DarloRich
Veteran Member
It is the dated nostalgia i find boring with these threads. All anyone ever does is offer the same old dull and unimaginative names from the past that don't really reflect modern society. I will, therefore, suggest 5 categories from which names may be selected:
It must be noted that names these days are, generally, about generating PR NOT nice train names. Clearly the names chosen need to reflect both the heritage of the route in question along with recognising the vast changes and regeneration that have taken place in our cities and the make up of our communities. There should also be a reflection of the people and places served by current services and the lives people lead in 21st century Britain. Clearly namings can not be divisive or controversial but have to be more than just a list of dead, old, white, blokes! They have to mean something to the public paying for tickets, help to engender in the travelling public a feeling of “togetherness” and a connection with the company and the service offered. Ultimately they have to be used to entice people onto the train. It may also be used to help create links between local communities/groups and the company, ultimately helping to reduce trespass or rail crime.
We need to remove our trainspotter hats and wear our commercial hats. What PR does a name give us? Will it get us in the papers? Can I get a slot on the ITV news via this? That is what is important not that 47689 was once called University of Nowhereville.
they aren't named after warships unless they are space warships.
the RN have 20 front line ships and 10 submarines. Most people would struggle to name mythological creatures or people beyond the obvious ones. Take a look at the names on the barrier vehicles used by Arlington - Liwet? Pascher? Perpetiel? I have a classics background and struggle with those!
We need a mix of names from a mix of sources.
There will be but it will be an informal grouping rather than a standing body. I suspect they would come together once the PR director had convinced the board of a cunning plan to develop free PR via a naming campaign
- Heritage/ culture
- Tourism
- Places
- People who have made an outstanding contribution ( or are famous and alive!)
- Responsibility & reward ( sponsorship & support for charity works)
It must be noted that names these days are, generally, about generating PR NOT nice train names. Clearly the names chosen need to reflect both the heritage of the route in question along with recognising the vast changes and regeneration that have taken place in our cities and the make up of our communities. There should also be a reflection of the people and places served by current services and the lives people lead in 21st century Britain. Clearly namings can not be divisive or controversial but have to be more than just a list of dead, old, white, blokes! They have to mean something to the public paying for tickets, help to engender in the travelling public a feeling of “togetherness” and a connection with the company and the service offered. Ultimately they have to be used to entice people onto the train. It may also be used to help create links between local communities/groups and the company, ultimately helping to reduce trespass or rail crime.
We need to remove our trainspotter hats and wear our commercial hats. What PR does a name give us? Will it get us in the papers? Can I get a slot on the ITV news via this? That is what is important not that 47689 was once called University of Nowhereville.
with the 68s being named for warships
they aren't named after warships unless they are space warships.
Warships and those from mythology sound the best, are evocative and are timeless IMO. Of course, RN warships do have a naming committee.
the RN have 20 front line ships and 10 submarines. Most people would struggle to name mythological creatures or people beyond the obvious ones. Take a look at the names on the barrier vehicles used by Arlington - Liwet? Pascher? Perpetiel? I have a classics background and struggle with those!
We need a mix of names from a mix of sources.
I wasn't sure if some TOCs maybe had something like it in their PR departments or whatever.
There will be but it will be an informal grouping rather than a standing body. I suspect they would come together once the PR director had convinced the board of a cunning plan to develop free PR via a naming campaign