• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

If a Class 442 was to be kept for charter work...

Status
Not open for further replies.

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,387
I think if one was kept mainline registered for charters it'd be better as one or two of the original dc ones, taking into account the earlier talk of something being wrong with the AC conversion.?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,840
It seems some people just can't let go based on this thread. The SWR units are being stripped of bits - they're effectively under a destruction order.
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,387
Note I said "if". I don't personally see anything being kept in one piece except for the one car of 2401.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,840
Note I said "if". I don't personally see anything being kept in one piece except for the one car of 2401.
Yep - it wasn't specifically aimed at you. There's plenty of other posts about charter sets!
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,387
Yep - it wasn't specifically aimed at you. There's plenty of other posts about charter sets!
OK no worries. I'm just glad I cemented my memories of them in their original (GatEx) form, on the ROG railtour a few years back.

It's like anything in life really, nothing lasts forever. Just have to accept the past into memory and move on.
 

D6975

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
3,050
Location
Bristol
I think if one was kept mainline registered for charters it'd be better as one or two of the original dc ones, taking into account the earlier talk of something being wrong with the AC conversion.?
Or just remove the motor coaches from 2 sets and drag them around? :) ;)
 

Train wasp

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2010
Messages
140
Or just remove the motor coaches from 2 sets and drag them around? :) ;)

What about putting diesel power units under the coaches and running them on the West of England service Via Basingstoke and reclassifying them 742,s :)
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,640
Location
Hampshire
I'm glad I didn't ride them since they left the SW the first time around, so as to not ruin the memory of their actual original form with the snug area and first class compartments!

It would have been nice to see a set or two saved for charter use, but there's a limited market for such uses and the 5-BEL will have that sewn up. I'd also have no interest in riding them in refurbished form, and returning them to an as-built state would be expensive and difficult.

They were excellent in that era - the FC compartments were a much missed memory, as was the buffet itself. It was certainly fair to say that the Southern refurbishment really did rip the heart and soul out of them and they've never been as good (or as reliable) ever since.

I do agree though that I'm surprised no tour operator has snapped any of them up yet - While there is the 5 BEL, it hasn't stopped Mr H come up with a number of dining operations with his various sets: eg the Saphos with Mk1s, Statesman with Mk2s, Intercity / Blue Pullman with Mk3s. And yes, I am well aware there is a TDO on them!
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,354
Location
Yorkshire
They were excellent in that era - the FC compartments were a much missed memory, as was the buffet itself. It was certainly fair to say that the Southern refurbishment really did rip the heart and soul out of them and they've never been as good (or as reliable) ever since.

I do agree though that I'm surprised no tour operator has snapped any of them up yet - While there is the 5 BEL, it hasn't stopped Mr H come up with a number of dining operations with his various sets: eg the Saphos with Mk1s, Statesman with Mk2s, Intercity / Blue Pullman with Mk3s. And yes, I am well aware there is a TDO on them!
Had the pandemic not happened there may have been more potential in saving a couple for that sort of operation... but then had the pandemic not happened they might well be running along the Pompey Direct by now!

It's suggested upthread that the units are effectively (if not actually) under a "total destruction order" by way of being stripped down. Perhaps SWR/Shapps don't like the idea of a "look what you could've won!" situation arising as a result of a 442 charter picking up at the harbour! ;)
 

ChilternTurbo

Member
Joined
15 Jun 2016
Messages
323
They were excellent in that era - the FC compartments were a much missed memory, as was the buffet itself. It was certainly fair to say that the Southern refurbishment really did rip the heart and soul out of them and they've never been as good (or as reliable) ever since.
Pretty much this. I have fond memories of being about 6 years old and travelling down to Weymouth with my parents when they were introduced. I remember them having that 'new car' (or rather train!) aroma and being wowed by the swish looking compartments and buffet. Sadly these memories were sullied by using them on Gatwick Express services years later with the cheapo retrograde refurb. I was even less endeared to them when one I was travelling on failed outside East Croydon and I made a flight with minutes to spare.

It would be nice to see a carriage saved and put back into Network South-East livery at somewhere like Shildon. Sadly, I don't think it would be at all easy to put the interior back to it's original configuration.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,345
Sadly, I don't think it would be at all easy to put the interior back to it's original configuration.
Still enough seat frames in the Greater Anglia 321 fleet to restore at least one carriage to the original interior. The motor coach and first class coach would obviously be a more complicated project though.
 

ChilternTurbo

Member
Joined
15 Jun 2016
Messages
323
Still enough seat frames in the Greater Anglia 321 fleet to restore at least one carriage to the original interior. The motor coach and first class coach would obviously be a more complicated project though.
Oh right, I didn't realise they were the same seats. My memories of these in their original configuration are rather hazy!
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,345
Oh right, I didn't realise they were the same seats. My memories of these in their original configuration are rather hazy!
First class seats in the 321s are the same as the original standard class seats in the 442s - however, the motor coach got different (and unique to the class) seat frames when the seating area was first extended into the luggage compartment.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
Other than maybe a driving coach going to the NRM, I think the rest of the fleet should be stripped of parts that can be used either with HST Mk3 coaches or other MK3 coaches still being used.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,279
Other than maybe a driving coach going to the NRM, I think the rest of the fleet should be stripped of parts that can be used either with HST Mk3 coaches or other MK3 coaches still being used.
Why wouldn’t they have already stripped more than enough spares than they’ll ever need from all the ex-HST or high speed Mk3 hauled vehicles? This is clutching at straws again…
 

VEP3417

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2011
Messages
710
Location
Hampshire
whats the actual problem with loco hauling them or just 1 for rail tour purposes, or would that require a lot of modification just to do that
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
Why wouldn’t they have already stripped more than enough spares than they’ll ever need from all the ex-HST or high speed Mk3 hauled vehicles? This is clutching at straws again…
No more so than those stating about using the 442's for railtours! As the old saying goes, every little helps!
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,187
No more so than those stating about using the 442's for railtours! As the old saying goes, every little helps!
Why does it concern us whether or not spares are recovered? It’s Angel Trains’ problem and makes not one iota of difference to anyone outside of the train companies.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,640
Location
Hampshire
Other than maybe a driving coach going to the NRM, I think the rest of the fleet should be stripped of parts that can be used either with HST Mk3 coaches or other MK3 coaches still being used.

*Not the NRM / future unknown.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,786
Location
Somewhere, not in London
whats the actual problem with loco hauling them or just 1 for rail tour purposes, or would that require a lot of modification just to do that
No ETS for one.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Why does it concern us whether or not spares are recovered? It’s Angel Trains’ problem and makes not one iota of difference to anyone outside of the train companies.
It's actually SWR's they've taken possession of them.
 

Paul Jones 88

Member
Joined
15 Dec 2020
Messages
446
Location
Headcorn
Re 442s, I wonder how easy it would be to have a 442 cab at a heritage railway that acts as a simulator for as a close as possible main line driving experience, I would most definitely be using it, no one would employ me to drive a real train because of my dodgy eyes.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,574
Location
Northampton
Re 442s, I wonder how easy it would be to have a 442 cab at a heritage railway that acts as a simulator for as a close as possible main line driving experience, I would most definitely be using it, no one would employ me to drive a real train because of my dodgy eyes.
It would be well beyond any heritage railway's budget. You'd need to design the computer simulation, work out which lines you want to simulate and what scenarios to offer, then train somebody to operate the simulation whilst the punters are at the controls. A cab-view video on a loop, so that people could sit at the controls and get a 'drivers-eye' view of the run from Woking to Basingstoke, or similar would be manageable though.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,354
Location
Yorkshire
Re 442s, I wonder how easy it would be to have a 442 cab at a heritage railway that acts as a simulator for as a close as possible main line driving experience, I would most definitely be using it, no one would employ me to drive a real train because of my dodgy eyes.
The best bet for any sort of "virtual driving experience" type thing would probably have to wait for an existing driver training simulator to be replaced. Perhaps Science Museum Group could work with GBR to secure one when the time comes, as it would probably get folk through the doors (or rather off the other end of the footbridge) at York.
 

Rick1984

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2012
Messages
1,145
Have two units sandwiching a class 33
(This is not a serious suggestion)
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,035
Location
St Albans
Most of the posts in this thread are calling for preserving the 442s in some obscure way that would only be of interest to EMU fans. Given that maintaining anything that is effectively obsolete for mainline access is ridiculously expensive requiring regular revenue earning service to pay for it, any target market would be very small and way short of them paying their way.
It's difficult enough for the majority of steam heritage operations to stay viable where there is at least a novel spectacle seeing a smoky steamy noisy machine for the lay public to be entertained by, but to them a fully refurbished EMU is not really different to one's that they might go to work on. They certainly wouldn't dream of paying heritage premium prices for arise in a normal 'electric train'.
 

CBlue

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2020
Messages
859
Location
East Angular
Most of the posts in this thread are calling for preserving the 442s in some obscure way that would only be of interest to EMU fans. Given that maintaining anything that is effectively obsolete for mainline access is ridiculously expensive requiring regular revenue earning service to pay for it, any target market would be very small and way short of them paying their way.
It's difficult enough for the majority of steam heritage operations to stay viable where there is at least a novel spectacle seeing a smoky steamy noisy machine for the lay public to be entertained by, but to them a fully refurbished EMU is not really different to one's that they might go to work on. They certainly wouldn't dream of paying heritage premium prices for arise in a normal 'electric train'.
Ah, but... <Insert comments about 3rd rail world speed record here>
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,035
Location
St Albans
Ah, but... <Insert comments about 3rd rail world speed record here>
Even that's not much of a record. The only country with mainline 3rd rail running (i.e. 100mph) manages to get one of it's highest powered multiple units to do a fast run, just 9mph above normal linespeed. If one of the LNR Class 350/1 sets had shoes put back on (and any current software bars on DC running removed), it could do 110mph in service (PW dept permitting on 3rd rail).
 

VEP3417

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2011
Messages
710
Location
Hampshire
interesting to note that most emus that have been preserved, most havnt been restored and and are sat around, only a small number have been, and not to mane line working condition, so it seems at the moment theres no real love for anything that isnt a steam train

only the demu thumper and the brighton bell and the tc set i think are the closest things mainline rail worthy, is a shame as there is a gap in the market for that sort of thing, a small gap but still, for me being on that tc set hauled by some 73s was more interesting that a steam or diesel tour...mabey im alone in thinking that :lol:
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,574
Location
Northampton
interesting to note that most emus that have been preserved, most havnt been restored and and are sat around, only a small number have been, and not to mane line working condition, so it seems at the moment theres no real love for anything that isnt a steam train

only the demu thumper and the brighton bell and the tc set i think are the closest things mainline rail worthy, is a shame as there is a gap in the market for that sort of thing, a small gap but still, for me being on that tc set hauled by some 73s was more interesting that a steam or diesel tour...mabey im alone in thinking that :lol:
BIB is the problem - as was explained above, it costs a fortune to maintain things to mainline standards, and to fund that you have to be able to sell enough seats at a high enough price. You can't run a silver-service dining like the Brighton Belle or fill trains with grandparents and grandchildren like a steam train using a 442. If the only people who are going to go on it are people who were living around the SWML in 1987 then I don't really see how the business remains afloat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top