Given what I quoted upthread, could it be at Police instruction? Mind you you'd think that'd be immediate.
Completely pedantic, but the short note on the ScotRail website mentions nothing about closure, just that trains won't call there any more.![]()
I know that people in the Sarf have strange ideas about Scotland but I don't think we are a Police State yet.
Completely pedantic, but the short note on the ScotRail website mentions nothing about closure, just that trains won't call there any more.![]()
Why is it not legally being closed? I.e the same closure procedures as Breich. Unlike Barlaston, Wedgwood and Norton Bridge (now closed) it hasn’t got a replacement service. The closure procedure surely applies to Scotland because Breich went through it and remained open, despite costs of keeping it. Is it going to be closed permanently or is it just temporary until the site is ever used again?
It is for public use now and has been since 1986.
IBM Halt
This station is for use only by staff / contractors of IBM.
Please be aware the area out with the station platform is private property.
ScotRail have no resposibility for this area.
Thank you.
Ah, it's gone entirely? OK, in that case it makes sense as there will be no demand at all as it doesn't serve anything else.
Wiki says:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spango_Valley
Definitely no need then!
To be fair, Greenock and Inverclyde as a whole is a bit of an odd situation when it comes to rail travel.I was mulling over in my head whether it was worth building a Greenock South Parkway on the site, it’s pretty well located off the A78 and could certainly attract some traffic with a decent sized car park, the only thing is that the possible users will probably live closer to Inverkip or Branchton, plus 1 TPH isn’t much to write home about. Overall, probably better to either close or drop to a parliamentary service & safeguard the site for re-opening at some point.
It isn't. A forumite posted a very interesting blog post about their visit to the station earlier this year which can be found here: https://felixunstructured.weebly.com/lusblog/ibm-halt-and-a-bonus
It shows how the station serves only private land and has a picture of a sign on the platform saying:
I'm a little sad to see it go, but was also sad to see IBM go. Unfortunately times change and there's no use for the station now. Hopefully one day it'll reopen for either some new business there, but I won't hold my breath given how nobody seems to want it.
It isn't. A forumite posted a very interesting blog post about their visit to the station earlier this year which can be found here: https://felixunstructured.weebly.com/lusblog/ibm-halt-and-a-bonus
Did you ever make it to Lympstone Commando?In 2014, I spent a week visiting many Scottish stations in my old car and I was heading from Branchton in to the IBM complex in the twilight hours.
A male security guard on patrol politely asked my reason for being there. I was startled as there was no barriers, not even any cars in the car park. Just a deer and some rabbits in the car park. I gave the lost tourist excuse and was allowed to pull up in the rear of the car park to get my bearings and was about to leave when I realised I'd parked up at the footpath for the station. I hotfooted it to the platform for a photo and returned to the car and made off for Inverkip
Did you ever make it to Lympstone Commando?
Not for the public, anyway, the removal of 'for staff only' in the timetable doesn't change the legal status. Is this also true of Redcar British Steel?So this station was never officially 'open'? I'd be fascinated to see what effect that had on the rest of the legal stuff related to the railway.
As far as I know, no.has the correct consultation procedure been used? If not this needs to be challenged from a point of principle.
Am I alone in being disappointed that there's no Gaelic translation of IBM on the station sign? I appreciate that it's a brand name, but still a shame that nobody had the initiative to translate International Business Machines!