Stupidly, I was under huge time pressure to get to an exam on time. I usually use a rail card to purchase my ticket and then use my bus pass to continue my route. I was carrying the correct amount of change for the fare with a railcard. However, I had lost my railcard and bus pass which I had not realised before boarding the train. I slept up until the just before the final destination, a few close stops before. This is completely wrong and I understand that, but I was in such a rush and couldn't afford the bus with no spare change I completely panicked and lied. It's totally my fault and they know I lied as they asked how I got through the barriers without a ticket. I said I have lied, told the truth and did not say much else other than fully cooperating and giving them my details. I feel like I am going to write this up with more detail about where I was going and perhaps ask for an out of court settlement when/ if they send me a letter. How likely do you think they will accept this?
What throws a spanner in the works is that I was wrongly accused of fare evasion roughly 5 years ago. I wrote a letter to Northern explaining this and they asked for the train fare as I was changing in a station, went to a cafe and they thought I was attempting to leave via it. They wouldn't let me buy a ticket from them and said I'd have to write a letter. I wrote a letter, they said to just pay the fare remaining. So, as far as I know, Northern sees myself as innocent of this charge. But how will this add up now? I presume it will look really bad in my favour, even though they saw me as innocent? Do I mention this in the letter I write to them for this occurrence, or just not mention it at all?
I was in such a panic and rush that when the investigator asked me if I had been stopped before, I said no. It was only a few hours later I remembered what had happened previously - could this perhaps be seen as lying in a statement?
I would desperately want an out of court settlement if at all possible to avoid a potential criminal record
Thanks in advance
What throws a spanner in the works is that I was wrongly accused of fare evasion roughly 5 years ago. I wrote a letter to Northern explaining this and they asked for the train fare as I was changing in a station, went to a cafe and they thought I was attempting to leave via it. They wouldn't let me buy a ticket from them and said I'd have to write a letter. I wrote a letter, they said to just pay the fare remaining. So, as far as I know, Northern sees myself as innocent of this charge. But how will this add up now? I presume it will look really bad in my favour, even though they saw me as innocent? Do I mention this in the letter I write to them for this occurrence, or just not mention it at all?
I was in such a panic and rush that when the investigator asked me if I had been stopped before, I said no. It was only a few hours later I remembered what had happened previously - could this perhaps be seen as lying in a statement?
I would desperately want an out of court settlement if at all possible to avoid a potential criminal record
Thanks in advance
Last edited: