• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Northern strike action suspended

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,349
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Is this not the same deal that GA agreed with the RMT last year?
It's a bit of a disappointment, as I was hoping for a role like Southern's OBS, which as a passenger I find a lot better than a Northern Guard you may or may not see!

If the drivers are going to operate (at least release) the doors I think you're going to see more of them anyway. It will make the revenue part of the guard role much easier.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
8,411
Location
UK
If the drivers are going to operate (at least release) the doors I think you're going to see more of them anyway. It will make the revenue part of the guard role much easier.

Yes I do agree it's a step in the right direction!
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,864
Location
East Anglia
Is this not the same deal that GA agreed with the RMT last year?
It's a bit of a disappointment, as I was hoping for a role like Southern's OBS, which as a passenger I find a lot better than a Northern Guard you may or may not see!
GA guards are guaranteed this role until the end of the current franchise in 2025.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,339
Location
Yorks
Hooray,

It sounds remarkably like the sort of arrangement that some of us have been arguing for for the past two years.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,779
I'm totally lost in all this - I thought Northern were always going to have someone other than the driver onboard - ie. to access the ramp for wheelchairs etc. I assumed they wanted to devalue the "guard" so they could pay less; can someone fill me in as in if a train is DOO; who gets the ramp out? Who checks the tickets??
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
8,411
Location
UK
I'm totally lost in all this - I thought Northern were always going to have someone other than the driver onboard - ie. to access the ramp for wheelchairs etc. I assumed they wanted to devalue the "guard" so they could pay less; can someone fill me in as in if a train is DOO; who gets the ramp out? Who checks the tickets??

On full DOO trains, like the GWML, platform staff use the ramps, there aren't regular ticket checks, but most stations have barriers, and there are RPI stings at the smaller stations.

However on Southern there's an OBS who does the ramp and collects tickets.
 

geoffk

On Moderation
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,931
Location
Exeter
On full DOO trains, like the GWML, platform staff use the ramps, there aren't regular ticket checks, but most stations have barriers, and there are RPI stings at the smaller stations.
However on Southern there's an OBS who does the ramp and collects tickets.
On a DOO train in Ireland (Cork to Cobh) a few years ago, the driver got out of his cab to attend to the wheelchair ramp and stow it away afterwards, as the stations on the branch are unstaffed.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,779
On full DOO trains, like the GWML, platform staff use the ramps, there aren't regular ticket checks, but most stations have barriers, and there are RPI stings at the smaller stations.

However on Southern there's an OBS who does the ramp and collects tickets.
Thanks for that, does it mean someone turning up in a wheelchair at an unmanned station can't get on? In 2018??

Edit - adds that I have just read the post above. Could a driver not see the pax; maybe if thye are in a shelter?
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,826
I'm totally lost in all this - I thought Northern were always going to have someone other than the driver onboard - ie. to access the ramp for wheelchairs etc. I assumed they wanted to devalue the "guard" so they could pay less; can someone fill me in as in if a train is DOO; who gets the ramp out? Who checks the tickets??

Northern were going to vaguely try and put someone on every train, but without any guarantee that they would be on every train. On trains where they weren't on - there would be nobody to get the ramp out, check thy tickets, or do any of the 101 other things a qualified guard can and does do.

Now they have backed down from this stance, and agreed that a 2nd member of staff will be on 100% of trains that run, full stop.
 

Andyh82

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
4,577
I’m guessing something has happened behind the scenes, as they’ve been to ACAS before and nothing ever changed.

I expect Arriva have reached the end of their patience playing this game of the DfT’s making, and either they threatened to pull out of the franchise and/or some money has become available meaning Arriva can now afford to keep the guards without any financial impact.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
8,411
Location
UK
Thanks for that, does it mean someone turning up in a wheelchair at an unmanned station can't get on? In 2018??

Edit - adds that I have just read the post above. Could a driver not see the pax; maybe if thye are in a shelter?

But all of the stations are staffed on the GWML AFAIK
 

baz962

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2017
Messages
3,664
Northern were going to vaguely try and put someone on every train, but without any guarantee that they would be on every train. On trains where they weren't on - there would be nobody to get the ramp out, check thy tickets, or do any of the 101 other things a qualified guard can and does do.

Now they have backed down from this stance, and agreed that a 2nd member of staff will be on 100% of trains that run, full stop.

So does this mean that if a couple of guards go sick say , they just cancel the train ?
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,864
Location
East Anglia
So does this mean that if a couple of guards go sick say , they just cancel the train ?
Will be just as it is now. If they can cover they will but no way will any train run with just the driver.
 

bengley

Established Member
Joined
18 May 2008
Messages
1,987
I’m guessing something has happened behind the scenes, as they’ve been to ACAS before and nothing ever changed.

I expect Arriva have reached the end of their patience playing this game of the DfT’s making, and either they threatened to pull out of the franchise and/or some money has become available meaning Arriva can now afford to keep the guards without any financial impact.
Aren't DB selling Arriva?
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
10,499
Location
Cheshire
I’m guessing something has happened behind the scenes, as they’ve been to ACAS before and nothing ever changed.

I expect Arriva have reached the end of their patience playing this game of the DfT’s making, and either they threatened to pull out of the franchise and/or some money has become available meaning Arriva can now afford to keep the guards without any financial impact.

Arriva have, allegedly been making some unhappy noises to DfT for a while. So perhaps this is not a million miles from what has gone on. The DafT have had their heels dug in deeply for a long time, so to suddenly give way suggests more of a fear of another franchise fail rather than bowing to union pressure. And also consider who is the stakeholder of DB, and a certain political stalemate. Just saying like...
 

baz962

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2017
Messages
3,664
Most welcome mate. Everything is done to avoid a cancellation.

I was wondering though , if it happens a fair bit , do you think passengers will get cheesed off with no train. I'm just wondering if most passengers would rather a second person or no train .
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
So RMT have caved to the position Northern and the Government have been offering for months and they've previously refused to even discuss (guarantee of a second trained staff member on board, not necessarily a guard)?

Wonder what caused them to finally stop digging their heels in and actually talk about the offer on the table.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,864
Location
East Anglia
I was wondering though , if it happens a fair bit , do you think passengers will get cheesed off with no train. I'm just wondering if most passengers would rather a second person or no train .
Whether they get cheesed off or not makes no difference whatsoever. It rarely happens now so what's to think it will happen more in future?
 

Eccles1983

On Moderation
Joined
4 Sep 2016
Messages
841
So RMT have caved to the position Northern and the Government have been offering for months and they've previously refused to even discuss (guarantee of a second trained staff member on board, not necessarily a guard)?

Wonder what caused them to finally stop digging their heels in and actually talk about the offer on the table.


Eh?

The RMT hasn't caved. The offer was second person on board, which could mean any employee.

Today's offer is a conductor on board every train.

Capitulation has happened on one side only.
 

Muenchener

Member
Joined
31 May 2018
Messages
142
So with this issue finally on the down wind leg and approaching finals; what are we going to find to exercise us from here on in I wonder?

Oh well; I guess there is still the question of the delivery of the Northern May 2019 timetable... :rolleyes:
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
10,499
Location
Cheshire
So with this issue finally on the down wind leg and approaching finals; what are we going to find to exercise us from here on in I wonder?

Oh well; I guess there is still the question of the delivery of the Northern May 2019 timetable... :rolleyes:

Don't worry, there is still the issue of the 195/331 seats to be fully debated....;)
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
8,411
Location
UK
And also consider who is the stakeholder of DB, and a certain political stalemate. Just saying like...

Northern is only a very small part of Arriva's operations!
DB has little say over Arriva, as the day to day operations are run from Sunderland not Berlin!
DB has big problems of it's own, before it starts micromanaging Arriva.
Given that DB is semi privatised, I'm not sure how much control the German government has over it!
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,826
So RMT have caved to the position Northern and the Government have been offering for months and they've previously refused to even discuss (guarantee of a second trained staff member on board, not necessarily a guard)?

Wonder what caused them to finally stop digging their heels in and actually talk about the offer on the table.

Other way around it would seem - it sounds like it's the same arrangement that had been reached months ago with Greater Anglia. A guard on every train, just not necessarily in charge of the doors. RMT allegedly proposed this a long time ago, and it was Northern/DFT who refused to accept - and who have now caved.
 

Aivilo

Member
Joined
15 Jan 2014
Messages
646
Location
Surrey
Its not a case of RMT caving at all. Northern would not agree to a 2nd safety critical member of staff onboard which is the big issue.
 

CHAPS2034

Member
Joined
13 Mar 2018
Messages
646
So with this issue finally on the down wind leg and approaching finals; what are we going to find to exercise us from here on in I wonder?

Oh well; I guess there is still the question of the delivery of the Northern May 2019 timetable... :rolleyes:

From your aircraft analogy above, let's hope this issue doesn't suffer a "go-around"

Well, to exercise us, here's a few ideas.
  • What about training for all these new trains whilst maintaining a full schedule
  • And now we appear to be getting a 6 day railway again, what about Sunday driver availability?
  • Electric trains via Bolton?
  • Withdrawal - or not - of Pacers by the end of the year
  • Northern's "customer service"
Plenty to go at. All in their own threads of course :D

And indeed, I (and many others I guess!) would be interested to hear of the views of DfT's Peter Wilkinson on this solution ... But sadly I expect we never will :E
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top