• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

DC Class 455/456/458/465/66 discussion topic.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fincra5

Established Member
Joined
6 Jun 2009
Messages
2,636
You’d be better sending the 379s to Great Northern and then cascading the 387s south of the river.

Exactly. 379s don't have Shoe Gear fitted but 387s do. Although 458s would be a good fit, if shortened to 4 car, to replace 313s on the coast. And maybe some 377 Coastal Workings (not london bound), which would allow 377s towards london to reduce the use of 455s... or for lengthening services. 458s still have life in them.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,445
I like the ideas being floated around for the 458s, although personally I’d keep them as 5 cars but ensure that ASDO works (presuming there’s physically enough space for them).

that said, I cant help but think this is a solution looking for a problem. The GTR franchise physically own the units(*). They’re semi reliable, all the crew that need to know them, know them and they meet the relevant rules regarding accessibility and disabled passengers.

*turns out they actually don’t and I was typing incorrect information. they’re leased by Beacon rail according to a post below
 
Last edited:

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,445
How is that possible? I thought all rolling stock was owned by ROSCOs

some rolling stock that is life expired such as 483s and 313s are purchased by the franchise holder for a very small price (usually £1), but then take all liability for maintenance, overhaul and refurbishment.
 

rdlover777

Member
Joined
4 Feb 2014
Messages
461
Location
Kent
some rolling stock that is life expired such as 483s and 313s are purchased by the franchise holder for a very small price (usually £1), but then take all liability for maintenance, overhaul and refurbishment.
Huh, didn't know that! Today i learnt...

Also is that price per unit? Or for the entire fleet?
 

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,445
Huh, didn't know that! Today i learnt...

Also is that price per unit? Or for the entire fleet?

I’m not entirely sure and I’m struggling to find information to back up my claim.
Can someone someone please help me, I’m worried I might be going senile :D
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,851
I’m not entirely sure and I’m struggling to find information to back up my claim.
Can someone someone please help me, I’m worried I might be going senile :D
The Southern 313s show as being owned by Beacon Rail. You are correct that the Island Line 483 units aare franchise owned. Two other examples: the ScotRail 314s were franchise owned, too, and GWR own five HST power cars.
 

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,445
The Southern 313s show as being owned by Beacon Rail. You are correct that the Island Line 483 units aare franchise owned. Two other examples: the ScotRail 314s were franchise owned, too, and GWR own five HST power cars.

Ah thank you for clarifying, I’m a bit miffed about that. I wonder what led me to incorrectly think they were a franchise asset.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
How is that possible? I thought all rolling stock was owned by ROSCOs

It didn't take long for that to change. All the stuff BR operated got divided up into the three original ROSCOs and they maintain a dominant position, but there's been several new entrants to the market who have done things differently, plus assorted deals directly with manufacturers, like the Agility Trains setup for the IEPs/Azumas.

If you're buying a new fleet now, the way you do it depends on how you're able to raise the finance, and there's almost as many ways of doing it as there are types of train.
 

Siemens Staines

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2015
Messages
1,530
Probably a statistical anomaly, but I notice that all of the ex 460 units are running paired together and not with any of the ex 458/0 units.

458531+458533
458532+458535
458534+458536
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
It didn't take long for that to change. All the stuff BR operated got divided up into the three original ROSCOs and they maintain a dominant position, but there's been several new entrants to the market who have done things differently, plus assorted deals directly with manufacturers, like the Agility Trains setup for the IEPs/Azumas.

If you're buying a new fleet now, the way you do it depends on how you're able to raise the finance, and there's almost as many ways of doing it as there are types of train.

Yeah, there's nothing anywhere that says you have to use a ROSCO to acquire trains - the original ones were simply set up to carve up BR's fleet. After that, TOCs were free to finance and acquire new stock however they wanted, although TOCs owning stock outright remains rare, as there's no guarantee of franchises remaining in your hands long enough.
 

4REP

Member
Joined
16 Oct 2019
Messages
272
Location
Bingley
Could 458s replace Southerns 455s? It would only be a net loss of 4 coaches in total.
Basically 1 unit. As I created this forum I think i created a post near enough at the beginning about cascades and could be possible. Post 26/27 I just checked
 

RichJF

Established Member
Joined
2 Nov 2012
Messages
1,202
Location
South London
Basically 1 unit. As I created this forum I think i created a post near enough at the beginning about cascades and could be possible. Post 26/27 I just checked
Wouldn't it make more sense (in my mind) for the SWR 455s to come over to Southern? They have AC traction & a much better internal refit. I would've thought the SWR 455s would last longer than the SN 455s?
 

Islineclear3_1

Established Member
Joined
24 Apr 2014
Messages
6,594
Location
PTSO or platform depending on the weather
In theory 46 x 455s can be replaced entirely by the 458s if diagrams were possibly tweaked and capacity gained by having 5 coaches instead of 4 or the 10 377 can be converted to metro or even move the 313 s to metro in 9 x 6 car formation with 1 spare instead of 10 cascaded 377s (from being cascaded by 379s)which can be used to expand capacity.

313's on the metro!??

It just needs one to break down or catch fire and scupper everything else...
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,356
Location
Yorkshire
Wouldn't it make more sense (in my mind) for the SWR 455s to come over to Southern? They have AC traction & a much better internal refit. I would've thought the SWR 455s would last longer than the SN 455s?
On paper it would, however:
Drivers would need to retrain to drive the AC motored units.
The SWR units aren't set up for DOO AFAIK so would need investment to make them suitable for Southern.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,176
Location
West Wiltshire
On paper it would, however:
Drivers would need to retrain to drive the AC motored units.
The SWR units aren't set up for DOO AFAIK so would need investment to make them suitable for Southern.

I think it more likely that the SWR 455s will replace the Southern 313s on the coast, (without the class 508 trailers). In 3car form having been re-motored should be good for few years.

My only caveat is the 313s aluminium bodies are probably better at resisting corrosion from salty spay in all those coastal inlets

Actually I could see the 375, 377 used on services into London, and older units used on local services (that don’t go anywhere near London) thus freeing up some 377s. Would not be surprised to see the 387s leave Sussex (especially if some extensions to GWR electrification go ahead)
 

A0

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
7,751
I think it more likely that the SWR 455s will replace the Southern 313s on the coast, (without the class 508 trailers). In 3car form having been re-motored should be good for few years.

My only caveat is the 313s aluminium bodies are probably better at resisting corrosion from salty spay in all those coastal inlets

Actually I could see the 375, 377 used on services into London, and older units used on local services (that don’t go anywhere near London) thus freeing up some 377s. Would not be surprised to see the 387s leave Sussex (especially if some extensions to GWR electrification go ahead)

Surely when there's much younger, post BR era stock available, keeping the 455s which are all nearing their 40th birthday seems a tad unlikely ?
 

Peregrine 4903

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2019
Messages
1,518
Location
London
This is a terrible idea not really based on anything but there are 30 class 379's and 36 class 458's which makes 66 units in total. You could use all 66 of these to replace the 46 455's and 19 class 313's which adds up to 65 units in total, giving you a like for like replacement, plus 1 unit spare.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
This is a terrible idea not really based on anything but there are 30 class 379's and 36 class 458's which makes 66 units in total. You could use all 66 of these to replace the 46 455's and 19 class 313's which adds up to 65 units in total, giving you a like for like replacement, plus 1 unit spare.

I can't see anyone particularly wanting the 458s. They've had a terrible reputation, and there's only one other operator of that family of rolling stock. They're getting on a bit, being one of the oldest post-privatisation fleets, and I honestly can't see them having much of a future. The 379s are an interesting question. Adding third rail capability may or may not be easy, but also there was potential interest in them from Gautrain in South Africa, who want to expand their fleet of UK-spec Electrostar units.
 

Roger B

Established Member
Joined
16 Jun 2018
Messages
1,276
Location
Gatley
I can't see anyone particularly wanting the 458s. They've had a terrible reputation, and there's only one other operator of that family of rolling stock. They're getting on a bit, being one of the oldest post-privatisation fleets, and I honestly can't see them having much of a future. The 379s are an interesting question. Adding third rail capability may or may not be easy, but also there was potential interest in them from Gautrain in South Africa, who want to expand their fleet of UK-spec Electrostar units.

Surely further electrification providing ongoing work for these units in the UK, enabling diesel units to be retired / used elsewhere in the world, is a much better option than sending currently surplus electric units abroad?
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
Surely further electrification providing ongoing work for these units in the UK, enabling diesel units to be retired / used elsewhere in the world, is a much better option than sending currently surplus electric units abroad?

But so far no-one seems to want them. If the South Africans fork out the cash, that's where they'll go.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,851
I can't see anyone particularly wanting the 458s. They've had a terrible reputation, and there's only one other operator of that family of rolling stock.
It's a reputation, given by people who don't have anything to do with them.

The reality is somewhat different, as SWT and Porterbrook sorted out the initial problems to the extent that they were the most reliable trains in the country. Ask the engineers and they'll tell you the Onix traction kit is better than the Siemens equivalent and the drivers like the braking performance. From this daily user of them, they're the best trains we've ever had on the Waterloo-Reading line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top