railfan458sw
On Moderation
why does it take a while to go from mile end to stratford. it took 2 mins and 54s can someone explain. in detail
2.83km scheduled 3½minwhy does it take a while to go from mile end to stratford. it took 2 mins and 54s can someone explain. in detail
Mile End to Stratford is quite straight, as far as I am aware; not especially wiggly. The places are, simply, a long way apart!could you explain more. And also about the route. does the central line go around a longer bend under the tunnels towards stratford??
Could you explain why you're describing it as too long?could you explain more.
Perhaps it doesn't look all that far on a "not to scale" diagrammatic London Underground map!Could you explain why you're describing it as too long?
That's about 30.50mph which isn't bad for the Underground. Or at the OP's time of 2m 54s - 37.6mph, positively blistering!2.83km scheduled 3½min
The trains will be doing 65kph (max speed in the tunnel section on the Central)That's about 30.50mph which isn't bad for the Underground. Or at the OP's time of 2m 54s - 37.6mph, positively blistering!![]()
The trains will be doing 65kph (max speed in the tunnel section on the Central)
It's very clear just looking at Carto Metro with my Mk1 Eye Balls that Bethnal Green to Mile End is quite a bit shorter than Mile End to Stratford.If that's the maximum in a Central Line tunnel, then an average of not far short of 60kph station-station seems good to me! And the official schedule suggests an average of close to 50kph.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Hang on - I see that people are quoting the same distance from Bethnal Green to Mile End as from Mile End to Stratford.... Is there some confusion in the figures here? Now I stop to think (it's not a route i use often), it is indeed Bethnal Green to Mile End which is the really uncommonly long hop.
Mile End-Bethnal Green 1.64kmAt 2.83km, the distance between Mile End and Bethnal Green is the third longest distance between two stations
Hi, Could you describe your journey (In detail!!). Was the train you were on held or slowed down by signals en-route for example. Were you held before climbing up into the daylight platform at Stratford because your train had to wait for the train in front to depart and had been held in the platform.why does it take a while to go from mile end to stratford. it took 2 mins and 54s can someone explain. in detail
Yes thanks, not wholly awake yesterday (I blame the clock changesMile End-Bethnal Green 1.64km
Which is a timetabled 28.1km/h or 17.5mph. At 2m 54s then it's 33.9km/h or 21.1mph. Which seems far more in keeping with what you'd expect on the Underground given the average scheduled speed on the network is 33km/h?Mile End-Bethnal Green 1.64km
yes on the 1st run to mile end it took 2 mins 54 but going back to stratford we slowed down and stopped halfway wich i recoded up to 2 mins and 47s . and when the train started moving again it took an additional 43 secs to get to stratford sp 2m 47s + 43s for the second runHi, Could you describe your journey (In detail!!). Was the train you were on held or slowed down by signals en-route for example. Were you held before climbing up into the daylight platform at Stratford because your train had to wait for the train in front to depart and had been held in the platform.
When they built the Victoria Line, did they want to keep it "fast" or was there nothing between Finsbury Park and Seven Sisters that justified a station?And, when the OP is next in London, I suggest that they try Finsbury Park-Seven Sisters.
Which is a timetabled 28.1km/h or 17.5mph. At 2m 54s then it's 33.9km/h or 21.1mph. Which seems far more in keeping with what you'd expect on the Underground given the average scheduled speed on the network is 33km/h?
Having just read this thread all the way through, I must admit this made me laugh out loud!It's taken me more than 2m 54s to read this thread. Is that especially slow?
Very true, but even including dwells, some reasonable averages are achieved given the numerous speed restrictions to considerably lower than "linespeed". The Central line doesn't even run at linespeed normally anyway since the Chancery Lane incident.Though when comparing station-station average speed with overall average speed, I'm assuming that the latter is an end-to-end average for running along a whole line - which includes station stops. When working out an average speed between adjacent stations, neither station dwell time is included - hence this speed will be higher, and more in line with possible line speeds, than the overall average speed for a line.
And I've found one.In view of my earlier post, Errors and Omissions excepted!![]()
There is already a station at Manor House on the Piccadilly Line which sits between Finsbury Park and Seven Sisters.When they built the Victoria Line, did they want to keep it "fast" or was there nothing between Finsbury Park and Seven Sisters that justified a station?
Not sure if it’s true or not but I did once hear that one of the options investigated with the construction of the Victoria line was for the Victoria line to have a station at Manor House (as indeed it passes through the existing station footprint and shares an electricity substation with the Piccadilly line at this location), and the Piccadilly line to run in new tunnels, with a new station at Harringay Green Lanes, but also offering a more direct route than going via Manor House.There is already a station at Manor House on the Piccadilly Line which sits between Finsbury Park and Seven Sisters.
I did once read an observation that Manor House would be better served by the Victoria Line which has longer trains than the Piccadilly Line.