• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Experiences of travelling on Pacers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chris217

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2018
Messages
646
Been watching a lot of videos
on YouTube of these and there are pretty
strong feelings against these from what I
have read in some of the comments.

Like them or loath them is the main attitude I see.

My experience with travelling on them has
almost always been fine tbh.
The only exception was one turned up at Warrington Central about 15mins late due to only the back car working,hence it was about 45mph flat out back to Lime Street.

My first experience on 142s was when I moved to Liverpool in 1989 and I took an instant liking to them.
The Pacers hadn't reached Cardiff in time before I moved up!
Anyway,back in Liverpool, many still had the old engines and gearboxes,so it was hilarious listening to the engines changing gear,sometimes not even in unison lol.

I did however have an opinion after the Winsford accident that at best,the Pacers should remain on local lines only,even though it was an ecs move at the time running on the WCML.

I have always been a fan though.

On an overnight class 37 bash from Holyhead,waiting at Llandudno Jcn,my train turned up with a pair of 142s+150 vice the 37 and stock.
I was determined to bash this as Pacers in New Street would have been a major claim!

It didn't happen tjough,as the 2 142s were detached at Chester to my horror and the 150 went solo!

The main complaints from people I have noticed on youtube...
Always overcrowded
Bus style seats
Nodding donkey rides.

There is always going to be complaints about something old up north when London and the South keep getting new trains all the time!

Most of those contributes have now been sorted except overcrowding which is really down to the operator.

Although these are nearing the end of their lives due to DDA compliant regulations,we must remember that intended as a short gap,these have actually performed very well on their local and inner suburban lines they were intended for,and deserve their place in British Rail history whether you like them or not.
One of each should be saved for preservation in my opinion.
Always a divider this one lol.

As rail enthusiasts,many of us hated the
HST's when they first came out as they replaced the much loved Westerns and Deltics.
Like sprinters replacing the old DMU's and 66s replacing 37,47s and 56s.
And even now, the IEPs replacing the HST's.

Ha,the only thing I have never really forgiven was the Voyagers replacing 47s and HST's.
We have all moved on and shown our respect for what we had.

Pacers have their own following just like everything else,but admitting it can be something else though.
Happy replying
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

js1000

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2014
Messages
1,023
Pacers are fine as a limited operation on branch lines. However on busy inter-city commuter services they are not fit for purpose.

Most importantly, it's 2018 - I don't think trains with 1980s bus style seating, lack of level access with the steps, no wifi/sockets etc really cut it and encourage people to make the transition from cars to trains.

That's just the truth.
 

takno

Verified Rep - Traksy
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
6,612
Pacers are fine as a limited operation on branch lines. However on busy inter-city commuter services they are not fit for purpose.

Most importantly, it's 2018 - I don't think trains with 1980s bus style seating, lack of level access with the steps, no wifi/sockets etc really cut it and encourage people to make the transition from cars to trains.

That's just the truth.
I don't think buses with 1980s bus style seating make the cut anymore. The original northern refurb ones were okay, but at the end of the day they're too small for almost all purposes, grind noisily along the track and don't meet modern standards of comfort and accessibility.
 

142Pilot

Member
Joined
24 Sep 2018
Messages
120
They are brilliant little workhorses.

A doddle to drive initially, and absolute pigs in rain/leaf fall.

If you master a 142 you can drive any type of modern train.

They are massively underated, all due to bad press.

If people care to remember that it was Pacers or nothing they soon change their tune.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,934
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
The HSTs saved InterCity. What people forget is that the Pacers saved the branch lines.

It's 2018, and their time will soon have passed, but they were easily as important as the HST in the history of the railway. Yes, Class 210s would have been nice (and of course, in a way, will be along shortly in the form of the 769), but the money simply wasn't there. It was a cheap solution, or a bus service.

It's worth remembering just how bad a state some of the classic DMUs were in. People often quote that the Class 101s lasted 40-odd years in frontline daily service - but not all the Heritage units were so good.
 

Paul_10

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2011
Messages
952
After travelling on a 144 for the first time last year, I really don't know why more is not being done to convert them like the E-pacer because they do seem a bit quieter than a 142 and whilst the seating is a tad cramped, they do seem a bit more acceptable units for them to still be used especially on branch lines and rural sections of the network. Shame really but times do move on and I for one will miss the pacer when they finally go off lease although I got a feeling there will be some sort of extension with just 13 months for a lot of PPM units to be sorted and new trains bought in and tested etc. Its going to be interesting just where we are in terms of pacer withdrawals come this time next year, especially over in Wales.
 

Teflon Lettuce

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2013
Messages
1,750
sorry if this is the wrong place to ask... but why were/ are the sprinters such bad trains compared to the Pacers? After all they both have the same heritage... the Leyland National bus... surely 2 different trains based on the same platform should have similar ride/ noise characteristics? In particular I've never really understood why Sprinters squeal so much on curves compared to Pacers and other trains in general
 

MDB1images

Member
Joined
9 Jun 2018
Messages
683
sorry if this is the wrong place to ask... but why were/ are the sprinters such bad trains compared to the Pacers? After all they both have the same heritage... the Leyland National bus... surely 2 different trains based on the same platform should have similar ride/ noise characteristics? In particular I've never really understood why Sprinters squeal so much on curves compared to Pacers and other trains in general

Pretty sure Class 143/144 was Alexander bus based designs as opposed to Sprinters which was(when new) Class 150/1, 150/2 and Super Sprinters Class 155/156.

In view of Class 142 Pacers they where reliable in latter years but I dread to think of the costs spent on them to get to that.
Not many crews liked them as certainly the ride was bad, not sure many customers will miss them either although the Northern Spirit modernised class 142's did seem more popular (at the time mainly Heaton units)

Sadly many will view them as a cheap and nasty design that should have been faded out years ago, history/nostslga may be kinda to them when they are gone.

The Class 144's seem preferred by some crews and indeed the seats/heating/comfort seemed better but again not sure they will be missed except by some ardent enthusiasts!
 
Last edited:

Pete_uk

On Moderation
Joined
28 Jan 2017
Messages
1,556
Location
Stroud, Glos
I tell you what, on good track they are nice and comfortable and not too noisy.

But I can understand that on bad track they can be uncomfortable and noisy.
 

ninjazx6r

Member
Joined
20 Mar 2013
Messages
15
Rather have a pacer than a 153, if you are tall the lack of legroom in a 153 is crippling.
 

Ianigsy

Established Member
Joined
12 May 2015
Messages
1,351
It's rather strange thinking that the next time I ride on a Pacer could be my last- just over a week ago I caught 142048 on a Calder Valley fast service and while I had a moment of dread as I could see it approaching the station at Hebden Bridge, in the end I thought a Merseyrail spec unit on a fast schedule and hilly terrain could be interesting.

One thing that never gets mentioned is that the heating on Pacers is very good on a cold day but I think a lot of the issues come from the units being used on unsuitable routes- anything over about an hour, basically- and performance on jointed track and over curves. Anybody living near the curves north of St Helens Central must have been so glad of electrification...
 

Chris217

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2018
Messages
646
I do recal some of the Merseytravel sets getting modular seating fitted.
Haven't seen those ones for a while since the 319s took over.
The Northern Spirit 142s also had high back seating too,so not all bus seats lol.

Someone mentioned heating that was pretty good.
Worth mentioning on a very hot day,there were plenty of Windows to open for decent ventilation.
There is a fairy tale regarding Pacers being fitted with bus bodies and put on a wagon Chasis.
The fact that they are similar is the only coincidence.
Only the Leyland TL11 engine originally fitted was the bus part of it. The bodies were of only similar design to the Leyland National which was actual a massive success in itself.
LEV 1 was the original single car Pacer base on the mk2 National.

Thanks for all these replies.
It's good on here ain't it
 

Cardiff123

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2013
Messages
1,662
Location
South Wales
sorry if this is the wrong place to ask... but why were/ are the sprinters such bad trains compared to the Pacers? After all they both have the same heritage... the Leyland National bus... surely 2 different trains based on the same platform should have similar ride/ noise characteristics? In particular I've never really understood why Sprinters squeal so much on curves compared to Pacers and other trains in general
You've got Pacers and Sprinters mixed up here. Sprinters (150/1, 150/2, 156, 158) were not based on the Leyland National bus, only the 153/155 was.

I took rides on Northern 142s last year. I wasn't impressed. Whilst the Welsh Pacers are more acceptable in terms of interior seating, Pacers have had their day and should have gone a long time ago.
There's nothing more depressing than being on a Pacer on a wet winters day that has water coming in through the windows, you can't actually see out of the windows due to condensation, water leaking in through the gangway, along with cold wind blowing in through the doors.
Pacers have done their job well but are not fit for a modern commuter railway.
 
Last edited:

Chris217

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2018
Messages
646
The Valley lines will be all change before long.
Expect a big cascade of 150s from Northern or GWR.
Cannot envisage EMU's running for quite a few years yet. Interesting times ahead.
I still remember the old C3s.
Now they were lovely lol.
Cardiff is Pacer heaven hehehe.
 

PHILIPE

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Nov 2011
Messages
13,472
Location
Caerphilly
The Valley lines will be all change before long.
Expect a big cascade of 150s from Northern or GWR.
Cannot envisage EMU's running for quite a few years yet. Interesting times ahead.
I still remember the old C3s.
Now they were lovely lol.
Cardiff is Pacer heaven hehehe.

There are no plans for a cascade of 150s from Northern who have only fairly recently received a bunch from GWR and still are. GWRs 150s are spoken for.

There is a long term plan for TFW units and does not allow for any more 150s.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gEgOvffNEbW6XPuWuT6zMcgjY7x44KG_/view

Welcome to he Forum
 
Last edited:

Class37.4

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2018
Messages
125
Yes they were built to do job at time when the government didn’t want to invest in the railways but now they are an insult to the North and Wales, and anybody who suggests keeping them should face the displeasure of 15 million Northerners, and they wonders why Northerners complian about a bad deal yet moan a lot Scotland with a population of 5 million doesn’t have a Railbus in sight or even a 150 for that matter.

My worst Railbus journey early cold January morning Leeds Carlisle and what turns up a 142 with bus seats, cold drafty and not much chance of getting any sleep with bus seats, and clearly that was part of the problem that they were used on too many longer distance services but with so many of them there was little choice.

Go back to 1987/88 as commuter using the local Leeds Huddersfield and the service was an utter shambles I suspect worse than the current TPE shambles and that was mainly caused by those dodgy gearboxes that were originally fitted.

At the end of 2019 they should piled up to make a great big bonfire as far as i’m concerned.
 
Last edited:

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
12,027
Location
here to eternity
Yes they were built to do job at time when the government didn’t want to invest in the railways but now they are an insult to the North and Wales, and anybody who suggests keeping them should face the displeasure of 15 million Northerners, and they wonders why Northerners complian about a bad deal yet moan a lot Scotland with a population of 5 million doesn’t have a Railbus in sight or even a 150 for that matter.

The acid test for how good rolling stock is - are there any running in London and the South East?
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,375
Location
Yorkshire
Myth according to some (from the "Persistent railway myths, misunderstandings etc." thread):
Pacers came to be in the mid-1980s. Yes, this was the height of Thatcherism and post-Serpell, but route closures were shown to be politically unpopular by the reaction to that report. Many of the 1st generation DMUs displaced by Pacers could have been kept going a few years longer, until being replaced by something a little more user-friendly.

Without Pacers, some of the PTE-led reopenings such as Wakefield Kirkgate to PonteCarlo Monkhill might've not happened, and the revival of struggling lines like Penistone and Ilkley may have been delayed... but I don't believe any mileage would've been lost.
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,579
Location
Macclesfield
sorry if this is the wrong place to ask... but why were/ are the sprinters such bad trains compared to the Pacers? After all they both have the same heritage... the Leyland National bus... surely 2 different trains based on the same platform should have similar ride/ noise characteristics? In particular I've never really understood why Sprinters squeal so much on curves compared to Pacers and other trains in general
Presumably you're referring specifically to the 153s (and 155s) regarding Sprinters, as neither the 150s or 156s have any Leyland heritage at all and are in my view far more robust designs.

Beyond the fact that the 153s/155s utilise Leyland body panels and windows they have virtually nothing in common with Pacers: The Pacers are bus body components on short four wheel underframes, while the 153s are 23 metre long bogied vehicles.

The idea that anything squeals more than a Pacer is laughable! Pacers squeal on curves due to the relatively long fixed wheelbase.
 

underbank

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2013
Messages
1,486
Location
North West England
Nothing wrong with them for short journeys, i.e. short branch line shuttles. But having them on long distance/long time routes is ridiculous. Being sat on one for 2-3 hours is simply not acceptable.
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
7,373
Nothing wrong with them for short journeys, i.e. short branch line shuttles. But having them on long distance/long time routes is ridiculous. Being sat on one for 2-3 hours is simply not acceptable.
nor even for an hour from Manchester Vic to Bradford via Rochdale!
 

B&I

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2017
Messages
2,484
There was a need for cheap rolling stock - 210s and even 150s were too expensive.


Didn't the Pacers turn out to be nearly as expensive once enough mods had been done to them to make them even vaguely railworthy ?
 

PeterY

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2013
Messages
1,363
I have to travel quite a long way to experience pacers living in the sunny south.
It was only last year that I had my first ride on a pacer in South Devon. I have now had the pleasure of riding on Arriva South Wales ones and actually found them rather shabby and un-looked after. The Northern ones were OK though and enjoyed my rides in them.


If nothing else, great views out of the windows.

I hope to get a few more pacers in next year. No doubt some forum members will be requesting diagrams for the last ones in 2019:D:D:D
 

Class37.4

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2018
Messages
125
I have to travel quite a long way to experience pacers living in the sunny south.
It was only last year that I had my first ride on a pacer in South Devon. I have now had the pleasure of riding on Arriva South Wales ones and actually found them rather shabby and un-looked after. The Northern ones were OK though and enjoyed my rides in them.


If nothing else, great views out of the windows.

I hope to get a few more pacers in next year. No doubt some forum members will be requesting diagrams for the last ones in 2019:D:D:D
Well I carnt speak for the Welsh ones but GW ones are like Rolls Royce’s compared to Northern 142’s in particular but of course still have the lousy ride.
 

dave87016

Established Member
Joined
9 Dec 2008
Messages
1,896
Location
Lancashire
I have been told by a friend on Northern that once the 144’s at Northern are withdrawn they are going to ATW or TFW as they are called now
 

507021

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
4,759
Location
Chester
I've always liked the Pacers, they've been excellent workhorses.

I was very pleased when I heard 142001 will be joining the National Rail Museum collection.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top