theageofthetra
Established Member
Very true, although while never actually being an EMU in the true sense, they were put under such classification by BR as Class 442s initially, before being renumbered to 491 then to 438 - The designation they carried until withdrawal.
I can imagine, when you consider that the power output available from a 4REP was a hugely impressive 3,200 hp (8 x EE546 traction motors, each putting out 400 hp each) then that's more than enough to pull the skin off the rice pudding and leave the bowl full and steaming on the table. I wish I'd had the chance to sample a REP, sadly the last had been converted as I came into the world.
Am I right in thinking they were limited to working as just one REP + TC or other units if there were traction motors isolated due to their power thirst?
The thing we need to remember is that while Swanage may be able to make use of it (It hardly spends that much time being used on the Underground network and no doubt can be a useful money earning asset for TfL when loaned to lines like this), it's still LULs and the window bars / restricted droplights will be for the occasions that it does see use on the London Underground network. It's a shame, but a necessity - after all, it only takes the one incident. The fitment of Magnetic CDL is a welcome addition though.
Is it also true that a REP running alone was classed as a light locomotive with the restrictions that entails?