• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

TrawsCambria / TrawsCymru

Status
Not open for further replies.

daodao

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2016
Messages
3,601
Location
Dunham/Bowdon
It is possible to go from Cardiff to Newtown and return the same day. The same is not true of Cardiff to Aberystwyth.
False. For example, on Monday 9/8/21, the following trip is possible with 6 hours in Aberystwyth:


Cardiff Central Railway Station0750 depart2300 arrive
Carmarthen Railway Station0958 arrive /1009 depart2037 arrive / 2100 depart
Aberystwyth Bus Station1224 arrive1840 depart
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,990
False. For example, on Monday 9/8/21, the following trip is possible with 6 hours in Aberystwyth:


Cardiff Central Railway Station0750 depart2300 arrive
Carmarthen Railway Station0958 arrive /1009 depart2037 arrive / 2100 depart
Aberystwyth Bus Station1224 arrive1840 depart
You have to remember that @johntrawscymru has a phobia about trains, or maybe changing modes en route, or thinks others do, or thinks all journeys should cost no more than a Trawscymru Day Ticket or be free to concessionary passholders.
 

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
5,101
Location
Great Britain
Correct . Just like Barmouth the termination of the T3 which has a population of 2522). Just like Machynleth the termination of the T12 which has a population of 2235. Barmouth has the single attraction of a seaside location whilst Machynleth has no such attraction other than the depot of the T12 service provider.
You have made some very valid points above and I agree with them. The only thing that I would like to pick up on this this quote above. Firstly, aren't parts of the T3 commercial which could explain Barmouth? Secondly, that is how GHA ran the route and it did quite well so while Barmouth may be a small area, I think the logic is, the route does decent and people going further afield can change at Dolgellau. If you took out placement trips, I do question how many T3s would continue to Barmouth since there are a number of Wrexham - Dolgellau trips and also short Dolgellau to Barmouth trips.

Mach you have a valid point on the population but if TFW it is a decent interchange point. You have what... an almost hourly bus north to Dolgellau, Porthmadog etc and a half hourly bus to Aberystwyth. That is significantly better than Corwen which has only 3 regular routes, none of which have a proper frequency. The T10 is the only route with a frequency. The T3 runs at random times, sometimes hourly, sometimes buses missing then random times later on in the evening and then you have the 55 which generally only runs to link into the T3 times. Mach is a significantly better connection point and terminus for routes on the basis of the connections on offer. If things to belly up on the railways as well, you can shove people onto buses very easily with the routes available. Cowen has none of those benefits. 3 irregular buses, some of the connect, some don't. Population is a bit more spread out. No potential for multi modal journeys.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,927
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
Correct . Just like Barmouth the termination of the T3 which has a population of 2522). Just like Machynleth the termination of the T12 which has a population of 2235. Barmouth has the single attraction of a seaside location whilst Machynleth has no such attraction other than the depot of the T12 service provider.

The fact is that you are talking about long standing services. The T3 is clearly a straight replacement for the longstanding X94 (originally Crosville D93/D94) that has operated in that form for the last 60 years. Similarly, the T12 from Machynlleth to Newtown section is again a straight replacement for the 522 (originally Crosville S22) and has been like that since the 1960s (at least).

The idea that you are trying to make a point that TC has somehow deviated from its objectives and is terminating services in arbitrary places might hold water but these are very long established practices.

The takeover of multiple local bus routes like the T11 and T12 are perfect examples of the WG bumping up passenger numbers on the Trawscymru Network the easy way by stealing passengers. They are not long distance bus routes. The T11 is ridiculous when the T5 links the same 2 destinations in a third of the time. The T12 is ridiculous with a combination of 3 local services taking 3.5 hours to cover the route when a car would take 1.5 hours.

Stealing passengers?? Think that is a very illuminating phrase. Perhaps it might actually be a means of taking an existing customer base and developing it by introducing through links. And clearly, they aren't expecting to realise some hitherto hidden mass market from Mach to Wrexham - it's not for end to end journeys but as well as capitalising on existing flows, to create shorter other overlapping flows.

The 701 had 2 services per day and the T1C has only one. The T1C route Aberystwyth to Cardiff is a distance of 97.8 miles whereas the T4 Newtown to Cardiff route is 97.6 miles. You have to ask the question why Cardiff with a population of 481,082 has five T4 Trawscymru services going Northwards to Newtown with a population of 11,357 and yet there are no T1C services Northwards from Cardiff to Aberystwyth with a population of 18,749. The distance is the same, the population of Aberystwyth is approximately double that of Newtown when all 9835 University students are in residence. In addition to having a University, Aberystwyth has Welsh Government and County Council Offices, The National Library of Wales ( 95,133 visitors per annum ), National Broadcast Archive, Bronglais Hospital (Major hospital 200 beds with major trauma A and E) , Vale of Rheidol steam railway, and has many coastal static caravan sites with owners predominantly from South Wales and the Midlands. You have to ask the question why the 481,082 population of Cardiff want 5 Trawscymru services to Newtown, ( when Newtown has none of the facilities available in Aberystwyth), and yet the 481,082 population want no services to Aberystwyth. The excuse of competition with rail does not wash as the T4 does actually compete with a rail journey from Cardiff to Newtown via Shrewsbury which is approx the same time as the bus. The train Cardiff to Newtown takes just over 3 hours and the train Cardiff to Aberystwyth takes 4.5 hours . The T4 is competing with the train whereas the T1C is not as the rail line between Carmarthen and Aberystwyth was closed. Aberystwyth residents can visit Cardiff for a day (4 hours in Cardiff) or go for a weekend staying overnight returning on Sunday evening. The 481,082 population of Cardiff cannot visit Aberystwyth for a day or go for a weekend staying overnight. There is every logical reason for having T1C services departing from Cardiff to Aberystwyth. It is not a logical argument to say no services Northwards has been the situation in the past therefore no services Northwards is the solution for the future. I understand the original Trawscambria service did run Northwards as Carwyn said in the Welsh Assembly that he used it from Bridgend when he was a student in Aberystwyth. Why do we have seven T3 services per day from Wrexham (population 136,126) to the seaside at Barmouth (population 2522) and no T!C services from Cardiff (population 481,082) to to the seaside at Aberystwyth (population 18,749). It is not logical when Trawscymru (Across Wales) was supposed to link the major towns and cities of Wales . The WG logic with both the T1C, the T1 and the T2 is that efficient connections on public transport between South and North Wales along the West coast is not necessary, which is why traffic volumes along the A487 are so high. Traffic volumes are key to deciding where Trawscymru bus routes should be employed and where connections are to be made. I would be very interested to see a comparison of the traffic volumes Machynlleth to Caersws on the A470 and A489 with traffic volumes Aberystwyth to Caersws on the A44 and A470. Machynlleth to Caersws is not very busy whereas Aberystwyth to Caersws is very busy . The T12 should be operating as a direct long distance service between Aberystwyth and Wrexham via Llanidloes, Newtown, Welshpool and Oswestry with no meandering diversions off along local bus routes. Remember the Bevan recommendations on diversions and the route of the T3 ?
Well, you have been busy with Wikipedia. Where to start?

The 701 may have had two journeys when Lewis took over but they were 0740 and 0940 ex Aber so there was no morning service northbound. As I explained to you before, the "original" 701 had two journeys. One operated by Crosville Wales (later Arriva) and Rhondda (later Stagecoach) from Bangor to Cardiff, one south and one north, crossing in Aber. That was what Carwyn was referring to but it hasn't run in that form for the last 20 years.

The fact is, and this is something that you failed to recognise/research, is that they didn't want to provide any T1C at all. When Lewis folded, they were hoping that what is really a shoppers service from mid Wales to the South would be picked up by someone else. When no one did so, and there was a public uproar, then they introduced a simple replacement so basically the 0940 and the return were replaced with the T1C. So it's nothing, repeat nothing, to do with the population of Cardiff or any other chaff that you're throwing about. If it were up to WG, there would be no T1C; they would prefer that people get the train to Carmarthen and then the T1.

Also, the focussing on the population of Barmouth is the sort of bizarre, flawed logic that Dr Beeching used to cull routes to seaside resorts as it's about visitors from elsewhere.
 

carlberry

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2014
Messages
3,169
That is a valid point coach v bus. HOWEVER, the coach they use on the T1C service is very old school! It does not even have USB ports for charging phones. In this day and age for a 3.5hr journey (or 7hrs for return) that is unforgiveable! The T4 has them and for a bus is very decent! It is not simply Coach v Bus in 2021!
At least National Express have coaches with USB ports or plugs for chargers. So I am baffled as to how the T1C coach was conceptualised on the basis of old school attitudes?
It is possible that the users of the service want to get from somewhere to somewhere else and don't have the need to charge their phone at the same time. They might not even have a mobile phone, or might just use it as a phone in which case it'll quite happily exist all day without being charged. The scenery between Aberystwyth and the M4 is well worth taking in if you find your phone has lost charge.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The takeover of multiple local bus routes like the T11 and T12 are perfect examples of the WG bumping up passenger numbers on the Trawscymru Network the easy way by stealing passengers. They are not long distance bus routes. The T11 is ridiculous when the T5 links the same 2 destinations in a third of the time. The T12 is ridiculous with a combination of 3 local services taking 3.5 hours to cover the route when a car would take 1.5 hours.


route of the T3 ?
I don't know about the T11 however the T12 can hardly be accused of stealing passengers as there wasn't a service to steal from! It might not be the best use of the WG's funds, however there isn't a commercial service over the route!
 

Man of Kent

Member
Joined
5 Jul 2018
Messages
908
It is possible to have standees on a coach. The United Counties X5 used to carry 8, with a handle for each in the aisle.
Not under current rules. Coaches must have seatbelts and cannot have standees, and if it is a bus, the PSV Accessibility Regulations are more onerous. Extract from the regulations (full text at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2000/1970/pdfs/uksi_20001970_en.pdf)

“bus” means a public service vehicle designed and constructed for the carriage of both
seated and standing passengers which is of category M2 or M3 (as defined in Annex II(A)
to the 1970 Directive) and has a capacity exceeding 22 passengers, in addition to the driver;
“coach” means a public service vehicle designed and constructed for the carriage of seated
passengers only which is of category M2 or M3 (as defined in Annex II(A) to the 1970
Directive) and has a capacity exceeding 22 passengers, in addition to the driver;

Even a Plaxton Panther LE does not carry standees.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,927
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
I don't know about the T11 however the T12 can hardly be accused of stealing passengers as there wasn't a service to steal from! It might not be the best use of the WG's funds, however there isn't a commercial service over the route!
I think he's trying to suggest that there's some major extraction of passengers between Oswestry and Wrexham, not withstanding it only runs every two hours whilst the Arriva 2/2A service runs every 30 mins during the daytime (and has an hourly eve/Sun service).

However, the T12 is really just a conjoining of the former Crosville S22 and D71, latterly tendered routes 522 and 71, with an enhancement between Newtown and Welshpool
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,269
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Not under current rules. Coaches must have seatbelts and cannot have standees, and if it is a bus, the PSV Accessibility Regulations are more onerous. Extract from the regulations (full text at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2000/1970/pdfs/uksi_20001970_en.pdf)

“bus” means a public service vehicle designed and constructed for the carriage of both
seated and standing passengers which is of category M2 or M3 (as defined in Annex II(A)
to the 1970 Directive) and has a capacity exceeding 22 passengers, in addition to the driver;
“coach” means a public service vehicle designed and constructed for the carriage of seated
passengers only which is of category M2 or M3 (as defined in Annex II(A) to the 1970
Directive) and has a capacity exceeding 22 passengers, in addition to the driver;

Even a Plaxton Panther LE does not carry standees.

Replied here:
 

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
5,101
Location
Great Britain
I think he's trying to suggest that there's some major extraction of passengers between Oswestry and Wrexham, not withstanding it only runs every two hours whilst the Arriva 2/2A service runs every 30 mins during the daytime (and has an hourly eve/Sun service).

However, the T12 is really just a conjoining of the former Crosville S22 and D71, latterly tendered routes 522 and 71, with an enhancement between Newtown and Welshpool
The way that I took it was that John was implying the Welsh Government is trying to boost Traws Cymru passenger numbers by rebranding existing routes. If TrawsCymru reports passenger numbers jump by 100,000, that's great news and gives the Welsh Govt something to brag about. It does however miss the major point that the increase was only possible because 120,000 passengers were from the original tendered buses which are now rebranded and infact, the equivalent network had a 20,000 passenger drop, it's only had an increase because of the rebranded routes.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,927
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
The way that I took it was that John was implying the Welsh Government is trying to boost Traws Cymru passenger numbers by rebranding existing routes. If TrawsCymru reports passenger numbers jump by 100,000, that's great news and gives the Welsh Govt something to brag about. It does however miss the major point that the increase was only possible because 120,000 passengers were from the original tendered buses which are now rebranded and infact, the equivalent network had a 20,000 passenger drop, it's only had an increase because of the rebranded routes.

The annual report though points out there are no comparable figures for the T12 year on year; they do break it down route by route https://gov.wales/sites/default/files/publications/2020-12/trawscymru-annual-report-2019-to-2020.pdf see page 5. John has pointed out some errors (though has missed others) as evidence of some sinister, malevolent practice when it's that poorly executed, it smacks of cock up rather than conspiracy i.e. if you were gonna lie, you'd do a better job of it!!! Page 8 has a true howler in this respect.....
 

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
5,101
Location
Great Britain
The annual report though points out there are no comparable figures for the T12 year on year; they do break it down route by route https://gov.wales/sites/default/files/publications/2020-12/trawscymru-annual-report-2019-to-2020.pdf see page 5. John has pointed out some errors (though has missed others) as evidence of some sinister, malevolent practice when it's that poorly executed, it smacks of cock up rather than conspiracy i.e. if you were gonna lie, you'd do a better job of it!!! Page 8 has a true howler in this respect.....
Good points. I did miss the annual report. Just saying how I interpreted what John was saying. If he meant actual revenue extraction from non Traws commercial routes, there is extraction there. I've seen it first hand on the T3 and I believe the T12 is similar on some sections. The T3 does get people to the Maelor though so it would be difficult to do anything to stop people getting on in Ruabon going to Wrexham or even doing Wrexham to Llangollen because of the situation with the hospital. T2, you could argue revenue extraction against the X28 which is on the same frequency. There is revenue extraction there. The issue comes with some of the routes being commercial in part so it's a case of working out what is funded, what is commercial and then, is there any revenue extraction or is it commercial competition. There is a huge difference and that is something which needs looking at to help us all out here.

I do miss what you are saying about Page 8 though.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,927
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
Good points. I did miss the annual report. Just saying how I interpreted what John was saying. If he meant actual revenue extraction from non Traws commercial routes, there is extraction there. I've seen it first hand on the T3 and I believe the T12 is similar on some sections. The T3 does get people to the Maelor though so it would be difficult to do anything to stop people getting on in Ruabon going to Wrexham or even doing Wrexham to Llangollen because of the situation with the hospital. T2, you could argue revenue extraction against the X28 which is on the same frequency. There is revenue extraction there. The issue comes with some of the routes being commercial in part so it's a case of working out what is funded, what is commercial and then, is there any revenue extraction or is it commercial competition. There is a huge difference and that is something which needs looking at to help us all out here.

I do miss what you are saying about Page 8 though.

The level of revenue abstraction is pretty limited. As with Bangor to Caernarfon, the Oswestry to Wrexham section is superimposed over an existing service that has a much higher frequency. Regular passengers (with passes) are simply going to choose the Arriva ticket, and even for the majority of opportunistic journeys, they are going to be on the much more frequent service. There will be some abstraction but it will be limited.

I might be wrong in this but I think the T2 was the old TrawsCambria X32 (again funded by WG) and operated by Arriva using Daf Commanders from 2005/6, so predating the X28 by some years; if anything, the X28 is attempting to abstract trade from the T2! The introduction of the X32 was a major change. Before this (or at least in the mid 1990s), the service from Caernarfon to Dolgellau was the 2, only running to/from Mach/Aber on a Sunday. Instead, the Dolgellau to Aber service was, at that point, the 94A. All routes connected at Eldon Sq in Dolgellau with the 94 and probably one of the Tywyn routes, and I think all you had was the 94A every two hours (with a B series National) via Mach to Aberystwyth.

As for page 8, under Dealing with Covid 19, it says
"In March 2019 the network experienced the unprecendented challenges presented by the Covid 19 public health
emergency".....apart from the typo for "unprecedented", they were ahead of the curve by about 12 months!
 

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
5,101
Location
Great Britain
The level of revenue abstraction is pretty limited. As with Bangor to Caernarfon, the Oswestry to Wrexham section is superimposed over an existing service that has a much higher frequency. Regular passengers (with passes) are simply going to choose the Arriva ticket, and even for the majority of opportunistic journeys, they are going to be on the much more frequent service. There will be some abstraction but it will be limited.

I might be wrong in this but I think the T2 was the old TrawsCambria X32 (again funded by WG) and operated by Arriva using Daf Commanders from 2005/6, so predating the X28 by some years; if anything, the X28 is attempting to abstract trade from the T2! The introduction of the X32 was a major change. Before this (or at least in the mid 1990s), the service from Caernarfon to Dolgellau was the 2, only running to/from Mach/Aber on a Sunday. Instead, the Dolgellau to Aber service was, at that point, the 94A. All routes connected at Eldon Sq in Dolgellau with the 94 and probably one of the Tywyn routes, and I think all you had was the 94A every two hours (with a B series National) via Mach to Aberystwyth.

As for page 8, under Dealing with Covid 19, it says
"In March 2019 the network experienced the unprecendented challenges presented by the Covid 19 public health
emergency".....apart from the typo for "unprecedented", they were ahead of the curve by about 12 months!
I disagree with you in some parts there. I think that while yes there may be a higher frequency, sometimes people favour speed over frequency and others get the first bus which comes. I've seen many a lower frequency route succeed against a higher frequency one on the same corridor.

The T2, while yes the X28 may be extracting from the T2, you have to remember, that isn't how the world works. You can't have taxpayers subsidising against commercial routes. It's a waste of public funds and is actually illegal. Maybe you don't mind public funds going to waste to intentionally put commercial companies out of business but I and a lot of others certainly don't want public funds doing that.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,927
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
I disagree with you in some parts there. I think that while yes there may be a higher frequency, sometimes people favour speed over frequency and others get the first bus which comes. I've seen many a lower frequency route succeed against a higher frequency one on the same corridor.

The T2, while yes the X28 may be extracting from the T2, you have to remember, that isn't how the world works. You can't have taxpayers subsidising against commercial routes. It's a waste of public funds and is actually illegal. Maybe you don't mind public funds going to waste to intentionally put commercial companies out of business but I and a lot of others certainly don't want public funds doing that.
As I said, there will some abstraction but it will be limited. In terms of regular travellers, the frequency of the Arriva service massively outweighs the FOUR T12 journeys per day from Oswestry to Wrexham. That and the lack of an evening or Sunday service means that regular travellers, and most opportunistic journeys, will still favour the main Arriva service. Yes, you'll get the people who'll get the first bus they see, or might specifically go for the T12 in terms of speed, but I'd suggest the level of abstraction is actually relatively low. Even lower on the T2 between Bangor and Caernarfon where the time variance between that and the 5C is negligible.

I am very well versed in how the world works, thank you. I was being flippant! The fact is that these aren't public funds that are being used to intentionally put commercial companies out of business. They are providing links from further afield that happen to overlay commercial routes. However, they do so at lower frequencies in order to minimise the abstraction and so avoid the potential for legal conflict. Were they to avoid any duplication over commercial services, the T2 would run from Machynlleth to Penygroes, or the T3 would run from Barmouth to Llangollen which would be crazy. It makes sense to run to the obvious traffic objective with an enforced change (the Gateshead principle for want of a better phrase) but not at a frequency that would significantly abstract trade from the existing commercial services.
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,859
I don't know about the T11 however the T12 can hardly be accused of stealing passengers as there wasn't a service to steal from! It might not be the best use of the WG's funds, however there isn't a commercial service over the route!
Before the T11 there were the 413 (Fishguard - St. Davids) and 411 (St. Davids - Haverfordwest), both of which were (if I recall correctly) local authority supported (although there may have been the odd journey that didn't have 'PCC' (for 'provided by Pembrokeshire County Council') at the top of the column on the timetable - there certainly was on the 412 (which is now half of the T5)). Both the 411 and 413 were removed and replaced by the T11. Personally I think they should have kept the service number as 411 just as the 460 is still the 460 despite now being a TrawsCymruConnect service.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,927
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
Before the T11 there were the 413 (Fishguard - St. Davids) and 411 (St. Davids - Haverfordwest), both of which were (if I recall correctly) local authority supported (although there may have been the odd journey that didn't have 'PCC' (for 'provided by Pembrokeshire County Council') at the top of the column on the timetable - there certainly was on the 412 (which is now half of the T5)). Both the 411 and 413 were removed and replaced by the T11. Personally I think they should have kept the service number as 411 just as the 460 is still the 460 despite now being a TrawsCymruConnect service.
I think @carlberry is alluding to commercial services that could be adversely affected by the rebranding of the 411/413 as the less than all new T11.

However, you do raise an interesting point. Given that it was a "new" through route, and all other TrawsCymru (TC) routes have a T prefix, it would have been anomalous for it to retain 411, yet this route appears as a TC Connect route on the map as does the T12. However, the 460 and X43 are also TC Connect so what makes something a TCC route, how they are identified and promoted?

I know the T12 is operated by vehicles in full TC Connect livery; been a while since I was in West Wales so don't know if the T11 is similarly done whilst the X43 is also operated by TC Connect liveried vehicles so doesn't look like any hard and fast policy.
 

RELL6L

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
1,258
I think @carlberry is alluding to commercial services that could be adversely affected by the rebranding of the 411/413 as the less than all new T11.

However, you do raise an interesting point. Given that it was a "new" through route, and all other TrawsCymru (TC) routes have a T prefix, it would have been anomalous for it to retain 411, yet this route appears as a TC Connect route on the map as does the T12. However, the 460 and X43 are also TC Connect so what makes something a TCC route, how they are identified and promoted?

I know the T12 is operated by vehicles in full TC Connect livery; been a while since I was in West Wales so don't know if the T11 is similarly done whilst the X43 is also operated by TC Connect liveried vehicles so doesn't look like any hard and fast policy.
I was in Pembrokeshire last autumn and I saw a couple of T11s in St Davids, they were in TC livery. Before the 411 and 413 were connected the 411 Haverfordwest to St Davids was basically hourly, now the T11 is only two hourly, which is a poor main connection for a town, sorry city, of significance if not size. It does not appear that the T11 connects particularly well with the train to Haverfordwest which is also two hourly, but it isn't that easy to achieve with a two hourly service given the actual train times.
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,859
the 411 Haverfordwest to St Davids was basically hourly, now the T11 is only two hourly, which is a poor main connection for a town, sorry city, of significance if not size.
If I recall correctly the T11 was initially hourly (at least between St. Davids and Haverfordwest, I forget what it was between St. Davids and Fishguard but if I recall correctly it was a slight improvement on the 413). I expect the two-hourly service you're seeing now is a result of COVID-19 induced cutbacks. There are quite a few of those in the area. The T5 has more two hour gaps in the schedule than it used and the hourly First Cymru 348 (Haverfordwest - Pembroke Dock - Monkton) appears to have gone completely.
 

krus_aragon

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Messages
6,105
Location
North Wales
A recent change to the rail routeing guide has introduced advance purchase routes "via Carmarthen" , which are apparently for through rail/bus journeys:

On Thursday, the following change was published in the routeing guide:
Changes from 06 Aug 2021 (344) to 12 Aug 2021 (345).

Route changes:

Changed (added sections in red, removed ones in green):

From:
AP CARMARTHEN (07772) (24 records)
must go via Carmarthen (CMN)
This is a new route, which is only defined for journeys from 5th September, so I don't know how noteworthy this change is.
Subesquent messages in that thread cover the rail/bus nature of the 24 records.
 

Bwsbro

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2013
Messages
412
A recent change to the rail routeing guide has introduced advance purchase routes "via Carmarthen" , which are apparently for through rail/bus journeys:


Subesquent messages in that thread cover the rail/bus nature of the 24 records.
Looks like possible through tickets on the T1?
 

Markdvdman

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2011
Messages
496
Location
Merthyr Tydfil / Gorslas
Dai - getting rid of the T1C would stop Cross hands getting public transport to Cardiff/Aberystwyth without major hiccups. Do you think that is a fair synopsis? The T1C could be great with a better service and a better operator! NAT own the coach (Oh sorry Adventure Travel) but sublet it to another operator to run it. There is no tracking on it - it could be so much better if run by Adventure Travel!
 

Bwsbro

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2013
Messages
412
Dai - getting rid of the T1C would stop Cross hands getting public transport to Cardiff/Aberystwyth without major hiccups. Do you think that is a fair synopsis? The T1C could be great with a better service and a better operator! NAT own the coach (Oh sorry Adventure Travel) but sublet it to another operator to run it. There is no tracking on it - it could be so much better if run by Adventure Travel!
The T1C is subcontracted to Mid Wales Travel who also operate parts of the T1 for first and Megabus from Aberystywth to Cardiff. The T1C tracks daily on the TrawsCymru app and on Bus times
 

carlberry

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2014
Messages
3,169
Dai - getting rid of the T1C would stop Cross hands getting public transport to Cardiff/Aberystwyth without major hiccups. Do you think that is a fair synopsis? The T1C could be great with a better service and a better operator! NAT own the coach (Oh sorry Adventure Travel) but sublet it to another operator to run it. There is no tracking on it - it could be so much better if run by Adventure Travel!
It is run by Adventure Travel, it's their choice to sublet it!
 

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,990
Dai - getting rid of the T1C would stop Cross hands getting public transport to Cardiff/Aberystwyth without major hiccups. Do you think that is a fair synopsis? The T1C could be great with a better service and a better operator! NAT own the coach (Oh sorry Adventure Travel) but sublet it to another operator to run it. There is no tracking on it - it could be so much better if run by Adventure Travel!
Bus to Carmarthen (for the T1 to Aberystwyth) or Llanelli (for train to Cardiff)?

(Incidentally, I lived in Gorslas as a young boy in the early 60s. As far as I remember we went everywhere by car, even back then).
 

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
5,101
Location
Great Britain
I emailed NAT/Adventure Travel about the T1C and the reply was simply 'you will have to contact Transport for Wales as they deal with it'. So your point that NAT might deal with it better I believe are false on this occasion. They don't want anything to do with it it seems.
 

johntrawscymru

On Moderation
Joined
22 Jun 2018
Messages
118
I emailed NAT/Adventure Travel about the T1C and the reply was simply 'you will have to contact Transport for Wales as they deal with it'. So your point that NAT might deal with it better I believe are false on this occasion. They don't want anything to do with it it seems.
You may well be embarking on the magic roundabout.
In 2018 I asked the Welsh Government to consider a change to the departure time of the T1C (Aberystwyth to Cardiff coach service introduced in April 2018) from 9.30am to 9.25am and asked for more T1C services to be provided. The Welsh Government said that the T1C service was the responsibility of the Council managing the T1C contract (Ceredigion Council). The leader of Ceredigion council, said : “As this service is part of a strategic bus route and is the responsibility of Ken Skates AM, Cabinet Secretary for Economic Development and Transport, I suggest that you refer this matter to him directly.”
 

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
5,101
Location
Great Britain
You may well be embarking on the magic roundabout.
In 2018 I asked the Welsh Government to consider a change to the departure time of the T1C (Aberystwyth to Cardiff coach service introduced in April 2018) from 9.30am to 9.25am and asked for more T1C services to be provided. The Welsh Government said that the T1C service was the responsibility of the Council managing the T1C contract (Ceredigion Council). The leader of Ceredigion council, said : “As this service is part of a strategic bus route and is the responsibility of Ken Skates AM, Cabinet Secretary for Economic Development and Transport, I suggest that you refer this matter to him directly.”
Oh Yippee. The unaccountable Welsh governments. You've got to love it haven't you. There are moneys who are held more accountable for their actions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top