• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Have Northern Upped Their Game?

Status
Not open for further replies.

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
7,479
Location
Northern England
I used to favour TPE, but Northern's units currently seem far cleaner, with staff more visible rather than hiding in the back cab. TPE have really let cleanliness standards slip in the last few weeks, at least on the unglamorous Huddersfield stoppers.
I'd still probably have chosen TPE. The Sprinters which make up most of Northern's DMU fleet just don't feel that pleasant inside, mostly because of the absolute racket they make. The 185s are pretty noisy things but feel positively tranquil compared to the cacophony on a 150 of the engines, brakes and doors, not to mention the barely audible mess that passes for PA announcements.

For short journeys they're not unbearable, and to be fair there are now fewer times when one has to spend a long period on them given the prevalence of 195s on many of the longer distance routes, but there are still some long journeys which are entirely Sprinter.

I've generally found TPE guards to be quite good, though they tend to do fewer ticket checks than their Northern counterparts.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

driverd

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2021
Messages
909
Location
UK
I've always had a positive experience of northern, if I'm honest. I would have usually described them as "rough and ready", but since the fleet roll out, more "tidy and ready". As a rule of thumb, I find the majority of services to be far more reliable than those of other TOCs around these parts, more consistently on time and generally less busy.

It's more a reflection of the nature of the operation, but "normal" delays on TPE can easily exceed 30 minutes, at northern, I'm surprised at 15 mins.

I do think northern come in for a lot of unfair/unjustified criticism, which, in my experience, is more from a vocal but small number of unhappy users (usually based around Manchester), whilst everyone else in Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, Northumberland and Cumbria, are broadly very happy.
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
5,072
Currently on the 1752 Halifax to Leeds service. The automated announcement system announced 'This is Bradford Interchange' two minutes after it had left that station, and then announced it again just before arriving at New Pudsey.
.
This is exactly the same fault the trains had when they came into service over two years ago, when Northern said 'give us a few weeks to sort out teething problems'. Yet here we are with the same issue.

It suggests a company with no focus on detail and poor enforcement of quality service from the rolling stock owners.

No, Northern have not improved.
 
Last edited:

185143

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2013
Messages
5,353
I'm on a Northern 156 at the moment. Two passengers infront of me boarded, sat down and said "ooh it's very punctual!"

Now those are words I wouldn't have ever heard on a Northern train 2 years ago. It does feel like it's getting better. I've not been negatively affected by a cancellation for a while, though they did force me to spend an extra hour in the pub one day last week. Which I was obviously absolutely furious about... :D
 

CaptainHaddock

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,719
Northern have also been very slow to restore a full post-pandemic service on a number of lines. I doubt users of the Leeds-Lancaster and Leeds-Carlisle lines will have much positive to say about them
 

js1000

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2014
Messages
1,022
The Northern franchise has always been viewed as the poor relation in the rail industry with an unhealthy dependence on subsidy. However, given the franchise has a far lesser reliance on commuter traffic than most other franchises it is far better equipped to deal with permanent commuter passenger shortfall post-Covid.

The big difference has been new trains and fleet standardisation. New trains mean staff are willing to stay rather than move to TPE et al. Reducing the number of train types reducing time required to train up staff as well as maintenance costs. I feel getting rid of Pacers naturally boosted staff morale as well as passengers (particularly infrequent ones) and their opinion of the franchise.

All in all, the DfT will be very happy with how the franchise is performing at present. The fact they are willing to purchase more trains (probably some battery 331s once CAF sort the design out) and proceed with the Lostock to Wigan electrification is proof of that.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,774
Location
West of Andover
I've been waiting for that to crop on the forums, not fully sure what happened so didn't post.

Although I would imagine any trains from Blackpool on Saturday nights will be full & standing even without the extra crowds from the fireworks
 

philthetube

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
4,181
I had a few days up in the Northwest this week, and found them to be perfectly functional....The only negative side was at one Lancasher seaside town, where there was one leaf of a double door open checking tickets, then another ticket check at the barrier line, and the only time I had to show my railcard, and turn it over 'to make sure it had been signed'....
agree about the double check, but a bit harsh to complain when someone does their job correctly
 

Sprinter107

Member
Joined
26 Mar 2019
Messages
1,094
Travelled around the Northern lines in Cheshire, Lancashire and Manchester for a few days last week. The trains were clean inside and out, and punctual, the staff were friendly. The only annoyance were all the auto announcements. Absolute overkill really.
 

leonard clive

Member
Joined
19 Aug 2019
Messages
12
Location
Offerton
First time back on the Mid-Cheshire line for me last week after 18 months. Train noticeably cleaner, and four carriages. Ran to time. No staff seen. As an aside, Stockport was much quieter than pre covid, fewer trains and fewer people generally.
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
6,757
First trip into Manchester for about 6 weeks, about the 10th since the first lockdown began.

And my train was cancelled, due to “a safety inspection of this train”.

The following one was on time and is clean, certainly compared to how they used to be, and the conductor has been checking tickets and seems pleasant. But it’s a pair of 150s though
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,956
Location
Ely
Northern have also been very slow to restore a full post-pandemic service on a number of lines. I doubt users of the Leeds-Lancaster and Leeds-Carlisle lines will have much positive to say about them

Or indeed the Liverpool 'City Lines'. Eg. Huyton, which until Covid had a 'turn-up-and-go' 15-minute-interval service to/from Liverpool for decades, still has 45 minute gaps to/from Liverpool most hours, and it looks like it will stay that way until December.
 

185

On Moderation
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
5,709
I think Northern abandoning their 2312 Crewe to Manchester (54min journey, 35 miles) citing Network Rail engineering and replacing it with a 2hr 30m bus is not (imo) upping their game.

The bus isn't the problem, with a 55 minute road journey time... (google maps). Add in 15 mins more to stop at Wilmslow & Stockport = 1 hour 10mins.

Pennypinching, running just one bus doing all the local stops, departing at 2312 and arriving Manchester at 0142 (!) is probably not, imo, a great improvement in passenger experience.

The week before, most nights, the train departed with 35+ passengers. The week the bus was on, 1-3 passengers at most.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
7,479
Location
Northern England
I think Northern abandoning their 2312 Crewe to Manchester (54min journey, 35 miles) citing Network Rail engineering and replacing it with a 2hr 30m bus is not (imo) upping their game.

The bus isn't the problem, with a 55 minute road journey time... (google maps). Add in 15 mins more to stop at Wilmslow & Stockport = 1 hour 10mins.

Pennypinching, running just one bus doing all the local stops, departing at 2312 and arriving Manchester at 0142 (!) is not, imo, upping their game.
Is there really any point in a bus which stops at only WML and SPT anyway? Nobody in their right mind deliberately chooses uses the stopper end-to-end unless they bought a cheap Advance ticket (or particularly like 323s, I suppose).
 

185

On Moderation
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
5,709
Is there really any point in a bus which stops at only WML and SPT anyway? Nobody in their right mind deliberately chooses uses the stopper end-to-end unless they bought a cheap Advance ticket (or particularly like 323s, I suppose).
That time of night it is the *only* service running, given Transport Fails Wales abandoned their 1W76, the 2308 Crewe-Wml-Spt-Manchester 18 months ago, stating "not a problem, Northern are running a 2312" :lol:

Many people on the 2312 come off the Cardiff train that should have gone right through, not terminating at Crewe 'coz of Covid'.
 

driverd

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2021
Messages
909
Location
UK
I think Northern abandoning their 2312 Crewe to Manchester (54min journey, 35 miles) citing Network Rail engineering and replacing it with a 2hr 30m bus is not (imo) upping their game.

The bus isn't the problem, with a 55 minute road journey time... (google maps). Add in 15 mins more to stop at Wilmslow & Stockport = 1 hour 10mins.

Pennypinching, running just one bus doing all the local stops, departing at 2312 and arriving Manchester at 0142 (!) is probably not, imo, a great improvement in passenger experience.

The week before, most nights, the train departed with 35+ passengers. The week the bus was on, 1-3 passengers at most.

Are we sure this isn't legitimately due to engineering works?

If the 2312 is the last and only train on the route, it seems highly likely network rail may request a possession to come on a little early and bustitute that service.
 

MattRat

On Moderation
Joined
26 May 2021
Messages
2,128
Location
Liverpool
I was actually astonished recently when a 2 car 150 came from Manchester Oxford Road (to Liverpool Lime Street), and there was another 2 car 150 behind it. Normally a 150 would be itself and it would full to bursting, but maybe Northern finally noticed then problem.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
9,201
Used 3 Northern services today, first time since this 'ere Covid thing.

150 - nicely refurbished though the seat pitch could be more generous. Certainly cleaner than they generally were in the past.
319 - I like them. Clean and punctual.
323 - again a decent refurb.

The three were all punctual. Ticket check on the 319; hardly necessary on the 150 (barriered station to bs on my leg); no check on the 323 but since it was an emptying train out of Piccadilly probably not important.
 

Swanley 59

Member
Joined
6 Apr 2021
Messages
118
Location
Northumberland
Things don't look so good tonight.

Major disruption between Carlisle and Newcastle, owing to a shortage of conductors, and major disruption between Doncaster and Leeds, owing to a shortage of drivers. I'm sure things will be better in the morning ;)
 

IanXC

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
6,614
Things don't look so good tonight.

Major disruption between Carlisle and Newcastle, owing to a shortage of conductors, and major disruption between Doncaster and Leeds, owing to a shortage of drivers. I'm sure things will be better in the morning ;)

I'm not entirely convinced that cancelling:

2B37 2222 Leeds to Doncaster
2B88 2232 Doncaster to Leeds
2N62 2107 Carlisle to Newcastle (service started there for Hartlepool)

Counts as "Major Disruption"?

None of them are last trains of the day...
 

Swanley 59

Member
Joined
6 Apr 2021
Messages
118
Location
Northumberland
2B37 2222 Leeds to Doncaster
2B88 2232 Doncaster to Leeds
2N62 2107 Carlisle to Newcastle (service started there for Hartlepool)

Counts as "Major Disruption"?
True... I inadvertently misquoted Northern's website. It said "Severe" rather than "Major" disruption.
 

Bigman

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2011
Messages
297
Location
Leeds
Personally, I have had some very good journeys on new 195's and 331's both sides of the hill. Clean, loads of legroom, fast and punctual.
 

185

On Moderation
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
5,709
Are we sure this isn't legitimately due to engineering works?

If the 2312 is the last and only train on the route, it seems highly likely network rail may request a possession to come on a little early and bustitute that service.
This was indeed down to a possession (near Chelford), but IMO, where Northern crosses the line is only running one bus, stopping everywhere, taking 2h30 instead of 54mins and blaming NR for it - the distance by car at 55mph is 50-60 mins.

With TFWs 2308, 1W76 cancelled north of Crewe many of the passengers boarding the 2312 are just going to Stockport or Manchester. Diversionary routes were also open via NLW and Stoke.

The telling point is that the week the train ran, 30-40 people would board it - a bus stopping everywhere mostly had none, and occasionally had just one passenger on.
 

driverd

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2021
Messages
909
Location
UK
This was indeed down to a possession (near Chelford), but IMO, where Northern crosses the line is only running one bus, stopping everywhere, taking 2h30 instead of 54mins and blaming NR for it - the distance by car at 50mph is 50 mins.

With TFWs 2308, 1W76 cancelled north of Crewe many of the passengers boarding the 2312 are just going to Stockport or Manchester. Diversionary routes were also open via NLW and Stoke.

The telling point is that the week the train ran, 30-40 people would board it - a bus stopping everywhere mostly had none, and occasionally had just one passenger on.

Just to play devil's advocate, but surely an express bus should be provided by TfW, given its their cancellation thats putting express passengers onto the stopper?
 

185

On Moderation
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
5,709
Just to play devil's advocate, but surely an express bus should be provided by TfW, given its their cancellation thats putting express passengers onto the stopper?
In the magic merry go round of pass-the-buck TFW suggested they don't need to run one... as there is a 2312 :lol:
 

driverd

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2021
Messages
909
Location
UK
In the magic merry go round of pass-the-buck TFW suggested they don't need to run one... as there is a 2312 :lol:

Therefore, TfWs failure to provide for their customers when the 2312 isn't available.

To the uninitiated, welcome to the privatised railway!
 

AutoKratz

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2010
Messages
110
Location
Washington
As a commuter in the North East I still don’t feel there’s many good things to say about Northern. We’re still having to make do with the cast offs from the rest of the rail network. 32 year old 156s, poor journey times compared to the car, last minute cancellations, expensive tickets, depressing run-down stations etc. Some serious investment is needed in this part of the world to improve the entire railway - services, stations and trains. The fact the north east is practically its own self contained rail network has meant it has suffered over many decades from being the lowest priority area in the lowest priority franchise.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top