So just to clarify, Driver Managers are indeed able to be classed as contingency drivers. They were used to fill temporary gaps in rostering at my TOC the same as conductor managers - as stated before, this all stopped as it wasn't ran past the unions beforehand and both ASLEF and RMT kicked up a stink and had the practise stopped.This is an interesting point. I would imagine that driver managers can act as contingents? But I’m not 100% sure as it’s not my area of speciality.
This is a difficult one to phrase without sounding like I’m down playing the role of SCNR vs Driver. But, there is a reason that the conductor training course is significantly shorter than the driver course - and that is reflected in the ease with which competence can be maintained.
I am not suggesting for one minute being a conductor is easy - it is not! I think the nature of the role is very different, a lot more skills/NTS based in managing situations and events. Driving is a continuous process, and requires a very different skill set that requires very different types of learning and maintenance of competence.
So in short - I don’t think it’s about being one to specifically get rid of conductors, just accepting what level of contingency is feasible.
Absolutely it should be about what level of contingency is acceptable, including when and how it is used. I have to admit, I've not read up on the RMT's reasoning for this strike so I will see if it is similar to what I've seen or not.