• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Arriva Rail North DOO

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eccles1983

On Moderation
Joined
4 Sep 2016
Messages
841
Staff want Sundays outside of the working week. Sundays inside is not going to happen.


Once again you speak like your some sort of authority on this.

You are wrong again.

Drivers - who you are not are very aware of the impending Sunday requirements. The issue is not the actual Sunday but the fixed rest day pattern. That is the crux of the worry for the majority.

But you keep swinging champ. Those in the know are on to you and your blagger claims of being all knowing.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
6,477
Location
Sheffield
Public statements from the unions and the fact that ASLEF have proactively been asking Northern for Sunday's in the working week suggest the opposite. If a driver works a Sunday as part of the working week rather than as an extra day extra drivers would be required to cover other days.

Not sure how to post links but see the article dated 6th August in the news section of ASLEFs website.

Here's the link to the ASLEF news page you wanted to post; http://www.aslef.org.uk/article.php?group_id=6330
ASLEF rebuts Northern's claims
06 August 2018

Mick Whelan, general secretary of ASLEF, the train drivers’ union, spoke out this morning after Northern Rail claimed it had to cancel 80 services on Sunday - and expects to cancel many more - because 'staff made themselves unavailable to work'.

Mick said: ‘Numerous times we have sought to put Sundays in the working week - which would have obviated this issue. The company, though, prefers to run on voluntary overtime rather than employ enough staff to operate the services it promised in its franchise application to deliver for passengers. Then, of course, it seeks to blame those who opt not to work their days off? That’s a bit rich! And the company, by this attitude, runs a serious risk of alienating drivers even more and losing the little goodwill it has left with an increasingly demoralised workforce.’

The truth is that the company does not employ enough drivers to deliver the services it promised passengers - and the DfT - it would provide. The truth is that the company depends on drivers volunteering to work overtime. The truth is that we have tried, numerous times, to get Sundays in the working week'. But the company prefers to rely on overtime - and then has the temerity to blame its staff for not working the overtime they are not contractually required to work!
 
Last edited:

scrapy

Established Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
2,304
Its the taxpayer who is specifying the services. Northern services require a public subsidy. Its that simple.
Agreed and Northern do get a large subsidy but I was to another post and simply saying that the subsidy Northern gets should not increase any increase in cost to provide the services it is contracted to should be born by Arriva.
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,806
ASLEF rebuts Northern's claims
06 August 2018

Mick Whelan, general secretary of ASLEF, the train drivers’ union, spoke out this morning after Northern Rail claimed it had to cancel 80 services on Sunday - and expects to cancel many more - because 'staff made themselves unavailable to work'.

Mick said: ‘Numerous times we have sought to put Sundays in the working week - which would have obviated this issue. The company, though, prefers to run on voluntary overtime rather than employ enough staff to operate the services it promised in its franchise application to deliver for passengers. Then, of course, it seeks to blame those who opt not to work their days off? That’s a bit rich! And the company, by this attitude, runs a serious risk of alienating drivers even more and losing the little goodwill it has left with an increasingly demoralised workforce.’

The truth is that the company does not employ enough drivers to deliver the services it promised passengers - and the DfT - it would provide. The truth is that the company depends on drivers volunteering to work overtime. The truth is that we have tried, numerous times, to get Sundays in the working week'. But the company prefers to rely on overtime - and then has the temerity to blame its staff for not working the overtime they are not contractually required to work!

This is actually wrong, so lets put the record straight.

Drivers get rostered for 1 Sunday in 4 as " rostered overtime ". The Union agreed with management that any driver who did not want to work their booked Sunday could have that off provided cover was available. If cover was not available, then the driver would have to work it.

The guards agreement is slightly different.
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,806
Agreed and Northern do get a large subsidy but I was to another post and simply saying that the subsidy Northern gets should not increase any increase in cost to provide the services it is contracted to should be born by Arriva.

I would say that if Arriva had agreed extra services for which they would require no subsidy as the fare box would cover costs. then that would be very welcome. I dont see that happening however.
 

scrapy

Established Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
2,304
This is actually wrong, so lets put the record straight.

Drivers get rostered for 1 Sunday in 4 as " rostered overtime ". The Union agreed with management that any driver who did not want to work their booked Sunday could have that off provided cover was available. If cover was not available, then the driver would have to work it.

The guards agreement is slightly different.

It's not actually wrong a driver only has to worked their BOOKED Sunday. If a job is altered in anyway due to engineering etc (which the majority of Sunday's they are) under the agreement between ASLEF and Northern it is no longer their BOOKED Sunday it is an amended diagram and they are not required to work it regardless of whether cover is available and whether a manager says differently.**

Whilst I know it is not in the spirit of the agreement I know there are drivers who will refuse to work an altered Sunday for a minor change such as a different booked unit on a service but according to the terms of the agreement they are entitled to do this and Northern should have made it more watertight in the first place. (Agreement was made well before Arriva took over the franchise although they will have been aware of it when making their bid ).

**Agreement for West side drivers excluding ex TPE drivers, terms and conditions for ex TPE and East side may be different.

Anyway back on topic the strike on Northern will definitely go ahead tomorrow, ACAS talks ongoing.
 
Last edited:

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
A post from Tony Miles on wnxx suggests while the RMT has accepted that door responsibility can be transferred to the driver if a safety critical person is on board, a local RMT rep at Northern is not willing to accept that and is demanding guards retain door responsibility on all trains.
 

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,562
Location
UK
This is actually wrong, so lets put the record straight.

Did the point completely fly over your head ?

Sundays are not included in the working week : If Sunday was included then there wouldn't be any issues.
Sundays ARE overtime : Rostered or otherwise it is still a reliance on overtime.
Not enough Drivers to cover the work : Where there is an depot establishment there is a fixed ration of Drivers vs turns. Sundays are extra so you are still very limited to how much cover can be provided. Should there be an increase in the number of STP diagrams for example; you lose the flexibility to cover the work.

Contractual obligations I can't comment on as I don't work for them or have copy of their contracts. I can state that we have 'agreements' that are outside of our contracts. I am aware of the new contracts for my colleagues at GTR and there is a contractual obligation to work a minimum number per year. Previously this was just a local agreement.
 
Joined
31 Jul 2010
Messages
377
A post from Tony Miles on wnxx suggests while the RMT has accepted that door responsibility can be transferred to the driver if a safety critical person is on board, a local RMT rep at Northern is not willing to accept that and is demanding guards retain door responsibility on all trains.

I'd imagine the most likely scenario is the same as the Southern OBS deal. A member of staff on board the train, with evacuation, safety, GSMR, one on the bell and unit knowledge training. That would to me be the best scenario in regards to DCO.
 

muz379

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2014
Messages
2,501
Previous comments have suggested that neither unions or TOCs want it - "all far too difficult" !!
The unions themselves want it . It is in the ASLEF charter . And it has always been RMT policy to try and secure full employment with a clean salary which means getting rid of a reliance on overtime to secure more jobs . Bringing sundays inside the week would do this .

There as with most things are differences of opinion between individual traincrew . But ultimately when something is in the charter of the union if it is offered by the company on favourable terms it will become part of the contract .
Staff want Sundays outside of the working week. Sundays inside is not going to happen.
Not so quick . Aslef and the RMT have negotiated for sundays inside the working week at many other TOC's . As above it is part of the charter of ASLEF and is part of RMT policy to have no systematic reliance on overtime . Sundays will eventually end up inside the working week at Northern regardless of the views of individual train crew .

I caution you once again about listening to the table banging messroom lawyers , they are often the ones not attending their respective unions branches or with the ears of their respective unions company council reps . They dont actually have any sway .

I suspect given ongoing discussions it will become part of the working week for drivers long before it does for conductors . The RMT is not really talking about much else with the company given the dispute .

Did the point completely fly over your head ?

Not enough Drivers to cover the work : Where there is an depot establishment there is a fixed ration of Drivers vs turns. Sundays are extra so you are still very limited to how much cover can be provided. Should there be an increase in the number of STP diagrams for example; you lose the flexibility to cover the work.
Exactly . Currently monday to saturday there are a ratio of traincrew shown spare in the links who can then be utilized by resource planning to cover any jobs they sign that come up "on the week" because of AL / Sickness / Traincrew brought off on medical or competency grounds . Then there are also a contingent of rostered standby crew who cannot be utilized by resource planning who are then used by shift managers and control for "on the day" shortages like someone booking sick at the last minute , people turning in late or having incidents or getting involved in substantial delays .

However on a sunday there are no rostered spare in the link . There are some rostered standby turns but nowhere near the ratio of spare on a Monday to Saturday . This can cause issues when someone would be booked Sunday but they are not available to work it because of various reasons such as (refusing to work altered diagram /annual leave / Long term sick / Not allowed to work trains for whatever reason) . If there is not a sufficient number of volunteers who sign the jobs or who can catch the work because of working hour restrictions then you have jobs being uncovered .

As for the agreement for drivers on the west at Northern . They are supposedly bound by local agreement to work a booked Sunday if no other volunteer can be found to work it . It would be interesting to see it challenged because there is a massive imbalance in favour of the company . I cannot see how there could be any formal consequences for breach of the agreement by an individual .
 

387star

On Moderation
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
6,665
I'd imagine the most likely scenario is the same as the Southern OBS deal. A member of staff on board the train, with evacuation, safety, GSMR, one on the bell and unit knowledge training. That would to me be the best scenario in regards to DCO.
What evac training does an OBS have
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,509
I caution you once again about listening to the table banging messroom lawyers , they are often the ones not attending their respective unions branches or with the ears of their respective unions company council reps . They dont actually have any sway .
.
And eventually, if northern dont back down and RMT refuse to concede any further ground, won’t those mess room lawyers etc simply opt to join what they consider a more moderate union or choose to go non union ? particularly if RMT continually decline to recognise grades like the OBS
 
Last edited:

geoffk

On Moderation
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,931
Location
Exeter
ASLEF rebuts Northern's claims
06 August 2018

Mick Whelan, general secretary of ASLEF, the train drivers’ union, spoke out this morning after Northern Rail claimed it had to cancel 80 services on Sunday - and expects to cancel many more - because 'staff made themselves unavailable to work'.

Mick said: ‘Numerous times we have sought to put Sundays in the working week - which would have obviated this issue. The company, though, prefers to run on voluntary overtime rather than employ enough staff to operate the services it promised in its franchise application to deliver for passengers. Then, of course, it seeks to blame those who opt not to work their days off? That’s a bit rich! And the company, by this attitude, runs a serious risk of alienating drivers even more and losing the little goodwill it has left with an increasingly demoralised workforce.’

The truth is that the company does not employ enough drivers to deliver the services it promised passengers - and the DfT - it would provide. The truth is that the company depends on drivers volunteering to work overtime. The truth is that we have tried, numerous times, to get Sundays in the working week'. But the company prefers to rely on overtime - and then has the temerity to blame its staff for not working the overtime they are not contractually required to work!
I don't recall this Sunday situation happening last year. There was some increase in Sunday service last May but mostly in Yorkshire I think, which does not seem to be affected. Staff must be "making themselves unavailable" for a reason - it's can't be fine weather and World Cup now - and I assume that, although it's not in itself an industrial dispute, it's connected to the ongoing DOO dispute. Whatever, the travelling public is sick of it and I'm sure many have given up on trains altogether at weekends.
 
Last edited:

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
6,477
Location
Sheffield
Suggest you re read my post again, and then come back to me when you actually understand. I'm much better informed than you.

Moonshot, I used to think you might be right. Sadly the evidence of my own experiences travelling and speaking to train crew, plus my own past experience working as an elected union representative, leads me to advise that unless you know exactly who knows exactly what it's best not to keep making sweeping statements like that. I make no claims to being better informed than anyone on here, on anything, although there will be limited areas when I possibly might be! I've found it's always best to allow room to be corrected, and then to gracefully change a position in the light of new evidence. I have been known to be wrong.
 
Joined
31 Jul 2010
Messages
377
What evac training does an OBS have

In a nutshell how to make an emergency call to the signaller, where the emergency equipment is located, how to egress the doors, deploy the ladder and layout of running lines and the relevant telephones.

The rhetoric of the RMT makes it sound like they are akin to Assistant Ticket Examiners when they really are not.
 

Tom Quinne

On Moderation
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
2,225
This is actually wrong, so lets put the record straight.

Drivers get rostered for 1 Sunday in 4 as " rostered overtime ". The Union agreed with management that any driver who did not want to work their booked Sunday could have that off provided cover was available. If cover was not available, then the driver would have to work it.

The guards agreement is slightly different.

Would work - contracted to work or expected to work, as in they could just refuse.

“Expected to work” is a mile away from contracted if cover can’t be found.
 

mandub

Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
203
The drivers agreement for ex First North West (all west depots) is unclear on Sundays.
 
Last edited:

scrapy

Established Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
2,304
Possibly a glimmer of hope in this dispute. Mick Cash has said

'Northern have agreed to meet us again next week where we expect then to put forward a set of serious proposals around the guard guarantee while SWR continue to slam the door on our faces'

The rest of his statement wasn't exactly complementary of Northern but some progress may have been made at ACAS?

Obviously this could change if the set of proposals dont arrive or aren't as expected.
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,509
Possibly a glimmer of hope in this dispute. Mick Cash has said

'Northern have agreed to meet us again next week where we expect then to put forward a set of serious proposals around the guard guarantee while SWR continue to slam the door on our faces'

The rest of his statement wasn't exactly complementary of Northern but some progress may have been made at ACAS?

Obviously this could change if the set of proposals dont arrive or aren't as expected.
However it’s allredy been clearly explained on here the unions NEC will almost certainly reject any deal that contains even the tiniest amount of permissible DOO(p) so presumably the RMTs expectation currently remains completely unaltered in that northern either back down, or the strikes will continue.
 
Last edited:

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,352
Location
Yorkshire
I'd imagine the most likely scenario is the same as the Southern OBS deal. A member of staff on board the train, with evacuation, safety, GSMR, one on the bell and unit knowledge training. That would to me be the best scenario in regards to DCO.
Forgive my ignorance here, but if that's the case then is there really any point to the whole thing? If all that changes is which staff member presses a button, why even bother making the change?

Certainly if (as suggested in another post) the RMT is refusing membership to OBSs, that smacks of pig-headedness as well as cutting off your nose to spite your face.

On a related note, I assume that there's not going to be a strike on October the 6th, as it'd have been announced by now? Only ask as I'll need to be in Burnley by 2pm-ish!
 

Robertj21a

On Moderation
Joined
22 Sep 2013
Messages
7,691
Forgive my ignorance here, but if that's the case then is there really any point to the whole thing? If all that changes is which staff member presses a button, why even bother making the change?

Certainly if (as suggested in another post) the RMT is refusing membership to OBSs, that smacks of pig-headedness as well as cutting off your nose to spite your face.

On a related note, I assume that there's not going to be a strike on October the 6th, as it'd have been announced by now? Only ask as I'll need to be in Burnley by 2pm-ish!

The RMT has always refused to recognise the OBS role. Just their usual head in the sand approach.
 

woodmally

Member
Joined
16 Mar 2018
Messages
210
I'm assuming the strikes will continue into 2019.
Probably as I have suspected many times as the situation is unresolvable. RMT wont back down over DOO. Northern have to implement DOO or break the franchise agreement and the government wont back down over DOO as they, like me, see its safe and wont be bullied by trade unions. However its interesting to note there are ACAS talks going ahead next week. Wonder what they will discuss or if they think of a magical solution to please the Corbynites of the RMT.
 

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
3,495
Location
Over The Hill
Probably as I have suspected many times as the situation is unresolvable. RMT wont back down over DOO. Northern have to implement DOO or break the franchise agreement and the government wont back down over DOO as they, like me, see its safe and wont be bullied by trade unions. However its interesting to note there are ACAS talks going ahead next week. Wonder what they will discuss or if they think of a magical solution to please the Corbynites of the RMT.

For the sake of clarity I would point out that the RMT is not affiliated with the Labour Party and hasn't been for many years. Official policy is broadly in line with Labour however including tacit support for Corbyn but reserves the right to oppose Labour on specific issues, in particular would be likely to support other left-of-centre candidates against Labour MPs who voice support for DOO.
 

woodmally

Member
Joined
16 Mar 2018
Messages
210
For the sake of clarity I would point out that the RMT is not affiliated with the Labour Party and hasn't been for many years. Official policy is broadly in line with Labour however including tacit support for Corbyn but reserves the right to oppose Labour on specific issues, in particular would be likely to support other left-of-centre candidates against Labour MPs who voice support for DOO.
I have just reread my post and at no point did I mention that the RMT were supporters and members of the Labour Party only pointing out they are Corbyn supporters which you agree with. This is evidenced by the fact I have seen many photos of the RMT leader and Corbyn and their obsession with striking over everything. And striking even though there is no chance of success which I evidenced in my post.
 

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
3,495
Location
Over The Hill
I have just reread my post and at no point did I mention that the RMT were supporters and members of the Labour Party only pointing out they are Corbyn supporters which you agree with. This is evidenced by the fact I have seen many photos of the RMT leader and Corbyn and their obsession with striking over everything. And striking even though there is no chance of success which I evidenced in my post.

As to the part in bold that remains to be seen. Until the dispute is ended it is not possible to say whether a successful outcome has been reached, for either side. It may be frustrating but the dispute will eventually be concluded. At least ACAS is now involved.
 

woodmally

Member
Joined
16 Mar 2018
Messages
210
As to the part in bold that remains to be seen. Until the dispute is ended it is not possible to say whether a successful outcome has been reached, for either side. It may be frustrating but the dispute will eventually be concluded. At least ACAS is now involved.
To be honest unless the RMT backs down I wont be happy if it is resolved. Reason is simple. If Northern has the power to resolve it at ACAS then why the heck did they wait till we get to ACAS why didnt they do something sooner. I will be angry that its taken this many strike days and this much pain and suffering to get to this point.
Personally I dont think that they can. I hope im right as if I'm wrong all this pain and suffering would have been pointless.
 
Joined
31 Jul 2010
Messages
377
Forgive my ignorance here, but if that's the case then is there really any point to the whole thing? If all that changes is which staff member presses a button, why even bother making the change?

Certainly if (as suggested in another post) the RMT is refusing membership to OBSs, that smacks of pig-headedness as well as cutting off your nose to spite your face.

On a related note, I assume that there's not going to be a strike on October the 6th, as it'd have been announced by now? Only ask as I'll need to be in Burnley by 2pm-ish!

I think the DCO requirement was short sighted and as the role has evolved even senior managers are questioning the whole idea behind it which is why going forward SWR, GA and WMT have agreed to keep a guard on every train even if they are not dispatching. The original idea I believe was for a Strathclyde Manning agreementesque role mainly focusing on revenue work but its turned into a Conductor without dispatch and emergency protection dressed up as being able to provide a higher level of service even though soon after the whole thing began it was made a requirement for the OBS to put their key on and step off at every station in order to check for disabled passengers.
 

scrapy

Established Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
2,304
To be honest unless the RMT backs down I wont be happy if it is resolved. Reason is simple. If Northern has the power to resolve it at ACAS then why the heck did they wait till we get to ACAS why didnt they do something sooner. I will be angry that its taken this many strike days and this much pain and suffering to get to this point.
Personally I dont think that they can. I hope im right as if I'm wrong all this pain and suffering would have been pointless.
It seems Northern management are of the view that as long as the government are compensating them for strikes there is no rush to resolve or even reach a compromise.

Whilst I'm not for DOO there are some places it makes sense on frequent stop, high frequency fully staffed routes. Unfortunately very little of the Northern network is any of this and the crude figure of 50% of service mileage feels like it has been plucked out of thin air with little thought of how it would be implemented or whether it's the best thing for any individual routes.

So far I'm of the understanding that the RMT have offered drivers opening, guards closing and then drivers having full control as long as fully trained guard on board. Both proposals rejected by Northern and the second now retracted by RMT. The RMT have made compromises to the status quo.

So far I'm not aware of any compromises made by Northern or Chris Grayling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top