• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Uses for ex-Grand Central Mk4s?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Huntergreed

Established Member
Associate Staff
Events Co-ordinator
Joined
16 Jan 2016
Messages
3,178
Location
Dumfries
I hope the MK4’s and 90’s have something lined up? Going to scrap just seems such an enormous waste
 

DorkingMain

Member
Joined
25 Aug 2020
Messages
692
Location
London, UK
TFW would be a sensible place, which sadly means it'd never happen.

TfW will probably take the attitude that they aren't refurbished to the correct spec, and thus they don't want them.

The Mk4s + DVT would be excellent for a non-electrified middle distance route if appropriate locos could be found.
 

DorkingMain

Member
Joined
25 Aug 2020
Messages
692
Location
London, UK
Stick some HST power cars on each end and make a Castle set lol

In all seriousness, unfortunately the relatively small number of sets Grand Central had put together (5x2+6) probably means it will be difficult to find a home for them unless they're part of a wider project. There's already plenty of 365s sitting with no home; and 350/2s, 360s and further electric stock will be coming spare soon.
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
Five 6-car rakes, compatible with Class 67s.

Or, compatible with an extremely pokey electric locomotive that can do AC and DC.

Commandeer 12 more off TfW (give them something else!) and you’ve got 7 rakes.

I suspect commuters would love them in North Kent!
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,699
Location
West Riding
CrossCountry "local" routes?


(Runs for cover!)

To be fair, you would think an Arriva owned operator would be the logical destination, if they want to recover the cost of the refurb since Arriva own GC. XC are crying out for rolling stock.
 

ABB125

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2016
Messages
4,341
Location
University of Birmingham
Stick some HST power cars on each end and make a Castle set lol

In all seriousness, unfortunately the relatively small number of sets Grand Central had put together (5x2+6) probably means it will be difficult to find a home for them unless they're part of a wider project. There's already plenty of 365s sitting with no home; and 350/2s, 360s and further electric stock will be coming spare soon.
Well, they could be formed into six seven six (corrected back!) 4-car sets, which would probably be sufficient to take over the whole of the TfW Holyhead to Cardiff service?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,402
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
To be fair, you would think an Arriva owned operator would be the logical destination, if they want to recover the cost of the refurb since Arriva own GC. XC are crying out for rolling stock.

How many sets would be needed to run Manchester-Birmingham using them on a self contained basis?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,819
Five 6-car rakes, compatible with Class 67s.

Or, compatible with an extremely pokey electric locomotive that can do AC and DC.

Commandeer 12 more off TfW (give them something else!) and you’ve got 7 rakes.

I suspect commuters would love them in North Kent!
GC have/had four Mark 4 sets.
 

Anonymous10

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
2,631
Location
wales
The mark 4s should go to either tfw or to cross country with tfw they could used to run long distance services such as Milford haven to Manchester Piccadilly which would alleviate the issue of the 197s which personally are more regional to work the routes the 170s are then deploy them to other operators. With cross country they could be used on services such as Cardiff to Nottingham which again displaces regional trains ie the class 170 to be used elsewhere or transferred to a different operator. Unfortunately these being sensible will never happen
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,097
Location
Redcar
To be fair, you would think an Arriva owned operator would be the logical destination, if they want to recover the cost of the refurb since Arriva own GC. XC are crying out for rolling stock.
Well, when WSMR (owned by DB Regio) went under their Mk3s ended up moving to Chiltern (also DB Regio). Arriva of course are now the successor of DB Regio (speaking roughly) so moving them to another member of the Arriva group would have precedence...
 

Anonymous10

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
2,631
Location
wales
Five 6-car rakes, compatible with Class 67s.

Or, compatible with an extremely pokey electric locomotive that can do AC and DC.

Commandeer 12 more off TfW (give them something else!) and you’ve got 7 rakes.

I suspect commuters would love them in North Kent!
Unfortunately I wouldn't agree with doing that as I believe the service is a franchise commitment and would have to be replaced by another loco hauled also they r currently working out the mods to run using diesel loco once done it makes sense as Wales is short of long distance suitable stock
 

ABB125

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2016
Messages
4,341
Location
University of Birmingham
Well, when WSMR (owned by DB Regio) went under their Mk3s ended up moving to Chiltern (also DB Regio). Arriva of course are now the successor of DB Regio (speaking roughly) so moving them to another member of the Arriva group would have precedence...
I wonder whether Chiltern would be interested? Either as a Mk 3 replacement or as a supplement? Might not be enough spare class 68s around though!
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
Unfortunately I wouldn't agree with doing that as I believe the service is a franchise commitment and would have to be replaced by another loco hauled also they r currently working out the mods to run using diesel loco once done it makes sense as Wales is short of long distance suitable stock

Suffice to say it was the least serious thing I’ve ever put on this forum!
 

ScotRail158725

Established Member
Joined
27 Nov 2018
Messages
2,664
I hope the MK4’s and 90’s have something lined up? Going to scrap just seems such an enormous waste
How so? A lot of the LNER counterparts have seen the cutters torch so there’s no reason that this cant happen or thats its a “waste”. Typical response to any traction being sent for scrap
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
5,135
CrossCountry "local" routes?


(Runs for cover!)
Cross Country wouldn't be too much of a suprise, another Arriva company and is in dire need for more stock. However unless they can have electric only routes it isn't worth the bother for only a few more sets. Unfortunately XC has some bits not electrified on all its routes.
 

ABB125

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2016
Messages
4,341
Location
University of Birmingham
List of potential options:

  • Most sensible:
    • TfW, to supplement their three (?) planned Mk 4 sets, and hopefully take over the entire Holyhead-Cardiff service for simplicity
  • Other reasonable ideas:
    • CrossCountry, as a capacity boost (the problem being where would they be deployed?)
    • Temporary move to East Midlands to replace some "less non-compliant" Mk 3s?
  • Possible, but probably not:
    • Chiltern, to replace or supplement the Mk 3s as seen fit (lack of class 68s through?)
    • Scotrail, to provide more long-distance capacity
    • GWR (more Castle sets, but using class 67s instead?)

Realistically, I can only see them going to TfW.
 

Anonymous10

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
2,631
Location
wales
How so? A lot of the LNER counterparts have seen the cutters torch so there’s no reason that this cant happen or thats its a “waste”. Typical response to any traction being sent for scrap
With operators procuring regional trains for intercity workings I'd retain them and then have them distributed same goes for all stock make sure appropriate stock being used everywhere plus cross country is chronically short when it comes to capacity

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Cross Country wouldn't be too much of a suprise, another Arriva company and is in dire need for more stock. However unless they can have electric only routes it isn't worth the bother for only a few more sets. Unfortunately XC has some bits not electrified on all its routes.
If they waited they could possibly take lessons from tfw having adapted the mk4d for use even if it meant paying a small amount

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

List of potential options:

  • Most sensible:
    • TfW, to supplement their three (?) planned Mk 4 sets, and hopefully take over the entire Holyhead-Cardiff service for simplicity
  • Other reasonable ideas:
    • CrossCountry, as a capacity boost (the problem being where would they be deployed?)
    • Temporary move to East Midlands to replace some "less non-compliant" Mk 3s?
  • Possible, but probably not:
    • Chiltern, to replace or supplement the Mk 3s as seen fit (lack of class 68s through?)
    • Scotrail, to provide more long-distance capacity
    • GWR (more Castle sets, but using class 67s instead?)

Realistically, I can only see them going to TfW.
Couldn't agree more they make maximum sense with tfw and free up more stock to cascade
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,337
cross country is chronically short when it comes to capacity
Capacity costs money whether it is needed on not. Class 67s can't do the job needed to drag these coaches around. A timetable change to accommodate 90+Mk4 on Birmingham to Manchester is a big step / upheaval.
 

ABB125

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2016
Messages
4,341
Location
University of Birmingham
Cross Country wouldn't be too much of a suprise, another Arriva company and is in dire need for more stock. However unless they can have electric only routes it isn't worth the bother for only a few more sets. Unfortunately XC has some bits not electrified on all its routes.
That is the problem, which route(s) do you put them on? They'd be unsuitable for the "local" routes due to end doors and the perennial Stansted platform length issue, and the shortest "proper" route (Manchester-Bristol) interworks with the Manchester-Bournemouth.
Manchester-Bristol would, however, be ideal for a "bi-mode" Mk 4 set: class 90 on the north end, class 67 the other; electric Manchester to Brimingham, diesel round Camp Hill, electric King's Norton to Bromsgrove, diesel to Bristol. On the way back, hammer the class 67 on the approach to Bromsgrove, then whack up the pantograph for the incline! What's not to like? :D
Back in the real world...
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,699
Location
West Riding
Capacity costs money whether it is needed on not. Class 67s can't do the job needed to drag these coaches around. A timetable change to accommodate 90+Mk4 on Birmingham to Manchester is a big step / upheaval.

York-Edinburgh with class 91's? To free up Voyagers and reduce diesel under the wires.
 

ScotRail158725

Established Member
Joined
27 Nov 2018
Messages
2,664
List of potential options:

  • Most sensible:
    • TfW, to supplement their three (?) planned Mk 4 sets, and hopefully take over the entire Holyhead-Cardiff service for simplicity
  • Other reasonable ideas:
    • CrossCountry, as a capacity boost (the problem being where would they be deployed?)
    • Temporary move to East Midlands to replace some "less non-compliant" Mk 3s?
  • Possible, but probably not:
    • Chiltern, to replace or supplement the Mk 3s as seen fit (lack of class 68s through?)
    • Scotrail, to provide more long-distance capacity
    • GWR (more Castle sets, but using class 67s instead?)

Realistically, I can only see them going to TfW.
Option 4: Booths or Newport
 

Mainline421

Member
Joined
7 May 2013
Messages
907
Location
Finland
They could recrue an extremely miniscule amount of money from their investment by running them on a railtour from Euston to Blackpool in their GC state . ;) I'd definitely book this!
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
How so? A lot of the LNER counterparts have seen the cutters torch so there’s no reason that this cant happen or thats its a “waste”. Typical response to any traction being sent for scrap

Yup. They were designed for a life of thirty years, and they've worked for...thirty years. Let's not desperately look for a place to plonk a not-very-useful micro-fleet. They've served us well, it might just be the end.
 

Anonymous10

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
2,631
Location
wales
That is the problem, which route(s) do you put them on? They'd be unsuitable for the "local" routes due to end doors and the perennial Stansted platform length issue, and the shortest "proper" route (Manchester-Bristol) interworks with the Manchester-Bournemouth.
Manchester-Bristol would, however, be ideal for a "bi-mode" Mk 4 set: class 90 on the north end, class 67 the other; electric Manchester to Brimingham, diesel round Camp Hill, electric King's Norton to Bromsgrove, diesel to Bristol. On the way back, hammer the class 67 on the approach to Bromsgrove, then whack up the pantograph for the incline! What's not to like? :D
Back in the real world...
Maybe Manchester to Cardiff via Bristol but then InterWorks with tfw Manchester to Swansea services
 

ABB125

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2016
Messages
4,341
Location
University of Birmingham
Option 4: Booths or Newport
Yup. They were designed for a life of thirty years, and they've worked for...thirty years. Let's not desperately look for a place to plonk a not-very-useful micro-fleet. They've served us well, it might just be the end.
I would have thought that the unrefurbished Mk 4s would be scrapped in preference to the GC ones. But, I personally have no emotional attachment to them, so I don't really mind either way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top