• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Test And Trace Being Used To Harrass Women - Already

Status
Not open for further replies.

duncanp

Established Member
Joined
16 Aug 2012
Messages
4,856
This is regrettable, but I can't say I am surprised

This is what comes of implementing half baked idiotic ideas that are meant to give people a false sense of security.

Of course the law on data protection provides for sanctions against anyone who misuses data, and one would hope that the employees in this article are sacked on the spot.

If these incidents continue, then women will give false details to the person at the entrance, or refuse to give any details at all, which defeats the supposed purpose of gathering the data.

Men will most likely do the same, if, that is they are asked for the data in the first place, as I have been in several pubs since re-opening, and only one has explicitly asked for details.



When a young French woman with a choppy fringe and gold earrings asked me for my number before she took my lunch order at a restaurant on London’s Bermondsey Street yesterday, I didn’t think twice. She did so jovially and I felt I was doing my bit, like wearing a mask or liberally applying hand sanitiser.
But there is a much darker, deeply troubling phenomenon emerging out of handing over data in restaurants and pubs in order to try to curtail the spread of Covid-19. Women are starting to report that staff are approaching them inappropriately, using their details to contact them in order to ask them out.
In the UK, a young woman reported on social media that a barman approached her on Facebook to ask her out for a drink after she’d visited the pub he was working in the day before. In New Zealand, after visiting a Subway restaurant and handing over requested personal information, another woman received an email, text and Facebook and Instagram requests from the man who served her. Speaking to local media she said, “I'd feel really, really scared [if I lived alone]. Even now I feel a bit creeped out and vulnerable”. The Subway employee has since been suspended.
For any woman who has been catcalled - something that the Everyday Sexism project reported a rise in during lockdown, with the streets much quieter - or felt an unwanted hand placed on the small of their back as they’ve moved through a crowd, received an AirDropped dick pick or simply endures the routine LinkedIn messages from middle-aged men asking to “connect”, this is not surprising.

Like any long-standing campaign that wants to avoid defeat, harassers are quick and agile in utilising new opportunities. Yet, perhaps worst of all, when it comes to track and trace, women have little choice but to be compliant. In terms of your health, it is in your best interest to hand over your data.
Being a woman, especially a young woman, in a public place can sometimes feel like an assault course, ducking and diving to avoid the onslaught of unwanted advances that some men feel so entitled to make. Think I’m exaggerating? A report by the Women and Equalities Committee in 2018 found that “sexual harassment pervades the lives of women and girls and is deeply ingrained in our culture”. The report cites recent studies which found that 85 percent of women aged 18–24 and 64 percent of women of all ages reported that they had experienced unwanted sexual attention in public places. Thanks to test and trace, those advances now have the facade of being state-sanctioned.
However, the Information Commissioner’s Office has made plain that “You cannot use the personal information that you collect for contact tracing for other purposes”. Jo O'Reilly, Data Privacy Advocate at ProPrivacy explains: “Staff with access to customer information need to understand that there will be consequences. This is both an abuse of customer trust and a breach of data protection laws that could see the business owners liable for a fine.”
In terms of self-protection, O’Reilly says “there's little you can do - unless you're willing to set up a different email account and buy yourself a burner phone just to see out the pandemic”. And, of course, if it happens to you it's important to report any misuse of your data to the business owner. But it shouldn’t be down to women to take such steps, and it doesn’t tackle the root of the problem.
Indeed, O’Reilly adds, there’s plenty that pubs, bar and restaurant owners can do. She recommends larger businesses using apps to store their our data, but “even if landlords opt for a low-tech approach, there are a few things they can do in order to keep details secure. If customers are being asked to write down their details, each person should be given a single piece of paper, that means no log books left on the bar filled with people's names and numbers”.

The obtaining and exploitation of data is a phenomenon that we should all be much more aware of as we go about our daily lives, and one companies and Government are increasingly responding to. But in the national collective effort to stop the spread of Covid-19, women shouldn’t have the added penalty of potential harassment.
The idea that an individual would see this public health crisis as a chance to harass a stranger is remarkable but not shocking. The culture that permits harassment makes no allowances for global pandemics, in fact, if anything the pandemic has reinforced that same culture.
Women have picked up most of the domestic duties and childcare, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies; there has been a spike in domestic violence; the majority of underpaid frontline and care workers in this country are women, as are the majority of those in sectors such as retail and hospitality, and who now stand to lose their jobs.
The reaction to coronavirus has been to sink our heels into a power structure propping up a society that values women less than men. In this light, test and trace data intended to save lives being stolen to harass and intimidate women fits the same pattern. Be it either reactionary or opportunistic, we have used the pandemic and our “new normal” to exert misogynistic and sexist behaviours.
Right now, we continue to wait for the Government’s official test and trace app to eventually materialise. This, O'Reilly says, “will be about as secure/anonymous as it is possible to get”.
In the meantime, women will learn to live with the worry of harassment lingering in the back of their mind. The same way they do they walk past a large group of men or travel home alone late at night. Men using data to harass women will simply become yet another burden women carry as they go about their lives.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,457
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
This is regrettable, but I can't say I am surprised

This is what comes of implementing half baked idiotic ideas that are meant to give people a false sense of security.

Of course the law on data protection provides for sanctions against anyone who misuses data, and one would hope that the employees in this article are sacked on the spot.

If these incidents continue, then women will give false details to the person at the entrance, or refuse to give any details at all, which defeats the supposed purpose of gathering the data.

Men will most likely do the same, if, that is they are asked for the data in the first place, as I have been in several pubs since re-opening, and only one has explicitly asked for details.


Creepy.

However, I'm not sure there is actually much in this, simply because it would already have been possible to chase someone via social media if they've given a booking name (even easier if as part of the booking process people were asked to give a phone number), or even from the name on a credit card -- the only new thing here is that less effort would be required in tracing someone.

So, much as this is undesirable, I'm not sure there's much here that wouldn't already have been possible. Obviously with a big exception of someone going in and paying by cash.
 
Last edited:

Scotrail12

Member
Joined
16 Nov 2014
Messages
840
Disgusting behaviour but it probably was inevitable.

I guess this begs the question - can one give fake details and in what circumstance would it be reasonable? I've been requested for my name a few times and I'm very hesitant to give out my surname (it's uncommon so could be easily identified).
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
Disgusting behaviour but it probably was inevitable.

I guess this begs the question - can one give fake details and in what circumstance would it be reasonable? I've been requested for my name a few times and I'm very hesitant to give out my surname (it's uncommon so could be easily identified).

Just call yourself something else. As long as you can be contacted, it's fine. It'll also help you spot if your details are being sneakily used for marketing purposes.
 

BJames

Established Member
Joined
27 Jan 2018
Messages
1,465
Just call yourself something else. As long as you can be contacted, it's fine. It'll also help you spot if your details are being sneakily used for marketing purposes.
A Turkish friend I have does this - used to give a completely different name at Starbucks otherwise the staff would faff around for 2 minutes trying to work out how to spell it. There's no problem if the phone number is correct. Good point about the marketing purposes - if you did this and got marketing details in your false name, would that not also be a clear GDPR breach? The details are supposed to be stored for track and trace only I assume, how long can businesses keep them for?
 

Scotrail12

Member
Joined
16 Nov 2014
Messages
840
I can't see why they don't just request phone numbers for the sake of being able to be contacted. Asking names seems like an infringement of privacy. I'll go with a different surname.
 

Jonny

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,577
I'm not surprised that data from contact tracing is being misused. Saddened, but not surprised, especially since info is being held in decentralised locations and often using mark 1 pen-and-paper. It may be easy to destroy and very hard to hack remotely, but it doesn't have the same level of access logging capability that can be built into a program.
 

Pete_uk

On Moderation
Joined
28 Jan 2017
Messages
1,555
Location
Stroud, Glos
Inevitable really. I hope a business gets hammered under the data protection act to send out a message and whoever actually contacted the woman gets a visit from the plod
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
3,423
Just call yourself something else. As long as you can be contacted, it's fine. It'll also help you spot if your details are being sneakily used for marketing purposes.

I deliberately slightly mis spell my surname in some circumstances so I can trace the source of marketing etc. I also have a throwaway Gmail address for the same purpose. It's very interesting which companies ignore your marketing preferences.
 

Trackman

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2013
Messages
4,321
Location
Lewisham
I know someone who got hassled off a medical student after a completing a survey in hospital. she didn’t know who it was until they sent a picture. She laughed it off and blocked him, I said report it to the police or least the hospital as it is very serious , which she didn’t.
 

mmh

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2016
Messages
4,321
I can't see why they don't just request phone numbers for the sake of being able to be contacted. Asking names seems like an infringement of privacy. I'll go with a different surname.

Because someone calling you will want to confirm that they're speaking to who they think they are before sharing any detail.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
I know someone who got hassled off a medical student after a completing a survey in hospital. she didn’t know who it was until they sent a picture. She laughed it off and blocked him, I said report it to the police or least the hospital as it is very serious , which she didn’t.

...which means he may well have done it again. :(
 

Bedpan

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
1,299
Location
Harpenden
We went to one of the "Lounge" bar/restaurants in Didcot on Sunday evening, all very good there. The group leader fills up a sheet of paper with name, phone number, table number and times of arrival and departure and then put it in box with a slit in the top (like a ballot box) when you leave. No contact with anybody whilst you you are there so reasonably safe I would have thought, If a waiter there fancied a girl he had served, I'm not sure that he would be able to get access to the box, and even if he had got access to it, he would have ended with my name and number as the person who was at that table at the appropriate time. The system isn't completely foolproof but reasonable enough I would have thought.
 

al78

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2013
Messages
2,601
There's no "would have thought" about it - it's a massive breach. It's effectively stalking as well.

I wouldn't go as far as that, unless it was repeated, but it is a huge overstepping of boundaries. If you are going to ask someone out (and there is nothing wrong with asking someone out, it is how romantic relationships ultimately start), do it face to face and in a way that is not going to embarass/pressurise them (and take no for an answer).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top