pdeaves
Established Member
Indeed. I intended 'was once in this category' as it was, but no longer is, 'national network'.W&C still has no track connection.
Indeed. I intended 'was once in this category' as it was, but no longer is, 'national network'.W&C still has no track connection.
Depending on what exactly you count, branches like Sudbury may be candidates in normal service (the only track connection to the rest of the world being used to get a unit on and off the branch at each end of the day). There will be numerous other similar examples.
For 'no track connection at all', there will be very few. The Waterloo & City line was once in this category until passed to London Underground.
However, some services run as self contained shuttles. The Bromley North, Stourbridge Town, Looe and St Ives lines all run self contained during normal service, but share connection.
Merseyrail can’t operate independently at Chester as the platform is shared and the access to it crosses lines used by other trains.Other examples which theoretically could run without interference from the outside network are the Far North Line, by virtue of separate platforms at Inverness, and Merseyrail similarly with separate platforms at Ellesmere Port and Chester.
The first St Ives train of the day starts back at Penzance and the last departure runs through to Penzance, but everything else during the day is self contained
Merseyrail can’t operate independently at Chester as the platform is shared and the access to it crosses lines used by other trains.
Chester and Hunts Cross are the only two Merseyrail termini involving physical junctions with other lines (plus Bidston, a TfW terminus involving through running onto Merseyrail track). Southport (and Ellesmere Port?) of course has the possibility of through running but the others end in buffer stops.Yes, but these are two route which theoretically could be segregated completely. They obviously aren't for operational reasons, but it is still possible, especially with the long proposed new island at Chester.
That would involve the depot only being accessible from the east end of the station - can’t imagine they would be too keen on that.Yes, but these are two route which theoretically could be segregated completely. They obviously aren't for operational reasons, but it is still possible, especially with the long proposed new island at Chester.
It's 4ft gauge, not standard gauge, so it has to be. On the subject of underground lines, the Waterloo & City is effectively independent of both National Rail and London Underground - the only connection being a hoist-type affair.The Glasgow subway is self contained.
I think it was Serpell 2A that proposed closure of the Cambrian Lines but retention of the VoR; that would really have meant isolation.Holyhead breakwater operated separately for a period
Think it was like that in 1980s but don’t know the dates
The narrow gauge Vale of Rheidal railway might have been separate (unless the tracks actually had a crossing of standard gauge) which was part of BR until end of 1980s
The hoist was north-west of the main Waterloo station, and was removed when the international platforms were built in the early '90s.On the subject of underground lines, the Waterloo & City is effectively independent of both National Rail and London Underground - the only connection being a hoist-type affair.
Not in the UK, but the Waterford and Tramore Railway in Ireland was never connected to the rest of the network.
All of Cornwall and a fair bit of Devon in fact,Previous posts mentioned temporarily “disconnected” parts of network due to natural weather events .
Most of the Cornwall was separated from the network, when Dawlish seawall and its tracks were washed away .
All in here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cork_City_RailwaysQuestion: did the same apply to the railway lines south of Cork, before the cross-city lines connected them up to the main network? And did any of them remain open after the cross-city lines were shut?
Though IIRC there have in the past been peak-hours trains running directly between the Sheerness line and London (and vice versa), via the west curve at Sittingbourne.The Sheerness branch is also ran as a self contained service except for a few depot moves.
The Bideford, Westward Ho! & Appledore Railway was an independent company and closed pre-grouping (1917). Famously, the locomotives had to be steamed across Bideford's ancient road bridge on temporary track to the L&SWR sidings on the other side of the river, for disposal.Were any of these ever part of BR or the SR? Bideford may have been.
Morning and evening peak services, plus the last up[ trains of the day.Are there any through services from the main line to the Southminster branch in Essex ?
Morning and evening peak services, plus the last up[ trains of the day.