InterCity:125
Member
It gets put in the lost property because the staff don’t know they weren’t travelling.
I suppose the passenger could admit to not having purchased a ticket and sue for the return of his/her property, at which point the train company could prosecute him/her for failing to buy a ticket.Of course. But where does that leave things (legally) with respect of paying fees that the Left Luggage Co charge and make a profit on?
We didn’t say they had entered through the barriersI suppose the passenger could admit to not having purchased a ticket and sue for the return of his/her property, at which point the train company could prosecute him/her for failing to buy a ticket.
I find the lack of any customer care.in many of the above responses striking. If one left a bag in a supermarket and they tried to charge for returning it, one can imagine the fuss. Yes, I recoghise the greater volume of left luggage on trains, but to just take the attitude 'tough' and assume a £29 charge is reasonable both lacks customer care and lacks the scrutiny that most posters would bring if it was a ticket price under discussion.
To be frank that's just a case of Aldi being thick and quoting 'data protection' when they probsbly don't have a clue what the legislation says-and the story says that even Aldii itself says staff should have waited till the end of the dsy. I' ve had lost cards returned to me in stores, on production of suitable ID. If the staff were thst concerned and not wanting to retutn thrm to a customer, they should have sent them to thr bank or the police.If you leave your wallet or purse in some supermarkets they may not charge you to return it but the contents will be destroyed - https://www.scotsman.com/news/a-wom...p-all-her-bank-and-membership-cards-1-4772097
"A woman who left her purse in an Aldi store was reunited with it on the same day, but found her cards cut up due to “data protection”.
...
She said staff at the Aldi branch in Poole cited new data protection laws and that the company destroys all cards that are not reclaimed within an hour of being lost."
Indeed, and that’s the point I was making. Say I turn up to Paddington in order to meet an elderly relative off of the train: I meet them not from the “other side” of the barriers and in doing so I leave my brolly behind. I’ve not bought anything and, therefore, never agreed to the NRCOT. If I go back the next day and the lost property office charge me a fiver or whatever to give it back me they are surely, arguably, guilty of theft. Aren’t they?
I find the lack of any customer care.in many of the above responses striking. If one left a bag in a supermarket and they tried to charge for returning it, one can imagine the fuss. Yes, I recoghise the greater volume of left luggage on trains, but to just take the attitude 'tough' and assume a £29 charge is reasonable both lacks customer care and lacks the scrutiny that most posters would bring if it was a ticket price under discussion.
Could be worse: a hotel in Amsterdam offered to return my wife's iPod for 110 euros.
The same reasons that shops and anyone else would-public duty and a desire to look after your customers?No, why should they keep custody of your lost junk for free?
The same reasons that shops and anyone else would-public duty and a desire to look after your customers?
No, why should they keep custody of your lost junk for free?
No, why should they keep custody of your lost junk for free?
Paying reasonable storage expenses is one thing. Paying a fee that doesn’t necessarily reflect their expenses to a profit-making company is another thing. If it goes to the left-luggage company that run the service at several large termini that is what happens. I can’t recall what the fee is off the top of my head but it applies even if the property has literally just been booked in and they have held it for 5 minutes. They make a profit from it.
To be frank that's just a case of Aldi being thick and quoting 'data protection' when they probsbly don't have a clue what the legislation says-and the story says that even Aldii itself says staff should have waited till the end of the dsy. I' ve had lost cards returned to me in stores, on production of suitable ID. If the staff were thst concerned and not wanting to retutn thrm to a customer, they should have sent them to thr bank or the police.
I left a (cheap) laptop at New Street a while back and it turned up in Euston. £10 to get it back (plus two short-notice advance fares to London!). Made a day of it, paid £50 for 1st and went to the Odeon Leicester Square and The Bree Louise etc etc.I let an iPad at Heathrow Airport security and was charged £10 to pick it up the next day. It seems a fair charge, given it was my fault for leaving the thing.
Especially in this era of contactless cards and online spending I can understand them being destroyed - if you lose them you should have them blocked by the bank anyway.
I am sure that the banks take a different view on that. Maybe even something to do with the T&C of having/using a cardI can't understand it. If the shop has the cards, then they're clearly not out there about to be used by criminals... unless Aldi doesn't trust its own staff. Which maybe is sensible...
I can't understand it. If the shop has the cards, then they're clearly not out there about to be used by criminals... unless Aldi doesn't trust its own staff. Which maybe is sensible...
I am sure that the banks take a different view on that. Maybe even something to do with the T&C of having/using a card
I can't understand it. If the shop has the cards, then they're clearly not out there about to be used by criminals... unless Aldi doesn't trust its own staff. Which maybe is sensible...
Imagine a break-in at the shop while they had the lost property in their possession...What exactly do the banks take a different view on?
Sure, if you've lost your cards you should cancel them.
But if you're a shop that finds the cards, why should you cut them up?
It’s to protect their staff from malicious or mistaken allegations.