Logic would be to replace them with straight EMUs and transfer them to XC to get rid of some Voyagers.
@tbtc Glad to be of service
Thanks for proving my point...
But other than the tradition of suggesting that anything gets cascaded to XC, why would you want to remove 33x5x24m 125mph electric carriages from EMR and give them (roughly) 33x5x24m 125mph electric carriages instead? Is that "logic"?
Electrification wouldn't mean any great change in the fleet size or destinations served by standard off peak timetables, it won't mean any additional space at St Pancras (where trains are limited by 240m platforms, hence the reason for the 24m carriages, i.e. 2x5x24m will fill the platform), it won't mean any extra paths out of London, so any replacement EMUs would be pretty much exactly the same (i.e. 33x5x24m 125mph electric carriages)
Why go through all the disruption of removing the 810s and moving them to XC, only to train EMR staff on a new fleet of the same size?
Why can't we solve XC's problems directly, rather than relying on cascades from elsewhere, making do and mending with the fleets that other TOCs don't need any more (e.g. the Avanti Voyagers and the EMR Meridians)? Isn't that just repeating the mistakes of BR, which led to XC being the "Cinderella" operation?