A new name makes it clear that it's differentpersonally think the name change was silly... If the TM was Dft owned, they should've changed the livery with time, but kept logo / name the same...
Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
A new name makes it clear that it's differentpersonally think the name change was silly... If the TM was Dft owned, they should've changed the livery with time, but kept logo / name the same...
I agree, it looks like it is going to be a very slow process. It's the same with staff uniforms, we've been told it's going to take up to 18 months before frontline staff have been issued with them. We will be half way through the 7 year franchise by the time staff and trains have been fully 'liveried' up.I'm surprised with First's ownership, they haven't made a few more livery changes by now.
Plus, I would have thought the time between the announcement and the takeover, they would have completely refitted a train with new seat covers, posters, CIS... disappointing to see none of that has happened.
Red seats and that livery doesn't look good.
The logo I think is very clever, but it is a shame they didn't opt for a more traditional colour scheme like the GWR.It's a shame they never went down the GWR route though. Just a Navy blue, with silver SWR logo.
Sent from my MHA-L09 using Tapatalk
I agree, it looks like it is going to be a very slow process. It's the same with staff uniforms, we've been told it's going to take up to 18 months before frontline staff have been issued with them.
I agree, it looks like it is going to be a very slow process. It's the same with staff uniforms, we've been told it's going to take up to 18 months before frontline staff have been issued with them. We will be half way through the 7 year franchise by the time staff and trains have been fully 'liveried' up
This is a similar timescale to a few other other franchise changes, I don't think it has ever been instant.
I'm not taking it as a dig, this forum exists to chew the fat over topics such as thisIt seems to be a pattern...
...before a franchise starts, people complain about all the money being wasted on repainting things into the new colour scheme...
...once a franchise starts, people complain about everything not being transformed immediately.
Just like some of the people saying "wouldn't it be nice if we went back to simpler liveries like the BR blue and grey and didn't have corporate branding" are now complaining that the SWR livery is too boring.
First/ MTR seem to be taking a sensible approach, walking before they run. There'd be outrage if they were focussing too much attention on rebranding everything when they should have been wholly attending to Waterloo, they have a simple/ clear brand, they seem to be carefully replacing and updating things at appropriate times (e.g. SWT staff uniforms are still functional).
I don't agree with some aspects of the franchise (I don't understand why the 442s are needed in an era where brand new is cheaper than old - the 442s need significant money thrown at them), but I think that the livery/ branding is being treated sensibly.
(not intended as a dig at MartinB1 btw - I'm just quoting you as a factual example regarding how slow things will be)
The logo I think is very clever, but it is a shame they didn't opt for a more traditional colour scheme like the GWR.
Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk
I'm surprised with First's ownership, they haven't made a few more livery changes by now.
Plus, I would have thought the time between the announcement and the takeover, they would have completely refitted a train with new seat covers, posters, CIS... disappointing to see none of that has happened.
Red seats and that livery doesn't look good.
Originally it was a Stagecoach branch and they sold it to the Dft. So yes technically First Group can use it but it does not make business sense as SWT is associated with Stagecoach and they still use the same theme with EMT.
You could argue the name 'South West Trains' is a fairly neutral name but the brand (colours And logo) are not so I can see why First Grouo have opted to change.
Claim was submitted on the 5th, for a journey made on the 5th, so no excuses that I can see - it was also for a delay exceeding 60 minutes, which should be covered even under the old scheme as far as I'm aware.
In any case, after conferring with a colleague several times, he finally asked me to email their "no reply" address to send them a screenshot of my credit card statement. There is, as you might expect, no automatic reply configured for their 'noreply@' address, so who knows whether this has actually gone to someone or not. If they hadn't set the double whammy of TVMs no longer printing receipts and ticket barriers withholding single tickets, this wouldn't be an issue. No idea what people are supposed to do if they paid in cash!
I agree, it looks like it is going to be a very slow process. It's the same with staff uniforms, we've been told it's going to take up to 18 months before frontline staff have been issued with them. We will be half way through the 7 year franchise by the time staff and trains have been fully 'liveried' up.
Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk
That's what happens when Group branding isn't used... if it had been branded First South Western and standard First Group uniform used it could have probably been ready for franchise launch or not long after (fairly certain it was for FCC, can't remember for sure but don't think it was long if not!) as until recently all First franchises had the same uniform, although that has now changed. Seeing as SWR has its own brand a separate uniform now needs to be created....
its not just First though!
SWR are getting huge amounts of grief on twitter since the works, it's been almost like a day hasn't passed without issue at or near Waterloo. Though as someone mentioned a few posts ago, most of the blame does lie at NR's door, but passengers don't seem to know that.
SWR are getting huge amounts of grief on twitter since the works, it's been almost like a day hasn't passed without issue at or near Waterloo. Though as someone mentioned a few posts ago, most of the blame does lie at NR's door, but passengers don't seem to know that.
TBH I've noticed little difference from the months and weeks leading up to the works and passengers have naively thought it was going to immediately improve.
Most of which are down to NR infrastructure problems.
It was a stupid idea of the dft to allow the franchise to change hands mid works.
The Silverlink brand belonged to National Express, they weren't prepared to let the new operator use the name hence the removal/covering up of anything Silverlink before London Overground took over.
TBH I've noticed little difference from the months and weeks leading up to the works and passengers have naively thought it was going to immediately improve.
It has been infinitely worse this month than pre-August but not really due to SWR. Every day without exception in September has had issues.
It was a stupid idea of the dft to allow the franchise to change hands mid works.
SWR are getting huge amounts of grief on twitter since the works, it's been almost like a day hasn't passed without issue at or near Waterloo. Though as someone mentioned a few posts ago, most of the blame does lie at NR's door, but passengers don't seem to know that.