• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

No duff at Keighley this year!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
Hurrah! 47402 is unavailable for this year's gala, and 33109 has been drafted in instead :) All the duff-avoidance moves that had to be in place for last year's excellent event will be unnecessary this time.

Why anyone thought having a duff there would be a good idea in the first place is beyond me. Maybe this is fate trying to tell event organisers that duffs are, well, duff.....
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

matt

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
30 Jun 2005
Messages
8,858
Location
Rugby
Why anyone thought having a duff there would be a good idea in the first place is beyond me. Maybe this is fate trying to tell event organisers that duffs are, well, duff.....

Because maybe there are class 47 followers like there are for other classes :roll:
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
Do you know what DRS are sending already then?

Well, I admit no, but I'm keeping my fingers crossed for a 20 or 37. At least if they send a 47 there will only be one, rather than two if 47402 had shown up.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Because maybe there are class 47 followers like there are for other classes :roll:


Maybe some sort of class 47 gala could be held for them, so that the rest of us could point and stare ;)

Sorry, this isn't meant to be taken 100% seriously and I've been guilty of this sort of thing on here before. I like gently ribbing duff bashers, but obviously when it comes down to it liking duffs is no more irrational than liking any other type of loco.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top