• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New DMU fleet FGW/TPX/Northern

Status
Not open for further replies.

GospelOak117

Member
Joined
3 May 2009
Messages
215
Location
Eastern Region
Hi does anyone know anything about when the bidder chosen to build the new DMU fleet is going to be announced. It was supposed to have been chosen between Bombardier UK, CSR and CAF by april and no word yet. Hyundai Rotem apparently pulled out after winning further orders from Iarnrod Eireann.

It would be good to see Bombardier win so that such a large order is given to UK production but on the other hand it would be good to get some DMU variance on the network as Turbostars are taking over! If CAF won I guess we would see something similar to NIR's 3000 class. Not sure I trust Chinese build quality, the CSR's would probably be as hated in 15 years as 142's are now as they start to fall to bits!!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,851
Location
UK
Sorry to say it, but I absloutely hate CAF stuff, the only good units they built were the 332/333's with Siemens. To me they are far inferior than any Bombardier and Siemens stock.

I've spent a lot of time in Dublin and in Belfast and all we have is CAF and Rotem stock here and no Bombardier stuff and no Siemens stuff - always a treat to be back in the UK and some better rolling stock.
 

GospelOak117

Member
Joined
3 May 2009
Messages
215
Location
Eastern Region
yea i dont like the look of the CAF's or especially the Rotems in Ireland either. The turbostar/electrostar has surely become the new British standard carriage design. I love the Birmingham built Juniper/Coradia fleets though despite the teething troubles, such a shame Alsthom closed Birmingham, a 2-car Class 458 derived DMU would have been great :) Not a big Desiro fan I must admit.
 

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,851
Location
UK
I've been on the CAF and the Rotem stock. They appear to be cheaper than the Alstorm/Bombarider/Siemens trains we have here, don't know if they are or not, they just seem it. You don't get such a feeling of newness, like you do with the units we get here, even when they are new.
 

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
Any news on this? Something must be going off behind the scenes to prevent the details going public...
 

HSTfan!!!

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2005
Messages
1,975
the problem with the turbostar concept, is I don't personally think it's all that suited to a lot of the work it covers. I'm not sure the carriage/door layout is good for cross country type trains, I must prefer a 175 over a 170 for example. Although I will be the first to admit loading times are quicker with the door position of the turbostar design
 

daccer

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2009
Messages
373
I think the order has been cancelled. When Adonis announced the electrification plamn I think it was also mentione that the dmu order was now cancelled. In its place is a cascade of emu's from TL leading to dmus being made available from local FGW services out of Paddington and this leading to further cacades which will end up with Northern getting some extra bits - this will be Pacers and Sprinters only - there are no plans for Northern to get any new-build units at all!!
 

poshbakerloo

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2009
Messages
665
Location
Manchester, London, Sheffield & Moscow
the problem with the turbostar concept, is I don't personally think it's all that suited to a lot of the work it covers. I'm not sure the carriage/door layout is good for cross country type trains, I must prefer a 175 over a 170 for example. Although I will be the first to admit loading times are quicker with the door position of the turbostar design

I agree soooo much!!! I'm fed up on being stuck on a 170 or 185 on a long journey and having people pushing past me all the time for the door, which lets a freeeezing cold (in the winter) blast of air onto me!
 

The Snap

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
3,156
Yep - Turbos go West replaced by Crossrail/319s, and Sprinters go North

So 319s are going to TPE to run which service…? Manchester Airport to Liverpool, and Manchester Airport to Glasgow? That's the only electric routes that TPE will run once electrification is complete, and 319s don't seem good enough to go all the way to Scotland from Manchester? :|

Plus, I hope they refurbish them when they come to TPE!!
 

ukrob

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2009
Messages
1,810
So 319s are going to TPE to run which service…? Manchester Airport to Liverpool, and Manchester Airport to Glasgow? That's the only electric routes that TPE will run once electrification is complete, and 319s don't seem good enough to go all the way to Scotland from Manchester? :|

Plus, I hope they refurbish them when they come to TPE!!

Liverpool - Manchester Airport is Northern, not TPE, and will have the 319s. TPE will get 350s cascaded from London Midland for the Manchester - Scotland services.

And yes, the 319s will be heavily refurbished, with air conditioning too.
 

BlythPower

Member
Joined
15 Jan 2009
Messages
864
Location
Kenilworth
Any ideas on what's going to replace London Midland's 350s. I'd had the impression they were aiming for a standard fleet of just 350s at one point. God forbid that any TOC shold have a fully compatible fleet of units... :-?
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
5,022
I have a suspicion that they will add on the current ITT that's floating around for 30 x 3 or 4 car EMUS to replace the 323s for LM.
 

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
So will First TPE's 185s be displaced? I assume it must be them as they'll still need the Turbostars for the Hull runs...

I think the elephant in the room here is all the 142s which were supposed to be displaced are now still going to run. Frankly, it's well past time the 120+ Pacers were replaced altogether. We're playing catch up as it is, but if we fall any further behind we're also going to struggle to replace the Sprinters when the time comes.

Electrification will release acceptable DMUs, but not at a rate which will match stock replacement and market growth needs. What's needed is a massive order of new DMUs, not seen since the Turbostars were brought in following privatisation.
 

ukrob

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2009
Messages
1,810
So will First TPE's 185s be displaced? I assume it must be them as they'll still need the Turbostars for the Hull runs...

No, TPE retain them for strengthening existing services.
 

HSTfan!!!

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2005
Messages
1,975
Electrification will release acceptable DMUs, but not at a rate which will match stock replacement and market growth needs. What's needed is a massive order of new DMUs, not seen since the Turbostars were brought in following privatisation.

problem is the state of the government's debts who is going to fund a mass modernisation?
 

PhilipW

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2008
Messages
761
Location
Fareham, Hants
What's needed is a massive order of new DMUs, not seen since the Turbostars were brought in following privatisation.

I don't this is going to happen or ever will happen (Labour or Tory). More electrification releasing more DMUs seems to be the way forward. There are some relatively modest schemes which would release more DMUs.

Three examples, for instance (though I am sure people can think of more)
1) The three Thames Valley branches, releasing more Turbostars.
2) Oxenholme to Windermere, releasing Manchester-Windermere 185s.
3) Manchester-Leeds and Leeds-York releasing quite a large quantity of 185s.

If I was Minister of Transport, I would concentrate on building EMUs too, not DMUs.
 

87015

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2006
Messages
5,078
Location
GEML/WCML/SR
If I was Minister of Transport, I would concentrate on building EMUs too, not DMUs.
Thats what we should be doing, no doubt, but the problem is electrification + EMU is an expenditure double whammy to a near bust treasury. The scrapping of the 312s (and maybe even some 310s) - Mk2 stock remember - may seem a big mistake soon given they'd have been quite capable of working a few of the peak hour or out-of-the-way diagrams whilst saving the cost of a new EMU at over £1m/car on top of over £1m/mile for the wires...
 

PhilipW

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2008
Messages
761
Location
Fareham, Hants
There are two more schemes I could mention too.

1) Edinburgh-Glasgow electifrication which will relaese a lot of 170s/158s not all of which will be redeployed in Scotland. The Scottish Government is planning a new build of about 50 EMUs for the scheme. This is likely to go ahead irrespective of who wins the next election to Westminster.

2) The Midland Mainline electrification (if approved) will not need any new build as I suspect the ECML Class 91s and Mark IVs will be sent there when the new IEP arrives. That in turn will relaese many Meridians and HSTs for cascade elsewhere.

Sure, none of this will happen in the next year or two to relieve the DMU shortage now. But there is the prospect of many many DMUs being available in about 5 years time.

I have to say again that if I were Minister of Transport, that is what I would do. I suspect also that this is exactly what we will see when Lord Adonis releases his new Rolling Stock Plan in the autumn.

As a Postscript, I think it also the case that Manufacturers don't want to build DMUs any more. There would be UK-specific and not worth the hassle.
 

A60K

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2008
Messages
1,030
Location
Kilburn
All UK stock is UK-specific - the loading gauge sees to that, rather than diesel power equipment. There is a suprising amount of the European network that is not electrified - only the Swiss have managed a fully electrified network.

Manufacturers will build anything for a reasonable price providing a reasonable number are ordered. What's not good for prices is trying to 'knife-and-fork' small batches at a time.

I think it's more to do with the worry about residual values if too much diesel stock is built as an electrification programme gets underway. Still, we can always sell any surplus DMUs to Iran!
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
All UK stock is UK-specific - the loading gauge sees to that, rather than diesel power equipment. There is a suprising amount of the European network that is not electrified - only the Swiss have managed a fully electrified network.

Manufacturers will build anything for a reasonable price providing a reasonable number are ordered. What's not good for prices is trying to 'knife-and-fork' small batches at a time.

Not even the Swiss are fully Electric - its a very high percentage (95% IIRC) but not total

Leitschenstein is the only fully electric rail network. All 9kms of it!

Stadler are small run specialists, as they grew by building railcars for the Swiss private railways, but they use a lot of common components, substituting voltage, rack, size and gauge as required
 

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
In principal, I agree that expenditure should be channelled in to Electrification - but unfortunately that barely alleviates the problem on the unwired side of the network, and thats before you start factoring in the life-expired Pacers.

I thought the whole point of the ROSCOs was that investment would be from the banks, who would then lease the trains on to the TOCs. As it stands, they are leasing trains they received at a value of zero for several thousand per year!
 

A60K

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2008
Messages
1,030
Location
Kilburn
Not even the Swiss are fully Electric - its a very high percentage (95% IIRC) but not total

Leitschenstein is the only fully electric rail network. All 9kms of it!

I can't argue with the Liechtenstein statistic - although their 'network' is actually run by OBB!

Interesting about the Swiss network not being fully electrified though, I always thought it was apart from the two heritage lines Brienz Rothorn Bahn and the old FO stretch, which are deliberately operated as steam railways. I'm not doubting you, but what part of the network isn't electrified?


 

bnsf734

Member
Joined
15 Oct 2007
Messages
649
Location
Nuneaton
I can't argue with the Liechtenstein statistic - although their 'network' is actually run by OBB!

Interesting about the Swiss network not being fully electrified though, I always thought it was apart from the two heritage lines Brienz Rothorn Bahn and the old FO stretch, which are deliberately operated as steam railways. I'm not doubting you, but what part of the network isn't electrified?



I have travelled extensively in Switzerland and can think of no diesel operated "normal" passenger lines. The only non-electric lines are the steam operated (with diesel backup) mountain lines like the Brienz-Rothorn Bahn.

Calv
 

daccer

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2009
Messages
373
I think the electrification programme has been forced on the govt a little by the unwillingness of the ROSCOS to fund anymore diesel builds. Even the relatively small unit build for Northern/FGW was going to be govt funded - this has now gone replaced by a cascade plan. I have a couple of issues with the plans.

Firstly passenger growth is goingn to continue and maybe even increases especially in the areas where there has traditionally been no investment and where there has always been latent demand. Northern have kept growing at up to 8% during the recession. It is going to take maybe 8 years before the full effects of the electrification programme kick in - 8 more years of growth mean that the cascaded units will not be used for unit replacement but more to alleviate overcrowding.

There will have to be more reopenings in the future - the socio-economic forces at work now are only going to get stronger. To keep costs down it is highly likely these new lines will be diesel operated and will draw upon the current fleet.

If noone is prepared to build/fund diesel units anymore then we will see more LHCS operating using 57/67 haulage purely to free up units. If enough units can ever be released to enable the Pacers to be scrapped I am not sure. It seems to me that the current cascades will be like sticking a plaster over a gun shot wound. By the time they happen the patient may well have bled to death!
 

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
If noone is prepared to build/fund diesel units anymore then we will see more LHCS operating using 57/67 haulage purely to free up units. If enough units can ever be released to enable the Pacers to be scrapped I am not sure. It seems to me that the current cascades will be like sticking a plaster over a gun shot wound. By the time they happen the patient may well have bled to death!
Exactly! The way the DfT are treating the DMU side of things is as if it covers only a small amount of passenger needs - which simply isnt true, and wont be probably for half a century or more.

To simply leave a starving network to limp on with knackered stock is simply wrong.
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
I've got to say, though I doubt it'll happen, I dislike the idea of getting the 91s and MK4s on the MML.

We've only relatively recently got stock actually suitable for purpose! The HSTs cannot keep time on a lot of the services. I imagine neither will the 91s.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
True but the MML services instead of terminating at at Derby could carry onto Sheffield to terminate there with the existing Sheffield terminators terminating maybe at Doncaster?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top