• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

LNER 225 Failure (01/02)

Status
Not open for further replies.

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
A mate of mine was on a south bound service from Edinburgh to Kings Cross today when the 225 set lost power just after Morpeth. According to him they managed to set off again when suddenly the brakes came on hard and apparently the doors flew open!

It seems the 91 went pop with the cab being full of smoke.

Finally arrived two hours late in Newcastle after being dragged.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sjpowermac

Established Member
Joined
26 May 2018
Messages
2,079
A mate of mine was on a south bound service from Edinburgh to Kings Cross today when the 225 set lost power just after Morpeth. According to him they managed to set off again when suddenly the brakes came on hard and apparently the doors flew open!

It seems the 91 went pop with the cab being full of smoke.

Finally arrived two hours late in Newcastle after being dragged.

Maybe 1E02 05:48 Edinburgh to KGX, looks like it was canned at Newcastle:

http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/Y70214/2019/02/01/advanced

Reason given: ‘due to a problem with the overhead line power collection equipment (M1).’

How did your mate know the cab was full of smoke?
 

sjpowermac

Established Member
Joined
26 May 2018
Messages
2,079
So have a lot of loco and unit classes and they behave better than a 91.
To be honest, I think the East Coast would have been better with a fleet of Class 89s. The Class 91 being designed for 140mph ended up with some innovative design features that weren’t needed for 125mph running.

I’m struggling the think of any other loco class that have put in the same mileage as the Class 91s, unless you count Class 43 power cars. I know the XC 47s did a lot of miles but they didn’t exactly cover themselves in glory...

Anyhow, it will be interesting to hear if anything more comes to light about the door problem, it sounds like a serous incident from what the OP said.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,879
So have a lot of loco and unit classes and they behave better than a 91.
You really need to do some research on this rather than just posting groundless assertions.

Other than HSTs, I cannot think of any type that has done as a high a mileage over such a long period. Indeed the Pendolino fleet is probably the only equivalent among newer types. Reliability-wise, and looking at facts,
in the Modern Railways "Golden Spanners" the 91+Mark 4 fleet was more reliable (just) than all the HST fleets (and three times as reliable as the GWR HSTs), and roughly the same as the Pendolinos and West Coast Voyagers.
 

Highlandspring

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2017
Messages
2,777
Reported as 91116 having pantograph issues; no suggestion that any doors “flew open” that I can see.
 

Suraggu

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
1,083
Location
The Far North
Doors don't automatically open on Mk.4's, they can lose Interlock on the doors for various reasons however, eg Statcon not working.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
18,328
Location
Glasgow
A mate of mine was on a south bound service from Edinburgh to Kings Cross today when the 225 set lost power just after Morpeth. According to him they managed to set off again when suddenly the brakes came on hard and apparently the doors flew open!

It seems the 91 went pop with the cab being full of smoke.

Finally arrived two hours late in Newcastle after being dragged.

Having read up on some stuff, I'm thinking a TDM fault caused the brakes to come garden on. Whether the doors did indeed open or not though, I don't think they are wired into the TDM but rather the FDM system.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
Having read up on some stuff, I'm thinking a TDM fault caused the brakes to come garden on. Whether the doors did indeed open or not though, I don't think they are wired into the TDM but rather the FDM system.

I was reading some of Fireman Fred Wagstaffs tales on another site. According to Fred, he was asked by Control to pass a red and couple up to another failed 225 set to push them forward. Control abruptly told him not to connect the TDM as it it would unlock the doors. He had to push the train with his second man in the cab of the failed set and use hand signals.

So yeah quite possibly the TDM may have interfered with the door locks.
 
Last edited:

whhistle

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
2,636
At 0735 1E02 came ot a stand.
Following an investigation, the driver reported seeing smoke from the loco and was unable to lower pantograph from the DVT. The driver had to do walk back to the other end of the train to manually do this with assistance from the maintenance. 1E02 was then declared a failure.

then...

1E02 is at a stand at Little Benton (North of Heaton depot) with a loss of line light and interlock

and then...

As a result of this failure, the power was switched off, which resulted in units around Newcastle coming to a stand.
 
Last edited:

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
18,328
Location
Glasgow
I was reading some of Fireman Fred Wagstaffs tales on another site. According to Fred, he was asked by Control to pass a red and couple up to another failed 225 set to push them forward. Control abruptly told him not to connect the TDM as it it would unlock the doors. He had to push the train with his second man in the cab of the failed set and use hand signals.

So yeah quite possibly the TDM may have interfered with the door locks.

That was exactly where I got the idea from! :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top