Jamiescott1
Member
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2019
- Messages
- 1,116
They also seem like they want to fill up the broadcast time and justify having them so constantly announce new initiatives at them,such as masks on public transport and in hospitals
https://twitter.com/Darren_Dutton/status/1272676025474994176?s=09Much of the questions & answers are the same old topics and when you watch a briefing now it does feel like Groundhog Day.
Janey Godley has done some funny voiceovers with Nicola Sturgeon’s conferences as wellBest thing about the daily conference is what Darren Dutton on Twitter does with themhttps://twitter.com/Darren_Dutton/status/1272676025474994176?s=09
(not sure if twitter links are allowed ? )
That's what happens when celebrity journalists roll into the big top.And often completely unrelated to what has just been announced. The last I watched was a couple of weeks ago when a relaxation of lockdown (shops I think) was announced, which was pretty important, immediately followed by Laura Kuensberg asking an irrelevant question (can't remember what it was), but it was nothing at all to do with what had been announced in the briefing. It was as if she hadn't bothered listening (or had, but didn't have a clue what kind of relevant question to ask). I think the press should at least be able to think on their feet and ask relevant questions, especially someone as senior as Kuensberg - but the ITV's Peston does the same.
I do think the 5pm briefings should be scaled back now. Maybe reduce them to maybe three a week on Monday-Wednesday-Friday.
Much of the questions & answers are the same old topics and when you watch a briefing now it does feel like Groundhog Day.
As another forum member has stated, some questions put to the panel are not really relevant to Covid19 and the UK situation - the Hong Kong/HSBC scenario was a prime example.
The briefings still serve their purpose though in a lot of ways. I feel that even when we have seen the back of this dreadful virus, they should still consider holding one briefing a week into 2021, so we can be brought up to date with updates about our economy which is going to be in the worst state for 100 years.
CJ
It’s clear now when you watch the later news bulletins, that the question the political editors ask, is the one that fits in within their report that they are already putting together. They want the sound bite for that report, so will ask it regardless of what has actually been announced in the briefing.And often completely unrelated to what has just been announced. The last I watched was a couple of weeks ago when a relaxation of lockdown (shops I think) was announced, which was pretty important, immediately followed by Laura Kuensberg asking an irrelevant question (can't remember what it was), but it was nothing at all to do with what had been announced in the briefing. It was as if she hadn't bothered listening (or had, but didn't have a clue what kind of relevant question to ask). I think the press should at least be able to think on their feet and ask relevant questions, especially someone as senior as Kuensberg - but the ITV's Peston does the same.
It’s clear now when you watch the later news bulletins, that the question the political editors ask, is the one that fits in within their report that they are already putting together. They want the sound bite for that report, so will ask it regardless of what has actually been announced in the briefing.
It’s been annoying for a while when you get one of the specialist minsters on like Shapps, and then all the questions are about something that isn’t in his remit. And even worse than that, like others have said, increasingly the questions aren’t even about Covid-19.
Good. Daily was too frequent anyway.Update: Daily Press Conference scrapped.
Current Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/l...-updates-pubs-restaurants-cinemas-and-museums (See 14:10)
Good. Daily was too frequent anyway.
Preferably not with a politician, but with a medical officer and/or a scientific advisor.I'd still like to have kept one or two a week, though, perhaps one presenting and explaining the massively more detailed information that is sent out on Thursdays each week.
Preferably not with a politician, but with a medical officer and/or a scientific advisor.
Jenny Harries? I agree, she's very competent, transparent and always gives very thorough answers.Matt Hancock and Chris Whitty, I'd go with, possibly also his deputy who seems very competent (I forget her name).
They’ll still go ahead when there’s a big announcement. That’s the way I think it should’ve been for a few weeks now - most days they really have just been going through the motions. (Not surprising though - most days it’s just been the number of tests and deaths)I'd still like to have kept one or two a week, though, perhaps one presenting and explaining the massively more detailed information that is sent out on Thursdays each week.
I'd rather have Jenny Harries than Chris Whitty actually. Harries seems to have some notion of balancing medical needs with the need for life to carry on, whereas Whitty seems to focus purely on the science and would have us under house arrest for life if he could. At least that's how he comes across anyhow. "Social distancing is here to stay"...no it really isn't. The moment it's safe to get rid of it, (which isn't just yet), we will get rid of it. Either the government will, or the public will get rid of it for them. Their choice!Jenny Harries? I agree, she's very competent, transparent and always gives very thorough answers.
Then all you'd get is "stay at home, stay at home, stay at home" coming back again.Preferably not with a politician, but with a medical officer and/or a scientific advisor.
That’s the part that persuaded me they should be gone. And then you had the journalists increasingly asking non-covid questions.they're increasingly running out of things to say at the conferences
Although recently, including today, it seems as if the big announcements have been announced before the press conferences in any case.They’ll still go ahead when there’s a big announcement. That’s the way I think it should’ve been for a few weeks now - most days they really have just been going through the motions. (Not surprising though - most days it’s just been the number of tests and deaths)
Although recently, including today, it seems as if the big announcements have been announced before the press conferences in any case.
I do still get the impression that Whitty and his medical colleagues aren't fully comfortable with the data anymore, perhaps because they are fully aware that the 'new cases' statistic is starting to flatline, and they feel like we've reached a trough before another peak, however only time will tell.I do welcome the need for the press conferences to be scaled down but I do think they should still hold them at least a minimum of once a week throughout July and then maybe go once a fortnight in August if further restrictions are lifted.
I watched the final one tonight & Chris Whitty is really straight to the point with his statements and lays it on the line quite clearly that the UK is still a long way off beating this virus.
Chris Whitty and Jenny Harries are needed to keep reinforcing the dangers we still face. I do think that as a nation many many people will start to become complacent & I do feel it is important we maintain these conferences on a reduced basis to at least emphasise the importance that we should main reduced social distancing for the foreseeable future.
Indeed, some pretty macabre doom-mongering from Prof Whitty!