• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Conservative Liverpool mayor candidate makes ambitious claim

Status
Not open for further replies.

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
Just saw on Granada Reports the Conservative Metro Mayor candidate for the Liverpool City region say if he's elected each borough would get a new train line! The presenter told him that would cost a fortune, which he disputed.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,457
Location
LBK
He can say whatever he likes because he's not getting elected there.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
Has this latest Tory lie claim been painted on a big red bus yet?

I think he just made it up on the spot to make himself look better than the Lib Dem candidate who said more needs to be done to improve services in areas which don't get the benefit of Merseyrail.
 

AndyPJG

Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
543
It's not that reopening of the Liverpool Overhead story again is it?
 

Comstock

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2012
Messages
535
The Liverpool Metro Mayor is between Carl Cashman (LD) and Labour

I'd be amazed if anyone other than Labour won it and they will probably do so in the first round.

Second will probably be between the Lib Dems and the kippers. The Tories could well finish fourth and even then only if the suburban vote turns out well enough to put them ahead of the greens.
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
5,652
Location
Hope Valley
No doubt forum members with a better knowledge of Liverpool local government can explain.
Liverpool City Region is commonly described in terms of having five 'districts'. Transport strategies are often written with (say) 30-year horizons.
I am sure that people on the forum could come up with (literally) a 'handful' of rail schemes that might be beneficial to Liverpool over this timescale.
I am almost surprised that every candidate isn't proposing something similar or even more ambitious.
Is there a link to the speech/interview/manifesto or whatever?
 

Class 170101

On Moderation
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,661
Don't expect Liverpool City area to get funding it needs should a Labout Mayor be elected. Chris Grayling will see to that, as he has already eluded to in London.
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
11,139
Location
Redcar
I learn more every day on this website, even today on my 72nd birthday.

What is a "Labout Mayor"?

Happy Birthday Paul.

But please stop pulling up every single spelling mistake you see, it's tiresome.

As you well know, some people are dyslexic, sometimes drunk (or a combination of both) or use their large fingers on small phones that have tiny keyboards.
 
Last edited:

urbophile

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2015
Messages
2,481
Location
Liverpool
UKIP are totally irrelevant in Liverpool (as indeed everywhere else, but they will stand less of a chance here.)
To keep to transport matters, Steve Rotheram (Labour) has promised to re-regulate bus services which is something we desperately need. Anyone who does something to bring the Northern network up to the standards of Merseyrail will get my vote.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,917
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Don't expect Liverpool City area to get funding it needs should a Labout Mayor be elected. Chris Grayling will see to that, as he has already eluded to in London.

The equivalent Manchester deal was done with a Labour leader (Richard Leese).
And Merseyside has plenty of non-Labour voters outside the core city.

The clip I saw from the Tory candidate Tony Caldeira just mentioned "improved transport links", which is difficult to argue with.
He seems to be running on a "not Liverpool" ticket, being based in Knowsley and St Helens, and with Wirral interests.
 

Mutant Lemming

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2011
Messages
3,191
Location
London
.
He seems to be running on a "not Liverpool" ticket, being based in Knowsley and St Helens, and with Wirral interests.

Knowsley is only separated from Liverpool by a line on the map and contains many of it's overspill estates. It also has no tory councillors and even less tory voters than Liverpool.
St.Helens has no tory councillors and has some of the safest labour seats in the country.
The more affluent West Wirral may provide some votes but would be counter balanced by the poorer East Wirral.
 

507021

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
4,759
Location
Chester
It's not going to happen, it'll be between Labour and the Lib Dems. There are Conservative voters on Merseyside of course, but nowhere near enough for the suggestions of new lines for each district to be more than just an idea.

In his (don't know the candidate's name) defence though, there's every chance 'new' could have been taken a bit more literally than it was intended. I can't see many, if any, new lines in the Liverpool City Region any time soon, but I think there will be some large investment in rail infrastructure over the next five or ten years. I do hope some funding is diverted towards a larger Merseyrail fleet though, that is going to be key if any new lines are going to be realised.

For the record, I am a floating voter and haven't decided who to vote for yet.
 
Last edited:

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
7,344
A Tory in Liverpool eh. Rare than slugs teeth that one.

Actually slugs have millions of teeth... It's true, Look up Radula on Wikipedia! It has even got a photo to prove it.
I would have agreed probably not many tories in Liverpool though, but I just looked it up; in 2011 they got a few more votes than the Greens but didn't get a seat - unlike the Greens who got 1!
 

Comstock

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2012
Messages
535
UKIP are totally irrelevant in Liverpool (as indeed everywhere else, but they will stand less of a chance here.)

Agreed but they will probably still finish ahead of the Tories.

And they might just pip the Lib Dems for second if they have a rubbish night.

All irrelevant of course because there can only be one winner.
 

ExRes

Established Member
Joined
16 Dec 2012
Messages
8,363
Location
Back in Sussex
Personally I know nothing about Liverpool politics and nor have I ever even set foot in the place, is it possible though that he might actually be doing the people of Liverpool a favour by this pronouncement? maybe the likely winners might feel that they have to up their plans for public transport in the city?

Just a thought ....
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
That'd be a hell of a beast to serve every borough!

:D

Especially considering Halton is part of the Liverpool City region, despite not being in Merseyside.

UKIP are totally irrelevant in Liverpool (as indeed everywhere else, but they will stand less of a chance here.)

UKIP think the solution to the lack of Sixth Forms in Knowsley is Grammar Schools!

Is there a link to the speech/interview/manifesto or whatever?

http://www.itv.com/news/granada/upd...our-liverpool-city-region-metro-mayor-debate/ (It's almost 20 minutes long though.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top