working out what things will look like in a post Covid world. I'd imagine that him and his team were looking at it last year but the publicity strategy is clearly lacking.
 

Delenn

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
215
I thought it was only really Monkwick that was being impacted by competition?
No, in fact, the Monkwick competition hasn't changed much, as the 67 went round the back of Mersea Road in recent times.

The new competition is the Horkesley end of the 2, and that really does make no sense to me. It always seems to carry fewer people than the St Johns end of the 2.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,842
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
No, in fact, the Monkwick competition hasn't changed much, as the 67 went round the back of Mersea Road in recent times.

The new competition is the Horkesley end of the 2, and that really does make no sense to me. It always seems to carry fewer people than the St Johns end of the 2.
I know the Mersea route went round there but only every 30 mins; the new S8 is every 15 mins and serves a greater area of Monkwick than the 67 by diverting off early Mersea Road.

Is the S2 much different from the 65? I thought Horkesley was only being served by First's tendered 2
 

Delenn

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
215
I know the Mersea route went round there but only every 30 mins; the new S8 is every 15 mins and serves a greater area of Monkwick than the 67 by diverting off early Mersea Road.

Is the S2 much different from the 65? I thought Horkesley was only being served by First's tendered 2
No, First has the tendered 2A, which is evening and Sunday journeys. Arriva run the daytime (Mon to Sat) 2 commercially. It diverges from the 65 at North Station and is up a different artery from the 65 (and 61 and 8). Think different spokes of a wheel.

I haven't seen enough detail for the S8 to see where it comes off Mersea Road. The maps aren't clear. For example, it looks like the S1 and S2 don't serve Bruff Close and use the old Chambers stops on the Northern Approach Road instead.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,842
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
No, First has the tendered 2A, which is evening and Sunday journeys. Arriva run the daytime (Mon to Sat) 2 commercially.

I haven't seen enough detail for the S8 to see where it comes off Mersea Road. The maps aren't clear. For example, it looks like the S1 and S2 don't serve Bruff Close and use the old Chambers stops on the Northern Approach Road instead.
Sorry - I meant the 2A. I'd suggest First going into Horkesley with a half hourly 87 isn't quite as bold as the S8. The S8 is coming off Mersea Road onto QE Way rather than the current 67 going down Mersea Road further and then diverting off at the Silver Oyster. When I travelled on it just before Christmas, it (67) did seem a bit of a spoiler but the S8 is both more comprehensive and double the frequency.
 

Top