• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Coronavirus precautions: Has the world gone mad?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
12,003
Location
here to eternity
The problem was, if you pointed that out, you tended to get something like "well my uncle's brother works on the NHS front line and he says there's people under 50 dying of this STAY AT HOME EVERYONE FFS WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE".

This type of response is still happening even now. It has to stop.

Unfortunately they seem to dominate radio phone ins which gives the impression that is the opinion of everyone - I can assure you that isn't given the conversations I've had in my circle.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
6,185
The problem was, if you pointed that out, you tended to get something like "well my uncle's brother works on the NHS front line and he says there's people under 50 dying of this STAY AT HOME EVERYONE FFS WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE".

This type of response is still happening even now. It has to stop.
I have a cousin that works in a hospital. I've stopped talking to her about the kids. The response I kept getting was along the lines of "oh you shouldn't let your kids do that. Last week we had a child in with a broken leg." The point is they don't see the thousands of children that do things and don't get hurt.
 

al78

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2013
Messages
2,600
The cost of standing 2m away from another person on a pavement where there's space to do so? Zero. The cost of never crossing a road again, ever?...

It is not guarenteed you will never get run over if you never cross a road. People have been killed when a motorist lost control of their vehicle and mounted the pavement.

 

Scotrail12

Member
Joined
16 Nov 2014
Messages
840
Just saw on the BBC that there is a 2nd wave in South Korea. Very deadly 2nd wave of approx. 17 cases.

Scotland's leader also retweeted the article. :(

Since when was 17 cases a 2nd wave?
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
3,410
I have just seen the 'rules' from a local Pick Your Own Strawberry farm posted online. I won't shame the business which, as well as introducing a one-way system, highlight that:



So, who goes to a PYO strawberry farm for essential food retail?

Rule number 6: There will be no toilet or handwash facilities
Rule number 11: Wash your hands after your visit

I think I will give this farm a wide berth for now.

You're over thinking it. They are probably just covering their rear ends from a legislation point of view, so some busybody doesn't accuse them of running a tourist attraction before July 4th.
 

BJames

Established Member
Joined
27 Jan 2018
Messages
1,463
Just saw on the BBC that there is a 2nd wave in South Korea. Very deadly 2nd wave of approx. 17 cases.

Scotland's leader also retweeted the article. :(

Since when was 17 cases a 2nd wave?
It's not really. I was about to just suggest that it's probably poor reporting, but it's actually South Korea's own health officials who have used the phrase "second wave".

In terms of Scotland, I believe it fits Sturgeon's narrative against Johnson as she continues to fight to prove him wrong. There's no problem with her making her own decisions for her country but I do still think a lot of it is political games.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
In terms of Scotland, I believe it fits Sturgeon's narrative against Johnson as she continues to fight to prove him wrong. There's no problem with her making her own decisions for her country but I do still think a lot of it is political games.

Absolutely damn right it is. I wish I lived in England right now.
 

Scrotnig

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2017
Messages
593
You're over thinking it. They are probably just covering their rear ends from a legislation point of view, so some busybody doesn't accuse them of running a tourist attraction before July 4th.
This is entirely right. As if they are NOT running an essential food operation, the only thing it can be is a tourist attraction, which shouldn't be open.

As frustrating as it is, I would urge supporting them rather than castigating them. They are kind of stuck at the moment. It will get easier for them from July 4th.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,568
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
This is entirely right. As if they are NOT running an essential food operation, the only thing it can be is a tourist attraction, which shouldn't be open.

Eh? There is no requirement for food to be essential, just for it to be food. I can now, as I couldn't in March, pop to the shop purely for a choccy bar. I might just do, in fact, this has given me the idea :D
 

Scrotnig

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2017
Messages
593
Eh? There is no requirement for food to be essential, just for it to be food. I can now, as I couldn't in March, pop to the shop purely for a choccy bar. I might just do, in fact, this has given me the idea :D
Yes, sorry, bad wording. Food shops are seen as essential and can open, whereas tourist attractions aren't and can't.
 

scotrail158713

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2019
Messages
1,826
Location
Dundee
There's no problem with her making her own decisions for her country
We’ve got to live with these decisions up here though :)
As I said on the other thread, hopefully Johnson’s announcement today makes Sturgeon wake up and change her stance a bit.
 

BJames

Established Member
Joined
27 Jan 2018
Messages
1,463
We’ve got to live with these decisions up here though :)
As I said on the other thread, hopefully Johnson’s announcement today makes Sturgeon wake up and change her stance a bit.
True :D Hopefully things will start going in a better direction for Scotland soon. Especially if these relaxations in England don't cause too many problems, she won't really have a leg to stand on. And if Wales and Northern Ireland follow England, she'll look like an even worse outlier.
 

RomeoCharlie71

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2017
Messages
1,856
Location
Scotland
True :D Hopefully things will start going in a better direction for Scotland soon. Especially if these relaxations in England don't cause too many problems, she won't really have a leg to stand on. And if Wales and Northern Ireland follow England, she'll look like an even worse outlier.
We won't start seeing the effect of the July 4th changes until mid to late July, remember, so still a good 4 or 5 weeks away until she'll be able to conclude anything based on what's happened down south.
 

Huntergreed

Established Member
Associate Staff
Events Co-ordinator
Joined
16 Jan 2016
Messages
3,178
Location
Dumfries
We’ve got to live with these decisions up here though :)
As I said on the other thread, hopefully Johnson’s announcement today makes Sturgeon wake up and change her stance a bit.
I’m starting to feel reassured that things in Scotland are changing for the better.

John Swinney announced today that schools can (hopefully) return full time in August with no distancing, which is very reassuring and welcome news. Sturgeon’s tone in the press conference today seemed to suggest that she was planning to ease lockdown more quickly than she had initially planned.

I imagine what will happen is on 15th July, 1.5 weeks behind England, we’ll move to a similar phase where hospitality can reopen, leisure and tourism can restart, holidays can go ahead (hopefully she’ll let us back on the rails).

Things are starting to look more promising across the board, and for the first time in ages, I’m starting to feel like “normal” isn’t too far away.
In terms of the thread title, the world did absolutely go “mad”, but now, slowly but surely, it seems to be calming down.
 
Last edited:

underbank

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2013
Messages
1,486
Location
North West England
This is entirely right. As if they are NOT running an essential food operation, the only thing it can be is a tourist attraction, which shouldn't be open.

Food shops never needed to be "essential" to open. They, along with all manner of other shops were never required to close in the first place, as shops selling food were on the "allowed to stay open" list. That was regardless of what "food" they sold. It certainly never had to be "essential" food.
 

scotrail158713

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2019
Messages
1,826
Location
Dundee
John Swinney announced today that schools can (hopefully) return full time in August with no distancing, which is very reassuring and welcome news
I’ve just seen that as well. It’s a big change from his “blended learning is likely until next June” message he was giving last week. Definitely a positive move though.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,294
Location
Bolton
Food shops never needed to be "essential" to open. They, along with all manner of other shops were never required to close in the first place, as shops selling food were on the "allowed to stay open" list. That was regardless of what "food" they sold. It certainly never had to be "essential" food.
Obviously. But given most people would describe the main appeal of a pick-your-own fruit farm as one of the experience, not the actual fruit, it's clear that they need to do some "repackaging" of the service they are providing as mainly a food retailer and not a tourist attraction. Usually a pick-your-own fruit farm is a tourist attraction, so changing the record makes plenty of sense.
 

BJames

Established Member
Joined
27 Jan 2018
Messages
1,463
I’m starting to feel reassured that things in Scotland are changing for the better.

John Swinney announced today that schools can (hopefully) return full time in August with no distancing, which is very reassuring and welcome news. Sturgeon’s tone in the press conference today seemed to suggest that she was planning to ease lockdown more quickly than she had initially planned.

I imagine what will happen is on 15th July, 1.5 weeks behind England, we’ll move to a similar phase where hospitality can reopen, leisure and tourism can restart, holidays can go ahead (hopefully she’ll let us back on the rails).

Things are starting to look more promising across the board, and for the first time in ages, I’m starting to feel like “normal” isn’t too far away.
In terms of the thread title, the world did absolutely go “mad”, but now, slowly but surely, it seems to be calming down.
I'm relieved for the Scottish kids. Going into school one day a week next year for months if not the whole year was unacceptable and I'm glad to see this has been shelved. And fully agree with your other comment, it does seem like things are starting to calm down and settle a bit more logically now.
 

kylemore

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2010
Messages
1,047
We’ve got to live with these decisions up here though :)
As I said on the other thread, hopefully Johnson’s announcement today makes Sturgeon wake up and change her stance a bit.
The FM is putting the 2m social distancing rule to a committee - might I be helpful and suggest coming down in 10cm increments, say on a weekly basis or perhaps 5cm increments would be more sensible?
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
Yeah, the schools climbdown in Scotland is hugely welcome, especially because of the statement that the return will be with no social distancing in place. If it can be axed there, it can be axed everywhere else.

Significant easing of the rules in England will help too. Scotland can't be far away from similar measures, because the consequences of not doing so are too serious. If I owned a tourist business in the Borders, I'd be seriously concerned if businesses a few miles away had significantly more freedom to operate.
 

Scotrail12

Member
Joined
16 Nov 2014
Messages
840
Agreed with those regarding the schools. Blended learning was an abysmal idea and I'm glad that it didn't survive for long. It wasn't even practical anyway, where would the kids have even gone for the remainder of those hours in the week? It seemed like a knee-jerk decision and when they actually looked through it, they realised it wouldn't work.

The kids deserve an education of the same standard as everyone (if not better than) before them did and they deserve the full social experience. Just hope that there aren't too many over-protective parents refusing to send kids back.
 

Huntergreed

Established Member
Associate Staff
Events Co-ordinator
Joined
16 Jan 2016
Messages
3,178
Location
Dumfries
The EIS are demanding perspex screens and face coverings in schools. :(
EIS Statement from General Secretary, Larry Flanagan:

Clearly, if the suppression of the virus continues to be successful, public health guidance may change and this will impact on schools as well as every other aspect of society.

"It would be a grave mistake, however, to believe that the virus has gone away and therefore in the event of schools reopening more fully than currently planned, appropriate mitigations must be in place to protect staff and pupils and prevent flare-ups either in terms of localised resurgence in infection or even a full second wave.

"In terms of schools, this means looking at measures already being used elsewhere such as mandatory face coverings, protective perspex shields, proactive testing of teachers and an appropriate level of physical distancing between pupils and most certainly between pupils and staff, alongside continued protections for vulnerable groups. The EIS would expect these issues to be agreed within CERG before schools could reopen more fully.

"A great deal of work at school level has already gone into planning for a blended learning model from August 11th, so any change to that will require time to adjust plans and conduct revised risk assessments. Again, this will need to be subject to discussion and agreement.

"Everyone wishes to see schools operate as normal, but this should be done in a way which is demonstrably safe for students and staff, which doesn't undermine public health messages, and which is done with the interest of school communities being first and foremost and not political expediency."

The unions aren't helping with this (they're making things harder than it needs to be), hopefully as the virus continues to decline we'll see a less 'fearful' approach taken.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,343
This is what happens when you stir up the kind of hysteria we had in Britain......
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
The unions aren't helping with this (they're making things harder than it needs to be), hopefully as the virus continues to decline we'll see a less 'fearful' approach taken.

I've personally benefited greatly from union membership, but have these idiots got nothing better to do? The number of fresh cases in Scotland is tiny.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,568
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Face shields of the type being worn in many settings may be sensible for primary schools where distancing is genuinely difficult. Fixed screens would seem a little pointless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top