SS4
Established Member
I suppose it is a human shortcoming to look at this one year's TV output and compare it with their rose tinted view of the 'best' TV in their recall. In any typical Christmas offering there was lots of rubbish, even by the standatrds of the day. The prime shows hosted by favourites of the time would make us cringe with embarassment today, just think of Mike Yarwood, Cliff Richard, Cilla Black, Lulu, Larry Grayson. There is little enthusiasm to show repeats of these dire broadcasts which only succeeded because there were only 3 channels to choose from, despite the current trend to recycle everything in the vaults.
I'm no fan of Sky or any of the PPV media but for those who have made the financial commitment, they only have to spend a few minutes looking for something different.
I reckon the internet is more the cause than the proliferation of channels (many of which are +1 and show the same type of thing complete with synchronised ads). TV looking poor? I can fire up netflix, Prime Video, Youtube or the on demand services offered by the broadcasters as well as what I've recorded. These often have the bonus of not having to sit through the kind of adverts that were already overused and stale at the beginning of December. Put more simply there is more choice today which is also what you're saying - then you had to sit in front of the TV.
You also tend to have an older demographic who watch TV so naturally broadcasts are catered to them more than youngsters and Christmas, typically a time for reflection, means the nostalgia filter is out in full - hence the vault trawling
