Plus I understand a freight connection to the Norbord manufacturing facility to the west of the proposed station - only the connection at the moment - not the yard - as I understand it! Its was on the planning drawings - but not heard any mention of it in any of the press statements from NR..Even if the new station is only moderately busy, its construction will always have had the added bonus of a new loop being added to break up the single line section between Inverness & Nairn, allowing better recovery from delays and a more frequent train service.
Is that wall part of the new platform or a protection wall whilst they do the work?A short Youtube clip with a view of the work as of today.
Also, a lot of earthworks has been done to the East of the old bridge. I'll try to get something looking in that direction before the bridge is demolished.
Thank you for the video. It's always great when someone local on the forum can give updates. I look forward to your updates.A short Youtube clip with a view of the work as of today.
Also, a lot of earthworks has been done to the East of the old bridge. I'll try to get something looking in that direction before the bridge is demolished.

They are building a new town to the south aren't they? I assumed that is why the station got approval.I passed through on 1A50, 11 02 Inverness-Aberdeen HST last Wednesday and they hadn't started positioning the platform edging units then as far as I could see, so progress is clearly ongoing. I have to say though, that according to friends in the area, there are Reston-style doubts about the long term usage and viability of the new station. It's on the opposite site of the airport from the terminal building, which has frequent direct bus services from Inverness city centre. There may possibly be a limited amount of potential traffic from Elgin, Forres and Nairn, but it's still going to be a faff getting from the station to the terminal with luggage, even with a shuttle bus.
Ahh....I wasn't aware of that - and by the sound of things, nor were my friends near Inverness.They are building a new town to the south aren't they? I assumed that is why the station got approval.
I know there are houses being built in the area though I don't know if there are enough to be classed as a town.They are building a new town to the south aren't they? I assumed that is why the station got approval.
Very interesting....so will the new station be called Dalcross or Tornagrain?The "Town Plan" on the following page might be of interest, the station being shown as Item 10.
I hope that doesn't mean 50 years of (continuous) construction!According to the developers website Tornagrain will definitely be a town.
"The town of 5,000 homes, 3 primary schools, a secondary school, shops, employment space, parks and other services covers a 620 acre site and is expected to take 50 years to complete."

It will be called "Inverness Airport Station" - originally was Dalcross - but the current project team have been informed it will be Inverness AirportThere is mention upthread from #pdeaves of it being Inverness Airport - IVA.
I sometimes refer to it as Tornagrain Parkway, but doubt that will stick.
I should imagine those hoping to give Inverness a high profile would be pleased with a station name of "Inverness Airport".It will be called "Inverness Airport Station" - originally was Dalcross - but the current project team have been informed it will be Inverness Airport
Given the station's terminal nature (both location and role) it's difficult to see how it could be called anything other than Manchester Airport.Even a city such as Manchester has a station with the name of "Manchester Airport".
I think you will be well aware of certain website members who still keep referring to it as "Ringway"...Given the station's terminal nature (both location and role) it's difficult to see how it could be called anything other than Manchester Airport.
A bit like peoples irritating habit of calling Leeds/Bradford Airport ‘Yeadon Airport’. Can’t stand all this living in the past.I think you will be well aware of certain website members who still keep referring to it as "Ringway"...![]()
![]()
Given that the airport only has a single figure number of departures most weekdays (only 3 on one) and none Saturdays, its main usage is hardly likely to be for airport passengers. Why not reflect the area it is to serve.I should imagine those hoping to give Inverness a high profile would be pleased with a station name of "Inverness Airport".
Perhaps in many respects the past was a better place to live in. Nothing wrong with locals calling it Yeadon-that's where it is. Cant understand why Bradford is included in the title-it's not in Bradford and I suspect most Bradford fliers use Manchester. Possibly more users from Harrogate.A bit like peoples irritating habit of calling Leeds/Bradford Airport ‘Yeadon Airport’. Can’t stand all this living in the past.
Although for some it may be “ living in the past” to use Hurn, Abbotsinch, Turnhouse, Lulsgate or whatever, it’s also just a matter of local precision. If someone from a hundred mikes away fancies a bit of shopping in Oxford Street, they’re likely to say they’re going “ to London”. Someone in Acton, Highgate or wherever is likely to be more specific. Equally, I’m not aware of objections to the use of Luton, Stansted, Heathrow or even Lydd without the word “London” even though it’s part of the name….Perhaps in many respects the past was a better place to live in. Nothing wrong with locals calling it Yeadon-that's where it is. Cant understand why Bradford is included in the title-it's not in Bradford and I suspect most Bradford fliers use Manchester. Possibly more users from Harrogate.
I once spent a day plane spotting at London Airport.A bit like peoples irritating habit of calling Leeds/Bradford Airport ‘Yeadon Airport’. Can’t stand all this living in the past.
Perhaps it was in some respects but it’s never been called Yeadon Airport, ever. It opened as Leeds & Bradford Municipal Aerodrome.Perhaps in many respects the past was a better place to live in. Nothing wrong with locals calling it Yeadon-that's where it is.
Bradford is in the title as it serves the city as well as Leeds. Going by that theory London should be removed from the title of Gatwick, Stansted and Luton.Cant understand why Bradford is included in the title-it's not in Bradford and I suspect most Bradford fliers use Manchester. Possibly more users from Harrogate.
AIUI there is to be a fair amount of industrial/business park development at the airport so that might generate traffic.Given that the airport only has a single figure number of departures most weekdays (only 3 on one) and none Saturdays, its main usage is hardly likely to be for airport passengers. Why not reflect the area it is to serve.
I don't recognise these figures perhaps flight are currently at a reduced level due to Covid and it being winter?Given that the airport only has a single figure number of departures most weekdays (only 3 on one) and none Saturdays, its main usage is hardly likely to be for airport passengers. Why not reflect the area it is to serve.
Yeah, flights are way down at the moment. Typically during the summer you'd be looking at more like 15-20 flights a day.I don't recognise these figures perhaps flight are currently at a reduced level due to Covid and it being winter?
But not all passenger carrying.