• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

What could happen to the Class 144 "Evolution" unit?

Status
Not open for further replies.

CBlue

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2020
Messages
859
Location
East Angular
Could always kill two birds with one stone and attach a 442 to it as a trailer. After all, that's the other oft mentioned solution looking for a problem.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,346
Location
Yorks
Morecambe to Lancaster would be suitable. Not sure if the crew out there sign 144 though

The route used to regularly get the three carriage 144's. Before the world dissappeared up it's own backside, a 2 carriage pacer would have struggled on the route on a Saturday (a 150 was often cosy).

I would agree - and why would preserved railways want one with those awful ironing-board seats with no padding, and a complicated swing-door bog to maintain?

I agree. The trad ones are a lot nicer generally and less teccy. I'd go for one of those.
 

507021

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
4,759
Location
Chester
Scrap it, as like all other Pacers it's utterly dreadful and should have been scrapped ten years ago.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,391
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I agree. The trad ones are a lot nicer generally and less teccy. I'd go for one of those.

You also need things a bit retro. I would pay to go and ride an original style Pacer (brown seats and orange end panels too, ideally) - even more to drive one and I probably will do that at some point - but not one that has the interior of a Thameslink EMU. Preserved lines running public services just as transport don't work - loads have tried it and failed e.g. Wensleydale - it only works with subsidy which is why they closed in the first place - if they were viable they'd be open and run by a TOC.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,346
Location
Yorks
You also need things a bit retro. I would pay to go and ride an original style Pacer (brown seats and orange end panels too, ideally) - even more to drive one and I probably will do that at some point - but not one that has the interior of a Thameslink EMU. Preserved lines running public services just as transport don't work - loads have tried it and failed e.g. Wensleydale - it only works with subsidy which is why they closed in the first place - if they were viable they'd be open and run by a TOC.

I agree - to get the nostalgia effect, you need a design that has been reasonably widespread and in use. Having commuted on 144's for well over ten years, I will undoubtedly be looking to travel on the more familiar varieties in the future.
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,382
I would agree - and why would preserved railways want one with those awful ironing-board seats with no padding, and a complicated swing-door bog to maintain?

I really can't see any logic in all these arguments for using it somewhere as a one-off. What would be the point? It's been tarted up a bit but is still a decrepit Pacer, as a one-off there would be nothing the same to cover when it was unavailable, it would require specific crew training, and it would probably have to make long ECS movements for depot work - e.g. where would it go from Lancaster? Leeds? Allerton? Newton Heath? None of them are exactly nearby!

Carnforth!
As a one-off piece of scrapworthy junk it would fit in well
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top