• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Southern DOO: ASLEF members vote 79.1% for revised deal

Status
Not open for further replies.

Islineclear3_1

Established Member
Joined
24 Apr 2014
Messages
6,596
Location
PTSO or platform depending on the weather
I have a question aimed at the non railway persons commenting on this thread in support of DOO, it's broadly based on a real life situation.

You're on a train at dusk going along the Arun Valley line (for anyone unsure it's very valley-like, with terrible mobile phone signal). Suddenly the train hits a heard of cows on the line and derails into a position obstructing the opposite line. The impact crushes the drivers legs and so traps the driver in the cab but he's still alive. The impact also knocks out the GSMR system in the front cab. For the avoidance of all doubt too, you're in a colour light signal area operating under track circuit block (which makes a difference compared to axle counters). The impact has also dislodged the 3rd rail on your line, but not the opposite direction.

What are you going to do? Who are you going to call? What's your plan of action? I know all drivers and guards would give exactly the same answer.

And before you dismiss this for being hypothetical, this situation is not unheard of.

Final question. Why do you so obviously want to see the 2nd member of staff removed? What benefits do you perceive there will be?

I don't think anyone on here wants the second member of staff removed altogether.

At the very least, I would want that 2nd member to call the signalman from the nearest signal telephone to block both running lines to protect the train and who can call the emergency services etc. As a passenger, although I wouldn't be expected to do this, would I take the initiative and do the same in the absence of a 2nd member of staff? I shouldn't have to but would probably be compelled to do so.

However, would I get into trouble/be proscecuted for trespass?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Barn

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2008
Messages
1,487
Genuine question: when we talk of staff walking down the line to place detonators or walking to the nearest signal telephone, are we harking back to a time when lines were less intensively operated? On many busy DOO lines (including the BML), trains are only a few minutes apart at most. Wouldn't the collision probably already have happened by the time these actions could be taken?

Might it even already have happened by the time that the guard could recover from the shock of the incident, reached the emergency equipment cupboard to obtain TC clips, and successfully reached the signaller on his mobile phone and explained the incident?

In practice don't we effectively rely on GSM-R and other technologies anyway due to the intensity of service? I've always presumed this is why the fight is now about the platform-train interface rather than protection of the line.
 
Last edited:

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,445
Well firstly I don't particularly want to see the 2nd member of staff removed, it really makes little difference to me one way or the other, but in the cold light of day it is difficult to justify the retention of guards when DOO trains already operate on many routes.

As for this imaginary incident on the Arun Valley line, yes having a guard would be useful in that situation (assuming that they weren't also incapacitated) but can the retention of guards really be justified just in case various unlikely scenarios occur?


Well all of your posts come across to me that you want every train to run DOO and that the world will be a better place for doing so. Guards add value, and a lot of them actually more than cover their own salary in takings.

Yes my situation is hypothetical, but it is also based on a lot of situations that could happen.


I don't think anyone on here wants the second member of staff removed altogether.

At the very least, I would want that 2nd member to call the signalman from the nearest signal telephone to block both running lines to protect the train and who can call the emergency services etc. As a passenger, although I wouldn't be expected to do this, would I take the initiative and do the same in the absence of a 2nd member of staff? I shouldn't have to but would probably be compelled to do so.

However, would I get into trouble/be proscecuted for trespass?

I'd be out putting TC clips down before going anywhere, then I'd try the radio in the back cab.
 

Islineclear3_1

Established Member
Joined
24 Apr 2014
Messages
6,596
Location
PTSO or platform depending on the weather
Well all of your posts come across to me that you want every train to run DOO and that the world will be a better place for doing so. Guards add value, and a lot of them actually more than cover their own salary in takings.

Yes my situation is hypothetical, but it is also based on a lot of situations that could happen.




I'd be out putting TC clips down before going anywhere, then I'd try the radio in the back cab.

Indeed but as a passenger and not having access to either cab, this would not be an option to me
 

OliverS

Member
Joined
5 Dec 2011
Messages
108
I have a question aimed at the non railway persons commenting on this thread in support of DOO, it's broadly based on a real life situation.

You're on a train at dusk going along the Arun Valley line (for anyone unsure it's very valley-like, with terrible mobile phone signal). Suddenly the train hits a heard of cows on the line and derails into a position obstructing the opposite line. The impact crushes the drivers legs and so traps the driver in the cab but he's still alive. The impact also knocks out the GSMR system in the front cab. For the avoidance of all doubt too, you're in a colour light signal area operating under track circuit block (which makes a difference compared to axle counters). The impact has also dislodged the 3rd rail on your line, but not the opposite direction.

What are you going to do? Who are you going to call? What's your plan of action? I know all drivers and guards would give exactly the same answer.

And before you dismiss this for being hypothetical, this situation is not unheard of.

Final question. Why do you so obviously want to see the 2nd member of staff removed? What benefits do you perceive there will be?

First problem with your scenario is whether I know the driver is incapacitated. If he is able to communicate then he is able to instruct anyone to phone whoever is necessary. If not then I have to do something and perhaps I should anyway.

First danger is another train. It is track circuited so there is a chance that the other line's track circuit has been triggered, in which case the signals protecting the train will be at danger and unless we are unlucky enough to have a train already in the section approaching then it should all be safe.

The question for me is "What is the fastest way to make the signalman aware of the incident". Personally, irrespective of the discussion earlier in this thread, that is phoning 999 and telling them to ask the signalman where I am. No point in trying to use the back cab as I don't know what a GSMR radio looks like nor whether it needs setup or anything. This doesn't take into account whether I can get access to the rear cab. In my opinion it is faster to phone 999. Be aware that a guard would probably find it quicker to use the rear cab GSMR but I wouldn't. Second thought is that if the driver is not incapacitated then the railway wouldn't really like me breaking into the rear cab.

Once the signalman is aware then there is nothing else that I need to do to make the area safe from other trains. The danger is now the 3rd rail and idiots wandering around in the dark with lots of trip hazards. So next task is to keep everyone on the train and do any first aid necessary.

My question to you is "When did this situation last occur". I.e. how frequently do you expect this situation to happen. The reason I ask is risk assessment always asks "How likely is this to happen" and I believe that this situation is sufficiently contrived that it is so unlikely as to be irrelevant to the DOO discussion. For instance, assume that the costs of this incident are £100 million. Then assume that there are 400 guards at Southern and they cost the company (pay, benefits, additional management costs etc) £50k p.a. each. The costs of the guards for one year are £20m. So we need one incident like this every 5 years, in Southern territory, to make this incident mean you should keep guards. When was the last one where the driver cannot communicate to the signalman in Southern's area? When do you expect the next one to happen?

There are many reasons to keep guards, but to me this is not one.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
I'm perplexed by your assertion that everything is immediately OK because 'the other track circuit might have been triggered and the signals should be at danger'. The chances of that happening by some sort of fluke are slim. Your friendly Guard is the person who makes that happen, with track circuit clips. They're locked in the cab, by the way, not somewhere that you can access them as a passenger. Laying them also involves coming within inches of 750 volts.

They can also locate and use the GSMR cab radio, and failing that the nearest SPT. You know what one of those is, where to find it and what it does, of course??

You have illustrated in your first few lines precisely why trained staff are invalulable, as opposed to 'have a go' passengers somehow being the new acceptable alternative. There appears to be a genuine attitude amongst a small minority here that we should leave poorly informed passengers to deal with major railway incidents, and all they need to do is phone 999.

Jesus Christ :roll:
 
Last edited:

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,445
Last year (or the year before?) a similar incident to this played out on Southern did it not?

Also, unfortunately that's not how track circuits work. If the derailed train was impeding/obstructing the opposite line, it probably wouldn't have activated the circuit on the other line. As I say most guards pay for themselves through the year in revenue terms.

Also, I know you haven't mentioned it but others have, the disruption argument is a moot point, decent rostering will pair a guard and a driver for most of the day, which means if the guard is delayed, so is the driver. It keeps service recovery simpler.
 
Last edited:

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
7,490
Location
Gomshall, Surrey
Last year (or the year before?) a similar incident to this played out on Southern did it not?

Also, unfortunately that's not how track circuits work. If the derailed train was impeding/obstructing the opposite line, it probably wouldn't have activated the circuit on the other line. As I say most guards pay for themselves through the year in revenue terms.

Also, I know you haven't mentioned it but others have, the disruption argument is a moot point, decent rostering will pair a guard and a driver for most of the day, which means if the guard is delayed, so is the driver. It keeps service recovery simpler.

All other issues aside, and as an advocate of the retention of guards, this statement does not reflect my experiences in the slightest. It has been rare to find guards doing any revenue collection for a long time now. I can't recall the last time I saw one doing so (my regular route is Redhill to London), including first class enforcement (which would, even if done, only amount to asking the errant person(s) to move rather than collect any further revenue). While I understand that morale is low and has been for some time, the revenue-earning case for guards is, unfortunately, very weak.

Of course, other routes may be dramatically different, but I doubt it.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
All other issues aside, and as an advocate of the retention of guards, this statement does not reflect my experiences in the slightest. It has been rare to find guards doing any revenue collection for a long time now. I can't recall the last time I saw one doing so (my regular route is Redhill to London), including first class enforcement (which would, even if done, only amount to asking the errant person(s) to move rather than collect any further revenue). While I understand that morale is low and has been for some time, the revenue-earning case for guards is, unfortunately, very weak.

Of course, other routes may be dramatically different, but I doubt it.

On GTR, Guards will be very probably amongst the most demotivated workforces anywhere in the country. The situation at other TOCs is very different. To suggest that Guards do not collect significant sums of revenue is incorrect.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
I'm perplexed by your assertion that everything is immediately OK because 'the other track circuit might have been triggered and the signals should be at danger'. The chances of that happening by some sort of fluke are slim. Your friendly Guard is the person who makes that happen, with track circuit clips. They're locked in the cab, by the way, not somewhere that you can access them as a passenger. Laying them also involves coming within inches of 750 volts.

They can also locate and use the GSMR cab radio, and failing that the nearest SPT. You know what one of those is, where to find it and what it does, of course??

You have illustrated in your first few lines precisely why trained staff are invalulable, as opposed to 'have a go' passengers somehow being the new acceptable alternative. There appears to be a genuine attitude amongst a small minority here that we should leave poorly informed passengers to deal with major railway incidents, and all they need to do is phone 999.

Jesus Christ :roll:

I'm afraid that blaspheming isn't going to forward your case one iota:roll:!

I think what this 'small minority' have said is that in the event of any sort of accident the passengers are going to call 999 regardless of whether there is a guard on the train or not.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
On GTR, Guards will be very probably amongst the most demotivated workforces anywhere in the country. The situation at other TOCs is very different. To suggest that Guards do not collect significant sums of revenue is incorrect.

Well I think that varies, some guards do regular ticket checks and some don't bother.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
I'm afraid that blaspheming isn't going to forward your case one iota:roll:!

I think what this 'small minority' have said is that in the event of any sort of accident the passengers are going to call 999 regardless of whether there is a guard on the train or not.

Well, you certainly win this week's stubborn persistence award! It doesn't matter who calls bloody 999, it has precious little to do with staff dealing properly with the incident! How many times, seriously? Chap, you feel free to call 999, 118 118, the Ghostbusters or the speaking clock, we qualified staff shall do our jobs and make sure it gets done if the worst happens!
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
7,490
Location
Gomshall, Surrey
On GTR, Guards will be very probably amongst the most demotivated workforces anywhere in the country. The situation at other TOCs is very different. To suggest that Guards do not collect significant sums of revenue is incorrect.

While I have acknowledged several times the morale issue, on my line (as I also just wrote), revenue collection by guards is very rare in my experience, along with any sight of the guard during journeys. As I also said, all other routes may be dramatically different for some reason. "Significant sums of revenue" - would this be likely to be the, say, £60,000+ per annum per guard that salary and overheads would require to be covered to justify guards on revenue grounds alone, do you suppose?

I repeat that I would far prefer to see the guard's role retained, but the case for doing so can only be weakened in the eyes of the public if they perceive no benefit from the increasingly-invisible role.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,293
Last year (or the year before?) a similar incident to this played out on Southern did it not?

Also, unfortunately that's not how track circuits work. If the derailed train was impeding/obstructing the opposite line, it probably wouldn't have activated the circuit on the other line. As I say most guards pay for themselves through the year in revenue terms.

Also, I know you haven't mentioned it but others have, the disruption argument is a moot point, decent rostering will pair a guard and a driver for most of the day, which means if the guard is delayed, so is the driver. It keeps service recovery simpler.

The problem is that many Southern routes are partially DOO already and combined with ECS runs this means far few guards that drivers are required so pairing doesn't optimise efficient use of guards.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
Well, you certainly win this week's stubborn persistence award! It doesn't matter who calls bloody 999, it has precious little to do with staff dealing properly with the incident! How many times, seriously? Chap, you feel free to call 999, 118 118, the Ghostbusters or the speaking clock, we qualified staff shall do our jobs and make sure it gets done if the worst happens!

You've beaten me hands down to that award!

In an emergency, rail related or otherwise, people tend to call 999, no great surprise really.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Last year (or the year before?) a similar incident to this played out on Southern did it not?

Also, unfortunately that's not how track circuits work. If the derailed train was impeding/obstructing the opposite line, it probably wouldn't have activated the circuit on the other line. As I say most guards pay for themselves through the year in revenue terms.

Also, I know you haven't mentioned it but others have, the disruption argument is a moot point, decent rostering will pair a guard and a driver for most of the day, which means if the guard is delayed, so is the driver. It keeps service recovery simpler.

Isn't it often more efficient to roster driver and guard separately?
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,829
Southern have gone back to playing hardball.

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/business/southern-rail-withholding-holiday-pay-from-striking-workers-1-7660735

Southern Rail has been condemned after sending a letter to workers saying it is withholding holiday pay for those taking part in strikes. The Rail, Maritime and Transport union revealed it had received a letter from the company saying that backdated holiday pay is being withheld from conductors involved in the industrial action until the dispute is over. RMT general secretary Mick Cash said he was seeking legal advice. He said: ‘In all the disputes we have had over the years the RMT has never had a company make it so personal against their own staff. ‘Other companies have been hostile and angry at the position the union and its members were taking but at least they treated their staff with dignity. Not Southern. They have declared war on their passengers and staff alike.’ The letter from Southern’s owners Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) says: ‘As the dispute over conductors and DOO (driver-only operation) is ongoing and your members continue to breach their contracts by taking strike action, thereby causing significant loss to the business and disruption to our customers, we will (without prejudice to our rights) withhold payment of any backdated holiday pay from conductors. ‘Any conductors who have either worked normally during the dispute, or confirm that they will now work normally during the remainder of the dispute and will not participate in further industrial action, will receive payment. ‘Failing that, GTR intends to make the appropriate payment to employees of this grade in the pay run on 30 December 2016, subject to the current dispute being concluded and no further strike dates being called.” The union is staging a 48-hour strike from tomorrow, with more action planned in the coming weeks. A Southern spokesman said: ‘Passengers have had to endure 15 days of strikes so far and seven more days to come. These strikes have caused misery and hardship to people’s work and family lives. ‘We feel we cannot make these payments to conductors who are currently taking industrial action. ‘The fact they have taken strike action makes the calculation of what is owed more complicated. We plan to pay them once the industrial action is over.’ Southern said it planned to run 61 per cent of normal services on the strike days.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
While I have acknowledged several times the morale issue, on my line (as I also just wrote), revenue collection by guards is very rare in my experience, along with any sight of the guard during journeys. As I also said, all other routes may be dramatically different for some reason. "Significant sums of revenue" - would this be likely to be the, say, £60,000+ per annum per guard that salary and overheads would require to be covered to justify guards on revenue grounds alone, do you suppose?

I repeat that I would far prefer to see the guard's role retained, but the case for doing so can only be weakened in the eyes of the public if they perceive no benefit from the increasingly-invisible role.

Guards are not, of course, justified on revenue grounds alone, so it's rather a moot point, but I would doubt anybody is pulling in £60k. However, there are a great many lines where pax purchase tickets on the train in droves, and Guards paying in sums in the £000's in a single shift is certainly nothing unusual in places. In many of these instances, there are no revenue measures in place which would have captured the money at the destination; it is income which would otherwise have been lost. The same can be said for First Class on many peak services leaving London, the income simply from charging those who wish not to travel in Standard on the way home can be hundreds of pounds on a single trip, and equally cheapy weekend upgrades also generate a lot of on board income. All of this money is lost forever if it isn't collected during the journey.

There are far too many Guards who are lazy barstewards, which is a crying shame. However, management easily have the means to identify and tackle this, but sadly often choose not to. I would offer that revenue duties, combined with the essential customer assistance role which the DDA requires if it is to be honoured properly, along with the safety aspects of the role, all add up to it being a no-brainer to retain Guards in their current form. Indeed, when one considers all that they can do, they are surely rather good value for money?! They do, however, need to be willing to earn the salary, and work is needed on that issue in places.
 
Last edited:

Islineclear3_1

Established Member
Joined
24 Apr 2014
Messages
6,596
Location
PTSO or platform depending on the weather
I think the average passenger would call 999 as a first step because that is all they know. They won't know to go to a signal telephone and report to the signalman that something is amiss. They wouldn't think about protecting the train from a collision by another train. And of course, noone will know if the driver is incapacitated unless they bang on the cab door and get no response

I wouldn't want to be the one putting down TC clips on a live line, I'm not trained and wouldn't have the confidence to do so. I would just be endangering myself.

The problem with "modern-day" work economics is that it is cheaper to deal with an incident/medical emergency/loss of life on an "ad hoc as it happens basis" than spend the money to take preventative measures to avoid such incidents - e.g. by providing the necessary manpower.

And alluding to Pompy's question, yes, I doubt there are many cows lurking around the inner London suburbs so the risk is lower than out in open country :lol:
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
7,490
Location
Gomshall, Surrey
Guards are not, of course, justified on revenue grounds alone, so it's rather a moot point, but I would doubt anybody is pulling in £60k. However, there are a great many lines where pax purchase tickets on the train in droves, and Guards paying in sums in the £000's in a single shift is certainly nothing unusual in places. In many of these instances, there are no revenue measures in place which would have captured the money at the destination; it is income which would otherwise have been lost. The same can be said for First Class on many peak services leaving London, the income simply from charging those who wish not to travel in Standard on the way home can be hundreds of pounds on a single trip, and equally cheapy weekend upgrades also generate a lot of on board income. All of this money is lost forever if it isn't collected during the journey.

There are far too many Guards who are lazy barstewards, which is a crying shame. However, management easily have the means to identify and tackle this, but sadly often choose not to. I would offer that revenue duties, combined with the essential customer assistance role which the DDA requires if it is to be honoured properly, along with the safety aspects of the role, all add up to it being a no-brainer to retain Guards in their current form. Indeed, when one considers all that they can do, they are surely rather good value for money?! They do, however, need to be willing to earn the salary, and work is needed on that issue in places.

I was careful to include overheads in the (estimated) sum that I quoted. If individuals are collecting huge sums - great, but I simply say that it's not happening everywhere, and certainly not on my route.

Regarding first class, on Southern and Thameslink, both of which I use frequently, first class enforcement simply ceased months ago (again in my twice-daily experience) with RPIs gone and guards very rarely seen, let alone collecting/enforcing. Before the current era, those few guards who did try to enforce first class simply asked the miscreants to move, rather than collect extra revenue, as they were/are not authorised to issue penalty fares and seemed not to want to charge upgrade fares either.
 
Last edited:

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,445
While I have acknowledged several times the morale issue, on my line (as I also just wrote), revenue collection by guards is very rare in my experience, along with any sight of the guard during journeys. As I also said, all other routes may be dramatically different for some reason. "Significant sums of revenue" - would this be likely to be the, say, £60,000+ per annum per guard that salary and overheads would require to be covered to justify guards on revenue grounds alone, do you suppose?

I repeat that I would far prefer to see the guard's role retained, but the case for doing so can only be weakened in the eyes of the public if they perceive no benefit from the increasingly-invisible role.

It's nice to see support of the guards role. Could it be perhaps that the trains you use are already running DOO?

In my (very early) experience, guards on my TOC take between £4K & £6k a month but is varies dramatically depending on shift patterns.
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
7,490
Location
Gomshall, Surrey
It's nice to see support of the guards role. Could it be perhaps that the trains you use are already running DOO?

In my (very early) experience, guards on my TOC take between £4K & £6k a month but is varies dramatically depending on shift patterns.

No - the Redhill (Southern) to London trains are not DOO, although it is often hard to tell!
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
I was careful to include overheads in the (estimated) sum that I quoted. If individuals are collecting huge sums - great, but I simply say that it's not happening everywhere, and certainly not on my route.

Regarding first class, on Southern and Thameslink, both of which I use frequently, first class enforcement simply ceased months ago (again in my twice-daily experience) with RPIs gone and guards very rarely seen, let alone collecting/enforcing. Before the current era, those few guards who did try to enforce first class simply asked the miscreants to move, rather than collect extra revenue, as they were/are not authorised to issue penalty fares and seemed not to want to charge upgrade fares either.

In fairness on some trains it is easy to sit in first class without realising, I've done it myself before:oops:!
 

74A

Member
Joined
27 Aug 2015
Messages
775
I think the average passenger would call 999 as a first step because that is all they know. They won't know to go to a signal telephone and report to the signalman that something is amiss. They wouldn't think about protecting the train from a collision by another train. And of course, noone will know if the driver is incapacitated unless they bang on the cab door and get no response

I wouldn't want to be the one putting down TC clips on a live line, I'm not trained and wouldn't have the confidence to do so. I would just be endangering myself.

The problem with "modern-day" work economics is that it is cheaper to deal with an incident/medical emergency/loss of life on an "ad hoc as it happens basis" than spend the money to take preventative measures to avoid such incidents - e.g. by providing the necessary manpower.

And alluding to Pompy's question, yes, I doubt there are many cows lurking around the inner London suburbs so the risk is lower than out in open country :lol:

In DOO trains the DSD is connected to the signal box. If the driver fails to operate the DSD then an alarm will sound. In the recent sad case on C2C where the driver had a heart attack the alarm sounded in the box and the signaller was alerted. Surely in the kind of catastrophic accident we are talking about here the alarm will sound and the signaller will be alerted ?

i have to say also that TC Clips are becoming quite rapidly obsolete. All new signalling for a number of years now is axle counters where TC clips are useless.
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
7,490
Location
Gomshall, Surrey
In fairness on some trains it is easy to sit in first class without realising, I've done it myself before:oops:!

Sorry, and I'm not including you in this category, but it shouldn't be difficult if one is even slightly aware of one's surroundings. So many people simply refuse to take their eyes, ears and/or mind away from their 'phones for a moment and plonk down in the first seat they find. Of course there are also those increasing numbers who are just chancing it (from overheard discussions) on the basis that they are now so unlikely to be; a)caught, and b)asked to do anything more than move seats.

However, let's not get too bogged down in the first class enforcement sub-topic - the role of guards is far wider than that; it's just one of the more visible signs of them that most passengers see.
 
Last edited:

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,829
In my (very early) experience, guards on my TOC take between £4K & £6k a month but is varies dramatically depending on shift patterns.

Indeed, despite barriers being in place at all the major stations I sign, and my takings plummeting in the last year as a result, I'm still on course to have taken 70K this year.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
Sorry, and I'm not including you in this category, but it shouldn't be difficult if one is even slightly aware of one's surroundings. So many people simply refuse to take their eyes, ears and/or mind away from their 'phones for a moment and plonk down in the first seat they find. Of course there are also those increasing numbers who are just chancing it (from overheard discussions) on the basis that they are now so unlikely to be; a)caught, and b)asked to do anything more than move seats.

However, let's not get too bogged down in the first class enforcement sub-topic - the role of guards is far wider than that; it's just one of the more visible signs of them that most passengers see.

No need to apologise, and yes I'm probably as bad as anybody else;)!
 

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
All other issues aside, and as an advocate of the retention of guards, this statement does not reflect my experiences in the slightest. It has been rare to find guards doing any revenue collection for a long time now. I can't recall the last time I saw one doing so (my regular route is Redhill to London), including first class enforcement (which would, even if done, only amount to asking the errant person(s) to move rather than collect any further revenue). While I understand that morale is low and has been for some time, the revenue-earning case for guards is, unfortunately, very weak.

Of course, other routes may be dramatically different, but I doubt it.

While I have acknowledged several times the morale issue, on my line (as I also just wrote), revenue collection by guards is very rare in my experience, along with any sight of the guard during journeys. As I also said, all other routes may be dramatically different for some reason. "Significant sums of revenue" - would this be likely to be the, say, £60,000+ per annum per guard that salary and overheads would require to be covered to justify guards on revenue grounds alone, do you suppose?

I repeat that I would far prefer to see the guard's role retained, but the case for doing so can only be weakened in the eyes of the public if they perceive no benefit from the increasingly-invisible role.

I was careful to include overheads in the (estimated) sum that I quoted. If individuals are collecting huge sums - great, but I simply say that it's not happening everywhere, and certainly not on my route.

Regarding first class, on Southern and Thameslink, both of which I use frequently, first class enforcement simply ceased months ago (again in my twice-daily experience) with RPIs gone and guards very rarely seen, let alone collecting/enforcing. Before the current era, those few guards who did try to enforce first class simply asked the miscreants to move, rather than collect extra revenue, as they were/are not authorised to issue penalty fares and seemed not to want to charge upgrade fares either.

Regarding First Class, many people make a swift exit anyway when they are told that their Standard Class ticket / Oyster / receipt from two weeks ago isn't valid. Once you point it out, often they basically just run away. Those who don't are generally so obstructive that you need to get other resources to deal with them. Now that revenue staff are all OBSs and therefore all diagrammed to their own trains, and the rarely-seen neighbourhood officers generally deal with vandalism and disorder rather than tickets, you can predict how well that works... not having backup is a fairly big part of the problem now.

As for checks in general, as has been stated it is partly due to poor morale, as well as such routes which have conductors now being so busy (often due to others on the same routes being cancelled) that it's as much as anyone can do to get to the correct dispatch positions. There have also been a number of very nasty cases of abuse by passengers towards staff checking tickets due to dissatisfaction at the service, including amongst OBSs and non-RMT conductors (of which certain depots have a fairly high number) who haven't been on strike. Sometimes, in fact I would say often, the mood onboard services is such that a conductor would be unwise to check - better to just maintain the safety of the train and themselves, give out what information they can, and be visible enough to sell tickets to those who want them.

All that said, a number of people do still check tickets and I have good cause to say it's more by fluke than universal working practice that you haven't been checked.

Lastly - regarding revenue collection paying for conductors; whilst management at GTR have long wrangled with the issue of how to get staff visible on trains, statistics for the amounts collected has never really seemed part of this debate. Indeed, some conductors are being retained at depots with the very routes where they collect the least revenue. Some conductors at Southern collect a tiny amount, usually because the trains are long and the major stations have barriers, with those hopping between the smaller stops having developed a culture of hiding 6 coaches from the dispatch positions and not paying when challenged. There are depots where every conductor will see several months of the year go by without a shift with takings in four figures.

No - the Redhill (Southern) to London trains are not DOO, although it is often hard to tell!

Some of them are now, including services to and from Reigate, some of the early morning and late evening coastal services, and Tonbridge line services on the section of route between Redhill and London (except with Southeastern drivers, who are not permitted to drive Southern 377s under DOO(P) under any circumstances). An OBS or conductor should be onboard but may be present only for selected parts of it. And for some of said selected parts of journeys, that may be less time than it takes to walk through the whole train and get back to their locker! Checking tickets takes much longer than that, too.
 
Last edited:

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,516
On GTR, Guards will be very probably amongst the most demotivated workforces anywhere in the country.
Not so , you've conveniently forgotten the 300 or so DBS staff and other TOCs onboard staff facing actual redundancy right now, they still have to go to work daily driving shunting cleaning or servicing trains just like Southern Conductors, none of whom are facing redundancy unless they wish to volunteer for it
 
Last edited:

FordFocus

Member
Joined
15 Apr 2015
Messages
918
Always found First Class to be pointless on DOO trains. IMHO it should be removed but that's another topic.

The fact is GSM-R is quicker at stopping trains than a passenger ringing 999 in the middle of the nowhere at night where all they can see is their reflection in the window from the interior lighting. Who's trained to operate the train GSM-R? A driver and guard.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Not so , you've conveniently forgotten the 300 or so DBS staff and other TOCs onboard staff facing actual redundancy right now, they still have to go to work daily driving shunting cleaning or servicing trains just like Southern Conductors, none of whom are facing redundancy unless they wish to volunteer for it

Doubt he has hence he said "amongst". Stop trying to muddy the waters of his post ;)
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
I don't think anyone on here wants the second member of staff removed altogether.

But that is the problem. In an ideal world where the railway isn't being squeezed for every saving that it can make (well, you know what I mean), you would have a second member of staff on board who would focus on customer service duties and leave the driver to door operation (with far better methods in place). But we aren't in an ideal world - as soon as the second member of staff becomes not compulsory for operating the train, they become a 'nice to have', or as an accountant might say, an additional, unnecessary cost. They then get dropped in the interest of reducing costs and hey presto, no second member of staff on the train.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top