• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Snow Service Changes 25/02/18 onwards.

Status
Not open for further replies.

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,562
Location
UK
it comes from Meteogroup. They do have and provide their own data.

Weather stations

In conjunction with a number of partners, we operate our own private weather measurement network with approximately 1600 stations around the world. Our network of weather stations across Germany and Switzerland is the highest density of private weather stations in Europe. These stations provide the essential basis for our reliable and high-precision forecasts.

https://www.meteogroup.com/about-meteogroup
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Wivenswold

Established Member
Joined
24 Jul 2012
Messages
1,570
Location
Essex
No. It's their prediction based on their assessment of global weather model outputs.

The Met Office do provide percentages/measurements for extreme weather events.

Most decent weather websites and apps will actually have an explanation of how to read their site. Unfortunately we live in an age where we read the headlines and move off to the next thing.
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,906
Looking at TRUST for Tues.... says hourly Inter City, hourly Liverpool and hourly Cambridge, and no Wherry / Cromers
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
5,078
Meanwhile the north of England has had snow sevaral times this year and TOCs ran a largely normal service.
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,906
AGA must have a sound reason for doing it, a reduced service is understandable, I dont follow the outright cancellations, unless their forecast is better than we can get
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,906
Seems, London to Norwich, Hourly.
Nor - Lime Street, Hourly.
Nor - Cambridge Hourly.
Ips to Peter: Hourly
Ips to Cambs Hourly
Norwich to Lowestoft Hourly
London to Colch / Ips 2PH 1 x All Stns I x Fast ( I think) all 12 cars
1TPH London to Ips
Clacton to Colchester shuttle 1TPH all stns NOT the Town
Thorpe - Walton: 1TPH
Mantree - Harwich 1TPH
Additional Peak hour services London - Norwich and London - Colchester and VV
 

eastdyke

Established Member
Joined
25 Jan 2010
Messages
2,058
Location
East Midlands
Seems, London to Norwich, Hourly.
Nor - Lime Street, Hourly.
Nor - Cambridge Hourly.
Ips to Peter: Hourly
Ips to Cambs Hourly
Norwich to Lowestoft Hourly
London to Colch / Ips 2PH 1 x All Stns I x Fast ( I think) all 12 cars
1TPH London to Ips
Clacton to Colchester shuttle 1TPH all stns NOT the Town
Thorpe - Walton: 1TPH
Mantree - Harwich 1TPH
Additional Peak hour services London - Norwich and London - Colchester and VV
That sounds good :cake:
 

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
3,495
Location
Over The Hill
Don't bother with the Met Office etc, just buy the Daily Express.

Scroll down to view:
Daily Express Front Pages

In a post-truth world science is seen as being part of an agenda rather than intelligent analysis of factual data. Climate change denial is an obvious form of this reaction. And how many people have ever been actively taught how to think in an intelligently critical manner before reaching a conclusion in their opinions? It's no wonder I gave up buying newspapers a long time ago: so much dross, even in the broadsheets.
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
5,078
Meanwhile the discussion by passengers on my Grand Central train tonight is 'No snow yet. I hope it's knee deep by tomorrow. I'll be disappointed if not.'

I do get the feeling there's a different attitude in different parts of the country :)
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,397
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Good isn't what I would say - I would concur with most of the travelling public and say PATHETIC.

Damned if do and damned if don't may well be nearer to reality.

If you try and run a full service, you're okay until something goes wrong, however when it does things will fall over very badly very quickly - to the point where things are likely to degenerate into complete chaos. Then there are factors which the railway simply cannot control, for example if a road accident happens near a major train crew depot and the streets surrounding the depot become gridlocked, all of a sudden you've got a string of book-ons stuck running late with no idea when they will be in. Today's railway runs on the limit most of the time, so add in the effects of snow and you're now trying to run something which is probably unworkable.

Yes there are measures which the industry could take to improve resilience, however do we really want to pay for this simply for a couple of days per year which might not even happen? In the London area I don't remember much if any disruptive snowfall for the last two or three years.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,397
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Thankfully I like to think that the travelling public are generally more pleasant and understanding than yourself.

Many are, however some certainly aren't. When it snowed on the Sunday before Christmas (I forget the exact date), there were some really self-important types to be found in London, getting the right arse because their Christmas shopping was affected.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
9,206
Good isn't what I would say - I would concur with most of the travelling public and say PATHETIC.

Would you care to elaborate on that point? "Pathetic", sorry "PATHETIC" isn't entirely clear. How would you change the railway companies' response?
 

87015

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2006
Messages
5,078
Location
GEML/WCML/SR
Would you care to elaborate on that point? "Pathetic", sorry "PATHETIC" isn't entirely clear. How would you change the railway companies' response?
Well plemty of TOCs have spent all day fighting it having been told to fall in line behnd the bigboys that don't want to run trains. You should see tomorrow its not a full KRS (pre-agreed emergency plans) that has been invoked and some people want to run more trains than others

Personally i think taking the last trains out and binning entire routes in advance is pretty low. Snowplans started as a thinned, slower service not the complete cut and run it is rapidly becoming.
 

Mutant Lemming

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2011
Messages
3,191
Location
London
Typical and as I'd expect from the apologists - . I am usually very supportive of our railways when compared to our European counterparts but the failure to deal with expected weather conditions is extremely annoying - you know what is coming so do what is necessary to keep the trains running - it is what other countries do. I put PATHETIC in capitals because that is exactly how it appears to any sane person who is not blinkered by a pro-rail prejudice.
 

Mutant Lemming

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2011
Messages
3,191
Location
London
Would you care to elaborate on that point? "Pathetic", sorry "PATHETIC" isn't entirely clear. How would you change the railway companies' response?

.... by preparing and running a train service in what are basically normal Winter conditions - this is a standard European Winter NOT 1963 - if you cannot prepare for normal Winter then you aren't fit for the role quite simply.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
Typical and as I'd expect from the apologists - . I am usually very supportive of our railways when compared to our European counterparts but the failure to deal with expected weather conditions is extremely annoying - you know what is coming so do what is necessary to keep the trains running - it is what other countries do. I put PATHETIC in capitals because that is exactly how it appears to any sane person who is not blinkered by a pro-rail prejudice.

Are you talking about other countries that regularly have heavy snowfall and therefore have the equipment to deal with it?
 

Mutant Lemming

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2011
Messages
3,191
Location
London
Please could you give some examples of what you feel would be necessary actions to take?

What any sensible rail operator would take knowing the potential prevailing conditions - if you aren't capable of providing a 364 day a year train service based on the conditions of 364 days a year then you shouldn't really be doing that job. The upcoming weather conditions aren't exceptionally bad - they are pretty normal for this time of year it is only the' fake news' angle of the TOCs that are making a case to oppose the reality of their inadequacies to provide a public service year round. It's Winter for FFS if you can't deal with it then go find another job.
 

Mutant Lemming

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2011
Messages
3,191
Location
London
Like the UK railway is preparing to do?

... preparing to do by saying - DON'T PANIC... DON'T TRAVEL .... preparing properly means no one even notices and it's business as normal. Even before any snow fell we had threats of cancellations.. hence my lableiing it PATHETIC
 

TheSel

Member
Joined
10 Oct 2017
Messages
1,161
Location
Southport, Merseyside
As seen on the BBC's 'Red Button' Travel section this evening.

... or not.jpg

Thank heavens for the adverse weather conditions, then. Can anyone advise what timetables would be operating were it not for the weather?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top