Trainfan344
Established Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 2,305
There's snow guarantee...
There's snow guarantee...
Don't passenger trains generally take priority over freight? Could the points not have been checked in advance? I don't know, maybe more to this than meets the eye?
https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses/9691855915596800022 DRS 66's are en-route to Northumberland with snow ploughs at each end in order to clear the lines north of Newcastle
[/URL]Virgin Trains EC [URL='https://twitter.com/Virgin_TrainsEC']@Virgin_TrainsEC
Thank you to @NetworkRail for sending this machine through past York to the affected area north of Newcastle! #Snowmageddon
I was working in York yesterday - there was disruption to pretty much every service by the time I finished. Class 185 horns were failing all over the place, resulting in them being tested on incoming trains and a watering can of warm water being provided in an attempt to defrost them. A 150 also froze up after being left in the station for a while and refused to move when required, leading to a short form. We'll see what it's like later today...
The 185 I was on this morning to Manchester sounded like it was really struggling when the driver blew the horn. Made it sound quite sad really![]()
Someone signed that off as being safe too.
For those who think that railways in continental Europe are perfect and never delayed, there are cancellations in Switzerland as well due to the weather.
http://fahrplan.sbb.ch/bin/help.exe/en?tpl=showmap_external
Thanks for that. It's interesting. I enjoyed my travel today in the snow.UMS simply has no spare room in the peaks. With the move to a 10-car railway, some previous service recovery techniques are now lost, eg. terminating something in the bay platform at Kingston to release a path in the event of congestion on the UMS. Thinning services out would allow a bit more breathing space and provide a bit more flexibility (for example, switching between UMS and UMF to bypass a blockage or simply congestion as suggested) as the likelihood of something going wrong (an infrastructure failure, a passenger slipping and hurting himself close to the edge of a platform, etc) is high.
I see they plan to thin out the Chessington service tomorrow.I can understand Hampton Court and Chessington on the basis that they’re both low frequency services which in the grand scheme of things are comparatively less important. If you thin out Chessington, for example, the juice rails will ice up even more than they would already have done, and it’s highly likely something would get stuck.
In reality it’s quite possible the whole network will be in chaos anyway, so the issue may be rather academic.
HaywardH Heath Station has slippery steps. Not sure how they passed saftey standards tests. Maybe they do and it's my imagination something is wrong.It was reopened later, but whatever is the case about it the flooring really needs to be replaced, as it's dangerous on anything other than a hot sunny day. Smooth tile is useless for anywhere where people will be walking in with wet shoes on, let alone anywhere actually outdoors. Crikey, you'd think NR would realise that given that they've not long replaced all the tile on Preston's platforms with concrete slabs because it was too slippery (if I recall rightly).
Paddington station is reported as being closed, with local services terminating at Ealing and others at Reading.
Is it known why? Is the snow that heavy in West London?
Apparently they cleared the snow with warm water which subsequently froze...
This. I would like to see some.Surely there must be some photos (or even better videos) of Network Rail snow ploughs in action at the moment?
Single class 153s, many class 222s and all class 91s all now withdrawn from traffic due to class 153 air systems (and everything else) freezing up and failing and 91/222s having traction motor issues due to the snow. VTEC running HSTs only.