• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

What should GWR do about severe conditions on Dawlish?

Status
Not open for further replies.

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,531
Location
Plymouth
Would speed up services between Exeter & Newton Abbott for sure - I think "making Plymouth/Exeter journey times appropriate for the modern age" is overstating the effect somewhat, still got to crawl your way between NA & PymoPlymouth
Maybe if HS2 was scaled back then a tiny amount of money could be spent on the south west? Radical idea i know, but a diversionary line plus some small speed improvements NTA to Plymouth, say upto 75mph would make a huge difference to Cornwall and Plymouth.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Irascible

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2020
Messages
2,233
Location
Dyfneint
Yeah, no interest in that line that used to exist. Just a new direct route between Exeter and Plymouth. I don't think it's good for the railways when there's a direct road but the railway cannot match it.

Preaching to the choir on that one...

Maybe if HS2 was scaled back then a tiny amount of money could be spent on the south west? Radical idea i know, but a diversionary line plus some small speed improvements NTA to Plymouth, say upto 75mph would make a huge difference to Cornwall and Plymouth.

I'm not sure how you scale it back without destroying what it's set out to achieve. You'll find me shouting about the state of things down here fairly frequently, but I don't think we can gain something at the partial expense of HS2 ( only the full expense! that boat has sailed ). To get any real benefits for the south-west you'd need work all the way to Birmingham too.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,067
Location
St Albans
Maybe if HS2 was scaled back then a tiny amount of money could be spent on the south west? Radical idea i know, but a diversionary line plus some small speed improvements NTA to Plymouth, say upto 75mph would make a huge difference to Cornwall and Plymouth.
HS2 is not a pot of money so there's nothing to plunder. It's an investment against a defined payback in the future. The running of the south devon mainline is funded by passenger receipts and the transport department budget dished out by the treasury.
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,531
Location
Plymouth
OK how about we cancel every no hoper scheme like Twwedbank to Carlisle etc etc and put that money into a quick Exeter to NTA diversionary line. A line that would benefit millions of people compared to Tweedbank to Carlisle which if ever approved im guessing would benefit about 300.
 

Irascible

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2020
Messages
2,233
Location
Dyfneint
OK how about we cancel every no hoper scheme like Twwedbank to Carlisle etc etc and put that money into a quick Exeter to NTA diversionary line. A line that would benefit millions of people compared to Tweedbank to Carlisle which if ever approved im guessing would benefit about 300.

If you can persuade all the councils of D&C to start shouting for the same thing, then we might stand a chance. DCC have seemingly been fairly realistic with expectations & demands ( especially as Devon is huge & there's a lot of remote population ) but you'd need Devon & Cornwall & Plymouth UTA & Torbay UTA to act as one, and on top of that to make it really work, Somerset - which is furrin parts. New lines need projection of returns, which is definitely in the political arena. Go for it though, devolution talk seems to be getting heared these days :p
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,977
OK how about we cancel every no hoper scheme like Twwedbank to Carlisle etc etc and put that money into a quick Exeter to NTA diversionary line. A line that would benefit millions of people compared to Tweedbank to Carlisle which if ever approved im guessing would benefit about 300.

Pretty difficult to cancel something that’s not happening!
 

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
6,637
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
tiny amount of money could be spent on the south west? Radical idea i know, but a diversionary line plus some small speed improvements NTA to Plymouth, say upto 75mph would make a huge difference to Cornwall and Plymouth.

What 'tiny' amount of money would be required to achieve those aims ?!! It would surely be anything but tiny, and would supplement an existing route which has to be kept to serve Torbay anyway. Simply not justifiable.
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,531
Location
Plymouth
What 'tiny' amount of money would be required to achieve those aims ?!! It would surely be anything but tiny, and would supplement an existing route which has to be kept to serve Torbay anyway. Simply not justifiable.
I would argue it is becoming harder not to justify it. It is becoming clear that long term traction on the route will not be able to cope with winter storms. West Devon and Cornwall cannot be cut off each time the weather is bad.
Cornwall plus Plymouth has a population approaching 1 million. Imagine saying to a city like Birmingham with a similar population, you will be unreachable by train for 10 days per year. The money needs to be spent and is arguably more needed than HS2. And its not just about Dawlish resilience. Its about union connectivity (yes Kernow is sometimes considered a separate nation) and the other Government buzz word, levelling up. Levelling up shouldn't just focus on the north, the South west gets a lot less, and Cornwall is one of the poorest parts of the EU.
 

mike57

Established Member
Joined
13 Mar 2015
Messages
2,408
Location
East coast of Yorkshire

Railwaysceptic

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2017
Messages
1,738
Missed this one - the beach here is shingle, and every time there's a storm most of the beach ends up over the sea wall & in the town! there is a problem of making it stay where you put it too, if it's not a natural beach.



Would speed up services between Exeter & Newton Abbott for sure - I think "making Plymouth/Exeter journey times appropriate for the modern age" is overstating the effect somewhat, still got to crawl your way between NA & Pymouth...
A sensible Dawlish Avoiding Line (DAL) would either include a complete new-build section between Plymouth and Newton Abbott facilitating higher speeds or avoid Newton Abbott altogether and run direct to Exeter in as straight a line as possible. (See post 90) Any DAL must do double duty: be both a reliable 365 days a year railway and a modern fast route between two large conurbations.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
A sensible Dawlish Avoiding Line (DAL) would either include a complete new-build section between Plymouth and Newton Abbott facilitating higher speeds or avoid Newton Abbott altogether and run direct to Exeter in as straight a line as possible. (See post 90) Any DAL must do double duty: be both a reliable 365 days a year railway and a modern fast route between two large conurbations.
It isnt really a Dawlish Avoiding Line though (in financial terms) as the current line will still need expensively maintaining unless the coast towns are happy losing their services and someone else takes on the cost of the sea wall. This means the business case must absolutely suck!
It would be disappointing though if the Newton Abbott to Plymouth line eventually got electrified without straightening it up a lot.
 

BayPaul

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
1,518
It isnt really a Dawlish Avoiding Line though (in financial terms) as the current line will still need expensively maintaining unless the coast towns are happy losing their services and someone else takes on the cost of the sea wall. This means the business case must absolutely suck!
It would be disappointing though if the Newton Abbott to Plymouth line eventually got electrified without straightening it up a lot.
It would be possible to split the line into two branches: Newton Abbott - Teignmouth and Exeter to Dawlish Warren, and avoid needing to maintain the expensive bit except that the railway line and its sea defences also provide the main sea defences for Dawlish town, so NR would also need to somehow convince the Environment agency or similar to take that off its hands, which also seems unlikely.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,393
It isnt really a Dawlish Avoiding Line though (in financial terms) as the current line will still need expensively maintaining unless the coast towns are happy losing their services and someone else takes on the cost of the sea wall. This means the business case must absolutely suck!

Well the DAL proposals would not necessarily require the line through Dawlish to be maintained because the Dawlish railway stations could close and a new one(s) open on the landward side of the town.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,318
Isn’t this thread about what GWR should do?

So even in the highly unlikely event that a DAL ever gets built, it’s not in the TOC‘s area of responsibility, is it…
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,067
Location
St Albans
Isn’t this thread about what GWR should do?

So even in the highly unlikely event that a DAL ever gets built, it’s not in the TOC‘s area of responsibility, is it…
Precisely, so the only option for GWR is to fix the trains, - because citing the design shortfalls of the 802s as a justification for yet more new trains for the franchise is hardly likely to get any support.
 

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,339
Location
Reading
Precisely, so the only option for GWR is to fix the trains, - because citing the design shortfalls of the 802s as a justification for yet more new trains for the franchise is hardly likely to get any support.
And even that is tricky for those units supplied through the Intercity Express Programme (IEP) as the franchise contract — or whatever the current version is called — requires that GWR uses the trains supplied by Agility Trains West. I have no idea what leverage GWR has on Agility/Hitachi to put things right as it is not a normal customer/supplier relationship. Apart from, that is, the loss of the payments for the non-supply of those diagrams or part thereof.

Whether this loss of income because of a few missing trains is sufficient to make Agility/Hitachi take notice is another matter.
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,531
Location
Plymouth
Neither are they cut off for 10 days a year, nor from each other.
Global warming and all that, we are likely to see an increase in stormy winter weather.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

They arent cut off. They are put on buses which arent appreciably slower are they?
Oh well, why not just close the railway and replace it with a fleet of coaches then??!
Why is there this prevailing attitude that the South west is just some remote holiday destination.??? Alot of people actually live down here and there are plenty of businesses crying out for investment etc. But how on earth can they compete with the likes of Manchester which gets money thrown at it hand over fist (despite Mr Burnhams protests)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Not now it isn't...
True, but the point still remains it is one of the poorest parts of Europe, and with the way inflation is going, it ain't getting any richer!
 

Annetts key

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2021
Messages
3,834
Location
West is best
Global warming and all that, we are likely to see an increase in stormy winter weather.
From an environment point of view, the solution with the lowest carbon emissions would be to fix the 80X trains (on the assumption that regardless if there was or was not a new route, it is these trains that would run). Building a new railway route to replace an existing one is not exactly a low carbon solution unless it results in taking a substantial amount of traffic off the road network.

True, but the point still remains it is one of the poorest parts of Europe, and with the way inflation is going, it ain't getting any richer!
Yeah, but how much notice does the current government take of the voters in this area? If the answer is ‘not much’, I don’t see anything changing anytime soon.
 

Irascible

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2020
Messages
2,233
Location
Dyfneint
It isnt really a Dawlish Avoiding Line though (in financial terms) as the current line will still need expensively maintaining unless the coast towns are happy losing their services and someone else takes on the cost of the sea wall. This means the business case must absolutely suck!
It would be disappointing though if the Newton Abbott to Plymouth line eventually got electrified without straightening it up a lot.

Run it round the back of Dawlish & Teignmouth if you can then, build the stations there instead. I'm not sure if that's an actually feasable alignment if you want any decent speed, but it'd be faster than the current one. If the inhabitants of Dawlish & Teignmoutn complain then ask them if they want stations at all - they can have stations or everyone else gets a faster alignment. The inhabitants to the east & north of Exeter would dearly love some stations :p

Yeah, but how much notice does the current government take of the voters in this area? If the answer is ‘not much’, I don’t see anything changing anytime soon.

The working age inhabitants of the south-west exist to service the retirement & holiday industries, dontcha know - servants don't need to go anywhere. Exeter at least tries occasionally to be a city with diverse industry. Exeter & Plymouth are still solidly red - all the other wards are regularily redrawn to make sure they stay blue, so I guess there's *some* attention paid.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,977
Global warming and all that, we are likely to see an increase in stormy winter weather.

Hence the need to protect the line (and the town).

One thing to remember - this is only a problem when a high tide combines with a storm that has winds in a certain direction. For the number of time it happens, I think removing the Dawlish stops for a couple of hours seems a reasonable solution.
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
3,774
Run it round the back of Dawlish & Teignmouth if you can then, build the stations there instead. I'm not sure if that's an actually feasable alignment if you want any decent speed, but it'd be faster than the current one. If the inhabitants of Dawlish & Teignmoutn complain then ask them if they want stations at all - they can have stations or everyone else gets a faster alignment. The inhabitants to the east & north of Exeter would dearly love some stations :p
A look at a map showing the contours of that area will show how tricky that would be, unless rack-assisted. Any link along that sort of alignment would have to be tunnelled. The section past Dawlish isn't all that slow, 75mph, with faster sections either side so it's not going to save very much time either. The really slow sections are all west/south of Newton Abbot
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
Apologies if I missed an answer but were all the engines working on the failed trains, and if they weren't would having them all working made an appreciable difference to the likelihood of the failures occurring? ie is half the response just to get Hitachi to send out properly functional trains?
 

Annetts key

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2021
Messages
3,834
Location
West is best
The working age inhabitants of the south-west exist to service the retirement & holiday industries, dontcha know - servants don't need to go anywhere. Exeter at least tries occasionally to be a city with diverse industry. Exeter & Plymouth are still solidly red - all the other wards are regularily redrawn to make sure they stay blue, so I guess there's *some* attention paid.
Yes, it looks very blue for the 2019 General Election result:
4362B233-E5DD-408C-86C6-1A0EF5B85325.jpeg
So I don’t see why a Conservative government would do anything new in this area while they are being distracted by other more important (to them) issues elsewhere.
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,531
Location
Plymouth
Yes, it looks very blue for the 2019 General Election result:
View attachment 107068
So I don’t see why a Conservative government would do anything new in this area while they are being distracted by other more important (to them) issues elsewhere.
Yes sadly only Plymouth and Exeter remain the voice of reason throughout the greater South west, although id be shocked if the map still looks like that after the next election. The tories are so preoccupied worrying about losing the red wall seats in the north they haven't noticed how unpopular they have become in the south! They really should pay more attention to the pressing issues down here as they are going to lose alot of seats.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top