DaveNewcastle
Established Member
Saw this article by Andrew Gilligan on penaltyfareappeal.co.uk recently which some on here might appreciate:
OUR 10 RULES FOR BEATING THE TICKET INSPECTOR at http://www.penaltyfareappeal.co.uk/wordpress/?p=421
I'm sure he won't mind just a small quote here to give you the idea....
" you do, in fact, have quite extensive rights not to be charged penalty fares, many of them set out in law. Rights designed, in the words of the Government, to “make sure that the interests of honest passengers are protected”.
The chances are that if you have a reasonable excuse not to pay a penalty fare, you do not have to pay it – whatever a train company’s staff may claim. If you are prepared to quote your rights and call their bluff, you will usually prevail.
Provided always that you do pay the normal single fare, the chances are that any threats made against you, particularly of criminal prosecution, are hollow.
Train companies often scare people into paying up by threatening prosecution and a criminal record. However, the legislation establishing penalty fares, the Railways Act 1993, section 130, states that apart from failing to give your right name and address, “nothing in this section creates, or authorises the creation of any [criminal] offence”. The Penalty Fares Regulations 1994 state that “the recovery of a penalty fare is a civil debt”. So even if after reading your letter the company still decides it wants the money, it has to sue you – probably not worthwhile for such a small sum."
(You may remember Andrew Gilligan for his reporting for the BBC that the "45 minute" excuse for the UK & US attacking Iraq was inaccurate. He now writes for London's Evening Standard)
Probably worth remembering much of his findings on this thorny issue?
OUR 10 RULES FOR BEATING THE TICKET INSPECTOR at http://www.penaltyfareappeal.co.uk/wordpress/?p=421
I'm sure he won't mind just a small quote here to give you the idea....
" you do, in fact, have quite extensive rights not to be charged penalty fares, many of them set out in law. Rights designed, in the words of the Government, to “make sure that the interests of honest passengers are protected”.
The chances are that if you have a reasonable excuse not to pay a penalty fare, you do not have to pay it – whatever a train company’s staff may claim. If you are prepared to quote your rights and call their bluff, you will usually prevail.
Provided always that you do pay the normal single fare, the chances are that any threats made against you, particularly of criminal prosecution, are hollow.
Train companies often scare people into paying up by threatening prosecution and a criminal record. However, the legislation establishing penalty fares, the Railways Act 1993, section 130, states that apart from failing to give your right name and address, “nothing in this section creates, or authorises the creation of any [criminal] offence”. The Penalty Fares Regulations 1994 state that “the recovery of a penalty fare is a civil debt”. So even if after reading your letter the company still decides it wants the money, it has to sue you – probably not worthwhile for such a small sum."
(You may remember Andrew Gilligan for his reporting for the BBC that the "45 minute" excuse for the UK & US attacking Iraq was inaccurate. He now writes for London's Evening Standard)
Probably worth remembering much of his findings on this thorny issue?