• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Trivia - UK constituency with no railway

Status
Not open for further replies.

quantinghome

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Messages
2,891
A few years ago there was a discussion about parliamentary constituencies with no stations. As far as I can see, there is only one mainland constituency with no railway, past or present, running through it at all. Anyone care to guess?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

waverley47

Member
Joined
17 Apr 2015
Messages
844
A couple of close contenders, and a couple that blur the criteria (does the tube count for example). I don't know about the exact boundaries of some of them, so close suggestions would be Brighton Kempdown, Ilford North (Central line notwithstanding) and South Swindon.

I think the winner would have to be Northampton North (though I'm pretty sure the railway counts as the boundary).

Happy to be corrected, or any different answers?

EDIT: The old Market Harborough route definitley cut the corner through Northampton North, so no winner there.
 

SargeNpton

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2018
Messages
1,742
A couple of close contenders, and a couple that blur the criteria (does the tube count for example). I don't know about the exact boundaries of some of them, so close suggestions would be Brighton Kempdown, Ilford North (Central line notwithstanding) and South Swindon.

I think the winner would have to be Northampton North (though I'm pretty sure the railway counts as the boundary).

Happy to be corrected, or any different answers?

EDIT: The old Market Harborough route definitley cut the corner through Northampton North, so no winner there.


And until the town was split into two (1970s? 1980s?), the whole of Northampton was just one constituency
 

waverley47

Member
Joined
17 Apr 2015
Messages
844
If the tube doesn't count, we have a winner with Epping Forest, with the new boundaries meaning the WAML now skirts around the edge, fully in neighbouring Harlow


And until the town was split into two (1970s? 1980s?), the whole of Northampton was just one constituency

Ah, but being pedantic, the OP didn't mention constituency splits, merely asking which current constituencies have never had a railway running through them.
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,908
There must be loads in the far north west of Scotland, for example?
 

GusB

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
8,155
Location
Elginshire
While it did in the past, Banff and Buchan currently has no railway.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

There must be loads in the far north west of Scotland, for example?
The current UK parliamentary constituencies that cover the far North are Ross, Skye and Lochaber, and Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross, both of which have railways.
 
Last edited:

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
13,008
Location
Up the creek
I think I have found the answer, but as I cheated by using the internet and reference books I won’t reveal. I will say that it is a little bit surprising, although not very surprising if you think laterally (and that isn’t a subtle clue).
 

Adoarable

Member
Joined
24 Jul 2020
Messages
68
Location
London
There must be loads in the far north west of Scotland, for example?
Excluding island-only constituencies (OP specified "mainland"), the far NW of Scotland is so sparsely populated that the constituencies are massive and therefore all have railways inside them.

Counting the London Underground and other light rail services as railway - sure they're not National Rail but you'd be hard pressed arguing they're not "railway" - I haven't found any yet.

My guess is it's got to be a small constituency to reduce the chance of there having been a railway at some point in the past, so I'm guessing somewhere suburban with a relatively high population density, particularly somewhere built on in the post-war pro-car era. I think London can be ruled out, so I'm guessing Midlands or North of England. Houghton and Sunderland is a contender but not quite right.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
5,765
Location
SW London
There must be loads in the far north west of Scotland, for example?
There are only two constituencies north of the Great Glen: Caithness, Sutherland & Easter Ross has the Far North Line, Ross Skye & Lochaber has the Kyle Line and the West Highland north of Rannoch.

Leeds NE looks possible.
 
Last edited:

etr221

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2018
Messages
1,601
If the tube doesn't count, we have a winner with Epping Forest, with the new boundaries meaning the WAML now skirts around the edge, fully in neighbouring Harlow
But as that bit of the tube was originally "main line" (GER), I think it does count, so Epping Forest isn't it.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,035
Location
St Albans
But as that bit of the tube was originally "main line" (GER), I think it does count, so Epping Forest isn't it.
Which is the same as Ilford North, the Fairlop Loop was opened by the GER in 1903.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
5,765
Location
SW London
The question did say "past or present", and "mainland".

The largest island in each of the Orkney and Shetland archipelagos are both called "Mainland". Does that count?
 

Kingspanner

Member
Joined
17 Jul 2019
Messages
328
Location
Dinsdale
Excluding island-only constituencies (OP specified "mainland"), the far NW of Scotland is so sparsely populated that the constituencies are massive and therefore all have railways inside them.

Counting the London Underground and other light rail services as railway - sure they're not National Rail but you'd be hard pressed arguing they're not "railway" - I haven't found any yet.

My guess is it's got to be a small constituency to reduce the chance of there having been a railway at some point in the past, so I'm guessing somewhere suburban with a relatively high population density, particularly somewhere built on in the post-war pro-car era. I think London can be ruled out, so I'm guessing Midlands or North of England. Houghton and Sunderland is a contender but not quite right.
Houghton and Sunderland? No way! Riddled with colliery lines and I think the Leamside lne.
 

C J Snarzell

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2019
Messages
1,517
Leigh is one of the biggest constituencies with no railway connections. The nearest local line is through Atherton, while the West Coast Line passes through Golborne but there is no stops between Wigan North Western & Warrington Bank Quay.

CJ
 

backontrack

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Messages
6,399
Location
The UK
It must be a new constituency. Yes, closed railways are specified within the OP - that includes constituencies that have seen closures. But there may be some constituencies who were created after the fact - in fact, there certainly are. I wonder if the answer is one of those.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
5,765
Location
SW London
I'm fairly sure it's Leeds NE. It doesn't reach as far souith as L:eeds city centre, the line to Harrogate is further west and the former line from Cross Gates to Wetherby further east. My 1923 rail atlas shows no other lines running north of Leeds between those two.
 

etr221

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2018
Messages
1,601
I'm fairly sure it's Leeds NE. It doesn't reach as far souith as L:eeds city centre, the line to Harrogate is further west and the former line from Cross Gates to Wetherby further east. My 1923 rail atlas shows no other lines running north of Leeds between those two.
Nor can I see any on the old OS maps on the NLS in the relevent area.
 

waverley47

Member
Joined
17 Apr 2015
Messages
844
So, I think we have a winner. The Low Moor Coillery Railway gets close (less than 100 meters or so) but apart from that, no evidence of anything railway related.
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
13,008
Location
Up the creek
I must admit I had Coventry North West, presuming that the line to the old Keresley Colliery didn’t count as a railway for the purposes of the question. I reckoned that the old Wetherby line just clipped Leeds North East.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top