LeylandLen
Member
Is there a separate thread for the trains that are to be built for HS2 ? I heard they could be up to 400m long , carrying a max of 1100 people ! And what about the anticipated fares ?
There are a number of existing threads, this seems the most recent:Is there a separate thread for the trains that are to be built for HS2 ? I heard they could be up to 400m long , carrying a max of 1100 people ! And what about the anticipated fares ?
So in effect, the trains running on HS2 will be about 400m long, - just like Eurostar and some other mainline trains on high speed lines' trains. When they leave HS2 for destinations on the classic network they will be split to 200m long, i.e. compatible with current signalling, track formations and platforms.... But onto the subject of the trains per the topic intended, I believe the plan for the classic compatible sets (which is all there will be to start with) is 200m sets, which will mostly run in pairs until they leave HS2 for the conventional network.
So in effect, the trains running on HS2 will be about 400m long, - just like Eurostar and some other mainline trains on high speed lines' trains. When they leave HS2 for destinations on the classic network they will be split to 200m long, i.e. compatible with current signalling, track formations and platforms.
Generally yes. I think the idea is that a 400m train will run on the WCML from the north end of HS2 and split somewhere for Edinburgh and Glasgow. This will only have a few intermediate stops on the classic network, where 400m platforms already exist or can be created fairly easily. Crewe will also need 400m platforms so trains can split and join there and run coupled together towards London.So in effect, the trains running on HS2 will be about 400m long, - just like Eurostar and some other mainline trains on high speed lines' trains. When they leave HS2 for destinations on the classic network they will be split to 200m long, i.e. compatible with current signalling, track formations and platforms.
Most of the west coast line could already handle 400M train lengths as it handles freight trains of up to 800M in length. Only problem is platform length which would be where the problems are.
Most of the west coast line could already handle 400M train lengths as it handles freight trains of up to 800M in length. Only problem is platform length which would be where the problems are.
The only major problems are Manchester Piccadilly, Liverpool Lime Street, Glasgow Central, Birmingham New Street and 14 of the 16 platforms at Euston.
Apart from those minor terminals, dead easy!
Obviously London and Birmingham will have new stations which will remove the issues there. of these Glasgow has had proposals to extent beyond on the Clyde for ages, which will be a nightmare but doable if required. Liverpool is the issue, isn't it the reason that not all 390s were lengthened?The only major problems are Manchester Piccadilly, Liverpool Lime Street, Glasgow Central, Birmingham New Street and 14 of the 16 platforms at Euston.
Apart from those minor terminals, dead easy!
Obviously London and Birmingham will have new stations which will remove the issues there. of these Glasgow has had proposals to extent beyond on the Clyde for ages, which will be a nightmare but doable if required. Liverpool is the issue, isn't it the reason that not all 390s were lengthened?
As I understand it the only proposal to run 400m trains off the high speed lines is the Edinburgh/Glasgow. On the classic route this probably only calls intermediately at Preston, where platforms are nearly long enough already, and probably Carstairs to split/join but this needn't be a passenger stop or SDO could cater for the very small numbers likely to use it. Only half the train will get to Glasgow or Edinburgh.Obviously London and Birmingham will have new stations which will remove the issues there. of these Glasgow has had proposals to extent beyond on the Clyde for ages, which will be a nightmare but doable if required. Liverpool is the issue, isn't it the reason that not all 390s were lengthened?
There are also various proposals to run 400m sets between London and Crewe and split/join there to serve two destinations - this could include Liverpool. I suspect they are being a bit cagey about where these would go, as the obvious destination is Chester or beyond but HS2 doesn't want to pay for electrifying that. Perhaps closer integration of HS2 and NR planning will get round that sort of problem.
I think there was scope for up to 2TPH of split/joins. One could be as you suggest and the other could be for Chester if electrified, and might otherwise just wait at Crewe to attach to a southbound. Or run to London as a 200m set.I believe the second half of that one is likely to go either all main stations to Preston, or there is a campaign to get it to go to Carlisle as otherwise Lancaster, Oxenholme and Penrith will lose direct London services (they are proposed to be served by a 200m train from Birmingham in phase 2).