Esker-pades
Established Member
I disagree. The point of checks and balances is to prevent the (in this case) executive doing something detrimental/damaging.The point of checks and balances is that they are supposed to lock in the status quo.
I disagree. The point of checks and balances is to prevent the (in this case) executive doing something detrimental/damaging.The point of checks and balances is that they are supposed to lock in the status quo.
Some countries aren't keen on as much CCTV and mass surveillance as we have in the UK.I don't entirely see the need for stickers when cameras can just look up by registration number.
I don't know - can UK cameras identify the car/owner if they are on foreign plates - and for that matter tolls (eg London) be chased up if unpaid?Some countries aren't keen on as much CCTV and mass surveillance as we have in the UK.
Yes and yes.can UK cameras identify the car/owner if they are on foreign plates - and for that matter tolls (eg London) be chased up if unpaid?
Yes and yes.
If there is an EU databank (which doesn't help for Russian cars etc) then won't we lose that after Brexit - at least if there's no deal??How does that work..is it useful only if there's already a reference to the foreign plate on the UK PNC, or is there realtime access to EU vehicle and driver data? Sorry, I know this is taking things a tad off-topic.
Yes and yes.
Could you elaborate please?That's not true.
Not all foreign registered vehicles are successfully fined. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-40996859Could you elaborate please?
Figures show about 1,160,000 fines - worth about £81m - have been passed to a European debt recovery agency since the Dart Charge began in 2014
Mr Freeman - known as "Mr Loophole" - said it sent out a bad message.
Highways England said non-payment was being followed up in the UK and abroad..
Some countries aren't keen on as much CCTV and mass surveillance as we have in the UK.
The government has published its assessment of the impact of a no-deal Brexit on business and trade.
The report said "some food prices are likely to increase" and customs checks could cost business £13bn a year in a no-deal scenario.
It also said there was "little evidence that businesses are preparing in earnest".
But the government said it had undertaken "significant action" to prepare for no deal on 29 March.
It comes as the PM has promised MPs votes on delaying Brexit or ruling out no deal, if her deal is rejected again.
Theresa May's Brexit deal was comprehensively rejected by MPs on 15 January and she has said they will get a second chance to vote on it - possibly with some changes - by 12 March.
The UK is currently due to leave the EU on 29 March - with or without a deal.
The government's report, which was drawn up for the cabinet, said: "One of the most visible ways in which the UK would be affected by delays in goods crossing the Channel is our food supply, 30% of which comes from the EU."
Possible disruption to cross-Channel trade "would lead to reduced availability and choice of products", the document said.
"This would not lead to an overall shortage of food in the UK, and less than one in 10 food items would be directly affected by any delays across the short Channel crossings.
"However, at the time of year we will be leaving the EU, the UK is particularly reliant on the short Channel crossings for fresh fruit and vegetables.
"In the absence of other action from government, some food prices are likely to increase, and there is a risk that consumer behaviour could exacerbate, or create, shortages in this scenario.
"As of February 2019, many businesses in the food supply industry are unprepared for a no-deal scenario."
It repeated analysis suggesting a no-deal scenario could leave the UK economy 6.3% to 9% smaller after 15 years, compared to what it would have been.
It said the worst-hit areas economically in a no-deal scenario would be Wales (-8.1%), Scotland (-8.0%), Northern Ireland (-9.1%) and the north east (-10.5%).
The document said slightly more than two-thirds of the government's most critical preparation projects - and fewer than 85% overall - were "on track" for completion in time for 29 March.
It also warned that a no-deal Brexit would "affect the viability of many businesses across Northern Ireland", and said some businesses could relocate to the Republic of Ireland.
The publication of the document follows a proposed amendment last month from former Conservative MP Anna Soubry and backed by ex-Labour MP Chuka Umunna - who are both now members of the newly-formed Independent Group.
In the Commons, Ms Soubry told MPs that the document was only a summary and she asked for access to the papers "which actually go into the detail", which she was shown in privy council terms (confidential terms).
"It's the detail that actually fully explains the impact of a no-deal Brexit, leaving the Brexit Secretary to comment that it would be 'ruinous' for this country," she said.
Deputy speaker Lindsay Hoyle said he was "sorry" that Ms Soubry felt she had been "slightly short-changed on what would be available".
"I would expect ministers to take on board your request and hopefully... you will pursue it other than on this point of order," he said.
And Mr Umunna said the report painted "a disastrous picture of the catastrophe which would befall our country if there is a no-deal Brexit".
"In light of what she knows, it is utterly irresponsible for the Prime Minister to keep a no-deal Brexit on the table given the extreme damage it will do," he said.
"These papers set out how food prices will rise, we may see panic buying, there will be severe disruption at the border, and jobs and livelihoods would immediately be put at risk.
"Today she told the House of Commons she is listening, but MPs have passed a motion rejecting a no-deal Brexit and yet she refuses to request an extension of the Article 50 process in order to stop no-deal
happening."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-polit...ews&ocid=socialflow_twitter&ns_source=twitter
Brexit: No-deal impact assessment published
some food prices are likely to increase
This chimes directly against the cheaper food mantra that is continued to be spouted by Reeeees-Moggg and co.Possible disruption to cross-Channel trade "would lead to reduced availability and choice of products", the document said.
"This would not lead to an overall shortage of food in the UK, and less than one in 10 food items would be directly affected by any delays across the short Channel crossings.
"However, at the time of year we will be leaving the EU, the UK is particularly reliant on the short Channel crossings for fresh fruit and vegetables.
It also said there was "little evidence that businesses are preparing in earnest".
Good for business(!)"affect the viability of many businesses across Northern Ireland"
It would be very interesting to see the full detail. If people know what is actually going to happen, we can all make an informed judgement. No doubt the usual "fake news", "project fear" and the like would take over again."It's the detail that actually fully explains the impact of a no-deal Brexit, leaving the Brexit Secretary to comment that it would be 'ruinous' for this country," she said.
Could you elaborate please?
Until the education system and teaching of languages reaches a decent standard then this country can not cope with nor deserves to be a part of the EU. Many of the remain camp are more the real xenophobe than the rabid Farage types - they wish to remain in the EU yet are too lazy to learn any of it's languages. People will SELL to you in any language - they much prefer to BUY in their own.
Foreign language learning is about as good in Ireland as in the UK, but no one seriously thinks the Irish are anything other than committed Europeans. The de facto international language in Europe is English and only a minority of Europeans fluently speak any other European language other than their own and English and very few speak more than one other language. For example, not many Polish people can speak Finnish and not many Finnish people can speak Polish, so when Polish and Finnish people talk together English would be the obvious language to use. Even the Dutch, who are considered to be the most polyglot country in Europe if not the world, will only generally speak Dutch, English and German fluently at best. When a Dutch person goes on holiday in Finland, they will use English just like a Brit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_the_Netherlands
Given the veto applies, will the EU grant one?Vote 502 to 20 in favour of allowing the government flexibility in the Article 50 deadline date. There is now legitimacy for May to ask the EU for an extension, should she need it.
Surprisingly, I don't know. The only state making negative noises is France. They have said that they will block unless there is a clear objective which has changed.Given the veto applies, will the EU grant one?
In theory, a "better" deal. In practice, probably sod all.Secondly what would an extension achieve?
Looks like our votes to have fewer immigrants thus freeing up space on the roads/hospitals/schools/surgeries is on target then.Net migration to the UK from countries outside the European Union has hit its highest level for 15 years, says the Office for National Statistics.
Figures show 261,000 more non-EU citizens came to the UK than left in the year ending September 2018 - the highest since 2004.
In contrast, net migration from EU countries has continued to fall to a level last seen in 2009.
Meanwhile; https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47400679
Looks like our votes to have fewer immigrants thus freeing up space on the roads/hospitals/schools/surgeries is on target then.
GREAT!!!!, if it doesn't bother you give us our freedom of movement back!!!!As ever, it's the remainers who are most obsessed with immigration