A park bench on wheels, utilitarian, very basic a commuter train with no frills.
Tightlock couplers with 42 pin MU jumper.
What are your views on class 455s?
Personally I dont know wether I like them or I hate them, it may sound odd but I like the design of them because it looks old. I dont know what the insides of them are like.
). I've always had a soft spot for the 455s:
My grandma's house overlooked Ewell West station on the Raynes Park-Epsom line and when I was young I was attracted by the sight of 455s in NSE (and later SWT) livery either stopping there or running through non-stop. At the time I really liked the distinctive whining sound they made when pulling away from stations.
Other than that, the 455s seem to have done their job of ferrying around commuters on the former South Western & Central divisions pretty well. Plus, they've always looked good in NSE livery!
They are simple. They are reliable.
But personally i'd rather take a 450.
Deal I will have the 455, you can have the disastro!
One problem with them, frequently outlined by my friend who lives in Twickenham, is that in true inner-suburban style, they lack toilets. Not a problem so much in inner London, however, when I lived in Reading for a short period in 2001, It used to irritate me no end when the usual weekday Reading - Waterloo VEP's would be substituted on the weekends by 455's. Did they seriously think that just because the 455's were around 12 years younger than the VEP's, travellers from beyond Feltham would consider inner suburban non-toilet stock as a weekend treat?
. Being about 14 I could "hold on", but what if you have a weak bladder, are elderly, or pregnant. Some might say: "get off at the next station, use the loo there and get on half-an-hour later", but what if there's no toilet at the station you get off at, or it's closed? Worth thinking about.:roll:The Southern refurbs are a bit dingy (although still better than original), but the SWT ones are rather nice, almost entirely new feeling inside (and they were refurbished a good few years ago now!).
I have to say that I once had to endure a non-stop journey from Woking to Waterloo (Via the Richmond Loop) on a 455 that was the last working of the night into London, and the absence of an on-board toilet was an extreme inconvenience (Pun not intended) to myself....The lack of a toilet [on 455's] is irritating...
They're not bad at all really. The Southern refurbs are a bit dingy (although still better than original), but the SWT ones are rather nice, almost entirely new feeling inside (and they were refurbished a good few years ago now!).
Though toilets are provided in many cases as a courtesy towards passengers - There is no legal obligation for them to have such facilities on board any train.hock:
After this journey, I did write to SWT asking if small lavvys could be installed on those trains to avoid such issues
The 455s aren't all bad. Sure they don't look the most artistic of trains, but they are MK3 based and have a good top speed for commuter services.
455s are ok and do their jobs well enough.
I will not say any more because there is nothing more to say other than 'replace with 377s'
You needs therapy bro! You needs therapy
It's down to wheelchair people requiring a toilet if normal people have a toilet. If you install a new lavatory for normal pax, you've got to have a huge one for wheelchair pax. Therefore, it's easier just to have no toilets at all.
I find it a bit odd that they weren't just built as "3rd rail 317s" with a pair of narrow loos in the non driving trailer. The requirement for accesible loos didn't exist when they were built.