Ah, okay.There was also a now deleted one, something about him being the only cast member to try and incite a riot against the government as well as get banned from social media. Or something along those lines.
Ah, okay.There was also a now deleted one, something about him being the only cast member to try and incite a riot against the government as well as get banned from social media. Or something along those lines.
Okay, read the whole thing. Is the relevant part that Trump forced his way into the film, or that he sold the hotel at a loss? Or something else?
There's room for a little cynicism in the light of what happened to Trump and his cronies on social media this week. Biden is expected to shake things up and moral stances aside what FB and Twitter did won't harm their cause from Jan 20th. The following was published before all this happened.[Citation needed].
To be sure, the people running these tech companies likely never intended for their platforms to be used in this manner. But given their current business models, there seems to be little chance that these problems will be solved without outside intervention. As such, Congress and the White House are likely to focus on reforming certain key elements of these companies’ business practices that engender this problematic activity, with policies aimed at:
- Protecting consumer privacy to by limiting the uninhibited collection and use of personal data for behavioral profiling
- Requiring algorithmic transparency to reveal how and why social media posts and ads target different individuals
- Leveraging antitrust policies to realign platforms’ growth incentives, limiting the potential for anticompetitive conduct that keeps would-be rivals from entering the market
- Ensuring platforms are held liable when they facilitate the spread of (or fail to effectively moderate) harmful content — without infringing on companies’ and users’ freedom of expression.
What's suggested is far from a crackdown. In fact, it's pretty much what people have been calling for in this thread.There's room for a little cynicism in the light of what happened to Trump and his cronies on social media this week. Biden is expected to shake things up and moral stances aside what FB and Twitter did won't harm their cause from Jan 20th
In a word, yes.Do some of them just get carried away with it all, and think they’re above normal standards?
Sidney Powell, so off the wall even Trump dumped her. That is quite something.I saw the other day that the firm who make many of the election voting machines is sueing one of Trumps high profile lawyers who was allegedly repeating any old rubbish about voting fraud. IIRC Trump had distanced himself from her eventually. Do some of them just get carried away with it all, and think they’re above normal standards?
That final bullet point might well be well-intentioned, but it's a tricky manoeuvre to pull off!There's room for a little cynicism in the light of what happened to Trump and his cronies on social media this week. Biden is expected to shake things up and moral stances aside what FB and Twitter did won't harm their cause from Jan 20th. The following was published before all this happened.
https://hbr.org/2020/12/what-will-tech-regulation-look-like-in-the-biden-era
Yep. Words are easy, actions..not so much. The ultimate in tightrope walking.That final bullet point might well be well-intentioned, but it's a tricky manoeuvre to pull off!
Or you can let him get away with it. A successful impeachment means he can't stand for office again (to be honest quite a few in the GOP will be secretly pleased about that!)
The behaviour of the Dems in Congress in seeking to impeach Trump when he has only 10 more days as POTUS is unwise, unnecessary and vindictive. They have only just scraped over the line in electoral terms and antagonising a substantial proportion of the electorate is hardly the way to heal wounds. It would be advisable if they turned the other cheek, let Trump just slip away and don't hound him now or when he has left office. If they pursue the GOP too vigorously, prominent Dems are at risk of assassination.
This is good news, he must be made welcome but not over welcome. I have suggested previously that all previous Presidents be invited (so George W. Bush as well). The incoming administration must not make this out to be Democrat v Republication but sane Americans v Trump and his gooNoids.
I do not disagree, but WASPS sting and one needs to be wary of them.He deliberately roused a mob with lies and smears and sent them to riot and storm Congress.
Five people died.
This was an attack on democracy and he caused it to happen.
I have suggested previously that all previous Presidents be invited (so George W. Bush as well).
I do not disagree, but WASPS sting and one needs to be wary of them.
I have suggested previously that all previous Presidents be invited (so George W. Bush as well).
Washington (CNN) Former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton will attend President-elect Joe Biden's inauguration, officials say, joining former President George W. Bush, who also plans to be in Washington for the official transfer of power.
If that's where the US has got to, the coup was a success and they may as well ask Liz (Windsor) if she fancies taking back control.The behaviour of the Dems in Congress in seeking to impeach Trump when he has only 10 more days as POTUS is unwise, unnecessary and vindictive. They have only just scraped over the line in electoral terms and antagonising a substantial proportion of the electorate is hardly the way to heal wounds. It would be advisable if they turned the other cheek, let Trump just slip away and don't hound him now or when he has left office. If they pursue the GOP too vigorously, prominent Dems are at risk of assassination.
All former presidents are invited as a matter of course.Mike Pence is to attend the inauguration https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/pence-attend-biden-inauguration-n1253645
This is good news, he must be made welcome but not over welcome. I have suggested previously that all previous Presidents be invited (so George W. Bush as well). The incoming administration must not make this out to be Democrat v Republication but sane Americans v Trump and his gooNoids.
(I do mean 'gooNoid' and not any similar word)
It is not a case of pursing the GOP, but rather Trump. There is quite a difference between the two.The behaviour of the Dems in Congress in seeking to impeach Trump when he has only 10 more days as POTUS is unwise, unnecessary and vindictive. They have only just scraped over the line in electoral terms and antagonising a substantial proportion of the electorate is hardly the way to heal wounds. It would be advisable if they turned the other cheek, let Trump just slip away and don't hound him now or when he has left office. If they pursue the GOP too vigorously, prominent Dems are at risk of assassination.
Excellent. I suppose I should have a) researched more and b) written 'issued a strong invite'. Make it clear that that the establishment are backing the process, the trouble is that I have been struggling to find Republicans besides Bush so it is important he attend. Neither Cheney nor Quayle are exactly statesmen of standing. There really needs to be an indication of approval for the process across the board and, thanks to certain Representatives who objected to the certification of the election, they are still potential grounds for confusion. The long that lingers, the more grounds for unrest. I think Biden has got a job and a half, I just hope he is up to it. And c) researched more.Ah yes just having a poke around Wikipedia and at Obama's first inauguration you had outgoing President George W. Bush, outgoing Vice President Dick Cheney, former presidents Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, and former vice presidents Walter Mondale, Dan Quayle, and Al Gore, along with their respective wives including Hillary Clinton attending as a former first lady. For Trump you had outgoing President Barack Obama, outgoing Vice President Joe Biden, former presidents Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush, and former vice presidents Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney, along with their respective wives, attended the inauguration (again including Hillary as a former First Lady which, now I think about it, means she's had to attend the inauguration of her electoral opponent twice now!).
And indeed there's an article from CNN a couple of days ago confirming that Obama, Bush and Clinton will all be in attendance at the inauguration.
![]()
Obama and Clinton will join Bush at Biden's inauguration
Former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton will attend President-elect Joe Biden's inauguration, officials say, joining former President George W. Bush, who also plans to be in Washington for the official transfer of power.edition.cnn.com
Thus proving that actions have no consequences. That just emboldens people to go further. Do you know why the storming of the Capitol happened now, rather than during past periods of political turmoil? It wasn't because people were angry with the political class - that has been so for generations. I'd say that the American public were much more divided and the temperature was much higher during the Vietnam War period.It would be advisable if they turned the other cheek, let Trump just slip away and don't hound him now or when he has left office.
"Nice democracy you've got here. It would be a shame if something happened to the leadership..."If they pursue the GOP too vigorously, prominent Dems are at risk of assassination.
Yes! It would involve a throne, a military uniform with lots of medals and some big rockets on the back of trucks.To be honest I’m surprised Trump and a select group of GOP senators aren’t talking about holding their own ‘alternative’ inauguration event.
To be honest I’m surprised Trump and a select group of GOP senators aren’t talking about holding their own ‘alternative’ inauguration event.
Yes! It would involve a throne, a military uniform with lots of medals and some big rockets on the back of trucks.
He’d love that.
They don’t really look like they would be.Yeah, but do you think the Proud Boys and assorted other acolytes are capable of formation goosestepping?
If they played YMCA they might be able to keep time: for a bunch of neo-nazis they seem to love that song (maybe a little too much...).They don’t really look like they would be.