• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

'Cardiff Central platform shortage travel chaos warning'

Status
Not open for further replies.

gareth950

Member
Joined
3 Nov 2013
Messages
1,009
Quite a substantial article today on the BBC News Wales website, with input from Prof Cole. I'd recommend reading it on the BBC website but have copied and pasted the story to make the thread legal:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-38391608

BBC News Wales said:
'Cardiff Central platform shortage travel chaos warning'

Cardiff Central railway station was built "for a different era" and will not be able to cope with a rise in commuters, a travel expert has warned.
About 265,000 people use it weekly, with developments like a new BBC building raising it to 475,000 by 2026.

Prof Stuart Cole believes new platforms are needed and could be built on the nearby Brains Brewery site.
Both Network Rail and Cardiff council said they were looking at ways to upgrade the transport system.

When Isambard Kingdom Brunel diverted the course of the River Taff in the 1840s to create the station on the old city walls, it was not meant to take centre stage like it is now.
It was designed predominantly for through-trains transporting coal plus a small number of passengers on the mainline to Swansea and to outlying villages such as Whitchurch and Radyr.

But things have changed - 13m people used the station in 2013, a figure expected to rise to 23m by 2023.
Increases will be exacerbated by the Central Square, Capital Quarter and Brains Brewery developments, while a new tax office for 4,000 employees has been mooted and redevelopment work on Cardiff Arms Park is also proposed.

The city is simply not prepared for it, because Wales traditionally is not a nation of rail users, according to Prof Cole from the University of South Wales.
He said valleys lines were mainly for coal transportation and it was only around 1900 when the industry began declining that Taff Valley Railway began seriously looking at other uses.
Despite this, cars remained the favoured transport method in the city into the 1990s, according to Prof Cole.
"Even when a franchise was awarded in 2003, no growth was built into it. It was in 2006 or 2007 that overcrowding became clear," he said.
"It was perhaps rising fuel costs, congestion, people wanting to do their bit for the environment. That's when it started going up and there was no plan for this.
"People in Cardiff are not used to being mass transited. They won't cwtch [cuddle] up with everyone like on the Piccadilly line at 8:30."
Part of the solution is using bigger trains - with Prof Cole giving an example of the impact of Intercity 125s, each capable of carrying 1,000 people, waiting to ferry the 45,000 rugby day crowds in a bid to keep queues to a minimum.
A proposed new electrified Metro system should also help with speed - currently, about six trains an hour go through Llandaf station, compared to about 11 on many London underground routes.
However, Prof Cole believes a bigger issue is getting rising numbers of passengers on to platforms safely.

"It was never designed for mass transit. It's not a commuter railway station, so it's not even fair to say it's the contractor's fault," he said.
"It was built for a different era, for mainline trains and a few other local trains."
Prof Cole believes a new platform eight, opening in 2017, plus improved signalling will help.
But he claimed the area around the station had been developed with no overarching travel plan - saying a new bus station being built will be "world class" but "not big enough".
Employers will also have a big responsibility, with 4,000 tax office workers on flexi-time, for example, reducing rush hour pressures.
And while ambitious plans have been unveiled for redeveloping central station, Prof Cole said they do not address a major issue.

"Network Rail want a nice mall and frontage. It would be good, especially if it extended to the BBC building, as it would allow people to stand undercover after events," he said.
"It's very pretty, but the key thing is capacity - and new platforms are needed."

With little available land, Prof Cole believes a proposed redevelopment of the Brains Brewery site behind the station holds the key.
When negotiating planning permission, it is not unusual for developers to offer 10% of land value as a contribution to improvement schemes, called a Section 106 agreement.
Prof Cole said "there is a deal to be done" and if land was requested instead, new platforms could be built.

While SA Brain is still months away from submitting a planning application, could the idea be a possibility?
The proposal is a joint venture with Rightacres and its chief executive Paul McCarthy said: "The timing for bringing forward the Brain's site ties in perfectly with the Metro system delivery programme.
"Public transport is pivotal to the success of any business district and to have a Metro terminal at Central Quay, adjacent to the central train station, would be good for all concerned."

Cardiff council said it is "actively engaged" with Network Rail, the Welsh Government and developers to find ways to improve the station.
A spokesman said: "It's essential that the ongoing regeneration of Central Square is reinforced by the regeneration of central station and the leader of the city council continues to press the case for investment."

Tim James, Network Rail's head of strategy and planning in Wales, said work around the station is positive and co-ordinating activities will be "extremely important".
"We will need to refresh our [passenger] forecasts regularly to take into account any new developments in the immediate vicinity of the station," he added.
While admitting money is not currently available, Mr James said Cardiff council is helping it look at funding options for developing Cardiff Central.
He added: "We are particularly keen to leverage more commercial funding as a contribution towards delivering improvements for passengers and we are developing options to look at a range of possible solutions."

All very good, but how could any platforms built on the Brains brewery site link up to the main line towards the east? Any new mainline platforms would need to be built at the front of the station not the rear surely?
I still can't see how anymore new platforms at the rear of the station can work whilst the office buildings immediately up against the raised valley lines section to Queen St in Callaghan square remain. Building those offices there was shorted sighted thinking at its finest.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

aylesbury

Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
622
This article is by the same person who said before Christmas that the Valleys metro would not work so take this with a bit of salt.
 

krus_aragon

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Messages
6,105
Location
North Wales
All very good, but how could any platforms built on the Brains brewery site link up to the main line towards the east? Any new mainline platforms would need to be built at the front of the station not the rear surely?
Given Prof. Cole is quoted as saying it "was built for a different era, for mainline trains and a few other local trains", I think his concern is lack of provision for local services instead.
I still can't see how anymore new platforms at the rear of the station can work whilst the office buildings immediately up against the raised valley lines section to Queen St in Callaghan square remain.
That's the flaw I see with his ideas. Going from four to five or six (through?) platforms for through services from the Queen St corridor won't make much impact if they're still fed by a two-track railway. By comparison, Manchester Piccadilly/Oxford Road are only aiming for four platforms for through services...
 

gareth950

Member
Joined
3 Nov 2013
Messages
1,009
Given Prof. Cole is quoted as saying it "was built for a different era, for mainline trains and a few other local trains", I think his concern is lack of provision for local services instead.

That's the flaw I see with his ideas. Going from four to five or six (through?) platforms for through services from the Queen St corridor won't make much impact if they're still fed by a two-track railway. By comparison, Manchester Piccadilly/Oxford Road are only aiming for four platforms for through services...

We will have to see what difference is made when P4 comes into operation for through local and valley lines services from the Spring but I think it will only improve reliability not frequency. ATW doesn't currently have the DMUs needed to go from 12 to 16 tph between Central and Queen St anyway. If P4 is used for regular up valleys services that only leaves 3 full length platorms for mainline services at Central which doesn't seem enough.

And yes, the extra platforms at Central and Queen St are very well but the 2 track sections over the Newport Rd bridge north of Queen St and between Queen St and Central will continue to be bottlenecks on any real long term frequency improvements.
 
Last edited:

gareth950

Member
Joined
3 Nov 2013
Messages
1,009
This article is by the same person who said before Christmas that the Valleys metro would not work so take this with a bit of salt.

I don't think Prof Cole has said that, but there's certainly been more than one academic/commentator who has stated that the Metro won't be the 'silver bullet' that the economy of the valleys needs for regeneration.
 
Last edited:

daikilo

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Messages
1,623
And yes, the extra platforms at Central and Queen St are very well but the 2 track sections over the Newport Rd bridge north of Queen St and between Queen St and Central will continue to be bottlenecks on any real long term frequency improvements.

And the flat junctions (2) at the north end of Queen St ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top