satisnek
Member
Doesn't bother me personally but given the choice (as in an unoccupied table) I default to facing. However, when travelling alone I always insist on a window seat and will usually stand if none are available.
I'll travel facing if a seat is available otherwise I don't mind facing backwards. Speaking of reversible seating I'm sure I've seen somewhere some Japanese trains have seats that can be swung round to face the other direction.
This is incorrect as was shown by research done by aircraft manufacturers a while ago. Although you are liable to be thrown forward against the seatback ahead, more injuries and fatalities were found to be caused by other loose items (bags, catering equipment, people etc) also being thrown forward and striking rear-facing passengers in the body. The seat protects forward-facing passengers from much of this.Prefer to face backwards as its safer in the event of a front on collision.
Then I stand in the vestibule.
No, not allegedly, empirically. I believe the AAIB, NASA and NTSB have all recommended it at different points in time, but airlines believe passengers wouldn't accept it.
Worst seats for protection are sideways facing seats, yet these seem to be spreading like wildfire on the likes of TfL to pack more revenue into the same operating cost of a vehicle. QUOTE]
Ah, these cynics who KNOW there's an ulterior motive for everything. Even in the 1930s most tube stock had more perimeter seating than transverse seating. TfL's predecessors were removing the transverse seats 25+ years ago, and the reasons are that as the number of passengers increases there's more room for them if all the seating is sideways, and people can get on and off more quickly if they don't have to get past the person sitting beside the aisle on a pair of transverse seats.
My choice of seat is the outside of a 2-seat (3/2 seating on my train), because that way I can't be totally squashed by an obese commuter choosing to sit next to me (and I seem to be a magnet for them).
I do find people who absolutely have to sit facing forward quite odd. I recall being on a diverted Argyle Line train that did a shunt manoeuvre somewhere in passenger service due to disruption (don't know exactly where, somewhere near Motherwell I think) where the train reversed for about half a mile before heading down a different route. I saw a man stand up and walk to the other side of the carriage to face the direction of travel, and then return to his seat three minutes later. That's just weird.
seriously? You are telling me that in a carriage with every forward facing seat taken yet every rearward seat free you would stand in the vestibule. Really? :roll:
Yes - in fact I did that this morning on the 09.34 from Epsom to Waterloo - a few rear facing seats were available, but no forward facing ones. Stood all the way.
why would you do that? I don't get it!
Simply don't like facing backwards.