• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Cross Country Getting EMT HST`s

Do you think XC will get EMT`s HST`s?

  • Yes

    Votes: 8 17.0%
  • No

    Votes: 39 83.0%

  • Total voters
    47
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

222001

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2006
Messages
838
Location
Chesterfield
I must admit that it seems really stupid that 220 and 221 can't work with 222 in multple. Why couldn't they make the coupler systems standard!
 

ukrob

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2009
Messages
1,810
I must admit that it seems really stupid that 220 and 221 can't work with 222 in multple. Why couldn't they make the coupler systems standard!

Once again, they are. But the units are incompatible electrically.

For similar units with incompatible couplers look at 170s and 171s although the 171s were requested to have different couplers.
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
I believe the main reason they can't be wired together is that the TMS on the 220/221s are much different (i.e. much older) than that on the 222. I think if it was so much about the electricity supplies etc that could be remedied quite easily.
 

90019

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2008
Messages
6,890
Location
Featherstone, West Yorkshire
For similar units with incompatible couplers look at 170s and 171s although the 171s were requested to have different couplers.

170s and 171s are completely incompatible, not just electrically. most of the 2 car 171s were retrofitted with dellners, apart from three.

Although, does this mean that 171s are mechanically capable of coupling with 220s, 221s and 222s?
 

222001

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2006
Messages
838
Location
Chesterfield
Once again, they are. But the units are incompatible electrically.

For similar units with incompatible couplers look at 170s and 171s although the 171s were requested to have different couplers.

Yes I know that. But I am saying when they were designing the train there must have been a way to make the systems compatable. I do not understand why they didn't find a way or design it differently.
 

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
Yes I know that. But I am saying when they were designing the train there must have been a way to make the systems compatable. I do not understand why they didn't find a way or design it differently.
It wasn't asked for - the units were designed for Midland Mainline remember - why would they want 'their' units to be compatible with Virgin Trains'?

It's stupid, but it happened even with British Rail - Network SouthEast specified that the Networkers have features such that they would not be freely moved up north - crazy!!
 

Jx^

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2006
Messages
33
Location
Northumberland
Victorialine, you're speaking a load of guff.

Do you have anymore GEN? I normally have a load of GEN, but you seem really informed too with all this GEN.
 

37402

Member
Joined
15 May 2007
Messages
532
I picked up "Today`s Railways" magazine today and there was an artical stating that the Pendolino could well be the last ever Hig Speed train bulit in/for the UK it was that or something along those lines.
The Pendolino wasn't the last high speed train built in the UK; it was assembled in the UK with kit parts from all over the globe (bodyshells from Italy for example).
 

37401

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2008
Messages
3,276
Location
Birmingham
The Pendolino wasn't the last high speed train built in the UK; it was assembled in the UK with kit parts from all over the globe (bodyshells from Italy for example).

Yeah i know so i dont know why the mag had that in it!
 

NickM

Member
Joined
12 May 2009
Messages
6
Location
Andover
170s and 171s are completely incompatible, not just electrically. most of the 2 car 171s were retrofitted with dellners, apart from three.

Although, does this mean that 171s are mechanically capable of coupling with 220s, 221s and 222s?

I think this was done to allow the 171s to be coupled to the 377s in emergencies as they also have the dellners
 

43034 The Black Horse

Established Member
Joined
2 Dec 2007
Messages
1,270
Just catching up after days away,

Just have to feel sorry for the 8 people who voted 'Yes'. Poor Poor People.

Mumar, Will your restaurant have Take away hats available? Do you accept all Major Credit Cards?

:P
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top