• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EU Referendum: The result and aftermath...

Status
Not open for further replies.

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
5,605
it comes from a sense of shared and common experience and history.

What "shared and common experience and history" do I have with the royal family, or with Wayne Rooney, or Tony Blair, or the random alcoholic at the local pub who is there from 9am? I'd happily argue I have more in common with the Bulgarian software developer who works in my office!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,380
Location
Liverpool
To be fair, a national identiy is more subtle than everyone thinking the same, banding together and singing Land of Hope and Glory at the top of our lungs. Maybe politely agreeing to disagree is a very British trait? ;)
Ha ha. That is my point though. My sister in law is Colombian. My cousin lives in Chile and has a son who is born to an African father. Two of my best mates are Spanish and two are Polish. Another cousin is married to a German and has lived there that long she dreams in German. These are just a few of the people who's values I share. I am British and some of them are not. I could list many more. Just what are these British values people talk about. I just refuse to define myself based on the country I was born in. I am not like James Penny after whom Penny Lane was named after. I'm not like Margaret Thatcher. Etc. Etc.
 

Bromley boy

Established Member
Joined
18 Jun 2015
Messages
4,609
I'm not sure why you keep referring to Nick Clegg when responding to me, I've already explained that I'm not a Lib Dem supporter but a member of the Conservatives - albeit one that's more pro-European than most in my party. Clegg didn't come up with the terminology of "pooling sovereignty" either - it's a term that's been used by far more than just him.

To help you understand why I'm both centre-right and pro-EU I've summarised my main reasons below, I don't expect you to agree with them but hope it provides some insight:

1. The EU single market is in itself a centre-right creation, it allows private enterprises to trade with over 510m people without any conditions and usually puts barriers in the way of state owned industry. Considering that the EU contains many of the wealthiest countries in the world and because they're geographically close to us, British businesses have the opportunity to grow by being able to export easily into a prosperous market. The wider British economy as a whole then benefits from this because the enterprises that generate wealth by exporting products and/or services into the EU predominantly reinvest the money back into other UK jobs and industry. In turn this boosts prosperity for us all, even for those of us who don't work with any form of international trade.

* I do accept that some EU nations are currently in a poor condition but even so they're still first world economies with more wealth and a higher quality of life than most countries worldwide.

2. British influence on the world stage is enhanced by pooling our sovereignty with fellow EU nations. The USA is the world's only superpower and the actions of Russia (militarily) or China (economically) could have a worldwide effect to a certain extent. Outside of those three nations, no other single country can claim to have a worldwide influence but the EU as a whole most certainly can. The EU is definitely an economic superpower and also the third strongest militarily (if you combined the capabilities of member states' forces). As a major player in the EU the UK is able to heavily influence it's position and utilise it's wider strength but if we're out we can't.

3. This is perhaps an expansion on the point above but I don't believe that we can strike better trade deals on our own than we can within the EU. I hasten to add that I'm not talking Britain down here, just being realistic. Larger markets generally achieve better trade deals and the EU>Solus UK when it comes to both population size and GDP. Must add that I hope I'm wrong here but unfortunately can't envisage it at this moment in time. Regardless, any future trade deals we strike post-Brexit will still involve pooling sovereignty.

4. Globalisation is real and ever increasing Brexit or no Brexit. With constant improvements in technology and transportation, the world is effectively becoming smaller all the time and I think it makes sense for as much collaboration between nations as possible. I'm not only Pro-EU but also Pro-TTIP, Pro-NATO and Pro-Commonweath. The Commonwealth isn't a viable alternative to the EU though as some Brexiters make out (not suggesting you here by the way) because it's GDP is only c.9% of the size of the EU's as well as being geographically more difficult to trade with. To finish off the worldwide integration point I believe that if we're going to tackle the really great challenges of our current and subsequent generations (e.g. climate change) I think the world needs a globalised approach and I support anything that takes the human race as a whole in that direction.

To return to whether the USA using some of our military infrastructure counts as pooling sovereignty or not, just because we are theoretically able to take the bases back doesn't mean the answer is no - it just means that if we were to do so we'd cease to pool, remember anything pooled can always be reversed because Parliament remains sovereign - this is exactly what we're doing now with the EU Withdrawal Bill.

NATO is actually a prime example of how pooling sovereignty can be used to magnify each members' power - in order to be a member we need to partake in a shared command structure and relinquish some control but in return we get to be part of the strongest military alliance on the planet. A very good deal if you ask me.

I wouldn’t say I disagree with any of the above.

Where I probably differ from you is my concern that the above could be achieved without the EU turning into a superstate. If the EU was capable of reform I would have happily remained but its direction of travel has become very evident.

Participating in NATO etc., in my view is a fundamentally different concept to making the U.K.’s law and judiciary subservient to the EU.
 

Bromley boy

Established Member
Joined
18 Jun 2015
Messages
4,609
I understand the sentiment, but have you any actual, tangible evidence of that? I note you using the word "seems" which is as good a get-out clause as any!!
I know the "Euro Army" was a worry to some, but even if that ever happened I can't see how it would prevent each nation being "sovereign" in so far as if any country involved in the "Euro-army" decided it wanted no part in a conflict, it would be obliged to withdraw it's own citizens from that army. But i'll admit to being ignorent of all matters Euro-army on the grounds it hasn't happened, and if it did they, like us, would probably be part of NATO (in which case, why have an Euro-army in the first place?).

The EU to a large extent stayed out of the Catalonia dispute, hasn't prevented Denmark banning face-covering, let us have the OUT vote etc etc. Do you think the EU SHOULD have been involved with the former?

The evidence is simply the direction of travel the EU has taken since its beginnings.

A single currency, an attempt to introduce a constitution (rejected but for how long?), talk of EU “citizenship”, talk about a European army etc.

No thanks! Sticking to a trading agreement would be fine but the EU has indicated it has ambitions way beyond this. That is not something I want this country to be a part of at all.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,795
I keep asking to be made an European Citizen but keep getting knocked back by being told there's no such thing...
 

Bromley boy

Established Member
Joined
18 Jun 2015
Messages
4,609
Ha ha. That is my point though. My sister in law is Colombian. My cousin lives in Chile and has a son who is born to an African father. Two of my best mates are Spanish and two are Polish. Another cousin is married to a German and has lived there that long she dreams in German. These are just a few of the people who's values I share. I am British and some of them are not. I could list many more. Just what are these British values people talk about. I just refuse to define myself based on the country I was born in. I am not like James Penny after whom Penny Lane was named after. I'm not like Margaret Thatcher. Etc. Etc.

But the fact remains the many of your outlooks and values will be a product of having been born, raised and educated in the U.K. You would probably be a very different person if you had been born elsewhere, as others have pointed out.

That isn’t to say that every British person has the same values, of course, but they have a shared experience of growing up in the U.K. which is an intrinsic part of forming those values.

It’s a complicated question which isn’t just about values, or just about where you were born, but a function of all the above.

You make a good point about asking what “British” values are. I think we as a country need to be a bit better at defining and defending them if we don’t want to risk losing them.
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
5,605
But the fact remains the many of your outlooks and values will be a product of having been born, raised and educated in the U.K. You would probably be a very different person if you had been born elsewhere, as others have pointed out.

That isn’t to say that every British person has the same values, of course, but they have a shared experience of growing up in the U.K. which is an intrinsic part of forming those values.

But you can say that of any area, no matter how small or large you make it.
As in, me growing up in the small village in South Wales that I grew up in was intrinsic in forming a lot of my views, just as me being European also has been pretty intrinsic in forming a lot of my views. Or if you want to be a bit mad, us all living on planet earth is important in all of of values. I don't see what the concept has to do specifically with just nationality to be honest.
 
Last edited:

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
6,038
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
You make a good point about asking what “British” values are. I think we as a country need to be a bit better at defining and defending them if we don’t want to risk losing them.

That I could get on board with. Having listened to an R4 piece today where interviewees in Lincolnshire tried to explain why they thought that life in England was better in the past (not entirely Brexit-centered but certainly vaguely related) - it seems that the ability to define these qualities and values would be a good place to start. So many opinions and decisions about our current existence are based upon vague perceptions and intangibles.
 

Bromley boy

Established Member
Joined
18 Jun 2015
Messages
4,609
I keep asking to be made an European Citizen but keep getting knocked back by being told there's no such thing...

If you are a British citizen you are also a citizen of the EU. This concept was introduced by the 1992 Maastricht Treaty. Although it is largely meaningless because the EU is not a country (yet).

The reference in the Maastricht treaty to “ever closer union” is what worries me - clearly the EU’s stated desire is to further and further reduce the independence of its member states.

I am also a British citizen. I have absolutely no desire to be a citizen of the EU.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:xy0026

  • Among its most prominent innovations, the treaty:
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,521
Location
LBK
The very fact we don't agree proves you are wrong on that one.

No it doesn’t. At no point have I tried to claim that if people are from the same country they share the same opinions.

Elsewhere, people have vaunted the EU as a mechanism for bringing different peoples together under a common umbrella. People are different all round the world. Don’t you agree? Or do you think your opinions, values, standards, culture, religion (or lack of), worldview etc would be exactly the same if you were born in Saudi Arabia, or Romania, or Peru, or Samoa? Honestly? You don’t think being born in Britain hasn’t shaped who you are? Calling bull poop on that one :)
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
5,605
No it doesn’t. At no point have I tried to claim that if people are from the same country they share the same opinions.

Elsewhere, people have vaunted the EU as a mechanism for bringing different peoples together under a common umbrella. People are different all round the world. Don’t you agree? Or do you think your opinions, values, standards, culture, religion (or lack of), worldview etc would be exactly the same if you were born in Saudi Arabia, or Romania, or Peru, or Samoa? Honestly? You don’t think being born in Britain hasn’t shaped who you are? Calling bull poop on that one :)

And as I replied to Bromley boy saying, you could make that argument for any random area. Be it a village, a region, a country, a multi national area like the EU, whatever. It has nothing to do with nationality really, so I don't see how it backs up your point at all. Being from the Rhondda in South Wales has shaped who I am and has made me different from someone born in Westminster, just as being born in a part of the EU has made me different from someone born outside of the EU. Being born in a certain place certainly does shape who you are (well technically it is the ideas and culture you are surrounded with, which could be different from the actual area you live in!), but the idea that can only happen on a country level is simply absurd.
 
Last edited:

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,380
Location
Liverpool
No it doesn’t. At no point have I tried to claim that if people are from the same country they share the same opinions.

Elsewhere, people have vaunted the EU as a mechanism for bringing different peoples together under a common umbrella. People are different all round the world. Don’t you agree? Or do you think your opinions, values, standards, culture, religion (or lack of), worldview etc would be exactly the same if you were born in Saudi Arabia, or Romania, or Peru, or Samoa? Honestly? You don’t think being born in Britain hasn’t shaped who you are? Calling bull poop on that one :)
You are saying I am British in my very nature because of where to was born. I am telling you you are wrong. I find the very concept insulting. The very fact we disagree makes you wrong unless you are saying I am not British which would again make you wrong.
 

EM2

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
7,522
Location
The home of the concrete cow
Or do you think your opinions, values, standards, culture, religion (or lack of), worldview etc would be exactly the same if you were born in Saudi Arabia, or Romania, or Peru, or Samoa? Honestly? You don’t think being born in Britain hasn’t shaped who you are? Calling bull poop on that one :)
Joanna Lumley and Cliff Richard were born in India. Terry Butcher was born in Singapore. Emma Watson was born in France. Rita Ora was born in Kosovo. Bradley Wiggins was born in Belgium. Eddie Izzard was born in Yemen. Joe Strummer was born in Turkey. Mo Farah was born in Somalia. JRR Tolkien was born in South Africa.
Do you think their opinions, values, standards, culture, religion (or lack of), worldview etc. come from where they were born, or how they were raised?
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,521
Location
LBK
You are saying I am British in my very nature because of where to was born. I am telling you you are wrong. I find the very concept insulting. The very fact we disagree makes you wrong unless you are saying I am not British which would again make you wrong.

You find it insulting to be British?
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
5,605
You find it insulting to be British?

Not wanting to talk for fowler9, but I can certainly see why saying someone is who they are just because of where they were born, as opposed to their upbringing, their experiences and what they have made of their life. Hell in many cases people are who they are despite of where they were born, not because of it.
 

Bromley boy

Established Member
Joined
18 Jun 2015
Messages
4,609
And as I replied to Bromley boy saying, you could make that argument for any random area. Be it a village, a region, a country, a multi national area like the EU, whatever. It has nothing to do with nationality really, so I don't see how it backs up your point at all. Being from the Rhondda in South Wales has shaped who I am and has made me different from someone born in Westminster, just as being born in a part of the EU has made me different from someone born outside of the EU. Being born in a certain place certainly does shape who you are (well technically it is the ideas and culture you are surrounded with, which could be different from the actual area you live in!), but the idea that can only happen on a country level is simply absurd.

But a country isn’t a “random” area. It is an established community with borders, a government, a common legal system, often a common language, an education system. It provides the framework for people to live their lives.

I disagree that being born in the EU makes you different to someone born outside it - the EU it is not a country, much as it seems to want to become one.

As someone born in a Welsh village you may not have much in common with someone from Westminster, but you’d probably find you had more in common with them than someone from a rural village in Pakistan who would speak a different language, have a different religion and likely very different values.
 

Bromley boy

Established Member
Joined
18 Jun 2015
Messages
4,609
Joanna Lumley and Cliff Richard were born in India. Terry Butcher was born in Singapore. Emma Watson was born in France. Rita Ora was born in Kosovo. Bradley Wiggins was born in Belgium. Eddie Izzard was born in Yemen. Joe Strummer was born in Turkey. Mo Farah was born in Somalia. JRR Tolkien was born in South Africa.
Do you think their opinions, values, standards, culture, religion (or lack of), worldview etc. come from where they were born, or how they were raised?

I don’t think anyone has said that it is solely down to where they were born. What it means to be “British” is a range of factors including but not limited to place of birth.

Someone born in the U.K. and raised abroad may well be less “British” than a foreign born U.K. citizen who had lived in this country for most of their lives and assimilated to its values.

It is bizarre that people who were born and raised in the U.K. seem to deny any sense of identity with the country at all and find the concept that being British is an intrinsic part of them “insulting”.
 
Last edited:

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
5,605
But a country isn’t a “random” area. It is an established community with borders, a government, a common legal system, often a common language, an education system. It provides the framework for people to live their lives.

It is essentially arbitrary though. Lines drawn due to war, diplomacy, trade etc. What makes Clontibret one country but Derrynoose another? (two random places on a map that are on either side of the Irish border). Common legal system, common language, common education system? Well the UK fails on those.

And in any case, why does that the country of your birth have more of an influence on you growing up than other factors that have nothing to do with countries as a concept (if your school is good, if there is a lot of crime in your area, if your parents can feed you good meals or not etc)? I would happily argue that the specific factors of where I grew up (deprived area, good links to Cardiff, lots of unemployment, lots of drug and alcohol abuse, parents who wanted me to do better than they did, parents who were able to feed me well and help me with my education, teachers who saw I had some potential and helped nurture it, etc etc etc) have affected me much more than just me being born in the UK. So I ask again, why do you bang on about country so much? If anything, I'd have thought you'd be banging on about towns / villages / cities as the specifics of them can have much more of an impact on you than just what country you are born in.

I disagree that being born in the EU makes you different to someone born outside it - the EU it is not a country, much as it seems to want to become one.

I disagree. As I said, I don't know why you are so focused on country. Being the EU means I have grown up being able to freely cross borders without a Visa, use the same currency in multiple countries whilst on holiday etc. That does have an impact on how you view the world (especially borders and the arbitrary lines we draw on a map).

As someone born in a Welsh village you may not have much in common with someone from Westminster, but you’d probably find you had more in common with them than someone from a rural village in Pakistan who would speak a different language, have a different religion and likely very different values.

But you could say that compared with someone from a rural villiage in North Wales too (different language - Welsh, different religion - I'm atheist so any region would be different, different values - I have different values to many of the chavs who lived just down the road from me, so I'd hardly say that is defined by country either).

It is bizarre that people who were born and raised in the U.K. seem to deny any sense of identity with the country at all and find the concept that being British is an intrinsic part of them “insulting”.

Certainly that isn't what I am trying to do.
What I am saying is that to jump on country as the only kind of unifying factor silly.
A set of values sure - but as already asked what would they be? And surely multiple countries can share the same values?

I don’t think anyone has said that it is solely down to where they were born. What it means to be “British” is a range of factors including but not limited to place of birth.

Someone born in the U.K. and raised abroad may well be less “British” than a foreign born U.K. citizen who had lived in this country for most of their lives and assimilated to its values.

So what is "being British" then? Because as far as I can see, you can't seem to define it apart from basically saying it can be anything as long as they share our values. So what if there were a group of other countries near us who also shared the same, or very similar values. Would it not make sense, using your logic, that there could be some kind of agreement or bond between those countries?
 
Last edited:

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,380
Location
Liverpool
You find it insulting to be British?
That is not what I said. I find it insulting to think that the only option I have to be as a person is from where I was born. There is a lot more to me than people born in Britain.
 

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,380
Location
Liverpool
I don’t think anyone has said that it is solely down to where they were born. What it means to be “British” is a range of factors including but not limited to place of birth.

Someone born in the U.K. and raised abroad may well be less “British” than a foreign born U.K. citizen who had lived in this country for most of their lives and assimilated to its values.

It is bizarre that people who were born and raised in the U.K. seem to deny any sense of identity with the country at all and find the concept that being British is an intrinsic part of them “insulting”.
It is not at all bizarre. I say that as someone who is British. I am defined by myself and the people I choose to spend my time with. Not which country I happened to be born in. What is find insulting is not being born in Britain or being British but the concept of that being what defines me. I am who I am because of people all over the world. Britain is Britain because of people all over the world. I find the petty differences of tiny nation states pathetic. I apologise if that offends anyone.
 

birchesgreen

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2015
Messages
7,673
Location
Solihull
One of the great things about being British is that you are free to hate being British.

Personally its 4th or 5th on the list of regional factors in my identity.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,795
If you want to go somehwre where almost everyone feels really, really British then go to Gibraltar; a place where some feel should be given back to the Spanish after Brexit!!

As for me - I always say British, never English. Nothing against England, it's just I'm a bit of a mix with a very proud Scots gran who passed on her grasp of financial issues to mum!!! Having the freedom to be free allows me to support the Netherlands :oops: and Liechtenstein at football, England at curling and hockey, Scotland at rugby and hockey etc...but I'm much happier supporting GB as it rolls everyone into one.

It goes back to an earlier post of mine - just who are we??
 

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,380
Location
Liverpool
If you want to go somehwre where almost everyone feels really, really British then go to Gibraltar; a place where some feel should be given back to the Spanish after Brexit!!

As for me - I always say British, never English. Nothing against England, it's just I'm a bit of a mix with a very proud Scots gran who passed on her grasp of financial issues to mum!!! Having the freedom to be free allows me to support the Netherlands :oops: and Liechtenstein at football, England at curling and hockey, Scotland at rugby and hockey etc...but I'm much happier supporting GB as it rolls everyone into one.

It goes back to an earlier post of mine - just who are we??
If you want to go somehwre where almost everyone feels really, really British then go to Gibraltar; a place where some feel should be given back to the Spanish after Brexit!!

As for me - I always say British, never English. Nothing against England, it's just I'm a bit of a mix with a very proud Scots gran who passed on her grasp of financial issues to mum!!! Having the freedom to be free allows me to support the Netherlands :oops: and Liechtenstein at football, England at curling and hockey, Scotland at rugby and hockey etc...but I'm much happier supporting GB as it rolls everyone into one.

It goes back to an earlier post of mine - just who are we??
Well I have to agree with that. What the hell is British? I haven't seen a convincing suggestion of what it means so far.
 

Bromley boy

Established Member
Joined
18 Jun 2015
Messages
4,609
It is essentially arbitrary though. Lines drawn due to war, diplomacy, trade etc. What makes Clontibret one country but Derrynoose another? (two random places on a map that are on either side of the Irish border). Common legal system, common language, common education system? Well the UK fails on those.

Well, yes, it is arbitrary in a sense. Borders are what they are. But the systems operating within those borders are what makes the difference between different countries.

And in any case, why does that the country of your birth have more of an influence on you growing up than other factors that have nothing to do with countries as a concept (if your school is good, if there is a lot of crime in your area, if your parents can feed you good meals or not etc)? I would happily argue that the specific factors of where I grew up (deprived area, good links to Cardiff, lots of unemployment, lots of drug and alcohol abuse, parents who wanted me to do better than they did, parents who were able to feed me well and help me with my education, teachers who saw I had some potential and helped nurture it, etc etc etc) have affected me much more than just me being born in the UK. So I ask again, why do you bang on about country so much? If anything, I'd have thought you'd be banging on about towns / villages / cities as the specifics of them can have much more of an impact on you than just what country you are born in.

Many of those factors you mention are country specific. Parents wanting you do do better than they did - what does that mean? It means different things in different parts of the world. If you are female you would also find that “doing well” can mean very different things than if you were male, in different parts of the world.

Teachers identifying your potential (and the fact you were lucky enough to receive an education at all) is a product of being educated by the British education system.

I disagree. As I said, I don't know why you are so focused on country. Being the EU means I have grown up being able to freely cross borders without a Visa, use the same currency in multiple countries whilst on holiday etc. That does have an impact on how you view the world (especially borders and the arbitrary lines we draw on a map).

Yes but you have been able to do that first and foremost by virtue of holding a British passport. I have travelled to various countries around the world (including parts of the EU).

Borders are arbitrary, but what happens within them is not.

But you could say that compared with someone from a rural villiage in North Wales too (different language - Welsh, different religion - I'm atheist so any region would be different, different values - I have different values to many of the chavs who lived just down the road from me, so I'd hardly say that is defined by country either).

But those chavs (who have made different choices to you) are still a product of a shared experience of being born, growing up in the U.K., education, participation in U.K. society in whatever form. The lowest common denominator binding you to them is you are part of the same demos @AlterEgo referred to previously.

So what is "being British" then? Because as far as I can see, you can't seem to define it apart from basically saying it can be anything as long as they share our values. So what if there were a group of other countries near us who also shared the same, or very similar values. Would it not make sense, using your logic, that there could be some kind of agreement or bond between those countries?

I don’t disagree with you on agreements between nations. Where the EU falls down is that it increasingly seeks to minimise and ignore the fundamental differences between member states. The fact is the countries of Europe are very different both economically and culturally.

Trying to define Britishness is a difficult question, I’ll grant you. Perhaps the “elephant test” of the legal world is a good way to try to describe it: “Britishness” is an amorphous concept which, like an elephant, is difficult to define, but is instantly recognisable. It is the complex product of a number of factors including (but not limited to): a sense of belonging; participation in the U.K; living here; speaking English; working here; being educated here; paying tax; voting in elections.

What does being Welsh mean to you? You have used in in your username on this site - I suspect your Welsh identity means more to you than “the bit of rock you happened to be born on”.

I would agree with you to an extent: some of us seem seem to have lost the ability to identify as British, or take any pride in where we are from, as evidenced by this thread. I think that’s a real shame. If we want to continue according to the values we take for granted, we should get a bit better at defining them.

Certainly that isn't what I am trying to do.
What I am saying is that to jump on country as the only kind of unifying factor silly.
A set of values sure - but as already asked what would they be? And surely multiple countries can share the same values?

It’s not the only unifying factor but it is the most important. Being British means a whole lot more than where you are born, or where you currently live.
 
Last edited:

Up_Tilt_390

Member
Joined
10 Oct 2015
Messages
923
Well I have to agree with that. What the hell is British? I haven't seen a convincing suggestion of what it means so far.

If I may point you to my earlier quote, maybe you'll see what it means to be British and what it truly is...
I think it's important to know that part of being British doesn't just come from being born in Britain, nor does it just come from your own personal self-proclaimed national identity, nor does it just come from people's own common opinions, ideals, standards, values and culture. What ultimately makes someone British is when it also comes from how you usually go about certain things, such as...

When it comes to fixing objects...
  1. Saying "let's have a look"
  2. Describing the brokenness
  3. Accidentally breaking it a bit more
  4. Saying "nah, it's definitely broken"
  5. Putting your hands on your hips
Dealing with a noisy passenger train...
  • By staring furiously out of the window.
Or ending a phone call like this
  • "Alright that's great, brilliant, cool, alright then. See you later, okay, bye, tarra, tarra"

You are free to disagree with me on those points as to what it means to be British, but that's what I'd say is part of what makes someone British. It sounds a bit like a joke, but it's not. It's funny cause it's kind of true from my point of view. :p
 

Bromley boy

Established Member
Joined
18 Jun 2015
Messages
4,609
It is not at all bizarre. I say that as someone who is British. I am defined by myself and the people I choose to spend my time with. Not which country I happened to be born in. What is find insulting is not being born in Britain or being British but the concept of that being what defines me. I am who I am because of people all over the world. Britain is Britain because of people all over the world. I find the petty differences of tiny nation states pathetic. I apologise if that offends anyone.

It think it’s a real shame you don’t feel able to take any pride in and celebrate your Britishness.

The differences between countries are not “pathetic”, they are something to be celebrated and enjoyed, in my view. What a boring world it would be if we were all exactly the same.

I enjoy travelling precisely because of those differences and I never feel more British than when I’m abroad.
 
Last edited:

Bromley boy

Established Member
Joined
18 Jun 2015
Messages
4,609
Well I have to agree with that. What the hell is British? I haven't seen a convincing suggestion of what it means so far.

In your case it includes, but isn’t limited to, being a scouser who hates Maggie Thatcher and enjoys a beer or two?

Is it possible to be more intrinsically British than that?! :D
 
Last edited:

EM2

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
7,522
Location
The home of the concrete cow
It think it’s a real shame you don’t feel able to take any pride in and celebrate your Britishness.
But why should someone have pride and celebrate Britishness automatically, just because they are born British? Surely the country must do things that make you feel proud to belong to it? I'm not saying that I'm not proud of certain aspects of Britain (not necessarily of me as a Briton), but that has been earned. There are plenty of other things that Britain does, or has done, that I am not proud of and certainly would not celebrate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top