• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Could Northern order more Class 195 units?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
That article is about ordering more 331s, not 195s. The DfT are heavily against ordering new diesel-only stock into the 2020s, and you can't exactly blame them. What I'd much prefer to see is, once some real data about how passenger numbers will look post-covid, an order to standardise the DMU fleet going in. I think a bi-mode with sufficient commonality to the 195 seems unlikely, so if not that, then something similar to the 755s. They'd be looking at replacing at least the 150s, 153s, 155s and 156s. By the time it actually happens, quite possibly the 158s too. That's a big order, especially if it's done from a national standpoint rather than franchise-specific and it'd need to be done right.
 

squizzler

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2017
Messages
1,912
Location
Jersey, Channel Islands
Oops posted in wrong thread :)

Since I’m here, I agree with ordering new 195s. Cheap and cheerful product, a statement of intent that gets Northern back into growth mode after pandemic.
 
Last edited:

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
I don’t see any need at top-down standardisation as the different manufacturers seem to have ended up occupying specific niches. Each niche seems to be tending towards a duopoly situation. That might not be the most competitive but is sustainable (think Airbus vs Boeing, Intel vs AMD, Ford vs Vauxhall GE vs EMD). For example:

Intercity EMU: Hitachi AT300, Stadler Flirt
Regional EMU: Bombardier Aventra, CAF Civity
Suburban EMU: Siemens Desiro City, Bombardier Aventra
Regional DMU: CAF Civity, Stadler Flirt

The Roscos seem increasingly to pick between two firms dominating each segment but still willing to try the odd micro fleet to keep the incumbents on their toes such as the TPE Nova 2 and 3.

We have reached this point after decades of private stock ownership and I would be loathe to meddle is at last a mature market.
True, but 150/153/155/156/158/170/195/319/323/331/333 could definitely be shrunk down a bit. More 195s would have been an obvious answer years ago, but now? I'm not so sure.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
6,430
Location
Sheffield
That article is about ordering more 331s, not 195s. The DfT are heavily against ordering new diesel-only stock into the 2020s, and you can't exactly blame them. What I'd much prefer to see is, once some real data about how passenger numbers will look post-covid, an order to standardise the DMU fleet going in. I think a bi-mode with sufficient commonality to the 195 seems unlikely, so if not that, then something similar to the 755s. They'd be looking at replacing at least the 150s, 153s, 155s and 156s. By the time it actually happens, quite possibly the 158s too. That's a big order, especially if it's done from a national standpoint rather than franchise-specific and it'd need to be done right.
Post pandemic is the time to decide what needs ordering. Using the various 15x units for another 2 or 3 years until then seems sensible. By that time we may find we need fewer unis of all kinds. We may also know how soon more electrified mileage will become available to determine if hybrid units compatible with 195/333s might be viable.

Having travelled in 195s I can see them attracting more users, the majority of whom aren't bothered what method of propulsion is being used.
 

Halish Railway

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2017
Messages
2,173
Location
West Yorkshire / Birmingham
If we’re talking about 15x replacements and Northern are talking about more 331s, we could see more battery 331s post Windermere trials, although what services these trains can operate on is dependent on battery range and whether a recharging solution can be put in place at terminus stations.

Perhaps even tri-mode 331s can be on the cards, although if that is a potential solution then I would rather see 756s with a 100mph top speed instead of 75mph.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
112,941
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
By that time we may find we need fewer unis of all kinds.

Depends how we look at it, I suppose. You could maintain the pre-pandemic disgraceful levels of overcrowding and do a "2 for 3" thing again, but I'd prefer they brought quality back into rail travel and aimed for seats for all if that's viable, taking advantage of the slight drop in patronage - so ideally 1 (195/331) vehicle for 1 (15x vehicle) at least.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
6,430
Location
Sheffield
Depends how we look at it, I suppose. You could maintain the pre-pandemic disgraceful levels of overcrowding and do a "2 for 3" thing again, but I'd prefer they brought quality back into rail travel and aimed for seats for all if that's viable, taking advantage of the slight drop in patronage - so ideally 1 (195/331) vehicle for 1 (15x vehicle) at least.
Certainly need to be preparing to order replacements for 150s to enter service by 2030. That should mean more electric or other greener stock as the 195s displace older diesel units.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
7,434
Location
Northern England
Where is the money for an extra 195 order likely to come from?

Covid-19 has cost huge quantities of taxpayer money. There are going to have to be cuts somewhere, and I don't think the railways are going to come off lightly. With an increasingly squeezed budget, more shiny new trains for a franchise that has only just finished introducing it's last batch of shiny new trains isn't likely to be high on their list of priorities - however hated the 150s may be (and I despise the things as much as the next man), they have had a fairly comprehensive (if cheap) interior refresh over the past few years, and they do the job for now (albeit in a cramped, noisy, slow way)

Yes, the units can be financed by a ROSCO, but those costs will still eventually be passed onto the TOC, and therefore the government, via increased lease payments.
 

Dspatula

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
182
Location
Manchester
Northern clearly do have a big sprinter problem by the time the current contracts end in 2025 (assuming those contracts still apply) the 150s will be an average of 39 years old, 155/6s 37 and 158s 34. Currently these classes account for 384 of Nothern’s DMU carriages out of a total of 599 64% of self propelled stock.

For context the previous oldest DMU in the area was the class 101 at 47 years and current oldest stock in the 507 at 43 years old. I would stay that 45 years is the longest we can expect any of the 15x stock to last before it becomes uneconomical to maintain so 2030 for the 150s and 2035 for the 158s.

I also believe that stock is being replaced on a more or less total length basis case in point the original 195 order total length was 3343.25m to replace 3316.038m of pacer stock. The only units likely to be available and worth taking are the 50 158s to be released by TfW and EMR and, the 175s from TfW. 170 carriages total length 3969.82m which is about enough to cover the loss of the 150s, 153s and 155s, total length 3992.376m.

Even then Northern in 2025 are still going to be left with 308 carriages that need replacing over the next ten years. 769s are a factor but they’re not well proven and based a platform that’s a minimum also going to be 35 years by this time. Electrification from York to Huddersfield won’t release many units 2 to 4 185s and maybe 2 to 4 Northern units.

Any new electrification based on the previous north west scheme will take 6 to 10 years to be available after commitment to doing it has been established and there aren’t really any easy win lines to do;
  • Warrington Central is has quite a few units on local services but expresses that won’t benefit maybe more in the future, needs re-signalling, most likely will have geological issues and has political issues as what kind of line it’ll be the future i.e. tram-train.
  • Southport has the issues around Wigan Wallgate.
  • Calder Valley is the most ready in terms of route upgrades but the sheer number of tunnels and over bridges is going to push the price tag way up.
  • South Leeds commuter routes needs to go all the way Sheffield via Barnsley to be useful.
  • Sheffield north to Doncaster and Wakefield seems the most doable but doesn’t free very many DMUs.
  • Tram-train south east Manchester could remove 5 hourly diagrams probably saving 10 units.
Some unit saving could be made by pushing some routes around Sheffield on to EMR but that would almost certainly come with the requirement that the Northern 170s also move to EMR so a net neutral move at best.

Best case scenario York/Hull-Manchester, Leeds/Doncaster Sheffield fully wired and Manchester tram-train completed by 2035 around 150 DMU cars required to replace life expired DMUs so equivalent to the complete 195 e.g. 33x3 + 25x2 or just 50x3.

Worst case all the 156s and 158s need replacing in a short space of time that 308 carriages or 7131.76m of train which would require 100 3 car 195s to replace them. (102 based on carriage numbers)

The previous investment was £500 million for 281 carriages so assuming a pure DMU order would be more expensive around £325million for 150 or £650 million for 300 carriages? Although this is all academic while the government maintains its anti diesel stance.

Also of note is that GWR will have 43 158 carriages and SWR 110 158/9 carriages to replace on a similar time scale.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
18,096
With the dead hands of the Treasury and DfT involved I really can't see orders for new rolling stock being placed any time soon. I really do hope I'm wrong but what goes around comes around.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,722
I also believe that stock is being replaced on a more or less total length basis case in point the original 195 order total length was 3343.25m to replace 3316.038m of pacer stock.
That's way too simplistic a way of looking at it. You've ignored the extra 150s, 156s, 158s and 170s that have come in to the franchise and not even mentioned the additional EMUs.
 

Dspatula

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
182
Location
Manchester
That's way too simplistic a way of looking at it. You've ignored the extra 150s, 156s, 158s and 170s that have come in to the franchise and not even mentioned the additional EMUs.
It is and I ignored the other stock because they weren't relevant to my argument, I'm talking about replacement stock not additional stock. To me it looks like they sat down and said he have this length of stock they have to replace and that's more of less the length of new stock we're going to let you buy. It would hardly be the first time the people with pursue strings have made a decision based on the simplest factors and completely divorced from the reality on the ground.
With the dead hands of the Treasury and DfT involved I really can't see orders for new rolling stock being placed any time soon. I really do hope I'm wrong but what goes around comes around.
It'll come down to a question of which is cheaper, keeping the current stock going, investing in electrification, buying DMU new stock or waiting for some new magic bullet technology. Given the current situation no decision is likely any time soon and most likely the current stock will simply be worked into the ground, with add hoc solutions like 769s thrown around until either holding out for the magic bullet works or they're forced to order more DMUs either way it'll be at the last moment and cause huge disruption.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
5,135
Northern is in a difficult situation, 50 158s, 27 175s and 24 156s (not preferable though) are coming off lease but all are end doored giving them longer loading times and making them less suitable 150 replacements. It would make sense to use these to cascade the 195s to stopping routes but there aren't that many 195s in Northern's fleet.

There are 2 options I can think of:
  • Order more 195s, Stadlers would be nice but have a too short diesel range for a lot of Northern.
  • Electrification, doesn't matter where but either of Northern's routes or somewhere with modern DMUs.
Ordering more 195s is basically impossible, politically ordering new DMUs is very difficult and it will be hard to finance them, short term I think Northern will just have to keep the 150s running.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
112,941
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Ordering more 195s is basically impossible, politically ordering new DMUs is very difficult and it will be hard to finance them, short term I think Northern will just have to keep the 150s running.

769s perhaps? Though it depends if they're actually considerably cheaper than new. Progressive electrification would perhaps allow them to be binned after 10-20 years.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,262
Assuming noone has deliberately made 196s not compatible with 195s, I would prefer any Northern DMU order be composed of those.

However, ultimately I think they need something like a 755/3 or 755/4, with huge installed power to help speed up the timetable and allow some of the semi fasts to be jettisoned.
Sure acceleratin the stopper willi ncrease fuel consumption, but I doubt it would be enough to offset the fuel burned by running a semi fast!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
112,941
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Assuming noone has deliberately made 196s not compatible with 195s, I would prefer any Northern DMU order be composed of those.

However, ultimately I think they need something like a 755/3 or 755/4, with huge installed power to help speed up the timetable and allow some of the semi fasts to be jettisoned.
Sure acceleratin the stopper willi ncrease fuel consumption, but I doubt it would be enough to offset the fuel burned by running a semi fast!

230s might be another option, if they can be made to be reliable? They would be fine on many of the branch lines. Again another "tide-over-until-the-wires" option lasting 10-20 years.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
7,434
Location
Northern England
Assuming noone has deliberately made 196s not compatible with 195s, I would prefer any Northern DMU order be composed of those.
Compared with the 195s, the couplers on the 196s are actually mounted upside down, so they won't even physically connect let alone work together electrically. and no, I don't know why!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
112,941
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Compared with the 195s, the couplers on the 196s are actually mounted upside down, so they won't even physically connect let alone work together electrically. and no, I don't know why!

It's because the arrangement on the 195 would get in the way of the gangway. However I don't see any reason why a 195 couldn't be modified to the 196 layout, and I guess the 197s will be the same as they are gangwayed.
 
Joined
9 Dec 2012
Messages
834
I dont get this notion about deisel being politically impossible considering what we have been subjected to as a nation for the past year . The vast majority of the public would take a vastly more modern diesel replacement of a 150 or 156 over nothing at all.
Some lines will never be electrified in our lifetime if ever such as Lancaster to Carlisle via the Cumbrian coast and Inverness to Wick.
If the main body of the network that carries the majority is electrified I don't see the issue with some diesel anomalies.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
18,096
I dont get this notion about deisel being politically impossible considering what we have been subjected to as a nation for the past year . The vast majority of the public would take a vastly more modern diesel replacement of a 150 or 156 over nothing at all.
Some lines will never be electrified in our lifetime if ever such as Lancaster to Carlisle via the Cumbrian coast and Inverness to Wick.
If the main body of the network that carries the majority is electrified I don't see the issue with some diesel anomalies.
There will come a point when savings have to be made and you only need to look back to previous decades to see some of the sort of things that are likely to happen.

Maintenance holidays
Hiatus of new orders
2 new for 3 old when it comes to replacement rolling stock
Patch and mend

Are all terms we are probably going to become familiar with
 
Joined
9 Dec 2012
Messages
834
There will come a point when savings have to be made and you only need to look back to previous decades to see some of the sort of things that are likely to happen.

Maintenance holidays
Hiatus of new orders
2 new for 3 old when it comes to replacement rolling stock
Patch and mend

Are all terms we are probably going to become familiar with
Absolutely true which is why i imagine Diesel or a blend of it will be here to stay on the long stretch unelectrified back and beyond bits of the network for ages unless battery technology at an affordable level for trains fastforwards into the next century.
 

popeter45

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2019
Messages
1,477
Location
london
rather than a DMU 195 would it make more sence to take the 331's base design to make a DEMU that is designed to be converted to an EMU in the fruture? (class 295?)
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
5,135
I dont get this notion about deisel being politically impossible considering what we have been subjected to as a nation for the past year .
The government has said no more diesel trains past 2040, that is seperate to covid completely.
Some lines will never be electrified in our lifetime if ever such as Lancaster to Carlisle via the Cumbrian coast and Inverness to Wick.
We have new 195s, 196s and 197s for those as well as about a third of the way old 172s and half way old 170s.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top