• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Could Crossrail run non-stop Liverpool St - Paddington?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
2,624
Location
South Staffordshire
Assuming all the station platform work is completed, the platform doors shield the construction workers from the trains and the railway is handed over for training etc, would there be any benefit to run the services non stop from Liverpool St to Paddington, assuming that some of those trains were for Heathrow airport or Reading ?

Obviously the intermediate stations could open for service once commissioned by switching in the platform doors and obviously advising staff etc.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Tio Terry

Member
Joined
2 May 2014
Messages
1,198
Location
Spain
Don't really know a great deal, but does this mean the Crossrail branding becomes subsumed into TfL, or does it still have sufficient credibility to remain as Crossrail ?

Assuming all the station platform work is completed, the platform doors shield the construction workers from the trains and the railway is handed over for training etc, would there be any benefit to run the services non stop from Liverpool St to Paddington, assuming that some of those trains were for Heathrow airport or Reading ? Obviously the intermediate stations could open for service once commissioned by switching in the platform doors and obviously advising staff etc.

Apologies if the questions are somewhat basic
You have to have the platform edge doors, and other things like PIS, fully operational to complete testing. Similarly, all the emergency and evacuation systems have to be operational in case of, well, emergencies if you are running trains with passengers on them.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,257
Don't really know a great deal, but does this mean the Crossrail branding becomes subsumed into TfL, or does it still have sufficient credibility to remain as Crossrail ?

Assuming all the station platform work is completed, the platform doors shield the construction workers from the trains and the railway is handed over for training etc, would there be any benefit to run the services non stop from Liverpool St to Paddington, assuming that some of those trains were for Heathrow airport or Reading ? Obviously the intermediate stations could open for service once commissioned by switching in the platform doors and obviously advising staff etc.

Apologies if the questions are somewhat basic
Too simplistic.

e.g. Bond Street is very behind (PEDs and platforms barely functional)/complete) the stations also contain ventilation systems and act as emergency exits from the tunnels so unless they are complete and integrated enough to the control and signalling system you can't run anything.

Lots of testing is needed before any passenger trains can run.

The first services to run will be Abbey Wood - Paddington because they aren't connected to any services on NR routes and TfL can be flexible as to when they start and frequencies.

Apart from the odd unit swapping move there won't be any Shenfield services running in passenger service west of Paddington, the normal services will be Abbey Wood - Reading/Heathrow
 

InOban

On Moderation
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,537
You have to have the platform edge doors, and other things like PIS, fully operational to complete testing. Similarly, all the emergency and evacuation systems have to be operational in case of, well, emergencies if you are running trains with passengers on them.
Which is why they've just had a six week blockade on testing to allow uninterrupted work on the items above. There was an option to extend this by two weeks but this has apparently not been necessary.
 

Tio Terry

Member
Joined
2 May 2014
Messages
1,198
Location
Spain
Which is why they've just had a six week blockade on testing to allow uninterrupted work on the items above. There was an option to extend this by two weeks but this has apparently not been necessary.

Not been necessary or would not be complete within those two weeks so longer is needed? Does anybody know?
 

rd749249

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2015
Messages
187
Not been necessary or would not be complete within those two weeks so longer is needed? Does anybody know?

There will be another blockade in late November for just over a week, a natural break over Christmas and one more in February.

From early December, there will be 8 units testing full length diagrams, 7 days a week. That will extend to 18 trains from late March.

Of course, any well-intentioned plan could be changed but that’s what I’ve seen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top