Some time ago a local operator in the South Yorkshire region had an intriguing attitude to tickets. It seemed that the ticket machines were perennially defective and passengers would be told they had broken down and they'd just have to give the driver the cash. They always worked perfectly when the route was being checked by an Inspector, however! Some drivers got very uppity if you asked for a ticket, and would begrudgingly print you one. Others would give passengers a choice - it'd be £1.50 for a single to town if you wanted a ticket, but £1 if you were happy without one.
Unsurprisingly, the company went bankrupt!
Transport for London has issued an edict requiring buses without functioning ticket machines to be immediately taken out of service. I can see that coming back and biting them on the ... if it happens too often, particularly if it seems to happen with certain operators, routes and individual drivers rather more than with others.
I don't know how recent this is, but I probably get on a bus 2-3 times per month without a functioning ticket machine. Some of the time this is because I often board at the first stop and the driver has not yet set the machine up. The drivers and operators presumably do not care as it is TfL not them which loses the revenue. Do the operators get charged anything when machines break down in lieu of the revenue that TfL loses?
Surely a better stipulation would be to state that the bus must be swapped with a functioning one next time it passes the garage or other relief point i.e. avoiding a bus being taken out of service.
Again, it appears that the attitude of *some* London operators, is to jump on any issue to pull a bus out of service rather than swap it over. I was once thrown off a bus at the stop opposite a garage because it had gone mechanical, which could have been avoided if somebody had arranged for another bus to be brought out and passengers transferred.
As to the different operators - First Mainline seemed to have emergency tickets as I was issued with one a couple of times including a "day saver" scrawled out in biro! LRT's policy seemed to be that if you are wanting a single ticket you must put the money in the vault, but if you want a day-saver you travel without putting money in and are told to purchase it on the next bus.
Whats to stoping a dodgy operator recording non existant passengers on a ticket machine? Whether the records come off the machine or manually entered their is clear scope for deception. Have to wonder when I see empty or almost empty commercially operated services.
On the opposite side of the coin, First Mainline modified the OAP pass button to record rather than print a ticket when the free travel was introduced. However, they presumably had issues with under-recording which were causing them to lose out on revenue, as they were soon replaced with a zero-fare ticket which the OAPs were told to expect - what a waste of paper.