MidnightFlyer
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 16 May 2010
- Messages
- 12,856
VIDEO REMOVED DUE TO VIOLATION OF TERMS OF USE now greets you. Did he die?
VIDEO REMOVED DUE TO VIOLATION OF TERMS OF USE now greets you. Did he die?
Yes. And very painfully.
Well I would have thought that we'd all be well aware of the dangers of 25,000 volts passing through ones body, as most people here don't seem to be idiots, but fair enough.
Very lucky indeed, not only to survive the electric shock but also for falling onto the tracks.
Here is what the Newcastle Journal had to say about it.
Incredible on two counts
Anything over 100 volts has the potential to create enough current through the body to kill and we are talking mili amps of current , not 1000s of amps associated with a connection to earth
Also the fall in itself let alone onto a running track. Plenty of folks are dead just falling over in the street, not 15 feet off a coach roof
His condition last night was described as poorly.
Poorly!? He's just had a few thousand volts pushed through him. He's in hospital. Is anyone in hospital not 'poorly'? Are the Echo employing five year olds to write this stuff?
I have been unfortunate enough to see the results of somebody coming into contact with 25kv ohle. The person concerned actually manged to walk / stagger with assistance away from the lineside despite being severely burned but succumbed to their injuries some two weeks later - a truly horrible way to go and one that I would not wish on my worst enemy.
It's one of the medical professions standard categories of status, and I'm surprised they're quoting him as being 'poorly' given the nature of injuries I would have expected him to have suffered. If this is accurate, he's been exceptionally lucky. IIRC the worst case is Critical, followed by Serious, and then Poorly is the lowest level where remaining in hospital for high-level treatment and observation is required. Sometimes stated with a 'but stable' indicating that the person's condition is not anticipated to get worse at this time. My understanding is that this description would indicate he is requiring relatively little active intervention to keep him alive, but that his condition is changeable as they don't say he's stable.
Obviously you mean the cant line, sole bar level is above the bogies, and most people go above thatThe 'perfect storm' scenario is that the electric could arc a distance of up to 9 feet, subject to conditions.
User Lester1979 on readytogo.net said:Alright folks. I worked with Andrew and he was a good mate. Cheers for starting a new thread without the jokes.
I just felt the need to post to say that the story in today's Northern Echo is an extremely sensationalist piece.
Although early indications pointed towards someone throwing Andrew's shoe onto the train, we've since been told that it wasn't the case. This information came from a reliable source who called the paramedics at the time.
It seems to have been an extremely unfortunate accident that would be hard to replicate. The [Northern] Echo have just quoted messageboards and Facebook for the duration of the story.
Andrew was a good mate who would put himself out for anyone. He'll be sadly missed by us all at work and by the group of us that go for Friday pints after work.
...
It seems that he kicked his foot out (as if kicking a football) and his shoe came off and landed on the train. He didn't get on top of the train but did climb the side and reach across. The electricity apparently arced (sp) and knocked him off the train.
Like I said, this is from the person who phoned the paramedics so I'd expect it to be fairly accurate.
He was daft to get up there but Andrew was the kind of person who cherished his belongings and his automatic reaction would have been to retrieve the shoe. He's paid the ultimate price but I guarantee it was just his natural response and he wouldn't have thought of the dangers at the time.
18 Oct 2010 16:50
POLICE CONTINUE APPEAL FOR WITNESSES AFTER DEATH OF MAN AT DURHAM STATION
British Transport Police (BTP) investigators are continuing to appeal for witnesses after a man suffered serious burns at Durham railway station and later died in hospital last month.
Andrew Minto, 23, of West Cornforth, County Durham, died after the incident at the station on Saturday, 11 September.
It is believed that shortly after 7pm, Andrew climbed on top of a stationary train to retrieve his shoe, which was lodged there. As he climbed up, he made contact with the overhead cables, suffered an electric shock and fell onto the tracks.
Police attended the scene alongside paramedics from the North East Ambulance Service and Andrew was taken to Newcastle Royal Victoria Infirmary, where he was treated for 40 percent burns.
A week later, Andrew died in hospital, in the early hours of Saturday, 18 September.
In a bid to establish the full circumstances surrounding Andrews death, BTP officers are continuing to appeal for anyone with information about the incident to come forward.
Following Newcastle Uniteds home game against Wigan on Saturday, 16 October, a one-month anniversary appeal saw BTP officers speak to passengers at Durham station in an attempt to gather further information.
Detective Inspector Stuart Mellish said: It is just over a month since Andrews death and our investigation to understand what happened is continuing.
Anyone who was in the area at the time, or who has any information, no matter how small, is asked to contact us so we can build a clearer picture of what took place.
Anyone with information about the incident should contact British Transport Police on Freefone 0800 40 50 40 quoting background reference B2 of 16/09/10.