• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Offensive Graffiti on Southern

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

class387

Established Member
Joined
9 Oct 2015
Messages
1,580
I imagine there was no other train they could replace it with.
I'm all for trains running with mild graffiti, but isn't this a bit too extreme? Not very nice for the driver that has to drive it either.
 

Sunset route

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2015
Messages
1,224
There was an 8 car 377 ecs move around midday down the BML towards Brighton that was heavily graffitied, it could be the unit involved and I guess it was going to get cleaned off?
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
I'm all for trains running with mild graffiti, but isn't this a bit too extreme? Not very nice for the driver that has to drive it either.

Sometimes it's good to let people see what has to be tidied up afterwards. Perhaps, in this case, highlighting the abuses tolerated or promoted by the Unions.
 

RichardKing

Member
Joined
25 Jul 2015
Messages
565
I'm sure this photo has been circulating for a good few months now. I don't think this is a recent graffiti case.
 

Sirgerbil

Member
Joined
19 Sep 2012
Messages
357
It's an old photo, not done in retaliation for the current news regarding the pay deal.

Social media stirring at its best.
 

mallard

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2009
Messages
1,304
As offensive as this is (although I've certainly seen worse), you've got to be pretty thin-skinned to cancel a train (and potentially make hundreds of commuters late for work; there's usually plenty of spare stock outside the peaks) for the sake of a bit of graffiti.
 

class387

Established Member
Joined
9 Oct 2015
Messages
1,580
It's an old photo, not done in retaliation for the current news regarding the pay deal.

Social media stirring at its best.
Right. That's just as annoying as the graffiti itself, especially given how it was probably done by one of its sympathisers. :rolleyes:
 

StemmePilot

New Member
Joined
15 Feb 2011
Messages
2
From Thameslink a while back (WARNING contains profanity), I boarded and alighted on the other side so didn't see the full effect. Tweet to customer service and they said it would be taken out of
service at Bedford (probably happening anyway).
 

Attachments

  • tlink.PNG
    tlink.PNG
    736.7 KB · Views: 404
Last edited by a moderator:

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,858
As offensive as this is (although I've certainly seen worse), you've got to be pretty thin-skinned to cancel a train (and potentially make hundreds of commuters late for work; there's usually plenty of spare stock outside the peaks) for the sake of a bit of graffiti.

Many TOCs have a policy that trains do not enter service with offensive or significant graffiti. It has been proved that this helps prevent copycat attacks. That does require someone to see and report it.

I know of several occasions where heavily graffitied trains have been taken out of service mid diagram. Indeed I called one in myself a few weeks ago.
 

CarlSilva

Member
Joined
3 Jul 2016
Messages
144
As offensive as this is (although I've certainly seen worse), you've got to be pretty thin-skinned to cancel a train (and potentially make hundreds of commuters late for work; there's usually plenty of spare stock outside the peaks) for the sake of a bit of graffiti.
Yeah true.
Hasn't anyone got a bottle of celly thinners and a rag. It would be a 2 minute job to wipe that off.
 

hooverboy

On Moderation
Joined
12 Oct 2017
Messages
1,373
Many TOCs have a policy that trains do not enter service with offensive or significant graffiti. It has been proved that this helps prevent copycat attacks. That does require someone to see and report it.

I know of several occasions where heavily graffitied trains have been taken out of service mid diagram. Indeed I called one in myself a few weeks ago.

why don't maintainance depots and train crew carry paintball guns,and add their own "artwork" to those doiing the graffiti?
they will soon get the message, it's like training cats not to crap in your back garden:D

perfectly legit.just needs an additional warning on the trespass is forbidden posters..in legalistic terms.Network rail reserve the right to IDENTIFY and prosecute patrons unauthorised to access this property.

in this day and age of counter-terrorism etc this could also have other uses.maybe the guy did succeed in his diabolical plan,but he was spotted and now covered in luminescent/smart water so lights up like a christmas tree,so can be brought to book.

do agree that travelling on most "pimped" trains is generally unsightly,but you need to tackle the problem at the root,not treat the symptoms.
 
Last edited:

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,858
That's called taking the law into your own hands, and is apparently frowned upon by the BTP.

However, BTP have caught some prolific 'artistes' and some have had a decent stretch at Her Majesty's pleasure.
 

hooverboy

On Moderation
Joined
12 Oct 2017
Messages
1,373
why don't maintainance depots and train crew carry paintball guns,and add

That's called taking the law into your own hands, and is apparently frowned upon by the BTP.

However, BTP have caught some prolific 'artistes' and some have had a decent stretch at Her Majesty's pleasure.

in what way?.
1)you have the disclaimer on the premesis saying unauthorised personnel shall be identified.
2)it is on network rail owned property,not a public highway(public thoroughfare rules are different)
3) it is a non-lethal projectile,designed to visibly mark, not maim or incapacitate.

if you go to a paintball place,yes they have a disclaimer form or two to fill in saying you fully accept responsibility for injuries sustained if you don't follow the rules...the point being that if you trespass on the rail in the first place you're already solely liable for any physical injury,be that hit by oncoming vehicle,electrocution or whatever.
 
Last edited:

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,453
As offensive as this is (although I've certainly seen worse), you've got to be pretty thin-skinned to cancel a train (and potentially make hundreds of commuters late for work; there's usually plenty of spare stock outside the peaks) for the sake of a bit of graffiti.
South West Trains must have been very thick skinned then as they cancelled trains due to graffiti but it seemed they only cancelled them if the graffiti was on the outside.

Personally I'd have run the trains but perhaps I'm not thick skinned.
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
8,331
Location
Herts
Many TOCs have a policy that trains do not enter service with offensive or significant graffiti. It has been proved that this helps prevent copycat attacks. That does require someone to see and report it.

I know of several occasions where heavily graffitied trains have been taken out of service mid diagram. Indeed I called one in myself a few weeks ago.

I was doing that as far back as 1996 - zero tolerance - and if the unit had to run (say to protect a peak service) - then a quick slash of white paint over the tagging was done - thus stopping the vandals getting the kudos of photographing their work in service. It worked too. That and not outberthing over Xmas and NY holidays - everything was berthed in safe locations with security - no incidents at all , whereas that Xmas I think SWT had several dozen vehicles damaged quite badly.

Once caught a kid tagging the interior of a Bakerloo line train - he did not expect a citizen's arrest and a quick walk to Queens Park Met nick for collection by the BTP.
 

zuriblue

Member
Joined
12 Oct 2014
Messages
558
Location
Baden Switzerland
I wonder if anyone else having seen that has thought “and the guard thinks drivers the same”?

Having seen SBB stock with the entire lower deck of one coach completely tagged or Italian stock tagged from cab to cab, apart from the language, that seems a bit mild.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,515
Location
LBK
As offensive as this is (although I've certainly seen worse), you've got to be pretty thin-skinned to cancel a train (and potentially make hundreds of commuters late for work; there's usually plenty of spare stock outside the peaks) for the sake of a bit of graffiti.

It’s not about being offended, it’s aboht ensuring that any graffiti isn’t visible. The idea is that the existence of graffiti promotes more graffiti (and worse) in the environment. There was a study in an American city about it once which I can’t be bothered to look up. :)
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
5,368
That's called taking the law into your own hands, and is apparently frowned upon by the BTP.

However, BTP have caught some prolific 'artistes' and some have had a decent stretch at Her Majesty's pleasure.
Out of interest, what kind of sentences/fines do these people get?
 

furnessvale

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2015
Messages
4,910
Out of interest, what kind of sentences/fines do these people get?
When I was involved in such matters, the best results obtained were 18 months inside for quite serious offences (damage in the £100,000+ bracket).
Mind you, that was 20+ years ago and sentencing has got more lenient as prisons fill up.
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,902
So, they aren't allowed to spray over such offensive language and drawings of the stereotypical phallus with some white or black pain temporarily whilst in service. It would take half an average dwell time and would minimise offence. I understand it wouldn't always be possible, but i could have that off in a couple of minutes, or covered over in 15 seconds.
 

hooverboy

On Moderation
Joined
12 Oct 2017
Messages
1,373
This is not correct. Duty of Care extends even to trespassers.

what do you mean by duty of care?
if someone is on the line because:
1)they are stoned out of their brains on some illicit substance and don't know where they are
2)they have a penchent for "artwork"/criminal damage
3)they have a penchent for pyrotechnics like parsons green

I think duty of care probably only extends to scenario 1 here,and that's only to get them apprehended and taken to a place of safety/medical asessment.

case study 2 is going to cost thousands,both in legal fees and remedial work,not to mention RISK of killing/hurting themselves.sentence should be commensurate with the "value" of the crime...ie £100k damage,+legal fees paid for by community work at average wage(lets say £28k per year)
£100k damage+legal cost looks like about 6 years community service to me.

case study 3 is going to cost lives if not dealt with swiftly and robustly....no duty of care required here,just duty of stopping it if and where possibe.

would you rather use the softly softly approach to begin with,and find out that you could have stopped it but didn't.....or the zero tolerance approach and find out it was a bit of an over-reaction?
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
8,331
Location
Herts
So, they aren't allowed to spray over such offensive language and drawings of the stereotypical phallus with some white or black pain temporarily whilst in service. It would take half an average dwell time and would minimise offence. I understand it wouldn't always be possible, but i could have that off in a couple of minutes, or covered over in 15 seconds.


Read what I said before - we used to ruin their vandalism and get the units OOS PDQ - only way to defeat them. That and the court system.
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,902
Yes i did read that bit which is what prompted me to ask why it wasn't done more frequently.
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
8,331
Location
Herts
Yes i did read that bit which is what prompted me to ask why it wasn't done more frequently.

Purely because I took a deep interest in keeping my trains clean and tidy + I hate vandalism ! - we pulled up the overall ambience of the North London Lines by such measures and the Station Managers did likewise on their turf. This was a period when the parallel LU lines lost it with graff , and you had Met Line in particular was blitzed with trains running around with murals and comments like "F===k the BTP sprayed on them" ...! -
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top