• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The Queens starts her Christmas holiday

Status
Not open for further replies.

mpthomson

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2016
Messages
1,384
Correct - However the Queen IS the Duke of Lancaster. The Monarch is always the Duke of Lancaster. I think it stems from Henry the 5th who ascended to the throne from the Duchy of Lancaster and has passed ot every monarch thereafter.

As an aisde a Duke is the top of the hereditary title tree and a female may hold a dukedom in her own right and be addressed as Duke.

This isn’t correct, the title is in abeyance and doesn’t formally exist anymore, HM would never be addressed or referred to as Duke of Lancaster in the way that some other royals are known by different titles in different parts of the UK. It’s used on an informal basis only, within Lancashire as part of a toast and by the Duke of Lancs Army regiment, as I said earlier (I grew up on the Duchy of Lancaster estate).
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,949
Location
Fenny Stratford
This isn’t correct, the title is in abeyance and doesn’t formally exist anymore, HM would never be addressed or referred to as Duke of Lancaster in the way that some other royals are known by different titles in different parts of the UK. It’s used on an informal basis only, within Lancashire as part of a toast and by the Duke of Lancs Army regiment, as I said earlier (I grew up on the Duchy of Lancaster estate).

That i did not know. I thought it existed as part of the hereditary honours in the monarchs name but was just not used. Thanks for the clarification.
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
4,005
Location
St Neots
I have not heard of any guard being positioned in case (say) DOO cameras failed, though it would not surprise me. 387s can be worked by guards, although finding someone with the route knowledge to route-conduct a guard with 387 knowledge (who would quite possibly be one of the few based South of the Thames in Southern land) would be quite the logistical effort.

What sort of challenge would it be to have a driver (who signs the route and 387s) carry out "standby guard" duties?
 

HLE

Established Member
Joined
27 Dec 2013
Messages
1,421
A union one to say the least.

A driver is there to drive it not act as a guard. Then there’s the fact not enough drivers are employed to cover the drivers’ diagrams without RDW in the first place
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
9,231
What sort of challenge would it be to have a driver (who signs the route and 387s) carry out "standby guard" duties?

Drivers aren't trained in "guard duties" (whatever they may mean in this context) in the same way that Guards aren't trained in "driver duties".
 

XDM

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2016
Messages
483
Drivers aren't trained in "guard duties" (whatever they may mean in this context) in the same way that Guards aren't trained in "driver duties".

True now, but not 3 years ago.
Years ago, in exchange for a good pay rise, Southern Eastern drivers agreed to act as guards if needed, but without the revenue duties. Did not happen very much, but it did happen.
Then about 3 years ago, when South Eastern wanted to extended DOO from Strood 3 stations to Gillingham, ASLEF said only if you drop the guards' role. TOC agreed. Everyone happy. But I am told more than a few drivers quite enjoyed an occasionally different view of the route & stations from a guard's perspective. It was quite interesting.
 

GodAtum

On Moderation
Joined
11 Dec 2009
Messages
2,684
Yes, absolutely. It's a normal service train. The Royal Party normally have one of the 1st class compartments for their exclusive use. Rumour this year is that they used the standard class bit right at the front of the train. Standard class and first class seats are exactly the same.

is there a 1st class service on that train?
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
18,156
is there a 1st class service on that train?

There is indeed but on 387s the seats in 1st are exactly the same as those in standard - and to make matters worse they’re ironing board seats.

I’m surprised a 365 wasn’t substituted which has far better seating in both classes of accommodation.
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,453
There is indeed but on 387s the seats in 1st are exactly the same as those in standard - and to make matters worse they’re ironing board seats.

I’m surprised a 365 wasn’t substituted which has far better seating in both classes of accommodation.
Surely they would want to promote a modern railway and so use the newer rolling stock.

Either that or the train is usually formed of those carriages so they did what they do every day.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
18,156
Class 365 trains operated between Kings Cross and Kings Lynn for the last 20 years. The 387s have mainly displaced the 365s on the Kings Lynn services although the 365s still make up many of the services operating to Cambridge and Peterborough.

I agree that you’d expect the railway to want to showcase its latest trains but it’s difficult to do that when the seating in 1st class on a 387 is exactly the same as in standard. Even GTR’s publicity for WiFi on the 387s used internal pictures from 365s, I can only assume they’re too embarrassed to publicise what the inside of a 387 looks like.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
True now, but not 3 years ago.
Years ago, in exchange for a good pay rise, Southern Eastern drivers agreed to act as guards if needed, but without the revenue duties. Did not happen very much, but it did happen.
Then about 3 years ago, when South Eastern wanted to extended DOO from Strood 3 stations to Gillingham, ASLEF said only if you drop the guards' role. TOC agreed. Everyone happy. But I am told more than a few drivers quite enjoyed an occasionally different view of the route & stations from a guard's perspective. It was quite interesting.

Doesn't say much for the world-beating excellence of DOO, does it...
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
There is indeed but on 387s the seats in 1st are exactly the same as those in standard - and to make matters worse they’re ironing board seats.

I’m surprised a 365 wasn’t substituted which has far better seating in both classes of accommodation.

I'm not sure a 365 has even been to King's Lynn at all since the May TT change?

Plus the split/join at Cambridge on both outward and return (recoupling to opposing direction services each way) means that you can't just sub a 365 in without significant diagramming consequences.

That and the fact that 387s are more modern and better presentationally for 'the railway'.
 

mpthomson

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2016
Messages
1,384
Well she does pay them to 'Her Majesty's' revenue and customs, i.e. she pays them to herself anyway. Also, she was avoiding tax, not strictly dodging it :)

She doesn’t actually pay tax as such, as she’s exempt. Instead Prince Charles and her voluntarily give a percentage of the gross income from the Duchy estates directly to HMRC in lieu, in Charles’ case it’s 25% but used to be 50% prior to his marrying Diana.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,442
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I'm not sure a 365 has even been to King's Lynn at all since the May TT change?

Plus the split/join at Cambridge on both outward and return (recoupling to opposing direction services each way) means that you can't just sub a 365 in without significant diagramming consequences.

That and the fact that 387s are more modern and better presentationally for 'the railway'.

It has, I believe, happened a couple of times. There are ways it can happen, but as you say it presents diagramming challenges.

The picture does make me chuckle though, I can’t help but look at it and form the conclusion HM doesn’t look like she’s just concluded a comfortable journey! I bet she preferred the 365s.
 

InOban

On Moderation
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,538
Sorry if someone has pointed this out, but it would be quite inappropriate, even if practical, for her to use the Royal Train. She isn't on a royal visit. She's going on holiday to her private residence. I'm sure it's an official, and indeed commercial secret, but the party should be paying their fares.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
It has, I believe, happened a couple of times. There are ways it can happen, but as you say it presents diagramming challenges.

The picture does make me chuckle though, I can’t help but look at it and form the conclusion HM doesn’t look like she’s just concluded a comfortable journey! I bet she preferred the 365s.

HM is notorious for her 'relaxed/contented' face always looking grumpy...even when she's not.

Much like Andy Murray and myself!
 

mervyn72

Member
Joined
23 Jul 2015
Messages
192
I heard that she started using public service trains a few years ago when there was very heavy snow in London and Norfolk so it was considered safer than driving. She enjoyed the experience so much, it sort of stuck. Might be nonsense but nice if it's true.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,928
Strange operational occurrences do happen sometimes when important figures like Her Maj. are about - she visited Matlock by service train a couple of years ago (impossible to path the Royal Train without a cancellation or two which doubtless wouldn't be done to the great and the good of Derbyshire!!) and as if by magic the regular dogbox 153 unit transformed into one of the pocket sized 222s with first class for the occasion.
 

mark-h

Member
Joined
14 Jan 2015
Messages
374
There is indeed but on 387s the seats in 1st are exactly the same as those in standard - and to make matters worse they’re ironing board seats.

I am now imagining a Queen's Speech where she rants about the quality of seats on her train journey.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,951
Location
UK
There is indeed but on 387s the seats in 1st are exactly the same as those in standard - and to make matters worse they’re ironing board seats.

I’m surprised a 365 wasn’t substituted which has far better seating in both classes of accommodation.

Perhaps she wanted Wi-Fi access and a power socket to charge her phone and allow her to watch Game of Thrones?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top