Considering it hasn't even been announced officially yet, or will be in much detail, those questions won't be answered fully any time soon. GRIP is gone/going anyway and already has a replacement.Just a few of questions on the granularity of responsibilty:
Who will be responsible for Transport and Works Acts preparation?
Who will have the grip on Grip ?
Inherent in the above - who will have the responsibility for delivering and paying for the national decarbonisation strategy?
Does this mean the end of TfN - but the survival of TfW?
The term "slash costs" is much bandied - who,what,where,when,how?????
According to The Guardian, the name for this new organisation will be 'Great British Railways'. Is there any need for the 'Great' bit? No doubt the Union Jack flag will be plastered all over the new livery as well.![]()

Hahaha! There will be 442s for all on Great British Railways!What is wrong with that?
I know a very tasteful livery in those colours which is very popular with people on here
You could showcase it on a 442 too (look, I got them into the thread!)
I can't believe the naivety of the name. The first time there is a major disruption or shutdown, the headlines write themselves. Either that's a try-on - to see how much the press will believe, or the current batch of politicians really do think they can run a railway better than anyone else ever has!
Mussolini managed it..... Just sayin'....I can't believe the naivety of the name. The first time there is a major disruption or shutdown, the headlines write themselves. Either that's a try-on - to see how much the press will believe, or the current batch of politicians really do think they can run a railway better than anyone else ever has!
or my favourite, Going Nowhere Except Retford!And earlier than that, the ‘Late and Never Early Railway’, WC and Pee etc...
LMS, "Hell of a mess!"or my favourite, Going Nowhere Except Retford!
I can't believe the naivety of the name. The first time there is a major disruption or shutdown, the headlines write themselves.
Maybe we should follow the continent and use Ironroad instead of Railways? SNCGB maybe? Although I don't think the abbreviation for Ferrovie UK would be a sensible choice...As was said above, is there any railway name that can't be corrupted? Given that you can do rail->fail there probably isn't.
Also 'Lose 'em, Mix 'em and Smash 'em'.LMS, "Hell of a mess!"
I think they should just name go with BR rather than GBR. Makes me think of the Great British Bakeoff...
Mussolini managed it..... Just sayin'....

Brilliant!Maybe we should follow the continent and use Ironroad instead of Railways? SNCGB maybe? Although I don't think the abbreviation for Ferrovie UK would be a sensible choice...![]()
According to The Guardian, the name for this new organisation will be 'Great British Railways'. Is there any need for the 'Great' bit? No doubt the Union Jack flag will be plastered all over the new livery as well.
![]()
UK railways brace for shake-up and cuts as long-overdue review arrives
Biggest change since 90s privatisation looks to halt franchise failures, reform fares and, for the Treasury, slash costswww.theguardian.com
I'm hoping that this will just be the name over the overall body responsible for it all, and that the region specific, but operator neutral names that have been given to franchises in the last few years will stay. So every English region will have a region specific name like now - GWR, EMR, WMR, West Coast, East Coast etc. And of course TfW in Wales and ScotRail in Scotland. But knowing this government i'm not holding my breath.
Maybe we should follow the continent and use Ironroad instead of Railways? SNCGB maybe? Although I don't think the abbreviation for Ferrovie UK would be a sensible choice...![]()


If you've been following Network Rail's chairman Sir Peter Hendy on Twitter over the past year, you'll be aware this is a throwback to BR in more ways than one... in terms of design he has even personally pushed for
This is even stated in the latest Network Rail design guidelines, which state that the BR symbol should replace the Network Rail symbol for public use.
- a return of the BR "double arrows" symbol
- black-on-white signage
- and commissioned a new version of the "Rail Alphabet" typeface
Source: https://files.whatdotheyknow.com/request/request_for_updated_wayfinding_m/NR_GN_CIV_300_01.pdf
According to The Guardian, the name for this new organisation will be 'Great British Railways'. Is there any need for the 'Great' bit? No doubt the Union Jack flag will be plastered all over the new livery as well.![]()
Happy days!
Boringly drab to me. It needs a modern house style and livery. There is only one thing for it - get Best Impressions in and create desire for rail. Their work on London Midland was unrivalled.
It's no different to many of the Continental rail styles? It reminds be somewhat of the German railways design.

Ok call it British National Rail, BNR. Won't ever be mistaken for anything else less savoury.That's OK until you have 28 National Rails across Europe.
Or we have 3 National Rails in GB.
I think it needs a better descriptor.
Well I as under the impression with the new set-up the companies operating the franchises would become less visible anyway?Yeah, what are the chances of SNCF, DB, Trenitalia or NS getting involved in running British trains.
Oh wait.
Finding it ironically amusing that the thread on the biggest change to the rail industry in this country for 30 years has degenerated into a discussion about branding and nomenclature.
Feel free to give us your in-depth analysis of the other more important issues then!Finding it ironically amusing that the thread on the biggest change to the rail industry in this country for 30 years has degenerated into a discussion about branding and nomenclature.
Great British Rake-off (if TPE's class 68 and Mk5a coaches part company en route).LMS, "Hell of a mess!"
I think they should just name go with BR rather than GBR. Makes me think of the Great British Bakeoff...
Ironically amusing, or just predictable?Finding it ironically amusing that the thread on the biggest change to the rail industry in this country for 30 years has degenerated into a discussion about branding and nomenclature.